Author Archives: ekitchen

Reflecting & Broadening Scope

Module #4 Weblog #3

Usher, Peter. J. 2003. Environment, race and nation reconsidered: reflections on Aboriginal land claims in Canada. Wiley Lectures. The Canadian Geographer. Vol 47 No 4. Pp. 365-382.

This resource is written from the Geographer’s perspective, in regards to land claims, land title and rights, as well as how the course of development and settlement changed the Aboriginal communities. Usher speaks to common forms of livelihood in modern times in response to Western market economies. He says that the

“model points to one strong reason that people stay in placed that by conventional economic measures do not have much going for them. In this kind of economy, you do not have to go to the grocery store to put food on the table, you do not pay a mortgage, and the kinship-based social support network ensure that everyone’s basic needs are covered by the exchange of food, labour, equipment and personal care” (Usher, Peter, J. 2003. Pp. 372).

What I found to be interesting about this article is Usher’s description of the ways in which settlers would move into areas inhabited by Aboriginal communities, find valuable resources or areas of land and monopolize its value by regulating it, requiring licensing and treating it as though access for Aboriginals was a privilege, rather then a right. Usher provides case study examples where settlers interfered and altered watercourses which in turn impacted valuable lands, spawning grounds, habitats and water resources.  Another example provided was the ‘caribou crisis’ that gave validation for hunting restrictions, increased regulations and spurred sedentarisation and supervision over Inuit and Dene peoples who formerly lived alongside caribou herds for their sources of food, clothing and tools. “Governments saw these measures as critical requirements for both the modernization of the people and the conservation of caribou herds. Thus caribou management became an integral part of a broad program of social engineering” (Usher, Peter, J. 2003. Pp. 372).

I wanted to include this article in the Weblog this week, just to be able to experience a different perspective, I found that being written from a geographer’s perspective, it broadens our understanding of how large the impact was of settlement and colonization and we can compare historical colonization to colonization around the globe today. I think of worldwide projects like the Three Gorges Dam (China) flooding and altering waterways for the lands people in the area, or Serpent River First Nation located in Northern Ontario that is located at the bottom of their Watershed which just so happens to be where tailings drain from the old Elliot Lake Uranium Mines. Just saying…

 

Module #4 Weblog #4

I wanted to include a few resources, including the Pan Arctic Inuit Logistics Corporation, just because it is an example of many initiatives that have taken place in the sub-Arctic and Arctic Regions of Canada to incorporate land claims beneficiaries into local business initiatives and in receiving the benefits of those industries.

Qikiqtaaluk Medical is another example of an Inuit owned company, who partners with a Quebec-based company, Sirius Wilderness Medicine to expand specialties and services under the umbrella of Inuit-owned, operated and benefited.

It is becoming very common for contracts to be awarded to companies (specifically in the North) that hire and engage with local land claims beneficiaries rather than hiring people from the south – the attempt is to give business to local people, keep money in the community and increase opportunities.

I just wanted to include a couple of examples, as this is the reality in my workplace and I thought that you we should question what the benefits and challenges are with this model?

Also see: Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. regarding gaining beneficiary status.

 

Module #4 Weblog #5

Looking at all of my Weblogs and tracking my interests as I progressed through this course has been an interesting and very reflective process. I feel like I have made great strides in understanding and acknowledging the complex challenges faced by Aboriginal people today; this I not to say I understand, or can relate or comprehend as if I lived an Aboriginal experience myself. It means that I think in the past, it was easy to always associate with information that is channeled through mainstream media, common stereotypes or my own local community, when in fact Aboriginal communities exist internationally, with unique experiences, histories and struggles that do not need my pity, sympathy or apathy. Rather, there is a need for awareness, acknowledgement and support for the value of Aboriginal people within our communities, for inclusion of their culture and respect for their historical rights.

I am not sure if you have heard of Shannen Koostachin from Attiwapiskat First Nation, in Ontario, but she started the largest movement by children for children in regards to Education for Aboriginal children in Canada. Unfortunately she passed away in 2010 at the age of 15 in a car accident, she went to school in the South as she was unable to access quality education within her own community and it was in her commute home to visit that she was killed.

Anyway, I would like to leave you with some links to her story and her fight to bring both aboriginal and non-aboriginal people together to fight for educational rights and access for all.

