New York: UR dog suit one of a litter of cases

Democrat and Chronicle: UR dog suit one of a litter of cases

Colleges here and across the country, long accustomed to dealing with service dogs for people with physical disabilities, are now contending with a new demand: animals that lend emotional support for the mentally disabled.

A lawsuit filed Oct. 1 by a University of Rochester student who wants to keep her dog on campus is just the latest example of a growing national phenomenon that has included similar cases involving cats, ferrets, snakes and even spiders.

School officials say inconsistent interpretations of federal laws designed to protect the civil rights of the disabled have left them with inadequate direction on how to address such requests.

ORU founder returns to defend school

Tulsa World: ORU founder returns to defend school

Oral Roberts came to his namesake university for the first time in three years on Monday and told students and employees in a chapel service “the devil is not going to steal ORU.”

He said all allegations made in a lawsuit and an attached report are false. And he said Richard Roberts, who took a leave of absence as the school’s president last week, eventually will return to his position.

A Call to Defend Academic Freedom

Inside Higher Ed: A Call to Defend Academic Freedom

Saying that they are fed up with “aggressive incursion of partisan politics into universities’ hiring and tenure practices,” five prominent academics have issued a call to “defend the university” and gathered dozens of backers in what they view as a new way to bolster academic freedom.

The Ad Hoc Committee to Defend the University has issued a statement and is asking professors and others to sign on

Are IRB’s Needed for War Zones?

Inside Higher Ed: Are IRB’s Needed for War Zones?

A common complaint among social scientists in recent years is that institutional review boards — which are supposed to protect the interests of human subjects in research — are too involved in work they don’t understand. Good social science is getting held up, the social scientists say.

Justice blames Yale affirmative action for his early job problems

The Boston Globe: Justice blames Yale affirmative action for his early job problems

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has a 15-cent price tag stuck to his Yale law degree, blaming the school’s affirmative action policies in the 1970s for his difficulty finding a job after he graduated.

Some of his black classmates say Thomas needs to get over his grudge because Yale opened the door to extraordinary opportunities.

Former Graduate Student at SUNY-Binghamton Says Professor Stole His Work

Press & Sun-Bulletin: Ph.D. student suing BU, says prof stole his work

Contending that his work was stolen and that he was forced out of a doctoral program, a former graduate student has filed a $202 million lawsuit against Binghamton University and four of its current and former staff members.

Charles O. Ogindo filed the civil lawsuit in state Supreme Court in May seeking $200 million in compensatory damages and $2 million in punitive damages and attorney’s fees. For the case to continue, he will have to re-file it in the state’s Court of Claims after a Friday pre-trial hearing before Judge Ferris D. Lebous determined the state Supreme Court had no jurisdiction over the matter.

Israel: University strike / Academic year fails to start after last-minute talks fall through

Haaretz: University strike / Academic year fails to start after last-minute talks fall through

Representatives of the country’s senior faculty unions announced an open-ended strike for better pay yesterday, after Saturday night’s talks with government representatives failed to produce an agreement.

Education Minister Yuli Tamir expressed disappointment with the unions’ rejection of the government’s proposal, and yesterday, she suggested appointing a mediator for a predetermined time period. But the professors said they had not heard about her offer, which she made to the Finance Ministry’s wages director, Eli Cohen.

Since no date has been set for further negotiations, the strike is expected to continue tomorrow.

Israel: Tamir proposes external mediation in bid to end university strike

Haaretz: Tamir proposes external mediation in bid to end university strike

Education Minister Yuli Tamir on Sunday evening proposed appointing a mediator to work with her ministry and senior university lecturers in order to end a nationwide academic strike.

Senior university staff began the strike Sunday morning following the breakdown of negotiations with government representatives. Classes had been scheduled to begin Sunday.

