AI vs Humans

“Siri, please write my SCIE 300 blog post for me.” Unfortunately, Siri does not yet have the capability to form conscious thought and respond with an engaging response…but this idea may not be so far-fetched.

In recent studies, Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems from Alibaba and Microsoft performed better than humans on reading comprehension tests. Although this AI innovation threatens to displace some human jobs, the practical applications of this technology in customer service and other professional sectors show extraordinary potential in saving time and human efforts.

Source: https://cumanagement.com/sites/default/files/2018-09/AI-human-heads.jpg

In the study, AI machines were subjected to Stanford University’s SQuAD, a reading comprehension test based on Wikipedia articles. Humans scored an average of 82.304, while Alibaba’s machine learning model scored 82.44 and Microsoft’s scored 82.65. I found this innovation interesting because reading comprehension is a complex task involving language understanding, critical thinking, and problem solving. The thought of computers surpassing humans in these areas both scares and fascinates me.

Alibaba’s AI software is a deep neural network model based on Natural Language Processing (NLP) using the Hierarchical Attention Network. It can read in order to identify phrases that could contain potential answers. Currently, the model only works well with questions that have clear answers. If inquiries are too vague, or if there are no clearly prepared solutions, the system may not work. Despite these hiccups, the impact of this underlying technology is incredibly widespread. It is already being expanded and utilized in customer service jobs, such as call-centers, food service, retail, and online inquiry management. Alibaba has already employed this technology in its AI-powered customer service chatbot which answers millions of online shoppers’ questions.

After Alibaba and Microsoft announced the ability of their AIs, there has been a looming fear that machines will take over human jobs. This new technology could indeed mean that we could codify routine jobs, even those that require social interaction (like answering customer inquiries) into a series of machine-readable instructions.

As this technological automation occurs, companies may deploy more bot technology, potentially displacing human jobs. However, with the current technology, AIs are not yet capable of fully understanding and responding to customers as a human could, and are thus unable to fully replace most jobs. Entirely new job sectors will also arise as technology develops and grows, especially in fields such as data science and computer engineering. Looking further, this innovation could lead to more advanced bots capable of solving more complex problems, including social and political issues such as climate change or resource allocation.

– Angela Wei

Image

No Resistance: An Introduction to Superconductivity

Technologies like magnetometry (the measure of magnetism) and magnetic resonance imaging rely on the strength of magnetic fields. With increasing need for experimental precision and control, new physics are sought after to develop stronger electromagnets. One way is to eliminate a material’s electrical resistance. This is known as superconductivity. Herein we discuss what superconductivity is.

In physics we learn that electrons may be excited into higher energy states. We can excite electrons using energy carried by light (known as photoexcitation).

Semiconductors respond to photoexcitations. These are materials that exhibit an electrical resistance unlike that of insulators or conductors. Their electronic behaviour, the way that electrons “move” through the material, is often temperature dependent. All light carries energy. If this energy is absorbed by matter, the matter heats up. It is this heat that excites electrons, so we can use light to change the electronic behaviour of semiconductors. This makes them useful objects of study.

For simplicity, we treat these semiconductors as patterned arrangements of atoms (called a lattice). Where there are “gaps” in the arrangement, for not every lattice is densely packed, we imagine varying densities of electrons. It is reasonable to imagine these electrons as a cloud that pervades the atomic arrangement. If we excite the semiconductor with light, this electron cloud may change, thereby changing the semiconductor’s electronic behaviour.

Where does superconductivity arise? As mentioned, semiconductors are temperature dependent, so they respond to heating (in our example, by way of photoexcitation). What if we cool a semiconductor instead? As a general rule, the electrical resistance of a semiconductor increases as its temperature decreases. However, when cooled to a temperature near absolute zero (the semiconductor’s critical temperature), its electrical resistance vanishes. All magnetic field lines, like those seen with iron filings dropped around a bar magnet, are expelled from the interior of the semiconductor.

“Levitation of a magnet on a superconductor” (source: Wikimedia Commons, available under CC BY-SA 3.0)

This bizarre property of matter, while it is not universal, is the direct consequence of a lack of electron excitations. Recall that excited electrons (like those in an electronic circuit) emit energy as they relax. This energy is absorbed by matter, so energy is lost as heat. Electrons also need somewhere (i.e. a higher energy state) to be excited towards. This “somewhere” is unique to the material, so the material determines how and where electrons are excited.

