Briton’s love of The Clash, Led Zeppelin sparks plane security alert

clashlcalt350.jpgVia Rock and Rap Confidential:

Briton’s love of The Clash, Led Zeppelin sparks plane security alert
Apr 05 12:29 PM US/Eastern

A love of punk and hard rock anthems by The Clash and Led Zeppelin led to a British man being hauled off a plane bound for London by police on terrorism fears, newspapers reported.

Indian-born Harraj Mann, 23, played “London’s Calling” by The Clash and Led Zeppelin’s “Immigrant Song” through the stereo of a taxi he caught to Durham and Tees Valley Airport in northern England.

The taxi driver, however, grew suspicious of his passenger after listening to the lyrics of his chosen songs and alerted the authorities after they reached the airport.

Two police officers boarded Mann’s flight to London’s Heathrow airport shortly before take-off last Thursday.

“I got frogmarched off the plane in front of everyone, got my bags searched, asked every question you can think of,” Mann, a mobile phone salesman, told his local newspaper, the Hartlepool Mail, on Monday — a story that was picked up by the national press on Wednesday.

“I was being held for questioning under the Terrorism Act,” he said.

By the time Mann was set free his plane had already departed.

The offending lyrics by The Clash include the lines: “London calling from the faraway towns, now war is declared and battle come down.

“London calling to the underworld, come out of the cupboard, you boys and girls.”

“Immigrant Song”, for its part, starts: “The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands, to fight the horde singing and crying Valhalla, I’m coming!”

A spokeswoman for the Durham Police confirmed that a man was escorted from the London-bound flight, questioned by police and released without charge.

“Safety is paramount and we respond to concerns from members of the public in the way they would expect us to,” she said.

“In this case the report was made with the best of intentions and we would not want to discourage people from contacting us with genuine concerns regarding security.”

www.rockrap.com

Rouge Forum Update (April 4, 2006)

warfor1.gifThe Rouge Forum No Blood For Oil web page is updated.

We have added a section on the current protests related to immigration “reform.” Here is one of many related pieces.

In these days of regimented curricula, high-stakes tests, and the sheer soldiering through the day that typifies much of schooling, closed schools, closed by social strife, are often better than open schools. And, to the converse, schools that are seized in the midst of social strife, as in the case of some universities in France now, may well offer lessons about real freedom schooling.

Those who want to “Save public education,” need to recognize that behind not-so-public education for “knowledge and the common good,” lies the force and violence of the cops who will be used, invariably, against poor and working class kids–trying to drive them back into the warrens that are called schools–forcing them back to be subjected by curricula and teaching methods that promote lies and obscurity–alienating kids so much from learning that they learn to believe it has nothing to do with them–a remarkable achievement of unpublic apartheid schools today.

Given the nature of the protests against racism and nationalism related to the many immigration bills, it must be underline that it is not possible to strip racism and nationalism from imperialism–and war—as many elites would like to do. The kids seem to recognize that, if their self appointed leaders do not.

The reason that poor and working people flood into the US is, in part, because US backed regimes in their home nations make life nearly impossible and, on the other hand, because low-wage employers in the US feed on them and draw them in, use them, then seek to kick them out, or to shift the burden of their needs onto other workers inside the US. The minor differences between the many “immigration” bills in Congress only serve specific interests among elites, ie, the growers’ interests, the meatpackers’ interests, some xenophobic nationalist interests, and the interests of the US military as well, desperate for bodies to fight its wars.

There is no way out of this dilemma under the system of capital, which requires nationalism, racism, imperialism and war. Nor is there any way out of the immigration dilemma for the US ruling class. Just as they are trapped in Iraq, unable to stay and win the war, unable to leave and leave the oil—and the social/political damage this debacle has created; so they are unable to deal with the reality of 12 million, or more, workers in the US, who have decided to not just stay, but fight back.

Despite the fact that these demonstrations are often misled by adults who seek to drive kids to church, the polls, or even the military, it remains that the youth have taken courageous, direct action—examples for all the rest of us who should be both inspired and shamed by their nerve in facing down ridiculous levels of police repression in order to stand up for their own, and others’ , dignity.