Israel: Teachers strike / Union says treasury waging war of attrition as talks halted

Haaretz: Teachers strike / Union says treasury waging war of attrition as talks halted

The Secondary School Teachers Organization’s (SSTO) talks with the finance and education ministries were suspended yesterday as the strike at the country’s junior high and high schools enters its 12th day today.

Israeli Academic Year Begins With Faculty on Strike

The Chronicle: Israeli Academic Year Begins With Faculty on Strike

Israel’s academic year began deep in crisis on Sunday as faculty members at universities throughout the country went on strike in pursuit of a 20-percent pay raise.

Hours earlier, university heads rescinded their threat not to open the campuses, in protest of government delays in honoring a commitment to provide an extra $75-million in support this year. In a compromise with the government, the presidents accepted an infusion of $55-million instead.

Jury Awards $2-Million to Black Coach Who Blamed Dismissal on Racial Bias

The Chronicle: Jury Awards $2-Million to Black Coach Who Blamed Dismissal on Racial Bias

A state-court jury in Louisiana awarded $2-million last week to a former head football coach at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette who said he had been fired because of his race.

Jerry L. Baldwin, one of only a handful of African-American head coaches in a big-time football program, was dismissed in 2001 after his teams compiled a 6-27 win-loss record during his three seasons on the job. University lawyers said the coach’s poor record and low attendance at the team’s games had led to his dismissal.

Opposition Mounts to David Horowitz’s Islamo-Fascism

page0_5.pngNational Project in Defense of Dissent and Critical Thinking in Academia:
Opposition Mounts to David Horowitz’s Islamo-Fascism

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Reggie Dylan: (626) 319-1730
Email: criticalxthinking@yahoo.com

Website: www.defendcriticalthinking.org

Opposition Mounts to David Horowitz’s Islamo-Fascism
Awareness Week.

There has been increasing opposition by students,
scholars and organizations around the country to David
Horowitz’s Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week (IFAW) during
October 22-26. The National Project to Defend Dissent
and Critical Thinking in Academia
(www.defendcriticalthinking.org) is reporting on
student and faculty plans at UC Berkeley, UC Davis,
UCLA, USC, DePaul University, Emory University, Boise
State, the University of Washington, Columbia
University, and elsewhere. More activities are being
announced every day.

A newly formed Chicago Committee to Resist
‘Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week’ is calling on
“students, faculty, and all people of conscience to
come to DePaul to defeat Horowitz’ reactionary
offensive.” They call on people to rally an hour
before Robert Spencer’s speech at DePaul on Monday,
Oct. 22nd, and have plans to respond to every event
organized by the DePaul Conservative Alliance.

Professors Peter McLaren, Juan Gomez Quinones and Alan
Jones, and Larry Everest, author of Oil, Power, and
Empire will take part in a forum at UCLA on Tuesday at
1 p.m.; and Everest will join UC Berkeley Ethnic
Studies graduate student/acting instructor Roberto
Hernandez for a panel discussion, entitled “Who Are
the Real Fascists?,” Tuesday evening on the Berkeley
campus.

At UC Davis, the Muslim Student Association is
responding to IFAW with “Academic Freedom Week,” with
a series of forums and film showings. At Tulane,
students are circulating a petition in opposition to
Ann Coulter’s talk there, saying that it is “an event
encouraging violence and hate towards members of our
community.” Students at Emory, which is one of the
schools hosting David Horowitz, began events in
opposition the week before IFAW.Many organizations have released statements condemning
IFAW, including The Committee for an Open Discussion
of Zionism, The US Campaign to End the Israeli
Occupation, Jewish Voice for Peace, Muslim Students
Association, Council on American Islamic Relations and
the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. World
Can’t Wait-Drive Out the Bush Regime has said that
IFAW aims to “create an atmosphere at these colleges
where it is okay to be openly racist and reactionary.”

