Gauntlet News: Students judge faculty promotion
While students may stress over endless exams and papers, professors confront their own fears when it’s time to face the faculty promotions committee.
Gauntlet News: Students judge faculty promotion
While students may stress over endless exams and papers, professors confront their own fears when it’s time to face the faculty promotions committee.
Comments Off on Students judge faculty promotion
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
The New York Times: Decline of the Tenure Track Raises Concerns
Professors with tenure or who are on a tenure track are now a distinct minority on the country’s campuses, as the ranks of part-time instructors and professors hired on a contract have swelled, according to federal figures analyzed by the American Association of University Professors.
Comments Off on Decline of the Tenure Track Raises Concerns
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
The Chronicle News Blog: A New Fact on the Ground: Nadia Abu El-Haj Wins Tenure at Barnard College
Barnard College just announced that Nadia Abu El-Haj, an anthropologist whose tenure bid has been the subject of withering online debate for weeks, has been promoted to the rank of associate professor.
A Barnard statement released this afternoon says that Ms. Abu El-Haj has passed a “highly rigorous review” to receive tenure at the college. “The process will be procedurally complete after the decision has been presented to the boards of trustees at both Barnard and Columbia,” the statement says, “but it is expected that Professor Abu El-Haj will earn the rank of associate professor.”
Comments Off on A New Fact on the Ground: Nadia Abu El-Haj Wins Tenure at Barnard College
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
The New York Times: Embattled Barnard Anthropologist Is Awarded Tenure
An assistant professor of anthropology at Barnard College whose scholarship on the use of archaeology in Israel has attracted both fierce criticism and scholarly support has been approved for tenure, Barnard officials said in a statement released yesterday.
Comments Off on Embattled Barnard Anthropologist Is Awarded Tenure
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
The Chronicle News Blog: A Lobby Forms to Battle Against Lobbying Tenure Cases
Calling itself the “Ad Hoc Committee to Defend the University,” a group of five prominent academics has posted an online rallying cry against “outside groups seeking to influence what is taught and who can teach” in academe. The group is especially concerned about the recent spate of popular campaigns to sink the careers of scholars who criticize Israel.
Comments Off on A Lobby Forms to Battle Against Lobbying Tenure Cases
Posted in Academic freedom, Tenure & Promotion
Inside Higher Ed: ‘Scholarship Reconsidered’ as Tenure Policy
In 1990, Ernest Boyer published Scholarship Reconsidered, in which he argued for abandoning the traditional “teaching vs. research” model on prioritizing faculty time, and urged colleges to adopt a much broader definition of scholarship to replace the traditional research model. Ever since, many experts on tenure, not to mention many junior faculty members, have praised Boyer’s ideas while at the same time saying that departments still tend to base tenure and promotion decisions on traditional measures of research success: books or articles published about new knowledge, or grants won.
Comments Off on ‘Scholarship Reconsidered’ as Tenure Policy
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
Inside Higher Ed: Tenure Denied, Tenure Gained
When Northwestern University denied Sarah Taylor’s bid for tenure in May, many students and faculty protested what they felt was an injustice toward a talented teacher and distinguished scholar. But what happened next could have been even more stunning: the university reversed its decision and granted Taylor tenure.
An about-face in a tenure decision is hardly an everyday occurrence in academe, as recent controversy in nearby Chicago demonstrated, and unpopular denials often lead to some protest. But tenure has never been a popularity contest.
Comments Off on Northwestern: Tenure Denied, Tenure Gained
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
Inside Higher Ed: Finkelstein and DePaul Settle
Wednesday was supposed to be the day of the big showdown at DePaul University. Instead it turned out to be the day of the big compromise. DePaul and Norman Finkelstein, the professor to whom it had denied tenure, announced that he was resigning immediately. The university and Finkelstein even managed to say some nice things about one another. But while Finkelstein will be leaving, some at the university and elsewhere believe that significant academic freedom issues raised by his case are very much alive.
The Chronicle: Tenure Dispute at DePaul Ends With a Settlement and Professor’s Resignation
A long-running battle between DePaul University and the controversial political scientist Norman G. Finkelstein reached an anticlimactic conclusion here on Wednesday as the professor announced his decision to resign from the university.
Comments Off on Tenure Dispute at DePaul Ends With a Settlement and Professor’s Resignation
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
Day of Shame for DePaul Administration; Resistance
Emerges.
On the resignation of Norman Finkelstein
(The following statement was passed out at DePaul by
activists and supporters of the National Project to
Defend Critical Thinking and Dissent in Academia.)
