Academic boycott debate returns to UK

The Jerusalem Post: Academic boycott debate returns to UK

The academic and cultural boycott of Israel debate is likely to return this month as the trade union conference season, that began in April and culminates with the Trade Union Congress in September, continues.

The Association of University Teachers (AUT), which last year passed a motion calling for a boycott of the University of Haifa and Bar-Ilan University before it was eventually overturned, holds its conference this week.

It is believed the AUT will not have a boycott motion on the agenda, however a commission, set up by its Special Council after the overruling of the boycott motion, will propose that a boycott be used as a last resort and only implemented when requested by a trade union at a university or college concerned.

CSU trustee takes heat from students, faculty

State Hornet Online: CSU trustee takes heat from students, faculty

California State University Trustee William Hauck, who has led the charge to raise student fees and institute executive pay increases, according to the California Faculty Association, was the target of a May 3 rally in downtown Sacramento.

More than 200 student, faculty and staff protesters from CSUs, most with picket signs and some wearing graduation hats and gowns, chanted on the doorstep of the California Business Roundtable, located on 15th and K streets, voicing concerns about Hauck’s conflicting roles as president of the Business Roundtable and a CSU trustee.

The Business Roundtable co-founded and has helped fund the Campaign for College Opportunity, which promotes raising student fees.

CSU faculty furor over Munitz’s rehiring deal

San Francisco Chronicle: CSU faculty furor over Munitz’s rehiring deal; Ex-chancellor given one class, earns more than full professors

An association of California State University faculty members on Tuesday asked the state attorney general to investigate the recent rehiring of a former CSU chancellor to a teaching position at a high salary — eight years after he quit the university for another job.

Gallaudet board chief steps down

The Washington Post: Gallaudet board chief steps down

Celia May Baldwin, the interim head of the Gallaudet University board of trustees, has resigned from the board because of the stress of an emotional presidential search process that has sparked angry protests and “numerous aggressive threats” to her in recent weeks, according to a memo sent to the board secretary.

Accountability, Canadian Style

Inside Higher Ed: Accountability, Canadian Style

“It is essential to balance the government’s desire for accountability with the need to respect the dual cornerstones of the university: institutional autonomy and academic freedom.”

Sound familiar? It might to anyone who has been tracking the work of the U.S. Education Department commission studying American higher education, whose members’ oft-expressed desire to hold colleges more accountable for their performance in educating students effectively and efficiently has elicited occasional howls of protest from associations of colleges or faculty groups. But much as the above statement sounds like some of the things they’ve uttered, it came instead from a report released Monday by a faculty group in Ontario, about the Canadian province’s own fledgling accountability system.

Boston U. Paid $6.1-Million, Mostly in Deferred Compensation, to Its Former President in 2005

The Chronicle: Boston U. Paid $6.1-Million, Mostly in Deferred Compensation, to Its Former President in 2005

Boston University paid John R. Silber, its long-serving president and chancellor, who retired in 2003, about $6.1-million last year, mostly in deferred compensation, the university announced on Tuesday.

Mr. Silber, who remains the university’s president emeritus and lives in a university-owned residence, said in a written statement that approximately $3.3-million of the lump sum was earned as a deferred percentage of his annual salary, which averaged $96,000 per year over his 34-year tenure. Through investment, deferred compensation grew by $1.3-million, he said. The rest of the payment, about $1.5-million, was for housing, leave benefits, and insurance payments.

Gallaudet U. Faculty Votes No Confidence in President-Elect

Gallaudet U. Faculty Votes No Confidence in President-Elect

Faculty members of Gallaudet University approved on Monday night a motion of no confidence in Jane K. Fernandes, the embattled president-designate of the world’s only university devoted to educating deaf students.

Opponents say Ms. Fernandes, who is now the provost of the 1,900-student institution and is scheduled to become president in January, is not a strong enough advocate for deaf people at a time when their identity as a community is challenged. Many deaf people feel that advances in medical technology, which are restoring hearing to a degree unimaginable earlier, threaten the culture and hard-won dignity of the deaf.

Ms. Fernandes’s opponents have also criticized her leadership style and the selection process that led to her appointment.

Protests began minutes after the Board of Trustees announced its choice of Ms. Fernandes on May 1, and continued on Monday, with students still blocking the main entrance to the campus, in Washington. Some protesters were camping out in dozens of tents by the entrance, under banners proclaiming “Not without us.”

Stanford raises living wage for subcontracted workers

Stanford raises living wage for subcontracted workers

Stanford University will raise the living wage rate it requires contractors to pay their employees by more than 10 percent, President John Hennessy announced Monday.

