COMM 296 – 26/03/2013 – My experience of “PUSH vs. PULL”

While learning; it is often more efficient to bring practice to theory. When these two elements are finally combined in harmony, one experiences a feeling of empowerment. 🙂 When we addressed in class the distinction between PUSH and PULL in promotional strategies; theory joined practice for me…  I’m now happy to share with you my experience of “PUSH vs. PULL”.

I have been a member of the French scout association Les Scouts et Guides de France since the age of 8 and I shall acknowledge the contribution of scouting in my childhood: I learned a lot and gained a lot of confidence. I have also tried to give back by becoming a scout leader and organizing nationally and internationally scout fora for young adults on the topics of Citizenship, Youth Participation to decision-making and Project Management. The 1st Inter-Regional Agora in April 2012 was one of them. It gathered in Switzerland during 5 days 43 participants from 26 countries.

Our target segment were Continue reading

COMM 101 – 08/10/2012 – The Blue Ocean Strategy

Michael E. Porter’s Generic Strategies imply a value-cost trade-off according to which companies can either create greater value to customer at a higher cost, or create reasonable value at a lower cost. However, another strategy pursuing both differentiation and low cost simultaneously exists: the Blue Ocean Strategy. Developed by W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne; the Blue Ocean Strategy contrasts with the red ocean metaphor. The idea is that a company doesn’t compete anymore to get a bigger market share than the other competing sharks in the bloodied existing market space but creates a new market to swim in a new blue ocean.

The success of the Cirque du Soleil is a good example of the Blue Ocean Strategy. Since they were the first ones with shows combining street performers, acrobats and gymnasts in intercultural theater and dance dramas, they reconstructed the market’s boundaries. They created an uncontested market space and made competition irrelevant. Consequently, they created and captured a new demand. Furthermore, they did not behave monopolistically and priced their “product” strategically to win a massive public resulting in a win-win situation for the spectators (value proposition), for the Cirque (profit proposition) and for the artists (people proposition). Their strategy is illustrated in the following strategy canvas:If attending a show remains expensive (≈ $100 for the show ‘O’), it is because of the focus put on creativity. No lack of means should impair the performance of the artists. For instance, to set the Bellagio Hotel built for ‘O’ in Las Vegas was $75 million. Such costs justify the pricing of the tickets. The artists’ needs must be satisfied for the Cirque to ensure its success, the viability of its business model and, of course, the stars shining in the eyes of its amazed spectators.

Sources:
www.blueoceanstrategy.com
www.sixpathsconsulting.com/blue_ocean_strategy.htm