The first day of classes this year was a sad one for
DePaul University. After a year and more of
extraordinary pressure, as well as a concerted smear
campaign (which got extremely dirty with the recent
release of “internal memos”) – the Administration got
what they wanted: Norman Finkelstein will no longer be
a part of the life of DePaul. They have forced the
resignation of a remarkable thinker and teacher who
was well-respected by scholars and students alike,
they have violated the basic norms and practices of
the tenure process, and they have re-enforced a
terrible precedent setting in across the country.
On the same day, there was a very significant
outpouring of support and protest from students and
faculty at DePaul and elsewhere. An atmosphere of
debate and discussion erupted, where very quickly much
of the campus was discussing urgent matters of
academic freedom, and the future of critical thinking
and dissent on campus. People, including many
freshmen, boldly stepped forward and held a protest
and march which reverberated across the school.
It is unfortunate that things ended up with the
settlement and resignation of Professor Finkelstein.
This is not what many who stepped forward hoped for.
Finkelstein has said that he’s moving on. But we
cannot accept what the University has done, and we
cannot move on with business-as-usual. There is a foul
stench on campus. The DePaul Administration must be
held responsible for this deplorable and
unconscionable sequence of events. We cannot let stand
the completely unjust grounds upon which, nor the
process through which this was done; we must demand a
repudiation and apology from the Administration. This
goes against everything that the intellectual life of
a university is supposed to stand for.
This battle has both been very much about Norman
Finkelstein, but it’s also been about something much
bigger- the overall assault on critical thinking and
dissent on campuses. With the recent firing of
tenured-professor Ward Churchill at the University of
Colorado, the attacks on Middle East and Ethnic
Studies, and with the actions of David Horowitz, who
was brought to DePaul just this spring and who has
just announced plans for “Islamo-Fascism Awareness
Week” on campuses across the country in October- these
attacks are growing by leaps and bounds. And if the
whole process and grounds on which Norman Finkelstein
was forced to resign are not repudiated and apologized
for- then this opens the door for other attacks on
professors, and it further sets a chill onto campuses
everywhere. Now is the time for the resistance to both
spread much more broadly, and come forward even more
boldly. There’s not a minute to lose.
–Penny Brown and Samantha Hamlin, Supporters of the
National Project to Defend Critical Thinking and
Dissent in Academia, www.defendcriticalthinking.org
Comments Off on Day of Shame for DePaul Administration
Posted in Protests, Tenure & Promotion
The Chronicle News Blog: Finkelstein Resigns at DePaul U., After Deal Forestalls Threats to Defy University
Chicago — Norman G. Finkelstein, the controversial political scientist who was denied tenure at DePaul University last spring, had planned to attempt to return to his office here on the campus this morning, even though he had been placed on administrative leave and his courses had been canceled. He had said that he was willing to be arrested if the university stopped him, and that he was even planning to begin a hunger strike.
None of that was necessary.
Mr. Finkelstein and the university have reached a settlement, and he has resigned.
He spent the morning lecturing to a couple of dozen former students on the quad at DePaul. It was supposed to be the first lecture of one of the courses he was to teach this fall, but instead he spent the time reviewing what had happened between him and the university. Around 10:15 a.m., he was interrupted by a note from his lawyers.
The professor conferred with his lawyers while students marched outside the political-science offices. When he returned, Mr. Finkelstein announced that the two sides had reached a deal that he believes clears his name. Check The Chronicle’s Web site for more coverage of this story tomorrow morning. —Paula Wasley
Comments Off on Finkelstein Resigns at DePaul U., After Deal Forestalls Threats to Defy University
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
From the National Project to Defend Dissent and Critical Thinking in Academia:
Friends and Colleagues,
As all of you are no doubt aware, students and faculty at DePaul have organized to support Dr. Norman Finkelstein. Last friday, they held a very successful protest at the university convocation (you can read about it at Chicago IndyMedia, which we link to on our homepage: http://defendcriticalthinking.org/).
Wednesday, September 5, will be the first day of classes at DePaul. Students will be holding a press conference and a protest on campus. Dr. Finkelstein is planning on holding his class which the University canceled. It is likely that Finkelstein and other students will be arrested.
The fact that the students, with some faculty support, are taking such a strong stand is a very good thing. They are already having a real impact on the situation. The administration, along with some allies, are increasing their efforts to demonize Finkelstein and intimidate his supporters. (Two examples: “leaking” memos for an article in the Chicago Sun-Times, which is basically a warning to students not to throw away their academic careers, and a disgusting hit-piece on Finkelstein by Andrew Sullivan. Both of these are available on Dr. Finkelstein’s website: http://normanfinkelstein.com/).