 

Tying In: Health Wellness, Land Claims

Module #4 Weblog #1

Chan, Laurie. 2005. Health and Environment Issues with Canada’s Aboriginal communities. Centre for Indigenous Peoples’ Nutrition and Environment, McGill University. Access via:

http://www.fnehin.ca/uploads/docs/Health-Enviro-Canada-AboriginalCommunities-Chan2005.pdf

In understanding health and wellness within Aboriginal communities, environmental issues and connectivity is a recurring theme. As Chan outlines in his document, Health and Environment Issues with Canada’s Aboriginal Communities,

“activities such as hunting, fishing, and gathering of wild resources are important to  strengthening and maintaining the social fabric among individuals, families and generations within a community… harvesting and using traditional/country food provide a number of benefits such as physical fitness, community well-being an the dissemination of cultural knowledge such as survival skills and lessons in food preparation.”

What were once community based processes in hunting and gathering food, preparing it, creating things such as clothing, tools etc, has slowly diminished. Culture centered on community, experiential-based learning and skilled trades/crafts where communities are now based on the market economy, commodities and individual success. I want to point out the significance of this point, that, as Chan calls it, the social fabric of Aboriginal community and culture is deteriorating due to a loss in tradition and values that they identify with and associate to and much of which is blamed for high suicide rates in Aboriginal communities (Chan, Laurie. 2005. pp. 4).

This article is very scientific in that it examines point source pollution, chemicals and industry associated to various communities within Canada that are impacted by contaminated environments, water, soils, animals, fish and air. Industry in the south has great impacts of the concentration and flow of pollutants in the North, thus showing us how far our reach is. The author also connects certain pollutants to diseases and illnesses most common in Aboriginal communities and provides comparisons between non-Aboriginal health incidents and Aboriginal health incidents. For example, there is a gap of 6.1 years in life expectancy for First Nations people in comparison with First Nations people in Canada in 2001, or First Nations and Inuit are 3 times more likely to get heart disease than the rest of the Canadian population (Chan, Laurie. 2005. pp. 3).

 

Module #4 Weblog #2

Collins, L. (2010). Protecting Aboriginal Environments: A Tort Law Approach. Critical Torts. Accessed via:

http://www.commonlaw.uottawa.ca/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=2614

In understanding the role of the environment and land within Aboriginal culture, we need not forget that a significant role of colonization was to acquire and commoditize valuable land and convert it to a common law system. The article, Protecting Aboriginal Environments: A Tort Law Approach provides an analysis of the way in which Aboriginal groups have engaged in land rights/ treaty disputes in the past and an avenue that may produce greater results. Collins proposing that accessing the Tort Law approach, it allows for

“an Aboriginal group that explicitly opposes a particular environmental decision in the course of consultation can later proceed to tort litigation without fear that the consultation process will undermine its claim…” (Collins, Lynda. 2010. pp. 70)

whereas through constitutional law

“Aboriginal peoples are required to participate in the consultation process if they wish subsequently to allege an infringement of their Aboriginal rights or title, and further that where adequate consultation is conducted, the Crown need not obtain the agreement of the Aboriginal people before proceeding. Thus under section 35 approach, it may be possible for an Aboriginal group to be consulted, to adamantly oppose the proposed conduct, and yet to find that its subsequent section 35 claim fails on the grounds that adequate consultation has occurred” (Collins, Lynda. 2010. pp. 69).

Section 35 is referring to the Constitution Act, 1982. I wanted to include this article, because it speaks to bureaucracy and systemic nature of colonial powers as they exist today in enforcing their supremacy. Having Aboriginal communities navigate these bureaucracies in an attempt to reclaim and preserve their land and culture is an oppressive task within itself. When reading this article, I find myself lost in the system and the lingo, however am continually interested in discovering more about it, as it seems like a system of great cyclical injustices.

Just to quickly define Tort Law, which I had to explore myself, Tort Law simply refers to a civil wrong which results in wrong going done to someone else, causing them to suffer some kind of loss. What is unique about Tort Law is that it may simply be a result of negligence rather than criminal actions and less amount of proof is required (as opposed to proof beyond reasonable doubt). Definition sourced online through a Google search and consultation with various sites.

ICT: Improving Social Capital for Aboriginal People?

