NMC 2011 Horizons Report: A critical analysis
To the average educator, the pace at which new technologies appear may be overwhelming. The 2011 Horizons report has narrowed down the number of technologies judged most likely to impact teaching, learning, and creative inquiry in higher education over the next 4 years, from a list of 50 to a more manageable top 6.
SUMMARY
Format:
- a downloadable PDF file ; published annually, 2011 version is 37 pages;
- has a Table of Contents for easy perusal
Focus:
- primary focus in on the use of the technologies in colleges & university; higher education, institutional
- framework on which emerging technologies are judged is centred on 4 key trends and 4 key challenges to implementation
- 6 technologies were chosen out of a list of 50 identified for adoption between 2011-2015:
- e-books, mobiles, augmented reality, game-based learning, gesture based computing, learning analytics
- organized in chapters of Time-to-Adoption time frames: 1 year, 2-3 years, 4-5 years; each time frame containing 2 technologies (in the order listed above)
- each technology is given:
- an overview,
- relevance for Teaching, Learning, Research, or Creative Inquiry,
- use of technology in practice, & further reading
- a dynamic online version of the Horizon report may be found at: http://navigator.nmc.org)
Authors of the Report:
- a focused collaboration between the EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI) (a community of higher education institutions and organizations committed to advancing learning through information technology (IT) innovation) and the New Media Consortium (globally focused not-for-profit consortium dedicated to the exploration and use of new media and new technologies.)
- produced by a diverse group of 42 people w/ range of backgrounds, nationalities, & interests including education, technology, & business
- qualitative research process using 1°, 2° references, articles, and trend reports on technological innovations
- part of a longitudinal study initiated in 2002
- used a modified Delphi process to determine final list of 6 technologies
NB. Delphi is a systematic, interactive forecasting method which relies on a panel of experts based on the principle that forecasts (or decisions) from a structured group of individuals are more accurate than those from unstructured groups http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi_method
CRITIQUE
This report concerns the use of emerging technologies by global college/ university level instructors and students primarily in the ‘classroom’ (virtual or otherwise), as opposed to the larger business of implementation, development, and support. Some of the “Further Reading” links do branch out to business, training, museum, health and art areas, however, and it does a very good job describing how can the technologies can be used in higher education. For example, the “Relevance” section includes real applications in action around the globe, examples of uses within different curricular areas, and active links to collections of resources gathered by the bookmarking service formally known as del.icio.us.
For me, some of the most important aspects of this report is that it was collaborated on by a credible group of people who employed a rigorous process to rank a few key technologies, which seems more reliable than some sole writer voicing their opinion on the future. Its focus is global and is based on research, articles, and interviews. However, there is little to no time spent on the economics of implementation, nor on other aspects of investment, other than probability of adoption over several time frames. As well, the qualitative research process did not seem to include statistics or numerical analyses, which might be of interest to venture-oriented readers.
In terms of seeking out future reports, I am attracted to a web-base format that would be updated rather than a static published report, and have bookmarked the Horizon Project Navigator, a dynamic and interactive library of the examples and projects used in creating these reports. I will also download the NMC Horizon 2011 K-12 Edition of the report, as that is the area I am most interested in, and am considering presenting some of these technologies to our staff at the next pro-d day.
–
Posted in: Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace
kstooshnov 5:23 pm on September 13, 2011 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Hi Karen,
I’d be interested to hear which of the technologies make the cut in your pro-d presentation, and if possible, bring these ideas to your North Van home for the teachers there. NMC’s Web version is amazing, isn’t it?!
Kyle
bcourey 5:38 pm on September 13, 2011 Permalink | Log in to Reply
I too appreciate the breadth of the Horizon report (but like the Navigator even more now that I have explored the site) and we have used it in our department planning meetings when selecting what tools we would include in our blended learning projects. I will definitely look for the K-12 edition you are referring too. Thanks for pointing that out.
Everton Walker 8:44 pm on September 13, 2011 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Karen Jones,
Interesting report. However, do you think the 6 selected technologies with be significant globally or just in a few locations? Even though it qualitatively done, I would really like to see some stats to get a better understanding of what actually took place and reasons for decision taken.
Deb Giesbrecht 5:24 am on September 14, 2011 Permalink | Log in to Reply
It is interesting that they focus on higher education versus K-12. Wondering if that is a more economically viable environment? or is that where many of the technological changes are seen?
Angela Novoa 9:18 am on September 14, 2011 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Hi Deb, I was wondering the same thing. I posted a critique about ELI’s 7 Things you should know about… and I had the same sense….
Karen, About your ideas, I also read the NMC report and two things that kept my attention was that they specified who were behind this report and that its focus is global.
Angela