The University of British Columbia is 0 / 2 in its ability to find facts in its most recent “fact-finding processes.” The first was the Fact Finding Report: Commerce Undergraduate Society (CUS) FROSH CHANTS. The second was the Summary of the fact-finding process and conclusions regarding alleged breaches of academic freedom and other university policies at the University of British Columbia.
How or why is it that fact-finders appointed to find facts cannot find any facts of administration? Or of specific administrators?
Is it that the the facts are so tiny, so microscopic that they are there but cannot be found? Is it that facts of administration are so taken-for-granted that they are too big to be found?
Is it that facts of the administration of UBC cannot be found because they need not be found?
Is it that secrecy prevails and the evidence put in front of the fact-finders has no bearing whatsoever on the facts of administration?
Is it that legalism at UBC is in itself culpable and invariably can find neither fact nor fault with specific administrators at UBC? Is this sort of a legal fox guarding managerial hen-houses story at UBC?
Follow