All who believe in justice need to use what means they have to stand shoulder to shoulder with those taking action at DePaul. Here are some concrete ways to help:
* Send statements of support to Dr. Finkelstein, with cc to the administration and the students. Finkelstein recently sent a very appreciative note to us saying how much strength he gets from such letters and other efforts on his behalf. Send these even if you have already sent letters already. Here are the pertinent email addresses:
Dr. Norman Finkelstein: normangf@hotmail.com
DePaul Academic Freedom Committee: info@academicfreedomchicago.org
DePaul University President, Rev. Dennis H. Holtschneider, C.M. – president@depaul.edu
DePaul Provost, Dr. Helmut Epp – hepp@depaul.edu
DePaul Dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Dr. Charles Suchar – csuchar@depaul.edu
* Sign (if you have not already) our Open Letter to DePaul Faculty: A Battle for the Soul of DePaul, and for the Future of Academia. You can do this at our website: http://defendcriticalthinking.org/. The letter is pasted below this message.
* Call informal and formal faculty meetings at your school to discuss the issues in the case. There are a number of resources available on our website.
* Have a session of your class which discusses the importance of critical thinking and dissent, and how they are concentrated in this case. Students could read the piece by Bill Martin (text and pdf available at our website), as well as the statements by Dean
Suchar and President Holtschneider.
* Be attentive to the developments at DePaul on Wednesday and afterwards, and be prepared to shift gears to respond appropriately.
* Forward this email to colleagues and encourage them to help as well.
The DePaul administration must not be allowed to get away with this ugly capitulation in the face of power. At at a time when the “right to think at all is in dispute” (to quote Brecht in his play about “Galileo”), the stakes are tremendous.
Finally, our website has a link to make financial contributions to the National Project. We would like to retire our debt to the person who fronted the money for the full-page ad which was published in the New York Review of Books earlier this year. Doing so will
allow us to be in the position to do similar things in the future (for example, a full-page ad in the DePaul newspaper). Please consider making a donation.
For the National Project to Defend Dissent and Critical Thinking in Academia,
Reggie Dylan
Greg Knehans
————————-
A Battle for the Soul of DePaul, and for the Future of
Academia:
An Open Letter to DePaul Faculty
Over the last year, scholars around the country (and worldwide) have been looking to DePaul University with increasing alarm. The denial of tenure to Dr. Norman Finkelstein on June 8, after a mean-spirited campaign spearheaded by Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, is widely seen, even by those who do not share Finkelstein’s political views, as a blatant violation of the fundamentals of academic freedom and procedural
guidelines. More, it is viewed as a fundamental threat to the intellectual ferment and critical thinking so desperately needed – in academia and in society – at this time in history.
From the beginning there have been faculty from DePaul who have recognized and responded to the gravity of the situation. Though few in number, they have stepped to the fore, often at genuine risk to their own careers. These scholars have investigated and exposed the facts of this case. Their work has laid bare how shameful and dangerous this decision is.
They have taken heart in the response of the students at DePaul, who protested the decision during exam week and at graduation. These students, organized in the DePaul Academic Freedom Committee (www.academicfreedomchicago.org), have continued their work, spending their summer vacation organizing, establishing their own university Without Walls to learn more about the political issues concentrated in
these decisions, and going to the US Social Forum in Atlanta to present a resolution to 10,000 activists.
Now the situation at DePaul has moved beyond egregious violations of academic freedom to vindictive and arbitrary punishment of kafkaesque dimensions. The administration has refused to let Dr. Finkelstein teach his terminal year (once again violating AAUP guidelines), and cancelled his classes (ironically, on “Equality and Social Justice,” and “Freedom and Empowerment”). It has effectively suspended him against his will and in violation of DePaul’s faculty handbook, locked him out of his office and is evidently even threatening to arrest him if he comes on campus.
In the face of this, the fact that Dr. Finkelstein has refused to back down is a very good thing. His resilience and determination is inspiring many others to stand with him, as well as with Dr. Mehrene Larudee, who many feel had her tenure denied because of her public support of Dr. Finkelstein.
On the first day of class (September 5th), Dr. Finkelstein will return to campus to teach his students. The DePaul AFC has organized a press conference and protest, along with an important conference on academic freedom on October 12 at the University of Chicago.