Many, many demonstrations are scheduled for the next few weeks. Depending on shifts in the law and congress, perhaps the biggest will be the mass walkout now set for May 1, Mayday, all over the world, perhaps rekindling the international communist holiday that it once was–dovetailing nicely with antiwar actions scheduled for the April 29th weekend.

Many Rouge Forum members will be at the AERA meeting in San Francisco this coming weekend. Come see us at the MASSEs SIG (Marxian Analysis of Schools, Society and Education).

best, r (apologies for an unusually long message this week)

Thanks to Phillip, Gil, Sean, David, Stephanie, Cal, Barry, Joe, Henry, Scott of the Flex Program, Candace, Hoffie, Annie, Tommie Lee, Marc and Bonnie, Beverly P., Sharon A., and Alcorn.

And a message from Susan Ohanian regarding Substance News:

Substance, the newspaper of the resistance, is in crisis. They did not receive a single new subscription last month and renewals are coming in slowly. George and Sharon Schmidt made a tremendous sacrifice in the name of standing up to test secrecy. We owe them a huge debt. As a result of their legal appeal, people have the right to publish test questions (not whole tests but some questions). This is extraordinary. Fighting this battle cost George, a high school English teacher, his
job. He is now blackballed in the entire Chicago area.

Substance cannot continue to publish without our support. The immediate need is money to pay the printer for the April issue. But there is an ongoing need for subscribers.

Do we want a voice of resistance or don’t we? A subscription for one year is $16.

Please send what you can. We cannot let our voices be silenced.

Substance
5132 Berteau Avenue
Chicago, IL 60641-1440

Susan Ohanian, National Resistance Editor

MLB: E’s picks for 2006

aaron16_sm.jpg

**E’s picks for 2006**

NL East

  1. Atlanta
  2. (They win for the umpteenth year, this time w/o Rockin’ Leo)

  3. NY Mets
  4. (Because Tommy Glavine has a great year at 40. Whelan is happy for a while, until Cards take out the Mets in the Division Series)

  5. Philadelphia
  6. (Aaron Rowand a steal for Thome)

  7. Washington
  8. (Soriano is more liability than asset in LF and Fick can’t make up for that)

  9. Florida
  10. (Not enough experience to go with Willis and Cabrera)

NL Central

  1. St. Louis
  2. (Unstoppable, they take it all this year)

  3. Houston
  4. (Will Clemens return? Berkman, Preston Wilson good adds)

  5. Chicago
  6. (If Prior and Woods stay off the DL)

  7. Pittsburgh
  8. (Jim Tracey leads B.C. boy Jason Bay plus Sean Casey, Burnitz … too bad the Pirates traded Aramis Ramirez last year otherwise they might nip at Houston’s heels)

  9. Milwaukee
  10. (Corey Koskie to the rescue…nah!!)

  11. Cincinnati
  12. (Gave up good hitting for average pitching)

NL West (aka the worst division in MLB)

  1. San Francisco
  2. (Bonds is bum; should quit before he does dishonor to Hank and The Babe)

  3. San Diego
  4. (Gibson makes a comeback from glory days at Cranbrook School in Bloomfield Hills and nearly sends Pads to the playoffs; then gets traded to the Tigers in the off season, refuses to go citing previous experience at the River Rouge Ford Plant and chooses to retire from playing and becomes manager of the Florida Marlins, but Marlins move to Las Vegas before spring training 07, which prompts Gibson to make a speech castigating the role of casinos in American society and announce his return to academia.)

  5. Los Angeles
  6. (No way they could finish third in any other division)

  7. Arizona
  8. (Lots of moves, I like Estrada as the catcher, but unless they hire Dr. K. D. V. to manage they’re finishing out of the money)

  9. Colorado
  10. (I like Ray King a lot and Jose Mesa, but adding these guys to the bullpen is not going to change the fortunes of the Rockies)

AL East

  1. Toronto
  2. (Because they’re on TV a lot here; I hate the Yankees and am tired of the Bosox (sorry Ken))

  3. New York Yanquis
  4. (Adding Damon makes a difference)

  5. Boston
  6. (Losing Damon hurts)

  7. Baltimore
  8. (Go Rockin Leo! Did I mention I saw Palmeiro hit #3000 last year, right after he had a “vitamin” shot)

  9. Tampa Bay
  10. (Should have hired Gibson to manage this year)

AL Central

  1. Cleveland
  2. (The Tribe takes the division; Perry buys me tickets to go to the playoffs)

  3. Minnesota
  4. (Everybody loves the Twins this year but can pitching be the difference in the AL?)

  5. Chicago
  6. (Two in a row? I don’t think so.)

  7. Detroit
  8. (No way Leyland can salvage the Tigers)

  9. Kansas City
  10. (Gardenhire will be so distracted trying to fill out a line up card with Mientkiewicz and Grudzielanek in the first two slots he can’t concentrate on managing)

