Tag Archives: peace

Another “Peace Candidate” just started another war (By: Rich Gibson)

Another “Peace Candidate” just started another war.

By Rich Gibson

Wilson, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Bush One and Two, and now Trump.

William Blum, my friend, now deceased and lifetime radical made a list of the countries the US has bombed and/or invaded. Here it is https://williamblum.org/chapters/rogue-state/united-states-bombings-of-other-countries

This is what empires MUST do, relentlessly seek cheap labor, raw materials, markets and regional control. The US, an empire in rapid decline, is thrashing about internally and externally as China, with a vast military and new weapons, uses soft power to blithely invade all continents, including the Americas.

The socio-pathic narcissist Donald Trump, mushroom deep in the Epstein files, says “we will bring freedom to the Iranian people.” When did that ever happen in the past?

The Democrats, save a few, wring their hands and say, “Why didn’t you give us a chance to say, ‘hooray for another war.? It ain’t fair! We want to vote!” The two parties of the empire, trapped within the exploitative confines of Capital, are two heads on the same snake.

Imagine a billiards table the size of a football field. Then plunk thousands of round balls on that table. Now, take a giant cue ball and slam it into those other balls. They’ll all be slamming and crashing for weeks, months, even, perhaps, years.

Those balls are countries and people, each staged at unfair odds with one another.

That’s what just happened. It’s not all that unusual. It happened after the 2001 attacks, with the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

It happened in 2009/09 with the bailout of the banks to the tune of 12.9 Trillion dollars (Bloomberg). A trillion is a lot of socialized losses. Twelve Trillion is free health care for everyone, and free college or university or training school.

The working class, in this great financial collapse, took it in the heart. The United Auto Workers Union, a counterfeit union that sells the pacified labor of the members to the Big Bosses in exchange for dues income—off which the Labor Bosses live very well—except in some instances where their corruption becomes too glaring—a dozen UAW bosses were jailed in the last decade.

But, the rank and file was forced to accept wage cuts, multi-tier pay levels, and a no strike agreement for five years.

It happened with the Arab (farcically tragic) Spring. A fruit vendor in Tunisia, denied the right to sell his fruit, immolated himself. He was, well, an accelerator, a good way to show how things change. Grievances had piled up, and up, like land mines, one on top of the other. Quantity became quality. There was a leap.. Tunisians rebelled. The dictator fled.

Then the Obama administration, with Hillary Clinton, Samantha Power, and Susan Rice, looked on approvingly.

They decided to overthrow, with France, the man who had been torturing renditioned prisoners on behalf of the US—Ghaddafi of Libya—who had said, “I am the cork on top of Africa. Overthrow me and hundreds of thousands of Africans will be wandering in Europe. Mostly Muslims, they won’t be liked. Rightists will be elected on the grounds of mass, illegal immigration.”

He was murdered, sodomized with sticks, then shot.

Libya collapsed. It’s huge arms caches were looted. The subsequent civil war is still going on, after a decade, and the arms are being used in civil wars and hy jihadists south of Libya as countries like Mali suffer.

Libya went so well for the Obama gang that they decided to do Egypt, another torture ally and the recipient of billions in US military aid.

The torturer/dictator was overthrown.

Jimmy Carter approved of the subsequent election.

Then, shocker!

The Muslim Brotherhood, operating illegally, mostly underground, for years, won.

Oh No! That won’t do. The Muslim Brother new dictator, Morsi, was overthrown, put in jail under brutal conditions for six years where he died awaiting a kangaroo court.

Muslim Brotherhood out.

That want so well, the Obama gang went to work on Russian AND US torturer ally, Assad. The evidence is clear. The Assad regime was torturing renditioned prisoners on behalf of the CIA.

But Assad had to go, and with him the Russian base on the Mediterranean. It took a decade, with Assad fighting with Russian backing and the US using the Kurds (so often betrayed) and jihadists to battle his regime. But Assad went and now a “former” jihadist rules Syria. Trump likes him a lot.