As a faculty member at DePaul, you have an opportunity to make a profound difference by standing with them, in spirit and in body. We encourage you to use whatever means at your disposal to help them reverse a dangerous precedent which is already sending a chilling message to faculty and scholars to self-censor their scholarship and their public roles, or risk their careers.
As DePaul philosophy professor Bill Martin has written (“The Urgent Need to Right Wrongs at DePaul,” available at www.defendcriticalthinking.org), if this injustice is not reversed, “DePaul will be destroyed as a place deserving of respect in the intellectual and academic worlds, and, if this happens, academic freedom will be under attack everywhere.”
We encourage you to join with others at DePaul who have said they will not allow this injustice to stand. Those of us who have been a part of the National Project to Defend Dissent and Critical Thinking in Academia are determined to support you in every way we can.
Selected Signatories (as of 09/03):
Elizabeth Aaronsohn, Ed.D., Central CT State University
Gil Anidjar, Department of Middle East and Asian Languages and Cultures, Columbia University.
William Ayers, Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Derrick Bell, Visiting Professor of Law, New York University School of Law.
Robert Brenner, History Department, UCLA.
George Caffentzis, Professor of Philosophy, University of Southern Maine.
Rand Carter, Professor of the History of Art, Hamilton College.
Eric Cheyfitz, Ernest I. White Professor of American Studies and Humane Letters, Cornell University.
Ward Churchill, Scholar at Large.
Dana Cloud, Associate Professor of Communication Studies, University of Texas, Austin.
Drucilla Cornell, Professor in the Departments of Law
and Political Science, Rutgers University.
Walter A Davis, Professor Emeritus, The Ohio State University.
Richard Delgado, University Distinguished Professor of Law & Derrick Bell Fellow, University of Pittsburgh.
Haidar Eid, Department of English, Al-Aqsa University, Gaza, Palestine.
Mahmoud Ahmed El Lozy, Professor of Drama and Theatre, The American University in Cairo.
Randa Farah, The University of Western Ontario.
Silvia Federici, Emeritus Professor, Hofstra University.
Irene Gendzier, Professor of Political Science, BostonUniversity.
William W. Hansen, International and Comparative Politics, American University of Nigeria.
Stanley Heller, Teacher, Chairperson Middle East Crisis Committee, Connecticut.
Ruth Hsu, Associate Professor of English, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Francis A. J. Ianni, Professor Emeritus, Columbia University.
Christine Karatnytsky, Scripts Librarian, Billy Rose Theatre Division, The New York Public Library for the Performing Arts.
Charlotte Kates, co-chair, Middle East Subcommittee, National Lawyers Guild.
Mujeeb Khan, Former lecturer, Department of Political Science, DePaul University. (Doctoral Student, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley).
Peter N. Kirstein, Professor of History, Saint Xavier University.
Dennis Leach, Professor of Economic, University of Warwick.
Mark Lance, Professor of Philosophy, Professor of Justice and Peace, Georgetown University
Gary P. Leupp, Professor of History, Tufts University.
Andrew Levine, Research Professor (Philosophy), University of Maryland-College Park.
Peter McLaren, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.
Bruce Malina, Department of Theology, Creighton University.
Bill Martin, Professor of Philosophy, DePaul University.
Chris Mato Nunpa, Southwest Minnesota State University.
Ann Elizabeth Mayer, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
Tom Mayer, Professor of Sociology, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Matam P. Murthy, Professor Emeritus, Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago.
Sadu Nanjundiah, Professor, Physics department, Central Connecticut State University.
Marcy Newman, Assistant Professor of English, Boise State University.
Sam Noumoff, Retired, McGill University.
Sam Peterson, Retired Professor, American University of Cairo, Arizona State University.
Peter Rachleff, Professor of History, Macalester College.
Joseph G. Ramsey, Assistant Professor of English, Fisher College.
Asghar Rastegar MD, Professor of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine.
Rush Rehm, Professor of Drama and Classics, Stanford University, Artistic Director, Stanford Summer Theater.
E. Wayne Ross, Professor of Education, Department of Curriculum Studies, University of British Columbia.
Ken Schubert, Swedish Association of Professional Translators.
Henry Silverman, Professor and Chairperson Emeritus, Department of History, Michigan State University.
Natsu Taylor Saito, Professor of Law, Georgia State University.
Paul Vieille, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.
Michael Vocino, Professor, University of Rhode Island.
Immanuel Wallerstein, Senior Research Scholar, Department of Sociology, Yale University.
Elana Wesley, Human rights and a just peace activist, Jaffa-Tel Aviv, Israel.