Module #3 – Post #4

In an attempt to further define my final assignment, which is so difficult… I have tried to research journals and articles that focus on aboriginal or cultural identity as it is affected or impacted by the introduction of Information Technology. Both Post #4 and #5 address this topic.

Selouani, Sid-Ahmed. & Hmam, Habib. 2007. Social Impact of Broadband Internet: A Case Study in the Shippagan Area, a Rural Zone in Atlantic Canada. Journal of Information, Information Technology and Organizations. Vol. 2 Accessed via:

http://www.informingscience.org/jiito/articles/JIITOv2p079-094Selouani74.pdf

This article seeks to provide evidence of social transformation caused by broadband connectivity within a rural area of Atlantic Canada. What I found so interesting about the outcomes of this article were that there were several examples of new uses and activities that broadband induced, however there was little to no change in attitudes, behavior and relationships.

Positive changes that occurred include increased access to information (newspapers etc), opportunities to shop and make payments online, e-learning, downloads, use of email/webcam to name a few.

Concerns with increased access and incorporation of broadband into everyday life included confidentiality, amount of time spent using technology, and negative materials available to young people to name a few.

On a whole, residents from the rural community concluded that increased access to broadband did not negatively influence the social relations of people in these rural areas.

 

Module #3 – Post #5

Mignone, Javier. & Henley, Heather. 2009. Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Social Capital in Aboriginal Communities in Canada. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Communication. Vol. 4 Accessed via:

http://umanitoba.ca/faculties/human_ecology/departments/fss/media/5.pdf

This article looks at Information and Communication Technology (ICT) as it impacts the social capital of First Nations, Inuit and Metis communities. There is a great focus on defining and exploring what exactly social capital is and why it is relevant.

“Social capital characterizes a community based on the degree that its resources are socially invested, that it presents an ethos of trust, norms of reciprocity, collective action, and participation, and that it possesses inclusive, flexible and diverse networks.”  (Mignone & Henley. 2009. pp. 129).

There has been research that suggests that ICT decreases social capital by shifting people’s focus from relationships and community engagement to tech-based entertainment. While other research highlights the increase in social capital that is fostered by ICT in improving communication and social networks between people, specifically those who are separated by great distance.

This article incorporates case studies from different communities across Canada that have Aboriginal owned ICT networks and how they have managed to implement and sustain them, which in itself is interesting.

I wanted to include this article, because I wanted to give everyone the opportunity to consider social capital in terms of the role of ICT in Aboriginal communities, however also wanted you to consider impacts and issues that fall outside of social capital; the concept of social capital seems too simple and does not encompass all interactions, connects and the embeddedness that technology influences.

Elder Mentors: Urban Contexts

Module #3 – Post #3

Resource: First Nations House Magazine, University of Toronto. (http://www.fnhmagazine.com/issue3/preserving.html)

There are resources available on the main page of the First Nations House Magazine, however I linked to the Elders Program.  Entitled, Preserving: for the sake of handing down, written by Giles Benaway, he describes the role of the Elders Program in establishing meaningful relationships and connections with Aboriginal elders who “represent a living memory of who we are…”

In reflecting on Western society, or modern day society and how we perceive the role of Elders in our community, they are often associated to symbols or representations of weakness, fragility, old-fashioned and of little value within contemporary times. Often, they are unable to participate in the workforce and the economy and therefore are seen to be of little value.

After watching Alluriarnaq: Stepping Forward, it became very apparent how vital elders are in shaping and cultivating their culture within the community. In addition, providing a sense of context and identify for youth who are so lost terms of understanding their culture and place in the world (torn between modern, urban and traditional, land-based).

I wanted to provide this resource for the weblog, because I thought that this program description was very explicit in outlining their objective but also in recognizing increasing populations of Aboriginal people finding themselves in urban settings where their culture and identity is easily lost or forgotten. This kind of program brings context and value to Aboriginal peoples no matter where they live, it does not forget those people who have had to, or wanted to move outside of their home communities.

Role of Elders in Contemporary Society

Module #3 – Post #2

Week #8 readings really prompted me to examine the role and integration of Elders (specifically Aboriginal) within contemporary society. What I found interesting, was that there was significant acknowledgement and incorporation of Elders within well established Western Institutions (I specifically looked locally to Ontario, Canada for resources as that is my own backyard).

Aboriginal Elders and Community Workers in Schools (March 2001). Community Education Saskatchewan Education.