“Overview of superconducting critical temperatures for a variety of superconducting materials since the first discovery in 1911” (source: Wikimedia Commons, available under CC BY-SA 4.0)

Supercooled materials lose many pathways to these higher energy states, so their electrons are never excited unwillingly, so no energy is lost as heat. Since electrical resistance in semiconductors is temperature dependent, a supercooled and thereby “heat-less” semiconductor has zero electrical resistance. It is superconductive.

– Eric Easthope

The systematic study of candidate superconductors (like bismuth selenide) is ongoing at UBC’s Stewart Blusson Quantum Matter Institute.

Source: General Chemistry: Principles, Patterns, and Applications (2012). Saylor Academy. Available here under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

Artificial Intelligence: Should we be concerned?

Faster, efficient and predictable. These are some of the qualities that make a computer better than humans at computation and analysis of data. Ever since the first computer was made, the key difference between a human and computer has been intelligence. It is the reason humans use computers and not the other way around. However, if a computer were to have intelligence, to what extent would it affect humans? And on how large a scale?

The most common conception of artificial intelligence is a computer of superhuman intelligence capable of outthinking a human. In reality, most of this is true. Take for example a complex game like chess, a chess grandmaster cannot beat AlphaZeroGo (AI). AlphaZeroGo was beaten 100-0 by AlphaZero. OpenAI’s bot managed to beat the world’s top Dota(online multiplayer game) players in 1-v-1 games. It is on course to beating them in 5-v-5 games where the five on the computer’s side is really a one.

Why should this be concerning? Proffessionals in these games have spent thousands of hours practicing. The computer has only spent a few hundred, if not less. The computer does not have the rules of these games written in it’s code. It is allowed to form them; an act of intelligence. The computer can train tirelessly against itself to get better.

Sebastian Thrun
Attribution: World Economic Forum [CC BY-SA 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

The impact of artificial intelligence is not limited to games. Sebastian Thrun of Udacity (an online educational organization) and his colleagues have trained AI in various fields. One of them is an AI that drives car autonomously. This was done in a span of 3 months. Dermatologists train for several years to get proficient at identifying skin cancer. In late 2017, one of the world’s top dermatologists was looked at a mole on a patient’s skin and deduced that it was not cancer. To back their diagnosis, they used Thrun’s AI (different from self driving AI) through their phone which concluded that it was skin cancer. A biopsy revealed an aggressive form of melanoma. Link

Elon Musk
Attribution: Steve Jurvetson [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Why would this be a cause for concern? Elon Musk has been heavily involved in the field of artificial intelligence and he has been recorded stating his concerns about AI on multiple occassions. He has claimed that AI is more dangerous than nuclear weapons. Link Why do some share this concern while others do not? This can be answered by explaining what AI is and what it is not.

AI is most cases deals with a specialized domain. It is trained through a process called Deep Learning. It can be trained to get better than humans, but at specific tasks. For example, Thrun’s self driving AI cannot control a motorcyle on the same road or beat someone at Chess. An AI proficient in multiple domains does not exist at this time. Moreover, there is no governing body to monitor the fabrication of AI.

In conclusion, better communication of science behind AI can help curb the concerns over it and hopefully lead to formation of a body of governance.

This video describes the common misconceptions about artificial intelligence.
Attribution: TED Talks, via YouTube

https://youtu.be/B-Osn1gMNtw

Elon Musk is seen here expressing his concerns about AI.
Attribution: SXSW, via YouTube

Can one brain have two minds?

Imagine a knife slicing down right in the middle of your brain and splitting it into two separate halves. This is the result of a corpus callosotomy.

Picture

A summary of the functions for the left brain and right brain

The brain is commonly believed to be split into the left hemisphere, the logical side, and right hemisphere, the artistic side. These two halves are usually joined together by the corpus callosum, a fibre tissue that allows internal communication between the halves. However, people with refractory epilepsy or some traumatic accidents have the corpus callosum removed as a treatment and this creates a split brain.

There have been researches such as the one conducted by Roger Sperry that have proven the isolation of each half of the brain. This led to the proof that each hemisphere will have its own perception and impulses to act. Additionally, there have been cases where people with a split brain have reported conflicts in their lives. For instance, when one split-brain patient dressed, he sometimes pulled his pants up with one hand and down with the other due to the conflicting actions in each half of the brain. Luckily, conflicts like this seldom occur and even if a conflict does appear, one hemisphere usually takes control over the other half.

These results leave a lot of researchers questioning, do split-brain patients have two minds? Imagine having the one side of the brain deciding to punch someone with your left hand and the half of the brain controlling the right-hand tries to stop the action.

