Did We Forget Fukushima?

The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Attribution: Google Maps

You may recall, in March of 2011, the magnitude 9.0 undersea megathrust Tōhoku Earthquake that devastated the coast of Japan by tsunamis and killed tens of thousands. You may also recall the nuclear disaster when the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant’s emergency generators shut down, causing meltdowns, hydrogen gas explosions, and radioactive release into the ocean. While, like me, you may remember the constant focus by the news on the disaster and the failure of the Tokyo Electric Power Company in adequate preventative measures leading to the plant’s inability to manage during a tsunami.

That being said, you, also like me, may have put your focus on other, more recent topics, and forgotten about the entire situation. News is constantly updating and to think of what is happening now and what has ever happened is simply too much for the brain. So, let me remind you.

The nuclear plant is still leaking. According to the Japanese government, 300 tons of radionuclide-containing water is released to the surrounding ocean daily, particularly, cesium. This radioactivity is being found in fish, contaminating the fisheries market, and will take decades to clean from oceans or decay.

The Tokyo Electrical Power Company aims to have collected and treated the water pooled around the reactors by 2020 ; however,  to collect all would be impossible and the consequences of the event will remain. Without even considering the everyday struggle that Japanese radioactive refugees are still dealing with, ocean pollution is everyone’s problem.

For more information, watch the following video by Microsoft Research, YouTube Preview Image

 

 

-Lori Waugh

 

 

 

Pack Your Things, We are Going to Mars

Who said that we are going?

Around a year ago, the South African-born billionaire, Elon Musk, announced his plan for the colonilization of  Mars in a live video that went viral. Musk planned to land on Mars in the next decade and get it ready to host life by 2030. Since then, many have questioned the feasibility of the plan, including an esteemed astronaut who hypothesized that the project would stop as soon as Musk realizes the investment is not rewarding.

Are we even close?

According to researchers from the University of Lisbon and the University of Porto, we are. In their paper that was published on 18 October 2017, in the Journal Plasma Sources Science and Technology, Vasco Guerra et al. argue that Mars has nearly ideal conditions for CO2 dissociation to O2 and CO in Plasmas. As a result, production of O2 in Mars from CO2, which constitutes 95.9% of the Martian atmosphere, is possible.

Wait…what?

This is an illustration of a plasma lamp. When current is passed through plasma, amazing colours are observed. Uploaded by Joshua_Willson to Pixabay.com April 26, 2017

Basically, plasma is a state of matter where positive gas ions are surrounded by free negatively charged electrons. It can have interesting applications, such as plasma lamps. This state does not necessarily require high temperaturet. For example, non equilibrium low temperature plasma is a very interesting field of study and it is the type that Guerro describes as “the best media for CO2 dissociation”. There are several studies about how plasma assists the dissociation of pure COin the presence of a catalyst, usually TiO2. First, plasma supplies energy to drive the highly endothermic dissociation of CO2 through electron direct impact, in which an electron from the plasma transfers its energy to the CO2 molecule by collision, which aids the break of the C=O bond. Second, plasma adjusts the particles to the catalyst’s interface. Third, low temperature hinders the reverse reactions.

Why mars?

That is exactly Guerro’s argument. Guerro states that the atmospheric pressure of mars, 4.5 Torr, replaces the use of vacuum pumps that are necessary for the process on earth. Moreover, the average Martian atmospheric temperature, -63 oC, enhances the energy transfer from the plasma to the CO2. Also, Guerra mentions that the operation only requires as low as 20 W, which can be achieved on mars. Finally, the Martian atmosphere consists of 95.9% CO2, so O2 should be produced from this abundant source. Guerro says that the byproduct of this reaction, CO, can be used to fuel the return trip. In this way, the CO2 decomposition provides two benefits. Also, look at how beautiful it is:

An illustration of Mars, which is very beautiful. Uploaded by GooKingSword at pixabay.com

 

Personally, I used to think that if we can fix the atmosphere on Mars, then we should be able to fix it on Earth first. However, it turned out that Mars is helpful, but Earth is not. I started packing already…

By: Maged Hassan

Scientific Innovations in Nature: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow

Faced with the challenge of determining where we are and where we are going, humans took advantage of the magnetic field of the earth to provide a consistent orientation, with our invention of the compass, in 11th century China. Over 1.9 billion years prior, magnetotactic bacteria developed that same ability, albeit in a very different form. These bacteria contain chains of magnetic particles which orient themselves in response to the earth’s magnetic field, meaning the bacteria itself behaves like a compass needle, and will always point north (or south, depending on the species). This is one of many examples of how, in parallel to our development of technology through the use of the scientific method, the natural world has been using a different method, namely evolution, to develop its own tools which take advantage of physical phenomena.

Illustrative diagram of magnetotactic bacteria Credit: Wikimedia Commons

A study which highlights the continuing relevance of innovation in the natural world was conducted by a team of researchers at MIT. The team, headed by Kripa K. Varanasi, were looking into how to design surfaces which minimize the contact time of a bouncing drop. In situations where a liquid is dripping onto a hydrophobic (water-repelling) surface, the droplet of water will flatten upon hitting the surface, then reform a droplet and bounce off. The time it takes for the droplet to turn from its flat, pancake- like form into a droplet again is called the contact time. Minimizing contact time can be very important in applications such as the design of plane wings, where a shorter contact time can prevent drops of rain from freezing to the wing and beginning to build up.

Drops of water on a hydrophobic lotus leaf. Were these drops to have fallen onto the leaf, they would have first flattened, then reformed as droplets and     bounced off. Credit:  Flickr User Aotaro

Traditionally, contact time is reduced by decreasing the interaction between the liquid molecules and the molecules of the surface. When this interaction is decreased, it becomes more favourable for the water molecules to interact with each other, which causes them to clump together faster. However, once the liquid-surface interaction had been reduced to zero, no methods were known to further decrease the contact time. To get around this, the research group at MIT developed a new strategy, which has actually been used in nature for millions of years. By creating macroscopic ridges in the surface of the material, the researchers decreased the contact time by 40%. In their paper, the researchers acknowledge that both Morpho butterflies and the Nasturtium plant use macroscopic ridges in the same way: Morpho butterflies to keep their wings dry, and Nasturtium plants to clean their leaves. Lotus leaves are also very hydrophobic, and have often been thought to be the most hydrophobic surface in nature. However, because of these microscopic ridges, Nasturtium actually has a shorter contact time than even lotus leaves.

The wings of the Morpho butterfly have many amazing properties, including iridscence and extreme hydrophobicity. Credit: Wikimedia Commons

The oft-repeated quote by Isaac Newton “If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants,” speaks to the importance of prior work in the progression of science. As demonstrated by these examples, whether observed in bacteria, plants, or insects, the innovations of evolution can provide us with a continuing source of ways to see further.