A variety of scholars and others have spoken out in
opposition to IFAW and its proponents. Gary Leupp of
Tufts University has said called IFAW a “hate
campaign” which “is more than an affront to Muslims.
It is an insult to everybody’s intelligence.” Noted
linguist and political writer Noam Chomsky recently
said of Horowitz and his allies, “It’s pointless to
debate such lunacy, but it’s wrong to disregard it.”
He added that, “in a free society, there should be
zero tolerance for institutions responsible for the
indoctrination of the young, or for the rest of the
attacks on democracy under the cynical pretext of
defending democracy.” Chomksy made these comments at a
recent forum on Academic Freedom held at the
University of Chicago where nearly 1,000 people
listened to and engaged scholars Tony Judt, John
Mearsheimer, Tariq Ali and others.

Critics are particularly concerned about Horowitz’s
plan of staging sit-ins at Women’s Studies
Departments. This will be done, he says, in order to
raise awareness of the oppression of women under
Islamic fundamentalism and protest the “silence” of
feminists on the subject. Reggie Dylan notes that,
“Women’s Studies scholars have actually been at the
forefront of supporting the rights of women (and gays
and lesbians) under Islamic fundamentalism. And
without Women’s Studies departments and the feminist
struggles which gave rise to them, people like
Horowitz would not even be giving hypocritical
lip-service to the oppression of women anywhere.”
Sunsara Taylor of World Can’t Wait-Drive Out the Bush
Regime says that given Horowitz’s track record, he “is
a man who has no right to speak on behalf of women.”

Some of the speakers for IFAW, such as Ann Coulter,
Rick Santorum and Horowitz himself, are well known.
Many of the others are not broadly known, though some
are politically well-connected and influential. Robert
Spenser, the director of Jihad Watch, has led seminars
on Islam and jihad for United States Central Command,
United States Army Command and General Staff College,
a Department of Homeland Security task force, and
branches of the Joint Terrorism Task Force. Michael
Ledeen, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise
Institute, was said by the Washinton Post to be Rove’s
main international affairs adviser. Daniel Pipes,
whose Campus Watch encourages students to report on
the “anti-Israel” bias of professors, recently joined
Rudolph Giuliani’s presidential campaign as an
advisor. Nonie Darwish is an Egyptian convert to
Christian fundamentalism who has said, “Islam is
cruel, anti-women, anti-religious freedom and
anti-personal freedom in general.”

One of the groups most concerned about IFAW has been
the Muslim Students Association, along with other
Muslim and Arab organizations. Horowitz has called the
MSA a front for Islamic terrorists and insisted they
sign his petition or be branded as an enemy of the US.
Muslim students have expressed concern that women
wearing head scarves could be physically attacked by
students motivated by Horowitz. One student worried
that IFAW represented the beginning of a “Krystalnacht
for Muslims,” a reference to the pogrom of Jews by the
Nazis and their brownshirts in 1933.

Besides their specific concerns about IFAW, these
groups have pointed to Horowitz’s website
frontpagemagazine.com as a regular source of
anti-Islam material. One article called for “a
complete stop to Muslim immigration, and … creative
ways to deport all Muslim non-citizens” in order to
create “an environment where the practice of Islam is
made not easy but difficult.” Another says an
“average” devout Muslim is a “soulless robot … [who]
hates all non-Moslems, a “beast” with only “the body
of a human being.” Other Horowitz allies have said
“Osama bin Laden is a very good Muslim — a model one,
in fact, and one of the most devout in the 1400 years
of Islam,” and “Muslims have no allegiance to any
country. Their only allegiance is to Islam.”

IFAW comes in the wake of a number of high profile
cases in which professors have been forced from their
university. In June, tenured Ethnic Studies Professor
Ward Churchill at the University of Colorado-Boulder
was fired – many felt that he had been subjected to an
intense investigation solely because of his political
views. In May, prominent DePaul University political
scientist Norman Finkelstein was denied tenure, with
many DePaul faculty and others seeing it as an attempt
to punish one side of a controversial debate.

