I found ZDnet report very concise and th…
I found ZDnet report very concise and therefore useful to me. I would recommend it, it gave me opportunity to look things up that I didn’t know about, and explore them on my own (some hyper links are provided).On the contrary, someone looking for a research report that is more in depth might find the ZDnet report a little too brief, as they may be thirsty for more than 4-5 sentences on each trend prediction.
I was skeptical at the beginning of the report because of who was doing the predictions. Adam Garry, who works for Dell, I thought could be biased and end up pushing something that he is working on or selling. His main trend for 2011 was ‘platforms, platforms, platforms’. Not shockingly, at the end of his predictions a plug is thrown in for Dell’s Inspiron Duo (netbook platform and Connected Classroom), which “allows students to consume information as needed and easily switch to content production whenever they wanted”. Surprise, surprise.
Because this article came from December 2010, I was interested to see how many trends have come true.I realized though that it is difficult for me to judge, since I have been teaching out of North America for the last two years.
If someone had some cash and wanted to invest in ET, a 2012 similar trend prediction from these guys could be a good start. The article could inspire thoughts of “hey these guys think it’s going this way…they know more than me…maybe I should look into trend further”. One prediction that I have seen come true to some extent, was the idea of personalized learning. Although I haven’t seen it in schools, there are second language web businesses (pimsleurapproach.com) that takes student input to shape the delivery of instruction. What the individual wants to learn and what works best for him/her is what they get (I’ve seen a lot of people try to learn Chinese, and this site has shown the fastest results).
I would read this report again for my own career (I like concise), and it made me wonder, “What would the 2013 predictions entail?” My feeling is that there will be a lot of overlap between the 2011 predictions and the 2013. Perhaps giving 1 year predictions is too short for most of these ideas.To see widespread change to the industry, we might need a larger window to allow the slow wheels to turn.
I agreed with one of the criticisms from the message board:
“All this sounds great… except Chris and Adam—and so many others—seem to have forgotten that there is still a huge digital divide for low-income communities. Significant majorities of our students’ families (in Watsonville, CA) have NO computer or Internet at home, and aren’t about to run out and buy iPads, so all these great innovative possibilities—which I would LOVE to see in our schools—are not going to be very helpful… And as more of ed goes this way, the further marginalized become our poor families.”
-taltenberg
Socio-economics and geography play a large part in to the speed and ability of these trends to come to fruition. As taltenberg illustrates, even within a tech savvy state of a tech-savvy country, there is still a pattern of uneven development.
Posted in: Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace
Mike Rae 7:09 pm on September 12, 2012 Permalink | Log in to Reply
lesson learned: copy and pasting from Word may cause the beginning of the post to look like hell
Doug Connery 7:11 pm on September 12, 2012 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Hi Mike:
Yes I found that as well but manged to delete the coding before I posted it live. You can go in and edit your post later to delete the excess stuff.
Doug.
Doug.
Mike Rae 7:38 pm on September 12, 2012 Permalink | Log in to Reply
nice…thanks doug
Colin 9:21 pm on September 12, 2012 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Hi Mike, I agree with that a 1 year prediction window is too small when determining future trends. I think it would take several years for most of his predictions to happen.
jkotler 3:21 am on September 13, 2012 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Hi Mike,
I too have wondered what approaches could be taken to ameliorate the divide between those who have access and benefit from new technologies and those who cannot. Or better yet, what alternatives can be implemented so as to make those students feel a little less marginalized? What suggestions would you put forward?
adi 8:50 am on September 13, 2012 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the post; it inspired curiosity and I delved into several web pages to check things out. It turns you are right in taking the information from ZDNet cautiously, but not only because Adam Garry works for Dell, but because of who ZDNet is. It turns out ZDNet is quite a profitable company presently owned by CBS Corporation; they even accept advertising. Knowing this explains why the major predictions this guy makes are promoting tolls owned by major companies: Dell’s platform; Live@Edu (Microsoft); Journ(i)e (Blackboard); not one mention is made of OERs other open sources. When I couple this with the OECD information about how schools are failing to integrate technology and really make a change in education, I wonder if it’s not because we’re working backwards; instead of educators saying this is what I do and so I need this type of tool, we’re allowing companies to create needs that are not there.
Perhaps where his predictions are correct given the statistics provided by the OECD report on ‘Trades Shaping Education 2010’, is the need for personalized learning; however, I’m not sure this necessarily means LMS systems will disappear, rather we will see more open sourced options. The context of differientiated instruction is that of a community of learning, while that of personalized instruction is a solo act, and there’s room for both. His prediction on tablets and etextbooksis also right, but we need to find more ways to exploit this ability to become mobile learners and educators.
Adriana
Jonathan 8:33 pm on September 13, 2012 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Mike – I read the article initially with the mindset with a critical eye, as I would for our coursework, however, I found myself quickly relaxing my stance as I shifted my viewpoint to one of a fan of technology. I became less critical and was just enjoying the article as a general consumer. I couldn’t agree with you more on the Dell involvement. I thought it was fishy and I chuckled with the plug for their own product. His mention got me curious about the product, but I wasn’t able to find too much about the platform other than some general information. Do you have experience with it? I’m well aware of the Dell Duo Netbooks.
Adriana — Thanks for doing the extra research. I took it an extra step further to dig into Dawson’s previous predictions and found that while he was involved in ZDNET Education articles, he is just an informed writer, sharing opinions and thoughts. Naturally he’s catering to a wider audience and he does have yearly predictions. What is interesting about ZDNET and many of these firms as you’ve mentioned is that they are all intricately tightly wound together. I’m more hesitant with regards to some people reviewing products now because of this. Often reviewers feel inclined to give positive ratings just so they can continue to receive products. It’d interesting to know if this is a collegial friendship or one that was setup by ZDNET and advertising itself 🙂
kstackhouse 1:34 pm on September 14, 2012 Permalink | Log in to Reply
I also enjoyed the hyperlinks in this report and the NMC 2012 Horizon report. I think that I would not rely on one of these reports. I would be more likely to check out a few. Having the links would allow me to go from one report to another and gather the information I want without being bogged down with extras.