A study in 2017 found strong evidence against the split conscious theory. Yair Pinto and his team conducted a series of tests on two patients. In one of the tests, the patients were placed in front of a screen and shown various objects displayed in several locations. The patients were then asked to confirm whether an object appeared and to indicate its location. In another test, they had to correctly name the object they had seen, a notorious difficulty among spit-brain patients.  One of the patients went through all the tests using only his right visual field and the other patient only used his left visual field. Shockingly, the results have proven the unity of the two brains since the patients were able to respond correctly by using their left hand, right hand, or verbally. However, the experiment has not been replicated yet due to the difficulty in finding participants.

This new finding led to a new debate between the scientists regarding the existence of two separate minds in one brain. Here is a full video of the long debate on September, 18,2018 between Elizabeth Schechter, who stands for the two-mind view starts her explanation at 9:26, Yair Pinto, who debates for the one-mind view starts his point of view at 25:00, and Joseph Ledoux, who has an intermediate view starts at 47:27, (uploaded by NYU Center for Mind, Brain and Consciousness).

In all, even though the answer to this question is still undetermined. If the existence of two minds in one brain is proven, this leads to the question of, are we really the individual we think we are or is there someone else living within us?

– Eric Ma

Global Warming and Mountain living species Extinction. No place to live!

Scientists believe that the global temperature will continue to rise for future decades due to climate change and global warming, which will impact the whole ecosystem severely. One big issue that scientists found in recent years is called “Elevational Range Shift”. Each species that lives in a different range and altitude of mountains, together form a balance in mountain ecosystem. As the temperature continuously increase, many species, especially those living in the mid and high elevation of mountains, seek to escape from the warming original habitats and move towards higher ground. However, the living space in mountaintops is limited. What will happen to those creatures that have already lived at the highest levels and cannot go any higher? The only ending is the extension. In recent several years, more evidence have shown that species’ geographic range shift had arose and constituted an elevational extinction to species that live in mountains.

In November 2018, Dr Benjamin Freeman, from the University of British Columbia, published an article showing evidence about impacts of recent temperature warming on high-elevation birds species abundance declination and extinction in Peruvian Andes Mountains. Peruvian Andes is a tropical mountain located in the western edge of South America, with an average height of about 4,000m and host abundant types of species. Tropical species, especially birds, born and live within one particulate section of woods and don’t migrate.

A scarlet-breasted bird lives at high elevations on the Cerro de Pantiacolla in Peru. Source: BBC News

“It is only got a little bit warmer in the tropics and tropical animals seen to live a bit higher now than they used to,” told by Dr. Freeman to BBC News report.

The research team conducted a survey in 2017 of bird species that lived on a mountain peak by using same methods and at same time of year as a pervious survey carried out in 1985. They compared the results and found that the average living range had shifted upwards of the slope and most bird species that are found at the highest elevation had already declined in population and range significantly. Of the 16 species of tropical birds that had been recorded living at high elevation of the study area in previous survey, 8 had disappeared in the new survey in 2017.

Comparative species richness patterns for recent and historical. Source: PLOS

In contrast, scientists found that low elevation living bird species of the mountain get benefits from climate change by expanding their habitats range as they shift their upper living limits upslope. But current increasing in abundance still cannot guarantee that these birds will not face to the problem of run out of habitats.

What about the non-mobile species, like plants? Scientists believe that plants may be unable to shift according to the data showing that about 88% plant species show weak to no evidence of range shift. The main reason is due to plants’ dispersal limitation. Plant need other species, such as birds, or external force like wind to disperse seeds, which may not be quickly enough to keep peace with climate change.

In conclusion, the escalator to extinction will be even worse in the future if temperature continuously rising. “The way to deal with it is to maintain protected habitat corridors that stretch across large elevational gradients.” told by Dr. Freeman to BBC News.

– Jingyi Cheng

No Snow On Date Night

A speck of white twinkled as it fell across the night sky, silent as it danced in the cold wind. She smiled in willful ignorance, praying what she had seen was impossible. Her head tilted, shoulders twitching in anxiety, hoping the one across from her had not noticed. Meanwhile, he felt the itch too, terrified as he glanced at the light fluff drifting onto the table before returning an anxious gaze. The winter was cold, snow was inevitable, but alas… no snow was forecasted for the next week. This is the tragedy of two consenting more than friends trying to figure it out, and their mutual but private battle with an affliction affecting 50 percent of all humans. This is dandruff.