The university decided to adjust the wage rates after reviewing comparable rates for a range of Bay Area municipalities that have living wage policies. Stanford raised the wage minimum for subcontracted employees who work on the university campus and receive health benefits from their employers to $11.15 per hour—a 10.4 percent increase. It raised the wage minimum for subcontracted employees who work on the university campus and do not receive health benefits to $12.59 per hour—a 10.9 percent increase. The new wage rates go into effect Sept. 1, 2006, the beginning of Stanford’s fiscal year.

Fact-checking David Horowitz

Inside Higher Ed: Fact-checking Horowitz

From the moment in February that David Horowitz’s new book appeared, scholars have been poking at it, identifying errors and what they consider to be distortions (even as Horowitz was praised by many conservative talk show hosts, who have helped him boost sales).

Today, a coalition of academic and civil liberties groups is releasing a more detailed analysis of the Horowitz book,The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America. In “Facts Count,” the debunking document being released today, Horowitz’s book is slammed as “sloppy in the extreme.” The analysis also says that the details included in the book suggest that Horowitz is not concerned with the students he says he is trying to protect, but is actually trying to punish professors whose views he doesn’t like.

Among the findings in “Facts Count”:

  • Horowitz does not cite a single example of a student having his or her grade changed because of political views — despite his repeated statements that the “Academic Bill of Rights” is needed to prevent such grade punishment. (That bill would bar such grade changes and would also require that a range of views be taught — a measure many professors say would require them to teach intelligent design or Holocaust denial, or risk getting sued.)
  • In 52 of the descriptions of professors Horowitz critiques, he does not cite a single classroom event or statement — despite his statement that his concern about professors is over what they do and say in the classroom.
  • Of all of the evidence offered in the book, 80 percent concerns non-classroom activities.
  • Professors who teach women’s studies or other alternative viewpoints are consistently criticized, regardless of the quality of their work or scholarship.
  • While Horowitz’s book promises a list of the 101 most dangerous academics, he actually includes only 100.
  • Quotes and facts from Horowitz about individual professors are incorrect and many quotes are “wildly out of context.”

Ex-president of Morris Brown pleads guilty to embezzling

Inside HigherEd:
Delores Cross, the former president of Morris Brown College, on Monday pleaded guilty to embezzling federal funds when she led the financially troubled historically black college in Atlanta, the Associated Press reported. Cross could face jail time under a plea agreement under which many other charges were dropped. Her lawyers told the AP that she admitted to having made some mistakes in failing to prevent problems, and that she wanted to help the college recover. Lawyers for Cross said they would push for minimal or no jail time because of an unspecified medical condition that Cross has.

Victory for Janitors at University of Miami is Second Win in a Week for Service Workers Uniting for Improvements at Major U.S. Campuses

CommonDreams Newswire: Victory for Janitors at University of Miami is Second Win in a Week for Service Workers Uniting for Improvements at Major U.S. Campuses

WASHINGTON – May 2 – Coming on the heels of a similar victory for janitors last week at Georgetown, 450 poverty-wage janitors at the University of Miami won an agreement yesterday that gives them the right to form a union and raise living standards for their families.

The agreement came after a two-month strike by hundreds of service workers at the UM, a 17-day hunger strike by 10 UM janitors and 6 UM students, and an outpouring of support from students, faculty, and religious leaders, as well as national leaders like former U.S. Senator John Edwards.

In a major national outreach effort to university faculty, nearly 1,000 professors from nearly 200 colleges and universities across the country – from UCLA to Yale, UT-Austin to the University of Michigan — signed a petition to UM President and former U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna Shalala.

The evolving (eroding?) faculty job

Inside Higher Ed: The evolving (eroding?) faculty job

A week ago, new data on faculty salaries showed that professors’ pay fell behind inflation for the second year in a row. A month ago, when a federal commission studying higher education released a paper on reasons that college costs so much, it identified professors — their power and tenure — as a prime culprit.Feeling underappreciated and under siege? Does your job feel unstable?

There’s a reason, according to two of the leading scholars of the professoriate. They have just finished what experts are calling a landmark study of the professoriate, which argues that we are experiencing “a revolution” in academic life that will be equal in its lasting significance to such events as the importation of the research university model to the United States in the late 19th century or the “massification” of higher education after World War II.

“Seismic shifts are profoundly changing how knowledge is acquired and transmitted,” and while it is unclear where these changes will lead the academy, it is certain that faculty jobs are changing — and changing in a big way. That is the central thesis of The American Faculty: The Restructuring of Academic Work and Careers, by Jack H. Schuster and Martin Finkelstein, just published by Johns Hopkins University Press.

Florida: UM campus split as strike escalates

Orlando Sentinel: UM campus split as strike escalates

CORAL GABLES — On campus, a handful of University of Miami students join hands with ministers who pray for the administrators watching their every move.

Across the street, under a white tent near Miami’s Metrorail tracks, a UM janitor makes up a dozen cots for the next round of hunger strikers who will quit eating for a day in a show of solidarity with maintenance workers who walked off their jobs March 1.