AL West

  1. Oakland
  2. (I always liked those shoes)

  3. Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
  4. (Would finish first but for that name)

  5. Texas
  6. (Millwood with hitting behind him should make a difference)

  7. Seattle
  8. (What the hell happened in Seattle the past couple of years? But I love that “Ichiro” cheer)

NL Wildcard: New York Mets
AL Wildcard: New York Yanquis

World Series: Cleveland v. St. Louis (Cards prevail)

B.C. universities fight for corporate secrecy

One would think that the public should have access to information about the financial dealings of public universities. But B.C.’s three leading public universities say otherwise and are arguing that access to such records fall outside democratic interests and that the transparency principle of government does not apply when universities are acting as “service providers to a private company.”

The Georgia Straight reports that the province’s three largest universities have argued that the public should not have access to financial dealings of their spinoff companies. According to documents filed with the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner in a case involving Simon Fraser University, both UBC and the University of Victoria have justified this position, in part, with the claim that universities act as “service providers” to private-sector organizations.

The dispute centres around a freedom-of-information request to SFU, which was filed by David Noble, a professor at York University. Noble, a critic of the corporate influence on universities, sought information in February 2004 from SFU’s University/Industry Liaison Office on companies spun off from SFU research.

The Canadian Association of University Teachers has intervened on Noble’s side, claiming that SFU should not be allowed to use it’s wholly owned company to deny public access to documents involving licensing deals.

You mean those mean old liberal professors AREN’T victimizing right-wing students?

David Horowitz and his gaggle of right-wing emenies of academic freedom (like the so-called “Bruin Alumni Association” at UCLA) have been a on rampage in recent months. Horowitz has humped his “Academic Bill of Rights”as the solution to a phantom problem: liberal professors who ideologically abuse conservative students and give them lower or even failing grades because of their political views.

Hororwitz has never provided any systematic evidence to support his claims about classroom bias (nor does he supply evidence that liberal professors are murders, a claim made in his recent book-length rant about liberal/left professors).

Well, as it turns out there is empirical research on the issue in question and the evidence suggests that there is no relationship between students political views and their grades, with one interesting exception: in some disciplines favored by conservative students (e.g., business and economics), students with liberal politics are the ones receiving lower grades. Hmmm…

Inside Higher Ed reports: “Markus Kemmelmeier, a sociologist at the University of Nevada at Reno, has been watching the Academic Bill of Rights debate with growing frustration, because he thinks there is proof about the question about classroom bias that has been ignored. “I just don’t see evidence” of bias, says Kemmelmeier, one of three authors of an in-depth study on the topic that was published last year in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.”

Kemmelmeier’s research shows conservative and liberal students do equally well in courses with politically charged content (e.g., sociology, women’s studies, African American studies, education, cultural anthropology) and the results casts doubt on conservative activists’ claims that liberal faculty members routinely discriminate against their conservative students.

These results are from a four-year longitudinal study that began in the late 1990s, Kemmelmeier surveyed 3,890 students at a major public university in the Midwest. Asked to describe their political orientation, 2.7 percent identified themselves as far left, 34.6 percent as liberal, 42 percent as middle of the road, 20 percent as conservative, and 1.2 percent as far right.

Mr. Kemmelmeier then compared the transcripts of a variety of students taking the same courses, specifically courses taught in the economics department and the business school (which Mr. Kemmelmeier considered “hierarchy-enhancing,” or conservative) and those taught in American culture, African-American studies, cultural anthropology, education, nursing, sociology, and women’s studies (which he considered “hierarchy-attenuating,” or liberal).

He found that in the latter courses, students’ political orientations had no effect on their grades — which, the study says, suggests that disciplines such as sociology and anthropology “might be more accepting of a broad range of student perspectives,” while economics and business classes “appear to be more sensitive to whether student perspectives are compatible with those of the academic discipline.”