David A. Wesley, Anthropologist, Jaffa-Tel Aviv, Israel.
Howard Zinn, Professor Emeritus, Boston University
(Affiliations for identification only)
Comments Off on All eyes on DePaul
Posted in Employment rights, Tenure & Promotion
Chicago Tribune: DePaul memos tell of run-ins with professor
If embattled DePaul University professor Norman Finkelstein carries out his pledge to engage in civil disobedience at the start of the fall term Wednesday, it won’t be his first confrontation with school administrators and campus police, according to internal university memos obtained by the Tribune.
Comments Off on DePaul memos tell of run-ins with professor
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
The Chronicle News Blog: Finkelstein Supporters Stage Protest at DePaul U.’s Convocation
Ten to 20 professors joined roughly 30 students and community members in a silent protest today at DePaul University’s fall convocation over how the institution has treated Norman G. Finkelstein. Mr. Finkelstein, a controversial political scientist, was denied tenure at the university last spring. And just this week, DePaul announced that it had put Mr. Finkelstein on leave for the duration of his final year, and canceled the courses he had been scheduled to teach.
At today’s convocation, the students carried posters and banners and wore T-shirts that said, “We are all Professor Finkelstein.” Some professors also wore the shirts under their robes. Kathryn Weber, president of the DePaul Academic Freedom Committee, a students’ group formed in reaction to the tenure decision, said a larger protest was scheduled for the first day of classes, next Wednesday. Mr. Finkelstein has vowed to teach his classes, regardless of DePaul’s announcement, and said he is prepared to “engage in nonviolent civil disobedience and go to jail.” —Elizabeth Quill
Comments Off on Finkelstein Supporters Stage Protest at DePaul U.’s Convocation
Posted in Protests, Tenure & Promotion
From Criticalxthinking list:
DePaul is shaping up to be a central battleground in
the struggle to defend dissent and critical thinking
in academia. Not only has Dr. Norman Finkelstein
unjustly been denied tenure (along with Dr. Mehrene
Larudee), the university has cancelled his classes,
locked him out his office, placed him on academic
leave and is even threatening to arrest him if he
comes on campus.
Finkelstein has said that regardless, he will come on
campus and teach his classes. In an interview with
Inside Higher Ed
(http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/08/27/depaul),
he said, “If the university attempts to impede my
movements I intend to engage in nonviolent civil
disobedience and go to jail. If incarcerated I intend
to go on a protracted hunger strike until DePaul comes
to its senses. It is regrettable that I have been
driven to such drastic actions to defend basic
principles of academic freedom and my contractual
rights, upon which DePaul has been riding roughshod
for so long.” You can read a lot more on the situation
at Finkelstein’s website:
http://normanfinkelstein.com.
We would like to highlight two things. The first is an
article from DePaul Philosophy professor Bill Martin,
“Urgent Need to Right Wrongs at DePaul University.”
Martin powerfully conveys the damage already done by
the DePaul administration and the urgent need to
reverse the decisions. As he notes, “The cost for not
standing up will be enormous: DePaul will be destroyed
as a place deserving of respect in the intellectual
and academic worlds, and, if this happens, academic
freedom will be under attack everywhere.” You can read
the article on our website (which, incidentally, has
been completely redone):
http://defendcriticalthinking.org/
The second is the ongoing resistance and organization
of students at DePaul. They have formed the DePaul
Academic Freedom Committee. They are planning a
protest and press conference for the first day of
class – Wednesday September 5th. This is the day that
the students that would be in Professor Finkelstein’s
class would have gone to his classes (which start at
8:30am). They have also organized an exciting
conference on October 12. Called “In Defense of
Academic Freedom,” It will feature Akeel Bilgrami,
Noam Chomsky, Tony Judt, John Mearsheimer, Neve
Gordon, with host Tariq Ali. It will take place at
Rockefeller Chapel at the University of Chicago. You
can read more about the conference and their
activities at: http://www.academicfreedomchicago.org/
The DePaul AFC is asking that people send an email
letting the DePaul administration know what you think
of their actions. Here are some of their emails:
– DePaul University President, Rev. Dennis H.