  • this document seeks to provide resources and guidance for Educational settings to incorporate Aboriginal elders and community workers within the education system to build Aboriginal students knowledge, pride and heritage of their culture, thus building confidence and self-esteem which will overall provide for greater successes in life.

Northern Ontario School of Medicine – Aboriginal Elders Programming

  • the Northern Ontario School of Medicine seeks to provide a well rounded, comprehensive concept and approach to health and wellness.  Therefore seeking Elders to provide guidance in observing and approaching wellness at a family, community and overall environmental perspective.

Law Society of Upper Canada – Aboriginal Elders’ Student Supports

  • this is provided to both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal students, presenting various cultural teachings, culturally-appropriate counseling,  with the objective of promoting equality, diversity and overall awareness in respect to aboriginal culture and issues.

In examining the three different examples above, the collaboration is unique under institutional circumstances, in that the teachings  and activities are not linear and conventional but rather are facilitated by the Aboriginal Elders without Institutional instruction. I find this to be significant in that it values and acknowledges differences and alternate learning models and environments often overlooked by the institution.

Programs and Service for Aboriginal Youth

Module #3 – Post #1

After watching the Fraser River video from Week #8, it really got me thinking about what kind of services and resources are offered and available to Aboriginal Youth that are accessible and incorporate their culture and acknowledge cultural value.

So what I sought to do was search for a community-based organization that offered programming to Aboriginal Youth and compare it to programming offered  by the government.

Odawa Native Friendship Centre (based out of Ottawa ON) – DreamCatchers Youth Program — “instills traditional aboriginal values that address the emotional, physical, mental and psiritual needs of urban Aboriginal Youth”. This is done through cultural activities and community involvement. The organization also offers other programming to the community to include things such as Aboriginal community justice programming, youth leadership, programming for at-risk children and health living. This program stands out for its acknowledgement of the multifaceted nature of community and the real life struggles of Aboriginal youth today.

I found two government-based sites targeting Aoriginal Youth, Youth.gc.ca which provides resources for Aboriginal youth looking for employment resources, and attending post-secondary institutions. Nothing that is specific to culture. The second site I found was entitled Bold Eagle, and seeks to target Aboriginal youth living in the west to attend a training program that “combines Aboriginal culture and teachings with military training”. This is an odd combination and if you go on to discover the tabs on the website, the focus is military training, discipline and “continuing the Aboriginal tradition in military service”.

I am curious what other people think of this! I know that in the Arctic there is a big push for youth to become involved in the Canadian Rangers – but I wonder at what cost? Is there a place for incorporating militaristic values in Aboriginal culture? Or vice versa?

ICT: Both Sides of the Coin

Module #2 Post #5

Today, it is common for young people to be mobile, moving for work opportunities, post-secondary education, and world travel. With the introduction of ICT the world has simply gotten smaller.

“Most post-secondary education and employment opportunities exist outside aboriginal communities, and as a result, younger generations have become increasingly mobile and more removed from the communities that are traditionally the nurturing places for Aboriginal culture.” (Nickerson, Marcia. 2005. pp. 3).

Building on my 4th post, I wanted to look at an article that had an optimistic sentiment regarding the role of ICT within Aboriginal culture and the reality of moving into contemporary times. Aboriginal Culture in the Digital Age makes one thing very clear, as we move into the digital age, awareness is key to mitigating cultural threats posed by ICT. I have broken down and summarized the threats and opportunities that Nickerson outlines for preserving and transferring Aboriginal culture in the digital age:

Challenges of ICT

Opportunities of ICT

  • Misrepresentation
  • Misappropriation of culture
  • Cultural homogenization
  • Synthesis and ability to absorb knowledge of out context, outside of traditional community structures
  • ICT requires learning a new range of literacies and capacities
  • Increasing visibility of Aboriginal people
  • Connectivity to rejuvenate communities ties (removes physical barriers)
  • Ability to re-introduce culture
  • Can capture components such as visual characteristics (facial expressions, body language), audio (language preservation), and text
  • Transfer and accessibility to future generations (archives)
  • Populations are increasingly mobile, ICT is as well
  • Allows people to stay in their communities to learning (thus breaking the cycle of relocation)

 

Nickelson provides a successful model for cultural integration into ICT for learning (*I do have an issue with the word integration, for me it is synonymous with assimilation. I believe that we should look at this scenario as approaching learning and ICT’s from a different perspective where ICT is molded to fit into Aboriginal culture and needs, rather than the other way around). Anyway…. Sunchild eLearning Community (www.sccyber.net) focuses on specific learning needs of Aboriginal people and incorporates them into the program, which has attributed to high success rates for learners. Learning needs include First Nations’ sense of time, relationships, personal and family factors. In addition, the program is available to students within a more flexible context, to address ACT access issues which are common and prevention of relocation requirements.