In economics and business classes, the study found, conservative students earned better grades. It also found that conservative students were likely to gaduate with higher GPA’s in those courses than liberal students who entered college with similar SAT scores.

France: Declaration of the Unions of College Students, High School Students, and Workers

MRZine: Expand the Mobilization on 4 April, A New Day of Mobilization

The success of work stoppages and strikes and the power of the demonstrations of 28 March, their unity and intergenerational character as well as the movement’s duration and magnitude in high schools and universities, prove to be a historic mobilization, to demand the withdrawal of the CPE and the opening of negotiations.

Judge Rules Teachers Have No Free Speech Rights in Class

The Progressive: Judge Rules Teachers Have No Free Speech Rights in Class

Here’s an update on Deb Mayer, the teacher who said her contract was not renewed because she answered a student’s question about whether she would participate in a demonstration for peace. (See “Teacher Awaits Day in Court.”)

Her case involves an incident that occurred on January 10, 2003, at Clear Creek Elementary School in Bloomington, Indiana.

The students were reading an article in Time for Kids about peace protests. She responded to the student’s question by saying she sometimes honks for peace and that it’s important to seek out peaceful solutions both on the playground and in society. Afterwards, the parents of one of the students got angry and insisted that she not speak about peace again in the classroom. Mayer’s principal so ordered her.

When the school district did not renew Mayer’s contract at the end of the semester, she sued for wrongful termination and for violation of her First Amendment rights.

On March 10, Judge Sarah Evans Barker dismissed Mayer’s case, granting summary judgment to the defendants.

War made easy

The article below was published on March 29 as a Znet commentary and is excerpted from Norman Solomon’s speech to an antiwar rally in Sebastopol, California, on Sunday, March 19. His latest book is “War MadeEasy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.” For information, go to: WarMadeEasy.com.

Why Are We Here?

By Norman Solomon

On March 18, during her national radio response to the president, Senator Dianne Feinstein accused the Bush administration of “incompetence”in the Iraq war.

What would be a competent way to pursue the war in Iraq? How would you drop huge bombs on urban neighborhoods in a competent way? How would you deploy cluster munitions that shred the bodies of children in a competent way? How would you take hundreds of thousands of people from their home land and send them to a country to kill and be killed — based on lies — in a competent way?

How do you ravage the housing and health care and education of communities across the United States, while war-profiteering corporations post bigger profits — how would you do that in a competent way?

Senator Feinstein went on to say that it’s so important, for the war in Iraq, for the United States government to “do it right.”

How does one do this war right, when every day it brings more carnage? The only way to do this war right is to not do it at all. Reporting on a new assault by the U.S. military in Iraq, a headline on the March 17 front page of the San Francisco Chronicle said: “Biggest air attack since the invasion seen as delivering a message.”

Delivering a message.

Forty years ago, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara said it was necessary to drop bombs on North Vietnam in order to deliver a message to the Communist leaders in Hanoi. The former war correspondent Chris Hedges, in his book “War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning,” recalls that when he was reporting from El Salvador, one morning he and other reporters woke up at their hotel and discovered that death squads had dumped corpses in front of the building overnight, and in the mouths of those corpses were written messages threatening the journalists.

In Yugoslavia, during the spring of 1999, the bombs fell with the U.S.-led NATO forces delivering a message. And when, at noontime one Friday in the city of Nis, cluster bombs fell courtesy of U.S. taxpayers and ripped into the body of a woman holding a bag of carrots from the market, that too was an instance of sending a message.

Time after time, leaders send messages by inflicting death. On September 11, 2001, Osama bin Laden sent a message at the World Trade Center. And in the fall of 2001 the U.S. military sent a message to Afghanistan, where the civilians who died, if we are going to count numbers, were at least as numerous as those who died at the World Trade Center.

And now, George W. Bush continues to send a message with the bombs and the bullets. And we’re encouraged — if not to avidly support — to be passive. To defer. To be inactive.

When people across the United States gather to oppose this war, they are refusing to participate in sending the message of death.

