Category Archives: Politics

Trump and science: How US new travel bans affect scientists and their research

Science is one way for human beings to interpret and develop the world, and politics is another way, yet it is time to notice science and politics are no longer running in parallel. In the US, politics is affecting science and harming science progresses.

Since the beginning of this year, Donald Trump issued and revised policies limiting immigration from Muslim-majority countries. Following Nature’s reports, travel bans have negatively impacted scientists and their researches in and outside of the US. Active and future scientists faced extreme travel difficulties, and a few international science conferences and collaborations were canceled or delayed due to the ban.

No Ban, No Wall Protest at PHL Airport” by Joe Piette. Image from Flickr. CC BY-NC 2.0

In January, Trump imposed the first short-term block on seven Muslim-majority countries, in which perspective science researchers accepted into American institutions before January could not obtain a visa. Some of them lost the science education and research opportunities they had earned and been guaranteed. Samira Samimi, a glaciologist from Iran, had a plan of going to Greenland from New York to study snowmelt. After the ban became effective, she could no longer meet with her US team and fly to Greenland. Samimi faced potential consequences of ceasing her research project and delaying her PhD degree.

“None of this is right. There is no way this helps us or our science.” says Mike MacFerrin, a glaciologist colleague of Samimi’s.

A similar tragedy happened to Hani Goodarzi, a cancer biologist at the University of California, San Francisco. He was forced to cancel a talk at the University of Calgary in Canada, because as an Iranian migrant, he was under the fear of not being able to return to the US after leaving the country.

It is not fair for scientists to take the consequence of politics, and it is worse that life-save science researches also suffer from politics.

International projects on combatting disease were heavily interrupted. Farrokh Modabber, an infectious-disease scientist in Iran, could not attend a conference held at the US due to immigration policies. Without updated knowledge from the frontline scientists in regions emerging diseases, the development of vaccinations in the US can be slowed down significantly. As far as Nature has reported, several researches including one on HIV were all greatly hindered by the ban.

“The only way to prevent emerging diseases from coming to the US is to stop them in their tracks in the countries where they arise.” Says Peter Hotez, a disease expert at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas.

It is time to be alert that science deserves to develop without being disturbed, and politics can heavily impact science. A feasible approach to save science from bans is to exclude restrictions on highly professional individuals from policies. In fact, scientists including Nobel prize winners have already started fighting back since January, yet a lot more attention and voices are still needed for the sake of science.

YouTube Preview Image
Youtube: March for Science

-Zhou Wang

CRISPR: A Future with Super-humans?

Researchers at Jennifer Doudna’s lab in the University of California have potentially found the cure to all forms of diseases. With the help of CRISPR and gene editing, which was only part of a dream a few decades ago has now become a reality. Research on Escherichia coli bacteria back in the 1980’s has allowed scientists to finally pin down the Cas 9 protein which enables the bacteria to survive virus attacks. When a virus attacks a bacterium, it inserts its RNA into the organism which leads to the virus using the bacteria as a factory and it eventually hijacks the entire cell. However, with E -coli and its Cas 9 protein, the RNA is recognized by the bacteria and allows it to destroy it. When a virus inserts a copy of RNA that is not recognizable by the bacteria, the Cas 9 protein is able to read the RNA and insert it into its memory where it will know which virus is attacking it.

Further research has allowed scientists to isolate this protein and use it for gene editing by using the protein to recognize faulty DNA nucleotides in the human genome. The Cas 9 protein needs to be able to bind specifically and reversible therefore the interaction is via non covalent bonds.With billions of nucleotides present in an organism this protein is highly accurate and can destroy genetic mutations such as metabolic liver disease, congenital blindness, blood disorders, Huntington’s disease and cystic fibrosis. As Jennifer Doudna has stated “We may be nearing the beginning of the end of genetic diseases”. Moreover, there is more than just curing genetic diseases, you can also go a step further and add desirable traits. Since CRISPR is very efficient in detecting the exact nucleotide sequence, you can replace it with the desired characteristics. You want a blond hair, just replace the DNA strand which codes for blond hair color, you want bigger muscles, just replace the nucleotides, you want to be taller just replace the nucleotides – you get the idea. You can be the most powerful person living with this technology – if yet reached.

The insertion of nucleotides in a genome with the help of Cas 9 protein                                                         (Attribution: ViktoriaAnselm – Own work)                                                                           (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/CRISPR-Cas9_mode_of_action.png )

Replace a strand – get super powers ?                                  Attribution: IMGUR (http://i.imgur.com/LTDKlbm.gif)

 

Researchers are still investigating the full potential of the CRISPR technology and it can lead to artificially selecting humans on birth if used at an early stage. The idea of pre-selecting humans might sound uncomfortable to a few but humans have been artificially selecting for decades from plants to humans. We currently only crop the best type of plant in order to achieve the most desirable traits. In humans , genetic disorders such as down syndrome are undesirable. 88% of people in Europe would undergo an abortion if they found out that their fetus has down syndrome. CRISPR might just amplify the amount of selecting we do, and we have to ask when is enough? I believe that CRISPR is an amazing technology in curing various genetic diseases but using it to select certain traits seems excessive. There are somethings that nature does not want changed. As research continues it is important to keep human rights in our thoughts and as Newton would say “What we know is a drop, what we don’t know is an ocean”. The ocean may be filled with gold or horror.

Garvit Bhatt