What is Dandruff

Although these white flakes are most noticeable in your hair and on your clothes, dandruff isn’t really a hair condition but is actually due to your scalp. Naturally, your body produces skin cells constantly, and as they travel to the surface of the skin, the epidermis, the old cells fall off. For most, these cells are too small to be noticeable, but for others, when these cells clump together they can be rather large. These larger clumps of dead skin cells are commonly referred to as dandruff.

A woman struggling with dandruff @artem_goncharov

What Causes Dandruff

Dandruff affects about 50% of the population and the exact cause of it is actually unknown. Although, in recent studies, the yeast, Malassezia, is found to play a role in producing dandruff. When reducing the population of Malassezia in the scalp, amounts of flakes have been found to improve. But what is Malassezia and what does it do? Malassezia is a fungus that lives on the scalp where it, unfortunately, happens to be an ideal environment for it to survive. Here it releases enzymes that metabolize fat molecules, this produces oleic acids that are found to irritate the scalp. As a defense mechanism, your scalp can increase the rate it produces skin cells, sometimes causing a months worth of skin cells to appear on the surface in time frames as short as seven days.

Treatments for Dandruff

Many shampoos advertise being good treatments for dandruff but the ideal shampoo should contain anti-fungal or anti-yeast ingredients. A few common examples, found in Selsun and many other anti-dandruff shampoos, are zinc pyrithione and selenium sulfide which have the property of slowing down the growth of yeasts. When used in shampoo’s these ingredients are found to aid in reducing the increased production of skin cells by slowing down the metabolism of Malassezia for people that are dandruff-prone. 

The video, “Dandruff | How To Get Rid Of Dandruff (2018)” by AbrahamThePharmacist, below basically sums up everything I’ve gone over with the exception of stating that Malassezia is the main cause of shampoo as literature states that there is limited research stating such. 

 

Conclusion

Although we don’t have either confident cause or a concrete solution to dandruff, in using shampoos with anti-fungal ingredients this embarrassing condition can be minimized.

-Nelson Bulaun

New Wireless Pacemaker Offers Treatment for Parkinson’s Disease

In Canada, over 10,000 people are currently living with Parkinson’s disease with an additional 6,600 new cases being diagnosed every year. The disease is caused by a loss of dopamine producing nerve cells. Without this vital neurotransmitter the nerves are unable to control body movements efficiently. As Parkinson’s advances, movements such as walking and talking become heavily affected. Due to the complexity of this disease, the reason behind the nerve damage is very difficult to determine. Thus, researchers are focusing on ways to alleviate patients’ difficulty in movement. Most recently, UC Berkeley scientists have discovered a new neurostimulator, WAND, that could change the course of neurological disorder treatment, especially Parkinson’s.

The most effective method of Parkinson’s treatment is the implantation of a neurostimulator device to the brain. This is very similar to a cardiac pacemaker; in which it is able to maintain appropriate circuits in the brain. The dysfunctional areas of the brain are targeted by electrical signals that block any irregular brain waves.

The most used neurostimulator is the deep brain stimulation (DBS) device. As seen in the video below, the DBS electrode is implanted near target areas, with wires passing under the skin down to the shoulders and connected to the neurostimulator in the chest. The patient after recovery is provided with a remote or magnet that allows for the stimulator to be turned on and off at home. While this treatment has been seen to be mostly effective, the surgery process and control of the device can be very strenuous, especially considering the advanced age of most Parkinson’s patients. Therefore, UC Berkeley researchers have developed a new neurostimulator, called WAND, that is smaller and much more advanced in capabilities.

WAND or wireless artifact-free neuromodulation device, contains wireless and autonomous capabilities. This means that the device once trained to recognize signs of tremors or seizures, is able to adjust the stimulation parameters and apply electrical signals on its own. WAND is also able to record brain wave activity while applying the treatment. These recordings would allow doctors to see how the patient is reacting during and after the treatment. This is a large advancement from the typical DBS treatments which either stop recording or record away from the target region.

Newly Developed WAND Device. Source: Rikky Muller, UC Berkeley

To test its effectivity, researchers applied the device in a study that taught subjects to use a joystick to move a cursor. WAND was able to detect the neural signatures that preceded the joystick motion, and delay it by applying electrical stimulation. Thus, showing that the closed-loop system and neurological recordings worked more effectively in a demonstration done by previous DBS devices.