The there is the Zionist genocide in Gaza (“communism begins with atheism “Marx—and why is the left so unwilling to attack superstition?) which left the headlines but the maiming, killing, disease and misery continue while the Trump fascists plan resorts and US bases, replacing the Palestinians who seem to vanish from any current planning.

Putin’s Russia invaded the Ukraine (and tried to take Key-ev, not Keev) four years ago. Why do that? Well, NATO and the US had crow-hopped toward Russia for years. You can listen to the US’s Victoria Nuland planning the overthrow of the Ukrainian government here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUCCR4jAS3Y

The Ukrainians had given up their nukes years ago, on the promise they would not be invaded. That promise seems to be a lesson, not only to North Korea, but to Iran today.

Bogged down, and faced with a brief Wagner Group mutiny, Russia has taken, reportedly, more than a million killed and wounded. How much longer can these human billiard balls, crashing into each other, keep it up? The same movement, described below, is needed in the former Soviet Union.

Then there is Epstein, the degenerate millionaire, exposed by the crusading Julie K. Brown. There are more than one thousand victim/survivors, which must mean at least one hundred debased rich men and women.

Brown insists, and most agree, that Epstein did not commit suicide, but was murdered. Makes sense.

As a likely asset to many intelligence services, like Mossad, his videos and memories would be markedly dangerous. Ms. Maxwell is interred in a fairly comfy prison with her mouth shut: lesson learned.

Now, really, would the recently deposed Clintons lie? Remember, the lesson Monica taught every young woman involved with an exploitative older man—save the dress and don’t swallow. The Clintons are habitual liars.

Brown insists the Epstein issues involve more than the corruption of sexuality, but also power, and in the main, money. Epstein was floating millions all over the world, including into Russia, frequently through Trumps, favorite bank, Deutsche.

Now, the cover story for the billiards-crashing war on Iran, is the proliferation of nukes. Who is the greatest proliferator? Who bailed from the non-proliferation deals. None but the US.

Remember, always, China is coming. An empire, it must come to surpass the US as the world hegemon. The tyrant, Xi, said he would take Taiwan by 2027, and when China does that, the US billiard will lose its round bottom.

Trump, the greedy socio-pathic narcissist, ordered the attack on Iran with blessing of his Department of War drunk, Pete Hegspeth.

They took out the Supreme Leader and about half of his cabinet (no crazier than Trump’s cabinet which includes the delusional RFK Jr and the Epstein buddy, Howard Lutnik).

The Zionist/US bombing campaign, so reminiscent of Vietnam, quickly exploded a girls’ school, killing around one hundred and seventy kids, the body bags lined up in front of the school. As the billiards continued to crash, Iran attacked Qatar, Kuwait, the UAE, Bahrain, Israel, mediator nation Oman, and Saudi Arabia, with some hits on civilians, others on bases.

Trump’s declared “regime change,” may be more than difficult.

The son of the King of Kings (installed by the CIA’s Kermit Roosevelt in 1953), the Shah’s kid, hasn’t been in the country since 1979.

Does he still speak the language? Is he akin to the hacks the US installed initially in Iraq, who failed, and today the big winner in Iraq is Iran (the US is filled with nearly-ruined vets from the two wars of choice—Afghanistan and Iraq—while the US flight from Afghanistan mirrors the run-away from Vietnam).

France, Germany, and the UK have all threatened to intervene in the war on Iran, to “protect our interests,” which probably means protecting the movement of oil in the region. Oil tankers are already stalled, anchors down. The price of oil could easily hit $100 a barrel.

What stops this?

Well, a class conscious, anti-racist, international movement for reason (opposition to superstition) and equality (see the Declaration of Independence—created equal, economically?)

What steps can produce that, the ideas that can defeat men with guns?

Little steps at first, a la Minnesota, peaceful mass nonviolent protest, or the good humor of Portland Froggies, plus whistles and phones and cameras. Of course the Freikorps Ice might kill you, but there is risk in social change.

Then a general strike, not a one day action every six weeks monitored by that cork over a class conscious movement, Move-On, the Dem’s front, but a mass movement withdrawing labor with no date certain at the end.