Together, these two cases were seen by many in
academia as part of a much broader attack on academic
freedom, critical thinking and dissent. Reggie Dylan
notes that “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week is a
dangerous offensive intended to deepen the already
serious chill in academia by bringing together an
aggressive social base and unleashing it on what
Horowitz calls the “tenured left.” He adds, “IFAW
cannot be allowed to go down unchallenged. It needs to
be thoroughly exposed, repudiated and politically
defeated.”

Ad Hoc Committee to Defend the University

Ad Hoc Committee to Defend the University

Many of us, on campuses and beyond, have been monitoring and condemning
the recent attacks on academic freedom, including the ever more
aggressive incursion of partisan politics into universities’ hiring and
tenure practices. Today a diverse group of academics and other
concerned individuals are joining together to collectively mark our
resistance to the current abrogation of academic freedom. We are
circulating the petition below and asking for both signatures of
support and financial contributions to underwrite the expense of publishing the
statement, with the names of its proponents, as a full page ad in the
New York Times.

If you would like to join this ad hoc committee, please let us know
immediately (defend.university@gmail.com ) and send a signed word of
confirmation, your institutional affiliation if any, and your
contribution, made out to the Ad Hoc Committee to Defend the
University,
c/o Joan Scott, at P.O. Box 240 Princeton New Jersey, 08540.

Visit our page at
http://defend.university.googlepages.com/home , where we are
maintaining a set of links to relevant reports and web sites, as well as a list of
signatories.

Please pass this message on to as many friends and colleagues as
possible.

Defend the University Organizing Committee: Joan Scott, Edmund Burke,
Jeremy Adelman, Steven Caton, & Jonathan Cole

The Ad Hoc Committee to Defend the University’s Petition

In recent years, universities across the country have been targeted by
outside groups seeking to influence what is taught and who can teach.
To achieve their political agendas, these groups have defamed scholars,
pressured administrators, and tried to bypass or subvert established
procedures of academic governance. As a consequence, faculty have been
denied jobs or tenure, and scholars have been denied public platforms
from which to share their viewpoints. This violates an important
principle of scholarship, the free exchange of ideas, subjecting them
to ideological and political tests. These attacks threaten academic
freedom and the core mission of institutions of higher education in a
democratic society.

Unfortunately and ironically, many of the most vociferous campaigns
targeting universities and their faculty have been launched by groups
portraying themselves as defenders of Israel. These groups have
targeted scholars who have expressed perspectives on Israeli policies
and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with which they disagree. To
silence those they consider their political enemies, they have used a
range of tactics such as:

* unfounded insinuations and allegations, in the media and on websites,
of anti-Semitism or sympathy for terrorism or “un-Americanism;”

* efforts to broaden definitions of anti-Semitism to include
scholarship and teaching that is critical of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East
and of Israel;

* pressures on university administrations by threatening to withhold
donations if faculty they have targeted are hired or awarded tenure;

* campaigns to deny scholars the opportunity to present their views to
the wider public;

* the promotion of efforts to restrict federal funding for area studies
programs and the teaching of critical languages on political grounds;

* lawsuits in the name of the “right” of individual students not to
hear ideas that may challenge or contradict their beliefs;

* and demands in the name of “balance” and “diversity” that those with
whom they disagree be prevented from speaking unless paired with
someone whose viewpoint they approve of.

The suppression of free speech undermines academic freedom and subverts
the norms of academic life. It poses a serious threat to institutions
of higher education in the United States. The university should be a
place where different interpretations can be explored and competing
ideas exchanged. Academic freedom means not only the right to pursue a
variety of interpretations, but the maintenance of standards of truth
and acceptability by one’s peers. It is university faculty, not outside
political groups with partisan political agenda, who are best able to
judge the quality of their peers’ research and teaching. This is not
just a question of academic autonomy, but of the future of a democratic
society. This is a time in which we need more thoughtful reflection
about the world, not less.