Almost 40 years ago Martin Luther King talked about what he called “the madness of militarism.” And it’s with us, here and now; it’s with us in the United States every time a child is malnourished, every time people need medical care and don’t get it and suffer and sometimes lose their lives, while the military budgets of this country — over half a trillion dollars a year — are spent not on defense but on military expenditures, which dwarf anything that could be accurately described as defense. The madness of militarism that Dr. King talked about is expressed every day by the likes of Senator Feinstein, who demands “competence” in war and says that it must be done right.

We need a peace effort, not a war effort, from the United States. Instead of doing a better job of killing, there’s a movement around this country to compel what is said to be our own government to do a much much much better job of sustaining life — instead of taking it.

The problem isn’t that this war may not be winnable. The problem is the war was and is and always will be wrong, and must be stopped.

At every demonstration for peace and social justice, why are we here? Because those are values we want to live for.

And why are we here on this earth? Why are any of us here? Not an easy question to answer. But activism is a way of insisting that we’re not here to be part of war machinery. We’re not here to be part of the killing, we’re not here to aid and abet or enable those like George W. Bush who lead the charge to slaughter in the name of freedom to serve profit. We’re here with a very different mission.

Charles Sullivan “Matewan Revisited”

railroadalley1.JPG.jpg

[Thanks to Paul O. for the tip on this one.]

Matewan Revisited

By Charles Sullivan

The history of America is the chronicle of class struggle. The current fight is the same fight that working class people have always waged. In the past there were three distinct classes: the upper class, the middle class and the underclass. The middle class is rapidly melding with the under class, leaving us with essentially two socioeconomic classes. In essence, what remain are the rich and the poor. The chasm between rich and poor has never been wider and it is growing every year.

For reasons that must be political, those in power expend much energy and capital denying that America is a class society. Recall how Poppy Bush used to accuse his political adversaries of conducting class warfare, even as his policies, like those of his son, do great harm to working people while benefiting the wealthy. Unrestrained capitalism is the opposite of Robin Hood and it reigns supreme in America. The hypocrisy of the elder Bush’s inane pronouncement is an insult to the intelligence of every working class citizen, who knows about class divisions first hand through long experience. In essence, what we have here is a predator and prey relationship. The rich are today preying upon the poor, just as they have always done.

This relationship is portrayed clearly and accurately through an examination of labor history. One particularly poignant example occurred in the hills of West Virginia in the spring of 1920. This was the battle of Matewan that pitted the mining companies against the coal miners who were desperately trying to organize a union. Far from being atypical of the oppression and wage slavery that characterizes America to this day, the events that unfolded in the coal fields of West Virginia are emblematic of class struggle, as documented by the historical evidence. An examination of these facts reveals the insult and insensitivity of Poppy Bush’s absurd proclamations against the working poor.
Few of us today can appreciate the atrocious conditions that working people once endured. Some of the worst working conditions in the world were encountered in the coal fields of West Virginia. Thousands of men and boys (child labor was also exploited in those days) died in the mines as a result of wanton neglect on the part of the mine owners. The lives of the coal miners were of no greater worth to the mining companies than a turnip. Workers were nothing more than property that was expendable and easily replaceable in the field. The horrid conditions that prevailed in places like Matewan, West Virginia, are almost beyond imagination.

Whole towns were under the oppressive dictatorship of the coal companies, which included the political electorate. Thus the coal companies assumed the role of God not only in the coal fields of West Virginia, but all across the land. Other corporations did the same. The coal miners lived in constant fear and intimidation of their bosses and their goon squads. Their housing was owned by the company. Entire towns were in essence owned by the company. The coal miners were the slaves on whose backs great fortunes were amassed for the mining companies and the robber barons. The mine owners lived like kings, while the miners scratched out a subsistence living in utter squalor. The miners had to purchase their tools, their food and supplies from company stores, whose prices were grossly inflated. The long hours of toil in the wretched and dangerous mines were paid in company scrip. Often at the end of an eighty hour work week, owing to the irregularities that always arose in keeping the company books, the miners actually owed the mining company money.

Those who tried to organize unions were summarily fired from their jobs and evicted from their housing. Many were routinely beaten and murdered by company thugs, such as the Felts Detective Agency. These beatings and murders occurred all across the nation, and those who administered them did so with impunity. The police and the National Guard were under the employ of the mining companies. As they are today, they were called forth to protect the wealth and property of the rich from the justice demanded by the working poor. There was no law and there was no justice for working people. The only protection the workers had was the union. Despite that kind of opposition, miners joined the union by the thousands in Matewan and vicinity in a display of courage that is rarely seen today.