Now two months old, the strike at UM is roiling the once-tranquil campus near Miami. It’s prompted sit-ins and takeovers, arrests and hunger strikes, marches and countermarches, charges and countercharges, a trip to court and threats of disciplinary action against students who have camped out to defend the janitors’ cause.

New York: Gay-rights activists arrested at West Point

PoughkeepsieJournal.com: 21 gay-rights activists cited at West Point

Twenty-one gay-rights activists were arrested Wednesday after staging a protest against the Pentagon’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on the grounds of the U.S. Military Academy.

The West Point stop was the last on a 20-stop tour of conservative Christian and military colleges that Soulforce Equality Ride organizers say discriminate against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered people through their admissions policies.

“We are tired of being discriminated against, we are tired of being pushed in the closet, we’re tired of being told there’s not a place for us at the table,” organizer Jake Reitan told protesters.

Scholars and artists unite against Cuba policy

Progreso Weekly: Scholars and artists unite against Cuba policy

[Editorís Note: What follows is an initial statement of Cuban-American scholars, artists and intellectuals from throughout the U.S. who have come together under one umbrella which will be known as ENCASA to fight against current U.S. policy toward Cuba. To date, more than 45 individuals have already signed on from all corners of the country. They include a steering committee made up of MarÌa Isabel Alfonso and Lillian Manzor (University of Miami); Marta Caminero-Santangelo (University of Kansas); Max Castro (Independent Scholar); MarÌa Cristina GarcÌa (Cornell University); Liz Cerejido, Guillermo Grenier and Lisandro PÈrez (Florida International University); FÈlix Masud-Piloto (DePaul University); RubÈn G. Rumbaut (University of California, Irvine); and Silvia Wilhelm (Executive Director, Puentes Cubanos).]

ENCASA / U.S.-CUBA

Emergency Network of Cuban American Scholars and Artists for Change in U.S.-Cuba Policy

We are a group of Cuban American scholars and artists who have coalesced as a network of U.S. citizens opposed to current U.S. policy toward Cuba. We are committed to promoting reasoned debate in the public arena, to countering the stereotype of a monolithic Cuban-American community, to challenging the disproportionate influence of an unrepresentative sector out of touch with U.S. public opinion, and to help bring about an end to a failed policy that defies all sound principles for conducting foreign affairs.

By any measure, U.S. policy toward Cuba has been singularly unsuccessful for almost half a century. It has been a political and moral failure. The U.S.
embargo inflicts economic hardship on the Cuban people while denying opportunities to American farmers and business. Harsh travel restrictions infringe on the rights of American citizens and contribute to the trauma of separation of Cuban families. Laws intended to isolate Cuba internationally instead have alienated the U.S. from the rest of the world, especially its closest neighbors in this hemisphere, while earning the Cuban government sympathy and solidarity.

Time and again, from the Bay of Pigs to the Helms-Burton law, the policy of regime changeóin place since the Eisenhower administrationóhas backfired.
Increasingly, hard-line U.S. policies have done nothing but reinforce hard-line tendencies on the island. The Bush administration has taken this policy to an even more extreme level by adopting the 2004 Report to the
President: Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba (http://www.state.gov/p/wha/rt/cuba/). This singular track record of failure points to the need for a fundamentally different approach toward Cuba.

As U.S. citizens, we call for a new U.S. policy toward Cuba consistent with U.S. principles and ideals. Restrictions which bar U.S. citizens from traveling to Cuba, and which are not applied to any other nation in the world, curtail our fundamental freedoms. These restrictions pose an additional and inhumane hardship on Cuban families already suffering from often traumatic separations, as demonstrated by a recent Human Rights Watch report (ìFamilies Torn Apart: The High Cost of U.S. and Cuban Travel Restrictions,î http://hrw.org/reports/2005/cuba1005/).

New regulations on travel by Cuban-Americans to visit their families in Cuba restrict family visits to once every three years, providing no exception for medical and other emergencies. The restrictions also radically and absurdly redefine “family” in a way that excludes cousins, aunts and uncles, nieces and nephews. Such redefinitions are not in line with widely-held understandings of “familyî, especially in the context of Cuban cultural practices, and undermine and disregard the emotional and psychological importance of family ties.

New limitations in the number and dollar value of shipments to family members of such basic necessities as medicines and medical supplies, as well as the elimination of packages containing clothing, toilet paper, soap, and other basic necessities, are cruel and counter to humanitarian principles.
We insist that family values must include the freedom to visit and to send vital necessities to our families.