I wrote earlier in Counterpunch about why that hasn’t happened. https://www.counterpunch.org/2026/01/07/the-empire-is-teetering-why-is-there-no-general-strike/

To shorten the story, the unions’ leaders will oppose a general strike with the same determination their allies, the Big Bosses will. But Minnesota, to a surprising degree, shows that the labor bosses can be swept aside by a persevering, determined, movement of direct action.

Even as the US empire teeters and decays, devolves into more profound forms of fascism, as the ICE/Freikorps becomes the US’ SS, within a general strike, an organization most grow, deepening class consciousness and the willingness to sacrifice.

Now we oversee a billiards table that is beyond my pay grade.

Most Counterpunch readers are familiar with democratic centralism, and the latter half of that contradiction defeating the former.

I won’t call for violence. Indeed I abhor it. But I remind you of the Declaration of Independence (happy 250th) and the duty to make a revolution.

The core issue of our time is the reality of perpetual imperialist war and color coded inequality met by the potential of a mass, activist, class conscious movement for justice, equality, and democracy.

Rich Gibson (rg@richgibson..com) is emeritus professor of history from San Diego State University. With Wayne Ross, he is a co-founder of the Rouge From (online).

Educating for Peace in a Time of Permanent War: Call for proposals:

CALL FOR CHAPTER PROPOSALS

FOR A BOOK ENTITLED

EDUCATING FOR PEACE IN A TIME OF PERMANENT WAR:
ARE SCHOOLS PART OF THE SOLUTION OR THE PROBLEM?

Under Contract
Routledge / Taylor & Francis

Co-editors Paul R. Carr (Lakehead University, Orillia) & Brad J. Porfilio (Lewis University)

Afterword Zvi Bekerman (Hebrew University)

SCHEDULE

1. Chapter proposals due: February 28, 2011
2. Feedback and decisions from editors to contributors: April 4, 2011
3. First drafts due to editors: July 15, 2011
4. Feedback on first drafts from editors to contributors: September 5, 2011
5. Final drafts by contributors due to editors: October 14, 2011
6. Manuscript to publisher: December 1, 2011
7. It is our expectation that the book will be publisher in early 2012

Statement of aims
This project responds to a defined need to add to the literature in a critical manner, providing scholars, educators and others interested in peace and peace education with a nuanced, complexifed analysis and, importantly, strategies to better understand how schools engage with the notion of war and peace, and, moreover, what they can do to become part of the solution related to creating societies that strive to establish peace as a foundational component to socio-cultural, economic and political manifestations framing relations and experiences.

This CALL FOR CHAPTER PROPOSALS seeks critical contributions from scholars who are concerned with the unchecked infiltration of the military within schools, whether it be through the curriculum, through pedagogy, through policy, through experiential learning, or through military recruitment. As Paulo Freire and other critical theorists, including Henry Giroux, Peter McLaren, bell hooks, Joe Kincheloe, Antonia Darder and others have acknowledged, education is a political process, and it should, necessarily, address human suffering and oppression. The willful neglect, combined with our individual and collective complicity within the military enterprise, sometimes referred to as the military-industrial complex, takes place at many levels, including ignorance of militarization at home and abroad, tacit support for military conflict in spite of alternatives for peace that exist, an uncritical reading of history that glorifies war and patriotism, a lack of critical engagement to promote peace over war, and a general reluctance to infuse a more critical pedagogical experience interwoven into education that would allow for deliberative democracy and engagement that seeks to contextualize and bring to life diverse epistemologies, value-sets, disciplines, theories, concepts, and experiences.

Little is done in schools at the formal and informal levels to address war and peace, especially in relation to what can and should be done to bring about peace, and this volume seeks to provide a range of policy, pedagogical, curriculum and institutional analyses aimed at facilitating meaningful engagement toward a more robust and critical examination of the role that schools play (and can play) in framing war, militarization and armed conflict.

We are particularly interested in the connection between war and peace. Many excellent texts deal specifically with peace and peace education, and we are hoping that this volume will make a more explicit connection between war/conflict/militarization and peace in and through education. We are also interested in nuanced, alternative, critical interdisciplinary studies that bring to light how we know, understand, engage with, and problematize war within our societies, and, particularly, within our schools. This manuscript is intended for an international audience, and we welcome proposals from scholars in diverse contexts, geographical locations and disciplines.

