What does the world look like when you map it using data? Social geographer Danny Dorling invites us to see the world anew, with his captivating and insightful maps that show Earth as it truly is — a connected, ever-changing and fascinating place in which we all belong. You’ll never look at a map the same way again.
Daily Archives: May 29, 2017
FollowMAPS OF BRUTALIST ARCHITECTURE
Post by Natalina Lopez. October 14th 2016
“As more and more examples of classic Brutalism face demolition by neglect, we hope that putting these examples of D.C.’s Brutalist architecture on the map will foster public appreciation that ensures their longevity, said Madsen. “
City Guide publisher Blue Crow Media and Deane Madsen, Associate Editor of Design at Architect Magazine, have collaborated to produce the Brutalist Washington Map, which features 40 examples of Brutalist architecture in Washington, D.C. This is Blue Crowe’s fourth architectural guide map, following their Brutalist London Map, Art Deco London Map, and Constructivist Moscow Map. One can only expect further releases on the horizon.
For further reading and interest of this article please reach the link below.
From: http://www.archdaily.com/797164/new-map-celebrates-washington-s-brutalist-architecture
38 Maps They Didn’t Teach You At School
Let’s visit the link below. You can find many interesting subjects of these maps and they may be helpful to you to extend your imagination beyond the regular topics of mapping.
http://www.boredpanda.com/interesting-maps/
If you are interested in inequality, this is your site
An interesting look at what we could consider a map – The First Maps of the Internet – ARPA NETWORK, LOGICAL MAP, MAY 1973
Also, related to this here is a geographically depicted map of the map above. The First Map of the Internet:
Sam
A Closer Look at Jelly NYC
I found it interesting to take a closer look at Liz Hickok’s project “Fugitive Geography: Jelly NYC,” which was featured in Harmon’s You Are Here: NYC. On her website, she describes her process and intent, and includes photographs of the installation. The photographs give the project a different sense of scale compared to the human body, and begin to represent how you would see and interact with a map made out of Jell-O.
“Working with Jell-O and other gelatinous materials enabled me to play the role of architect and reimagine New York City. The material took unexpected turns as it bent, glistened and melted, revealing the hidden fragility of the familiar city grid. The buildings in Jelly NYC assume a human quality as they lean on one another for support.”
(Liz Hickok)
From “You Are Here, Mapping the Psychogeography of New York City” Exhibition at Pratt Manhattan Gallery, NY
600 years of war and peace, in one chart
Article from: Vox
You would not know it from the headlines, but today we’re living through one of the most peaceful times in human history.This great chart from Oxford‘s Max Roser — which shows the global death rate from war over the past 600-plus years — shows just how lucky we are.
The red line in Roser’s chart shows the worldwide rate of war deaths per 100,000 people, streamlined over a 15-year moving average. Each red dot shows an individual war or episode of killing; larger dots mean more people died. The blue line, based on a different data set, shows combatant casualties only.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3816326/ourworldindata_wars-long-run-military-civilian-fatalities-from-brecke1.0.png)
What you basically see is a pretty consistent amount of war over the centuries — but with some of the highest highs and lowest lows in the 20th century.
The red line stops at 2000, which is right about when global conflict was on its way to a plunge toward historic lows. You can see that in the blue line’s drastic decline.
If you zoom in a little bit on the 21st century, this trend becomes much clearer. At the dawn of the 21st century, according to both Roser and some more recent data from Steven Pinker, battle deaths appear to drop to close to zero per 100,000 people:
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/assets/4708176/battle_deaths_chart.png)
(Joe Posner/Vox)That’s pretty extraordinary: periods with five or 10 battle casualties per 100,000 people look like they’ve been pretty common throughout history, in addition to huge wars such as the Thirty Years’ War, the Napoleonic Wars, or World War II. By historical standards, humanity today is extraordinarily safe from war.
This is why one of the biggest and most important questions today is whether our so-called “Long Peace” will last.
A recent paper, by Nassim Nicholas Taleb and Pasquale Cirillo, argued that our current peaceful era was a statistical myth: that dips in war deaths should be expected, as Roser’s chart shows, and that there’s no reason to believe this time should be different. Pinker and others argue, by contrast, that things really have changed: that the rise of democracy, capitalism, industrial civilization, and international institutions like the UN have radically transformed the way global politics operates.
It’s impossible to know who’s right for sure. But Roser’s chart makes clear that, whatever the reason, we should be counting our blessings today.