Author Archives: lori-jon waugh

Why Do Onions Make Us Cry?

Via Wikimedia Commons

While I love cooking with onions, I absolutely hate cutting them. The stinging I feel when I slice through an onion is a sensation that I am very familiar with; however, I am not as familiar with the reason why. Like me, researchers were unsure what exactly happens between slice and tears, until a recent study on the structure of the enzyme responsible for the burning sensation when cutting onions, Lachrymatory Factor Synthase.

It was known that, when chopping onions, the broken cells’ cytoplasm releases amino acid sulfoxides that the onion enzyme, allinase, converts to volatile sulfenic acids responsible for the onion’s aroma and flavor. Another enzyme that is released as the cell breaks is lachrymatory factor synthase, or LF synthase. This enzyme converts select sulfenic acids into propanethiol S-oxide, another volatile sulfur gas that, when reaches the water in our tears, produces sulfuric acid. The acid irritates our eyes, which produces the burning sensation and more tears, further increases the burning. While research on allinase, a common enzyme found in plants responsible for producing volatile compounds, is well known, LF synthase is a new idea to the process.

Before 2002, it was believed that allinase produced the tear causing gas from the beginning of cell rupture; however, when a Japanese food company tested the theory, they discovered another enzyme, LF synthase, is really responsible. In order to really understand the complete mechanism, researchers needed to know the structure of LF synthase. And now we do.

Researchers in Ohio wanted to know what LF synthase looked like to gain insight into the enzyme’s role in the onion’s volatile gas mechanism. To do this, they analyzed the structure of the enzyme through X-ray crystallography after crystallizing the enzyme.  When compared to the structure of other plant proteins, they were able to identify the enzyme’s active site and propose a mechanism of propanethiol S-oxide production.

With this new piece of the puzzle, we now have a greater understanding of why we cry when chopping onions. Perhaps, one day, they will use this information to produce onions that do not result in tears. Until then, I will continue to dread making French onion soup.

Perhaps you could also try this man’s trick to cutting onions without tears. YouTube Preview Image

 

Lori Waugh

 

Did We Forget Fukushima?

The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Attribution: Google Maps

You may recall, in March of 2011, the magnitude 9.0 undersea megathrust Tōhoku Earthquake that devastated the coast of Japan by tsunamis and killed tens of thousands. You may also recall the nuclear disaster when the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant’s emergency generators shut down, causing meltdowns, hydrogen gas explosions, and radioactive release into the ocean. While, like me, you may remember the constant focus by the news on the disaster and the failure of the Tokyo Electric Power Company in adequate preventative measures leading to the plant’s inability to manage during a tsunami.

That being said, you, also like me, may have put your focus on other, more recent topics, and forgotten about the entire situation. News is constantly updating and to think of what is happening now and what has ever happened is simply too much for the brain. So, let me remind you.

The nuclear plant is still leaking. According to the Japanese government, 300 tons of radionuclide-containing water is released to the surrounding ocean daily, particularly, cesium. This radioactivity is being found in fish, contaminating the fisheries market, and will take decades to clean from oceans or decay.

The Tokyo Electrical Power Company aims to have collected and treated the water pooled around the reactors by 2020 ; however,  to collect all would be impossible and the consequences of the event will remain. Without even considering the everyday struggle that Japanese radioactive refugees are still dealing with, ocean pollution is everyone’s problem.

For more information, watch the following video by Microsoft Research, YouTube Preview Image

 

 

-Lori Waugh

 

 

 

BPA-free Doesn’t Mean Estrogenic-free

Attribution: Flickr Commons

Before the 1990’s, when researchers began publishing papers on the harmful health effects of Bisphenol A (BPA), hard plastic polycarbonate consumer products were mostly made with the chemical monomer. Scientists uncovered that BPA, in similar structure to the estrogen, estradiol, interacts with estrogen receptors in the body, disrupting the endocrine system. This estrogenic activity can cause infertility, heart disease, cancer, neurobehavioral deficits, and more. After public demand, numerous countries began banning BPA, mainly in food and drink containers and baby products.

Estradiol (Top) and Bisphenol A (Bottom). Attribution: Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia Commons.

Flash forward to now and our water bottles say “BPA-free”; however, this gives us a false sense of safety for, while our water bottles are free of Bisphenol A, the alternative resins used by plastic manufacturers are similar in structure and, as research shows, in negative health effects. Chemicals such as Bisphenol S (BPS) and Bisphenol F (BPF) are used as BPA alternatives in the production of PC plastic bottles and their chemical structures appear just, if not more, like estradiol than BPA. 

Bisphenol F (Top) and Bisphenol S (Bottom). Attribution: Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia Commons.

A study published in Environment Canada found BPA-free consumer water bottles that leach BPA-like chemicals, causing the same effects to the endocrine system. The Austin, Texas private lab, CertiChem, measured the estrogenic activity of various plastic consumer bottles including black and blue CamelBak, blue and green Nalgene, Topaz, and Zeonor reusable plastic bottles. By exposing breast cancer cells, that multiply when their estrogen receptors activate in the presence of estrogen-like chemicals, to the plastic water bottles, and stressing the bottles using UV light, they determined whether these bottles were leaching estrogenic activity such as that of BPS and BPF. Their study confirmed that CamelBak and Nalgene bottles excreted Estrogenic chemicals, while Topaz and Zeonor reusable bottles remained intact even during stressed conditions.

So, if this news is as alarmingly shocking to you as it was for me and you are on the lookout for another water bottle, CertiChem‘s paper suggests that purchasing Topaz or Zeonor products is a better choice than Nalgene and CamelBak; of course, if you remain unsure, non-plastic stainless steel bottles may be the best choice for you. I just bought one at Manna.

For more information, watch the following video.

YouTube Preview Image

-Lori Waugh