Matewan was different from the norm in an important way: its police chief, Sid Hatfield, a former coal miner, and its mayor, C. Testerman, were both men of courage and moral integrity who stood up to the thugs hired by the mining companies to terrorize the miners and their families. Understandably, such courage and strength of character were an aberration. Under enormous pressure from armed thugs, lesser men in other parts of the country capitulated and cooperated with the corrupt power of the mining companies. These companies were essentially all powerful

Agents of the Felts Detective Agency had been unlawfully evicting union families from their homes, setting their belongings out in the rain. Sid Hatfield and Mayor Testerman attempted to halt the evictions, but to no avail. Then on the afternoon of May 19, 1920, accompanied by a group of armed miners, Hatfield attempted to arrest the detectives including Baldwin-Felts president Thomas Felts, and brothers Albert and Lee, who carried out the evictions. Hatfield and Testerman faced their heavily armed adversaries in the street. Someone fired a shot and a fierce gun battle ensued. In less than a minute eye witnesses reported that more than a hundred shots were fired. Killed in the first volley were Al Felts and mayor Testerman. When the shooting was over, seven detectives, including Lee Felts and two miners were dead or dying in the streets of Matewan. The incident became known as the Matewan Massacre.

The episode made Sid Hatfield a folk hero to working people throughout the world. Here was a man who not only faced the armed thugs hired by the mining company, he shot it out with them in the streets of Matewan and killed two of the notorious Felts brothers. Fifteen months later, however, Sid Hatfield was gunned down in a surprise attack by agents of the Felts Detective Agency on the steps of the McDowell County courthouse. No one was ever tried, much less convicted for his assassination. The murder touched off a fierce armed insurrection by the coal miners that involved more than ten thousand men.

This is the history of class conflict in America—one episode among countless thousands. But it is a history, common as it was, that is rarely told. You will not read about it in the text books used to teach history in our schools. Why? Because events like this tell the real story about America’s long war on working class people. It reveals how our nation’s wealthiest and most influential families obtained their positions of wealth and privilege. It is the kind of history that foments outrage at the injustice that still afflicts working class people to this day. It is a history that demonstrates that ordinary people can fight back and demand justice, even against impossible odds. Better to die a free man than live a slave.

So when I hear the products of class privilege, the Bush family, for example, accusing others of fomenting class warfare it makes me shake with rage because I know the history of my country in sordid detail. I know they are spewing lies that dishonor the countless thousands of working class people who were brutally oppressed and often murdered by their employers and their hired guns. I am also reminded that the Bush family fortune has been amassed like so many other dynasties—through the brutal exploitation of working people known as wage slavery. The Bush clan has no conception about what it is like to struggle, to sacrifice and to honor and uphold justice for ordinary people. If I were a plutocrat, if this were my legacy, I would not want the world to know about it either. It is a disgrace too vile to be put into words. This is what I call America’s secret history—the history those in power do not want you to know about. So spare me the banal talk about a free and democratic society. That is not what America is about.

This secret history explains current events perfectly. Working people are still fighting the same fight against the same foes as did Sid Hatfield and those coal miners at Matewan on that fateful day in 1920. The descendants of those people continue to work the coal fields of West Virginia and they continue to die in the mines. Under burgeoning capitalism the mining companies are now permitted to write the legislation that is supposed to provide for the safety of the miners. Thus the guns of the Felts Detective Agency have been rendered, for the time being, unnecessary. Why resort to violence when legalized bribery works so well? How little things have changed. Working class people continue to be the prey of their corporate employers with little recourse to the judiciary. Unionism, as timid and ineffective as it is these days, continues to wane as corporate power increases. It is the same old drama being played out in modern times by the descendants of the original players—and, like it or not, all of us are participants.