The tightened restrictions on travel also curtail the freedom of American citizens to pursue programs of cultural and educational exchange in Cuba.
The value of scholarly study about Cuba, as well as the right of U.S.
citizens to pursue such study, is seriously undermined, and the ideal of the free exchange of ideas is profoundly diminished. Further, the possibilities of contacts and exchanges of a religious and humanitarian nature between U.S. citizens and Cubans are seriously restricted. These limitations on the basic freedoms of U.S. citizens are unacceptable.

The Cuban nation has a long and proud record of struggle for self determination and defense of its sovereignty. For more than 500 years, Cubans have rejected and defeated colonialism, military interventions and foreign influences. The policy embraced by the Bush administration and spelled out in the 2004 Commission Report ignores and misreads Cuban history. Moreover, the policy attempts to negate the Cuban peopleís right to self determination and sovereignty by implying that the U.S. should have a major role in determining Cubaís future. Cubaís present and future must be determined by the Cuban people, not by the United States.

Just as we condemn U.S. policy over the last 47 years and the restrictions and violations of basic freedoms and rights in Cuba over the same period, we lament the climate of intolerance that exists in our own community. The only beneficiaries of this culture of intransigence are certain enterprises, politicians, and media personalities who have built careers and fortunes manipulating the pain of our community. Those who practice persecution or who use their money and influence to silence those in the Cuban American community who dissent from a false monolithic consensus undermine democracy and human rights here and in the homeland.

While Cuban American academics and public intellectualsóartists, writers, academics, philosophers, scientists, legal scholars and othersóhave at times played significant roles in efforts to change U.S.-Cuba policy as individuals, to date there has been no concerted participation of this sector of our community in the struggle to end an unjust and irrational approach toward Cuba. In Cuban history, intellectuals repeatedly acted as moral agents and catalysts for change. In the United States today, intellectuals continually come together to speak out on important causes, providing a moral compass to their society.

Drawing from those noble traditions of civic participation in both Cuba and the United Statesóand with a great sense of urgencyówe have organized ourselves to voice our outrage at a policy that is inhumane, unjust, ill-conceived, hypocritical, and contrary to American ideals. For too long, this debate has been dominated by one sector of our community. We are determined that no longer will others in our community speak for us as they continue to insist on taking this country down a misguided path that has served neither the best interests of the United States nor those of the Cuban people.

Copyright 2006© Progreso Weekly, Inc.

New Jersey: Princeton students pass “academic bill of rights”

Daily Princetonian: Referendum’s success comes as a surprise

In the wake of yesterday’s passage of the Student Bill of Rights, both liberals and conservatives students on campus have been left scratching their heads, asking themselves a simple question: How did this happen?

Few observers — including those who proposed the bill — expected the undergraduate body to approve the measure in this weekend’s referendum after opposition groups launched a campaign to sink it. Indeed, the bill passed with a slim majority, with 51.8 percent of students voting in favor.

New York: Jackson angers RPI faculty and students

Inside Higher Ed: Division at RPI

It would be hard to beat Shirley Ann Jackson’s résumé: First black woman to receive a doctorate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a physicist who led impressive research teams at Rutgers University and AT&T Bell Laboratories, chair of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and — since 1999 — president of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

When national commissions or universities want an expert on science and especially on diversifying the research work force (a topic on many minds since a certain university president managed to offend women nationwide with his thoughts on the topic), Jackson is the person to call. She publishes papers and captivates conferences.

Back in Troy, however, it turns out a lot of people are less than impressed. The faculty held a no confidence vote this week and while Jackson in some sense won the vote, the margin was quite narrow: 155 to 149 in her favor.

New York: Trying to raise the stakes at NYU

Inside Higher Ed: Trying to raise the stakes at NYU

Graduate students at New York University — on strike for months in hopes of saving their union — got support Thursday from the outgoing and incoming presidents of the American Association of University Professors, who were arrested for disorderly conduct for blocking a street in front of NYU.

Cary Nelson, the incoming president and a professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, said in an interview before his arrest (and that of Jane Buck, the departing president) that he saw Thursday’s actions as a “ramping up of resistance” to NYU. More than 50 others were also arrested, most of them NYU graduate students, plus a few graduate students from other institutions.

California: Palomar College faculty union optimistic about contract talks

SignOnSanDiego.com: Palomar College faculty union optimistic about contract talks

A new labor contract for faculty at Palomar College may be in sight after several fruitless negotiations about benefits proposals.

Yesterday, for the first time, Palomar administrators offered additional funds beyond the 4.23 percent retroactive raise, which was approved this week, said Shannon Lienhart, a member of the faculty’s bargaining team.

New York: Hundreds rally for union at NYU

NYC Indymedia: Hundreds rally for union at NYU

At 12 noon today, hundreds of GSOC members, faculty and undergraduate supporters, members of other graduate employee unions, and visiting dignitaries from across the labor movement met in Judson Memorial Church to hold a rally in celebration of the fact that GSOC/UAW 2110 has officially recertified its majority support among NYU graduate employees.