I wanted to provide the example of Buffy St. Marie, who has become a very visible Aboriginal activist, artist, musician etc. She appeared on Sesame St in 1975, where confronted the continued survival and existence of “Indians.” Buffy did guest spots on Sesame Street over a five year period, taking such risks as breast-feeding her son on air, discussing the reality and lives of Aboriginal people (simply as equals and perspectives on belief). I recommend you go to YouTube and type in “Buffy St. Marie, Sesame Street” to view the videos.

Resources:

Nickerson, Marcia. 2005.Aboriginal Culture in the Digital Age. Public Policy Forum. Politics, Policy and Governance. Vol. 10. Accessed via:  http://www.ppforum.ca/sites/default/files/aboriginal_culture_in_digital_age.pd

 

Integration vs. Oppression

Module #2 – Post #4

I have titled my blog Integration vs. Oppression for the mere reason that this week we talked about preservation of culture, right or wrong. And in this resource below, I question how integration is better than oppression. “Integrating” into your community seems to be ubiquitous with being part of community. I disagree. Here, in this article I have linked to, is a great example of how integration/assimilation = continued oppression.

Resource:

Perkel, Colin. June 18, 2013. Half of First Nations Kids Living in Poverty. Toronto Star. Access via: http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2013/06/18/half_of_first_nations_kids_living_in_poverty_new_study_finds.html

I have been keeping my eye on the media lately, particularly in regards to articles related to Aboriginal issues (land claims, social justice, socio-economic development, leadership etc.)  in an attempt to be more critical about some of the themes from ETEC 521. Themes including perspectives and interpretations of culture, stereotypes, technology and artifacts as they are used for cultural preservation (or not) etc.

Today, in the Toronto Star, an article titled Half of First Nations Kids Living in Poverty; statistics originate from a national census pointing to Aboriginal, Metis, Inuit, non-status Indian and children from visible minorities and immigrant families as having such grim fates as well.

What I would like to ask all students in this course to do, is go to your favorite News Paper Website (or print copy if you wish) and review an article that has something to do with humanity, war, violence or poverty; how is it that these stories from around the globe pull on our heart strings and make us say things like “how could this be happening, how do people let this happen?” When in fact, we are letting it happen in our own backyard.

I try to think about the many ways that technology can be used for the benefit of people experiencing such oppression and cyclical struggles, but it is such a complex problem that is systemic and aggressive. The remote nature of many Aboriginal communities makes me wonder whether web-based employment opportunities are a great idea, or even online education – but I keep coming back to the outcome that it really takes away from the livelihood that so many Aboriginal people come from, living on the land, making their food, homes, clothing, tools and experiential learning there which must be passed down to children for preservation and identity.

Grassroots Resources ~ Aboriginal Initiatives

Module #2 – Post #3

In an attempt to better understand educational resource available online by Aboriginal people, for Aboriginal people, I have been searching for programming, projects and networking sites targeting Aboriginal communities. Week #6 Reading got me thinking…

I wanted to look for specific characteristics within these resources, such as:

  • exclusivity vs. inclusivity – specifically reflecting on our discussion from week #6 regarding cultural boundaries and cultural preservation
  • type of media and the accessibility, skill requirements and targets (ie. oral, text based, visual, interactive etc…)
  • Way culture is incorporated into the media, or delivery of resources/services
  • How the objectives seek to integrate culture or not at all
  • Sources of funding, partnerships or Advisory bodies (Aboriginal vs. non-aboriginal and the kind of hierarchy that is present within that structure)

Learning Communities Project: Alberta Region (learning-communities.ca)