ONE LINE DESCIPTION OF THE BOOK

Ignorance is no defense, and may even be construed as complicity in the quest for what Peter McLaren calls “permanent war”.

If education is not about peace, then is it about war?

Can a society have education that willfully avoids considering peace as its central objective?

FOCUS

This book intends to better articulate how schools are part of the war industry, and, importantly, how schools can do peace education by examining war.

War is not a nebulous, far-away, mysterious venture; we are involved in perpetrating and perpetuating it, and education about and against war can be as liberating as it is necessary.

If war equates killing, can our schools avoid engaging in the examination of what war is all about?

This book shines a light on the pivotal role played by schools and education in ending or continuing war.

CALL FOR CHAPTER PROPOSALS

1. Submit the following by February 28, 2011, to Paul R. Carr and Brad J. Porfilio: prcarr@gmail.com & Porfilio16@aol.com
2.
a. Title of proposed chapter
b. Author(s) and complete institutional titles and contact information
c. A 150-word biography for each author
d. A 300-word abstract of the proposed chapter, including what research methods are being used, theoretical and conceptual framework used, focus, and findings (or expected findings), and how the chapter is directly connected to the focus of the book.

Co-editor biographies

Paul R. Carr is originally from Toronto, and now resides in Montreal. He was recently an associate professor at Youngstown State University, where he taught courses in multicultural education, the sociology of education, diversity and leadership, and qualitative methodology, and is now an Associate Professor at Lakehead University (Orillia) in the Departments of Sociology and Interdisciplinary Studies. His current research is broadly concerned with social justice, with specific threads related to critical pedagogy, democracy, media literacy, and intercultural education. In 2007, he co-edited The Great White North? Exploring Whiteness, Privilege and Identity in Education (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers), which won two national awards, and, in 2008, co-edited another book, entitled Doing Democracy: Striving for Political Literacy and Social Justice (New York: Peter Lang). He recently finalized two other edited books: the first in French entitled Les faces caches de l’intercultural (Paris: L’Harmattan), and the second, with Brad Porfilio, entitled Youth Culture, education and resistance: Subverting the commercial ordering of life (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers). He has recently authored book entitled Democracy and critical pedagogy: Does your vote count? (New York: Peter Lang). Paul is the co-founder and co-director of the Global Doing Democracy Research Project, which aims to produce a range of studies on the international level, leading to critical, comparative analysis of how democracy and education can be more effectively connected.

Dr. Brad J. Porfilio is Assistant Professor of Education at Lewis University in Romeoville, IL. He teaches courses on critical pedagogy, qualitative research, globalization and education, multicultural education, foundations of education, and curriculum theory in the Educational Leadership for Teaching and Learning Doctoral Program. The Educational Leadership Program at Lewis University is unique in its critical and transformative focus where students are prepared to become transformative educational leaders who are deeply discerning, knowledgeable and approach the educational system as a potential avenue for challenging and transforming the status quo. Dr. Porfilio received his PhD in Sociology of Education in 2005 at the University at Buffalo. During his doctoral studies, he served as an Assistant Professor of Education at Medaille College and D’Youville College, where he taught courses across the teacher education spectrum and supervised pre-service and in-service teachers from Canada and the US. He has published numerous peer-reviewed articles, book chapters, edited volumes, and conference papers on the topics of urban education, critical social studies education, neoliberalism and schooling, transformative education, teacher education, gender and technology, and cultural studies. He recently published three co- edited volumes: The first, co-edited with Curry Malott, The Destructive Path of Neoliberalism (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers), the second, co-edited with Paul R. Carr, Youth Culture, Education and Resistance: Subverting the Commercial Ordering of Life (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers), and the third, co-edited with Curry Malott, Critical Pedagogy in the 21st Century: A New Generation of Scholars (Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing).

Paul R. Carr Brad J. Porfilio
Lakehead University (Orillia) Lewis University
prcarr@gmail.edu porfilio16@aol.com