In all, WAND is a brilliant new technology that is cost-effective, time-effective, and saves patient’s the worry of having to apply their own electrical stimulations. The device is able to treat and record simultaneously, which builds an up-to-date record of treatment. While there is still much research needed to look at potential side effects, this technology gives hopes to Parkinson’s patients of returning to their former, healthy selves.

          Arrthy Thayaparan

The technological singularity: Science fiction or science future?

What would happen if we programmed a computer to design a faster, more efficient computer? Well, if all went according to plan, we’d get a faster, more efficient computer. Now, we’ll assign this newly designed computer the same task: improve on your own design. It does so, faster (and more efficiently), and we iterate on this process, accelerating onwards. Towards what? Merely a better computer? Would this iterative design process ever slow down, ever hit a wall? After enough iterations, would we even recognize the hardware and software devised by these ever-increasingly capable systems? As it turns out, these could potentially be some of the most important questions our species will ever ask.

In 1965, Gordon Moore, then CEO of Intel, wrote a paper describing a simple observation: every year, the number of components in an integrated circuit (computer chip) seemed to double. This roughly corresponds to a doubling of performance, as manufacturers can fit twice the “computing power” on the same-sized chip. Ten years later, Moore’s observation remained accurate, and around this same time, an eminent Caltech professor popularized the principle under the title of “Moore’s law”. Although current technology is brushing up against theoretical physical limits of size (there is a theoretical “minimum size” transistor, limited by quantum mechanics), Moore’s law has more-or-less held steady throughout the last four and a half decades.

Moore’s Law, illustrated. Source: Our World in Data

This performance trend represents an exponential increase over time. Exponential change underpins Ray Kurzweil’s “law of accelerating returns” — in the context of technology, accelerating returns mean that the technology improves at a rate proportional to its quality. Does this sound familiar? This is certainly the kind of acceleration we anticipated with computers designing computers. This is what is meant by the concept of a singularity — once the conditions for accelerating returns are met, those advances begin to spiral beyond our understanding, if not our control.

This concept is perhaps most easily applied to artificial intelligence (AI):

Let us suppose that the technological trends most relevant to AI and neurotechnology maintain their accelerating momentum, precipitating the ability to engineer the stuff of mind, to synthesize and manipulate the very machinery of intelligence. At this point, intelligence itself, whether artificial or human, would become subject to the law of accelerating returns, and from here to a technological singularity is but a small leap of faith. — Murray Shanahan, The Technological Singularity, MIT Press

Clearly, there is reason to wade cautiously into these teeming depths. In his excellent TED Talk, the world-renowned AI philosopher Nick Bostrom suggests that, though the advent of machine superintelligence remains decades away, it would be prudent to address its lurking dangers as far in advance as possible.

Source: TED

— Ricky C.

I agree to all terms and conditions … Or do I?

In this day and age so much of what we do is shared on different platforms of social media that the notion of privacy is limited to having a private account. We open an account by providing a name and a picture and once we are in the system, one by one we begin adding more insight into who we are and what we do. We snap a picture of our outfit, take google recommendations for where to dine out and post a story of the meal we eat. Our urge to participate so actively on social media isn’t solely rooted in our desire to share but stems from us being innately social creatures who are inherently curious.
It didn’t take long for corporation to cultivate our curiosity and take data collection to a whole new level. Genealogy and ancestry companies, in the name of providing us with medical information and lineage tracing, now have access to what’s most personal to us, the code to our being.
It has now become posh and trendy to pay $100 to companies such as 23andme to find out what diseases we are prone to and where we have originated from. What we get as a result may not necessarily add much significance to our lives, but it provides those companies with pools of golden data. I stress the word “necessarily” as tendencies do not translate to definite diagnosis and a long list of places we get, does not provide us with much insight of where we originate from. On the other hand, companies like 23andme now have access to data that once took researchers years to gather.

How it works by 23andme

One might argue that having a DNA bank has in fact facilitated research by providing more detailed data. Additionally, DNA banks have revolutionized solving of murder and rape crimes. It is also illegal in Canada for such companies to sell this data to insurance and employment companies. However, the controversy does not lie in what is done to the data once collected, but whether or not the selling of it is considered an invasion of our privacy. We might have quickly scrolled down to check the “agree with the terms” button; or have even read the terms fully and agreed- which I highly doubt- but does that provide them with jurisdiction to use such personal knowledge in a research I did not consent to? How does DNA sequencing deidentifies a subject and how is my anonymity preserved? I can delete my Facebook account, get a new credit card, change my name, but I can never reclaim my DNA data.