Now the vast majority of workers are ‘at will’ employees without any kind of protection from their employers. Thus, as in the days of Matewan, if a person wants to survive they must submit themselves to the indignity of being the property of their employers. America is a nation that was built upon slave labor. Migrating from job to job is no better than migrating from one master to another. In any case, the worker is the slave of the employer. The tradition continues to this day, although with far more subtlety than in the past. Our elected officials, if calling them so is not to make a mockery of the term, are increasingly under the employ of the ruling elite. The judiciary is stocked with corporate apologists anxious to continue the tradition of fleecing the workers and lining their own pockets with wealth they neither create nor earn. The fact that Industrial slavery bears a close and disturbing resemblance to its cousin chattel slavery is no accident. Its end product is almost as tragic, as the gap between rich and poor widens exponentially. As is the custom in America, the rich have gotten to where they are by riding the poor.

The character and the courage of Sid Hatfield and those coal miners at Matewan, West Virginia, are inspiring. Following their outstanding moral example, let us not capitulate to the modern thugs of American corporatocracy—to the military industrial complex and the champions of empire that would grind us under their heel. Let us read and reread labor history—America’s history—with a sense of hope and optimism, inspired by the example of Sid Hatfield and thousands of people like him. Someone has to stand up to the thugs who have always run this country for private wealth. We must, as history demonstrates so clearly, take heart and show some courage. We must stand for justice for all, no matter the personal cost. Otherwise, we are only paying homage to high minded ideals while betraying them with our misspent lives. We must stand together, shoulder to shoulder and face the enemy.

A life lived in the pursuit of justice for all is the only kind of life worth living. It is an examined life that requires character, courage and a capacity for critical thinking that can see beyond rhetoric and the mere symbols of freedom, to the bedrock of reality. It is a life that demands substance from us. The Wobblies had it right all along. The answer to justice, to world peace, is One Big Union. An injury to one is an injury to all is as true today as it was the day the phrase was coined. We should live by this credo. Justice demands courage and even bravado. As Thoreau so eloquently stated, “A man sits as many risks as he runs.”

American history, as dismal as it often is, is also the history of class struggle against oppression. Therein lies its greatest value—its eternal hope. It is the long continued fight that has always kept America from being what it could become—a bastion of democracy and hope, bristling with peace. This is because a privileged few do not want to share the wealth of this nation with those who create it. They intend to keep it for themselves, as their predecessors did. So we must keep alive the idea of One Big Union. It represents our best hope for halting the exportation of jobs that pits worker against worker across political boundaries. To accomplish this Herculean task requires that we have the courage and the wisdom to bring back the revolutionary unionism championed by people like Eugene Debs, Mother Jones, Emma Goldman and Big Bill Haywood. Sid Hatfield and mayor Testerman have already shown us the way. Do we have the fortitude and the courage to follow their example?

Note: the author gratefully acknowledges and thanks long time union organizer Anthony Debella for providing the inspirational impetus behind this piece.

Charles Sullivan is a photographer and free lance writer residing in the eastern panhandle of West Virginia. He welcomes your comments at earthdog@highstream.net

Click below to post a comment on this article

Comment (0) | Trackback (0)

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

Rouge Forum Update (March 27, 2006)

From Rich Gibson:

Dear Friends,

A massive groundswell of people rose up in the past week, more than a million people marching in the streets from the Carolinas to Chicago to LA for the right to a decent job, a living, and a place to be–and in opposition to the nationalist movement in the US that seeks to make them, and all of us, unfree. Clearly, people are willing to take action, even in this repressive period. At issue is, in part, what kind of action, and toward what end?

We have endorsed the next scheduled action, April 10, as a day of leaving work, school, and the routines of daily life to demonstrate once again.

In addition, we have endorsed the April 29th world-wide demonstrations against the wars, which also dovetails nicely with Mayday.

Detroit Teachers wildcatted again this week, a one day sickout strike against layoffs and cuts in pay.

Here is a fine piece by our colleagues, the Research Unit for Political Economy in India, writing on the reasons for the latest US deals with the Indian ruling class, and the race for imperial control. These are the same folks who wrote, Behind the Invasion of Iraq.

The Rouge Forum No Blood for Oil web page is updated.

Of particular interest is a piece by Chalmers Johnson, author of Sorrows Of Empire, on the crisis of the economy and the military budget and an example of mainstream US media coverage (60 Minutes) of the fizzled operations of the last months. CBS joins the psy-wars.

We note with some regret that Andrew Young, former civil rights activist, is now a Walmart Spokesperson. He appeared on the scene with courage and intelligence, goes out as a farce.