Holtschneider, C.M. – president@depaul.edu
– DePaul Provost, Dr. Helmut Epp – hepp@depaul.edu
– DePaul Dean of the College of Liberal Arts and
Sciences, Dr. Charles Suchar – csuchar@depaul.edu
Please cc emails to DAFC, Dr. Finkelstein and the
National Project: info@academicfreedomchicago.org,
normangf@hotmail.com, criticalxthinking@yahoo.com
Comments Off on The intensifying situation at DePaul
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
Inside Higher Ed: Terminating the Terminal Year
When DePaul University rejected Norman Finkelstein’s bid for tenure in June, all the documents in the very divided review of his record suggested no dispute over the high quality of his teaching. The tenure denial also said that Finkelstein would receive a contract for this coming academic year — the “terminal year” contract that is standard for colleges to offer those who have been denied tenure.
Comments Off on Depaul is Terminating the Terminal Year
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
The Chronicle: DePaul U. Cancels Courses of Professor Who Lost Tenure Bid, but He Plans to Teach Them Anyway
DePaul University has canceled all of Norman G. Finkelstein’s courses, taken away his office, and put him on administrative leave for his final year, but the controversial political scientist said that will not stop him from coming back to teach this fall.
Comments Off on DePaul U. Cancels Courses of Professor Who Lost Tenure Bid, but He Plans to Teach Them Anyway
Posted in Employment rights, Tenure & Promotion
The Chronicle: Newest Battlefield of Middle East Conflict Is Tenure Case at Barnard College
Scholars of anthropology and of Middle East studies are rallying around Nadia Abu El-Haj, an assistant professor of anthropology at Barnard College whose tenure bid, like that of Norman G. Finkelstein at DePaul University earlier this year, has become the subject of an online skirmish in the larger conflict over research on the Middle East.
Comments Off on Newest Battlefield of Middle East Conflict Is Tenure Case at Barnard College
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
The Chronicle News Blog: Alumni Group Seeks to Deny Tenure to Middle Eastern Scholar at Barnard College
Controversial research on Israel and the Palestinian territories has become the basis of yet another campaign to prevent a professor from winning tenure. A group of Barnard College alumni has drafted an online petition asking their alma mater to deny tenure to Nadia Abu El-Haj, an assistant professor of anthropology whose scholarship, they say, is flawed and skewed against Israel.
Comments Off on First they came for Norman G. Finkelstein…
Posted in Tenure & Promotion
Kevin Moloney for The New York Times
The New York Times: Colorado Regents Vote to Fire a Controversial Professor
After more than two years of public tumult, the University of Colorado Board of Regents voted Tuesday to fire a professor whose remarks about the victims of the Sept. 11 attacks led to a national debate on free speech. But it was the professor’s problems with scholarship that the board cited as the cause for his termination.
Rocky Mountain News: CU regents fire Ward Churchill
The first, very long chapter of the Ward Churchill saga ended this afternoon as just about everybody — including Churchill — had predicted: He was fired from his job as ethnic studies professor at the University of Colorado.
The next chapter is set to begin Wednesday, when the controversial academic and his civil rights attorney, David Lane, sue the university in Denver District Court.
Denver Post: Regents ax prof; battle not yet settled
The nearly unanimous decision to fire professor Ward Churchill stirred discontent among some faculty Tuesday, many of whom vowed to fight the decision.
Many professors said they saw the decision coming and said they were crushed by what it might do to recruiting creative professors to the campus.
Already, as news bubbled out across the half-empty summer campus, several faculty said they will plan teach-ins and panel discussions about civil rights this fall.
Inside Higher Ed: Ward Churchill Fired
More than two and a half years after Ward Churchill’s writings on 9/11 set off a furor, and more than a year after a faculty panel at the University of Colorado at Boulder found him guilty of repeated, intentional academic misconduct, the University of Colorado Board of Regents voted 8-1 Tuesday evening to fire him.
The Chronicle: University of Colorado Board of Regents Fires Ward Churchill, Who Vows to Sue
Nearly six years after Ward Churchill compared some American victims of terrorism to Nazi bureaucrats, the Board of Regents of the University of Colorado voted Tuesday night to fire him. But the controversial ethnic-studies professor said he plans to sue.
Comments Off on University of Colorado Board of Regents Fires Ward Churchill, Who Vows to Sue
Posted in Academic freedom, Legal issues, Tenure & Promotion
Inside Higher Ed: Skepticism of Faculty and Tenure
A new poll by Zogby Interactive may not cheer professors. A majority of the public believes that political bias by professors is a serious problem and doubts that tenure promotes quality.
To critics of the professoriate, the poll is but more evidence of the gap between academics and the public, but some experts on public opinion about higher education have questions about the value of the new findings.
Comments Off on Skepticism of Faculty and Tenure
Posted in Faculty, Tenure & Promotion