The Chronicle: When Research Criticizes an Industry
A professor says Idaho State U. gave too much deference to mining interests, at his expense; the administration says it did nothing wrong
When Robert W. Van Kirk released a study in January about selenium contamination in trout streams in southeastern Idaho, he expected some flak from the influential phosphate-mining industry. He didn’t expect to feel pressured by the administration of his own institution, Idaho State University, where he is an associate professor of mathematics.
His research, paid for by a local environmental group, indeed raised the hackles of mining interests. Executives of one major mine operator, the J.R. Simplot Company, called the university’s leaders about the study just days after it came out.
What about Larry?: Compare Chemerinsky’s tale with academia’s bashing of ex-Harvard chief Summers.
Los Angeles Times: Compare Chemerinsky’s tale with academia’s bashing of ex-Harvard chief Summers.
The saga of controversial liberal law professor Erwin Chemerinsky’s on-again, off-again deanship at the new UC Irvine law school was highly unusual in two ways. First, the pressure to enforce political orthodoxy at Chemerinsky’s expense came from the right, not the left, and second, academic freedom and 1st Amendment values won a resounding victory when Chemerinsky was ultimately rehired. A more typicalexample of how academic freedom remains in jeopardy across the country is the UC Board of Regents’ treatment of Larry Summers, the former president of Harvard University.
Comments Off on What about Larry?: Compare Chemerinsky’s tale with academia’s bashing of ex-Harvard chief Summers.
Posted in Commentary, Free speech