Anderson’s Attributes of Learning

Attributes of Learning in terms of being LEARNER-Centered

If we accept Einstein’s genius as different from that of Beethoven, then that would suggest the way each person stores and learns information is inherently different. The theory of Constructivism suggests that learners have unique schemas built from past experience; learners both subjectively and actively transform information by modifying their cognitive structures according to new understandings. Gaining information regarding student misconceptions and cultural backgrounds is especially important in differentiating the lesson to suite student needs.

Taking multiple courses online, I found that they all had one thing in common: a week was dedicated to introductions. This essentially acted as an ice-breaker and gave the learner time to familiarize themselves with the technology. Even more importantly, the forums allows, and in fact encourages participants to question and discuss. In this particular course, we all come from varying backgrounds of technology prowess and the ‘General Course Information’ and ‘E-Toolkit Query’ provide the opportunity to discuss concerns and give suggestions.

In my own Moodle course, I am working to create a Splash page dedicated to understanding my students. Along with the Ice-breaker, I will develop a quiz questioning student’s misconceptions regarding Space. I also included the Introductory Survey provided by Moodle that determines the what the learner values in an online learning experience. Finally, I scheduled an Chat for the first week of class so that students could meet!

The learning activities in technology-based environments play a fundamental role in determining learning outcomes. Kearsley (1997) believe that technology provides unique opportunities of engagement that may be challenging to achieve in other venues. Learners must be engaged and interested in the activity for learning to occur.

II. Knowledge-Centered

Knowledge Centered learning reflects upon the role of the teacher in setting the ‘course’ of learning. This generation of students can attain information with a mere tap of a button. Where many of us had to travel to libraries to learn about topics, now information can accessed in seconds. However, it is up to the teacher to provide scaffolding in order to guide students as they make meaningful connections. According to Anderson, knowledge is built when students, teachers, and community collaborate, in other words through a social network.

The courses I have taken online have all promoted collaboration. DELICIOUS, the social bookmarking tool, was used in my course and it helped us manage and share our resources. Therefore, when it comes to completing projects, we accessed information quickly and efficiently.

III. Assessment-Centered

I do find that my online-courses lack formative assessment from teachers while it is rich in student feedback. Before submitting an assignment, I feel often felt like it was a ‘one-shot deal’. I find this interesting as most of my courses discuss at length of the importance of building knowledge and providing feedback as benchmarks to developing knowledge.

When participating in my Teacher’s Education Program, we were on a Pass and Fail system. We were continually given feedback (both peer and teacher reviewed) and were not granted a Pass until the quality of our assignments were up to the standards. I miss this particular point with my online courses. I love getting to know my profs and asking them for advice and feedback. I feel less compelled to do so using an online venue. I feel like I am ‘bugging’ the teacher. Does anyone else feel this way?

IV. Community-Centered

I have certainly noticed a difference between distance learning and online learning in terms of time-constraints. I feel that there is less freedom with online learning. I took a distance learning course in Psychology and found that I was quite strong at pacing myself. A community-centered format adds a new dimension to my experience: GUILT. For example, this week I have been working at the after-school tutorial program until 5:00 every night, and then on to report cards. I was unable to take the time to log into the course. As a result I continually felt guilty and anxious, a feeling I never got with distance learning.

LMS Evaluation Rubric

Platform Evaluation Rubric

 

 

Group #4:

Sabrina Fonagy

Keely Switzer

David Wees

Kris Hancock

Ryan Edgar

 

 

 

Precis: 

The Royal Roads University’s MBA in Greater China is increasing its enrolment up to 2400 students per year (800 per term).  Unfortunately, the increased number of students in their distance education program using current technology has caused numerous server issues (ie: server’s been crashing).

 

 

 

 

LMS Evaluation Rubric

Criteria (Multiplier)

Poor

(1)

Unsatisfactory (2)

Satisfactory

(3)

Good

(4)

Excellent

(5)

Cost

(x1)

·     Product is out of budget range

·     Product is slightly out of budget range

·     Product meets the budget range

·     Product cost is below budget

·     Product is free

Usability-

Learning Curve

(x1)

·     Difficult to use

 

·     Not intuitive and many components are required to master.

