This is part 1 of a point/counterpoint series on the AUS referendum. Hopefully we’ll get around to the counterpoint.
Votin’ with a click like yeahhhh
Checkin’ that box like yeahhhh.
There’s a poorly advertised/promoted/talked about referendumb question on this year’s AUS election ballot. It reads something like:
Do you wish to pay more every year for a new party space on campus? Like, not too much. Way the hell less than those new 2012 commerce kids, and when it’s all said and done, a little more than those damn peppy HKINners want in their referendum.
At this point, you might be all like “ZOMG WHAT A DEAL,” like when they put two Cheetos bags on sale for $4 and you buy four bags instead of your usual one because they’re so much cheaper.
Maybe you’re thinking “NAW WAY SON” because instead of an extra few bucks per year given to the AUS, you could buy eight whole bags of Cheetos instead of one or four.
If this thing passes and meets quorum (unlikely), you artsies will be paying:
- $18 for 2010/2011 and 2011/2012
- $23 for 2012/2013 and 2013/2014
- $28 for 2015/2016, then adjusted by inflation/CPI
Well, wait Gossip Guy. That seems like a fairly reasonable increase for a new building/sapce, but… what’s it going to look like? Where will it be? Great questions, astute reader! Luckily, GG has obtained some documents showing a revamped Buchanan West Courtyard. Clicky “continue reading” to see…