A study by a Harvard sociologist last summer found that “a greater
percentage of social scientists today feels their academic freedom has
been threatened than was the case during the McCarthy era.” It is time
to defend the norms of scholarship and the best traditions of the
academy.

We, the undersigned, therefore pledge:

* to speak out against those who attack our colleagues and our
universities in order to achieve their political goals;

* to urge university administrators and trustees to defend academic
freedom and the norms of academic life, even if it means incurring the
displeasure of non-scholarly groups, the media among them;

* to vigorously promote our views in the media and through the
Internet,
and to explain the importance of academic freedom to a sustainable and
vibrant democracy;

* to mobilize our students to defend the values and integrity of their
institutions.

The future of higher education in America, its role in our country’s
democracy, and its contribution to world affairs is at stake. We call
upon all citizens to join us in defending it!

University professors to strike after talks with government fail

Haaretz: University professors to strike after talks with government fail

The union of senior academic professionals on Thursday announced that university professors would begin striking on Sunday after negotiations with the Treasury and the Education Ministry over a new wage agreement failed to yield results.

The strike will delay the opening of the academic year, which was scheduled to begin October 21.

House bill reopens campus file-sharing battle

eSchool News: House bill reopens campus file-sharing battle

Two key members of the House Education and Labor Committee have rekindled Congressional efforts to make colleges use a technological approach to prevent so-called digital piracy of music and video files. Higher education leaders are, once again, up in arms.

Academic cesspools

Washington Times: Academic cesspools

Walter E. Williams

The average taxpayer and parents who foot the bill know little about the rot on many college campuses. “Indoctrinate U” is a recently released documentary, written and directed by Evan Coyne Maloney, that captures the tip of a disgusting iceberg. The trailer for “Indoctrinate U” can be seen at www.onthefencefilms.com/movies.html.

3 Ousted Professors Sue Founder and Dean of Ave Maria Law School

The Chronicle: 3 Ousted Professors Sue Founder and Dean of Ave Maria Law School

Three faculty members at Ave Maria School of Law have sued the school’s dean and board chairman, saying they were suspended in retaliation for reporting conduct by top law-school officials that they suspected was illegal.

The complaint was filed on Wednesday in a state court in Ann Arbor, Mich., against Thomas S. Monaghan, the law-school’s founder and chair of its Board of Governors, and Bernard Dobranski, the school’s president and dean. The law-school’s foundation was also named in the suit.

The plaintiffs, Stephen J. Safranek, Edward C. Lyons, and Philip A. Pucillo, have been involved in an acrimonious dispute over the Catholic law school’s planned move from Ann Arbor to property that Mr. Monaghan owns in southwestern Florida (The Chronicle, May 18). Mr. Monaghan, who made a fortune selling his Domino’s Pizza empire, holds a “significant financial interest” in the planned community of Ave Maria, Fla., and he has publicly said that the Virgin Mary directed him to develop the town and Ave Maria University there, according to the suit.

Boston U. to Spend $1.8-Billion on Faculty Hiring and Salary Increases

The Chronicle: Boston U. to Spend $1.8-Billion on Faculty Hiring and Salary Increases

Boston University unveiled on Thursday a 10-year, $1.8-billion effort to raise the institution’s academic profile by hiring 150 new full-time faculty members and substantially increasing faculty salaries.

“Dead” studies

The Boston Globe: A ‘Mindbender’ class

UMass teaching history through the prism of the Grateful Dead

Students shuffle into the morning history class to a dreamlike drone, a fog of fuzzy guitars, and sleepy harmonies. It’s a wistful, faraway sound, a lingering echo from a distant time.

Scientist Apologizes for Hurtful Remarks

AP: Scientist Apologizes for Hurtful Remarks

James Watson, the 79-year-old scientific icon made famous by his work in DNA, has set off an international furor with comments to a London newspaper about intelligence levels among blacks.