 

·     “Help” website difficult to understand.

·     Some aspects of this LMS require considerable time to master

·     LMS platform can be mastered within a reasonable timeframe.

 

·     “Help” website provides solutions to most problem

·     Most aspects of LMS are simple and quick to master.

 

·     Little reference to manual or training material required.

 

·     Useful “Help” website

·     LMS is simple and quick to master.

 

·     Can use without manual or training.

 

·     Easy to use “Help” website.

Accessibility for Varied Learning Communities

(x1)

·     LMS platform does not support people of varying abilities

 

·     LMS platform is available in only one language

·     LMS does little to support people of varying abilities

 

·     LMS platform is available in only one language

·     Several adaptations & modifications are available to people who require additional support

 

·     LMS platform is available in more than one language

·     Some effective adaptations & modifications are incorporated into the LMS to promote accessibility for a varied learning community.

 

·     LMS platform is available in several languages

·     LMS platform supports varied learning communities.

Features

(x2)

·     Lacks significant useful “extra” features

 

·     No interactive tools, or available tools are difficult to use/integrate

·     Very few useful “extra” features

·     Basic social interaction tools are available

 

·     Integrating additional web 2.0 tools is time-consuming and sometimes not possible.  Integration is not smooth

·     Several ‘extra’ features

 

·     Some social tools are available, while others are available on line. 

 

·     Additional web 2.0 tools purchased can usually be integrated into the LMS

·     Many helpful ‘extra’ features

 

·     A variety of social interaction tools are embedded into the LMS for easy use

 

·     Additional web 2.0 tools purchased can be easily integrated into the LMS

Server Requirements (x1)

·     Unable to host on school server because of requirements

·     Able to host on school server but requires high degree of IT support

·     Able to host on school server but needs constant IT monitoring

·     Compatible with school server but requires IT support from time-to-time

·     Compatible with school server.

Reliability

(x2)

·     Frequent crashes

 

·     Incompatible with most operating systems and limited to certain versions

·     Periodic crashes

 

·     Compatibility with limited operating systems (and versions)

·     Crashes are infrequent

 

·     Compatible with limited operating systems (and versions)

·     Crashes are rare

 

·     Compatible with several operating systems (and versions)

·     Crashes are rare

 

·     Compatible with most, if not all, operating systems (and versions)

Technical

Support

(x1)

·     No technical support provided

·     Little technical support provided and is very slow to respond

·     Technical support is available but often slow to respond

·     Technical support is provided and response time is tolerable

·     Technical support provided and response is immediate

 

 

 

Articulation:

As a group, we negotiated the criteria for evaluating a Learner Management System (LMS).  We based our decisions on the needs of Royal Roads, our own expectations of an LMS, and pertinent course readings.  In light of the multiple server crashes and recent enrollment spike, we felt Royal Roads would be most concerned with server requirements, reliability, and technical support.  In addition to these categories, we also saw a need to look at the accessibility of an LMS, particularly with respect to multiple language capabilities.  In our own contexts cost is always an issue, and even if money is not a primary concern for the developers at Royal Roads, the cost of the system will most likely still be a factor in the decision-making process.  The SECTIONS model (Bates & Poole, 2003) seems to support the categories we chose to focus on.  The SECTIONS model can be applied to any educational context, and the answers depend on the context (Bates and Poole, 2003).  It is our hope that the rubric can be used to evaluate all LMSs, and the answers created in context will enable the school to choose the best LMS for them.  The multiplier system used in the rubric, in which we applied greater value to certain criteria, can be modified by a school to better suit the needs of that school.  Royal Roads, for example, may choose to apply the greatest weight to accessibility and reliability, while assigning a lesser value to cost.  Our rubric was intentionally designed to be customizable in order to help schools with a variety of different needs find an LMS that works for them.

 

 

References:

 

            Bates, A.W. & Poole, G. (2003). Chapter 4: A Framework for Selecting and Using Technology. In Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education: Foundations for Success. (pp. 77-105). San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.