The objective of this project is to bring access and awareness of learning opportunities to Aboriginal communities both rural and urban in Alberta, to improve access, opportunities and overall success for Aboriginal people. The Project works with stakeholders including tribal bands, councils, and institutions such as e-learning Alberta. The Project attempts to use existing resources, but act as a liaison to connect people to resources and services. Something that stood out was that they attempted to utilize a community-grown framework, which sounds grassroots and community initiated, however there was not further elaboration on this concept. In addition, the learning opportunities were not specific to Aborginal people, for example, there were learning opportunities tabs, and some included industry sectors (oil and gas, the trades, human services etc. and a single table that read “Aboriginal Program and Services.” Nothing that noted how Aboriginal programs are of value, the importance of transferring cultural traditions, customs or knowledge. I guess I assumed there would be more information targeted towards Aboriginal communities and ways that members are contributing or able to participate using their skills and knowledge.

I also noticed that the site was 100% text-based, with many external links and limited details; this website fit well within the Western mold and any person could access it and find educational resources.

I wanted to explore this for one of my weblogs because our discussion this week really made me think about the kinds of boundaries exist within the www. In addition, how important it is to be clear with the mandate and mission of organizations and projects. There is nothing wrong with fostering dialogue and awareness to specific communities of people, acknowledging differences and collaboration.

Connecting Weblog to Research

I have been very interested in the leadership, development and use of technology for the purposes of improving rights and access to basic needs for Aboriginal people. There are many initiatives, groups, icons that we can turn to as sources of activism; looking at the bigger picture, change within Canada amongst everyday citizens is slow-going. Capacity building amongst Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal peoples is required to fight the stereotypes, the resentment and the complacency that has continued to foster inequality for Canadian citizens (specifically Aboriginal people).

In creating my weblogs, I reviewed materials looking at leadership, reservations, how the hierarchical western system has impacted Aboriginal communities, education platforms available online targeted to Aboriginal people, use of media in activism etc. Consistent themes that appear throughout this literature include:

·      Government funding based on a pre-determined agenda

·      Quick-fix solutions rather than focus on sustainability

·      Value of Aboriginal culture; integrating those values into policy, governance and economic development

·      Continued socio-economic struggles, lack of educational and employment opportunities

·      Perception of Aboriginal people by non-Aboriginal people

I started to reflect on my own behaviors and perception of Aboriginal people. I have been around Aboriginal people my whole life, I use to be homeschooled where one day a week I would go to the Reserve and be taught traditional handicrafts… I thought myself aware and enlightened in a way. However, upon reflection I began to recall things that I had said or considerations I have made, “I have nothing against Aboriginal people, but….” – this is referencing some illegal fishing practices that continue to take place on a reserve North of my town. Regardless of the scenario… I recognized by ignorance and my role in supporting stereotypes like many Canadians. Not only that, I fostered my next door neighbors ignorance and reckless racism.

In an attempt to tie in my thoughts, interests and research, I would like to investigate the ways in which Aboriginal culture can be infused into contemporary governance in a way that acknowledges value of Aboriginal culture, informs and educates Canadians and fosters collaboration and solidarity between all people. Information Technology plays a significant role in the way that people communicate and interact, receive news, engage in their workplace, education and community. With the support of information technology, it is possible to reach large groups of people, it is more efficient to convey large amounts of information and for people to see for themselves how others live, learn and participate. With this in mind, I would like to examine the role that IT can play in creating collaborations between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people for the purpose of improving livelihoods (on many levels) and changing perspectives.

In addition I would like to engage citizens to be critical of themselves, looking at whether they are tolerant of other people, and what that looks like, or whether they are able to take themselves one step further, to pluralism and what that would look like.

 

Resources

Valberg, Ashley. 2012. Aboriginal Representation in Canada: Reforming Parliament or Creating  a Third Order of Government. The Agora: Political Science Undergraduate Journal. Vol 2. No. 2.

Smith, Loretta. 2006. Mending Fences: Increasing Aboriginal Representation in Canada. 78th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, York University. Access via: www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2006/Smith,%20Loretta.pdf

Eck, Dianna. L. 2006. What is Pluralism. The Pluralism Project, Harvard University. Accessed via: http://www.pluralism.org/pages/pluralism/what_is_pluralism

Eck, Dianna. L. 2006. From Diversity to Pluralism. On Common Ground: World Religions in America (1997, Revised in 2006). Accessed via:
http://www.pluralism.org/pages/pluralism/essays/from_diversity_to_pluralism