Tag Archives: language

Is Texting the Downfall of the English Language?

Text-speak or textisms, you’ve used them. Everyone is guilty of using OMG, LOL, or IDK at least once. And really, how could you even avoid it? Today, using abbreviated words in texting is quick and easy universal slang.  The question is: how is this distinct text speech affecting our everyday language?

 

In recent years, this question has been asked a lot with mixed results. Some studies have shown that text-speak has a negative effect on literacy skills, lowering grammar scores of middle school students. It was found that students improvised text-speak, which drops vowels, consonants, punctuation, and capitalization, in academic assignments. On the other hand, studies have actually found a positive or no relationship between using text-speak abbreviations and student’s literacy skills. They argue that to fully understand and correctly use text-speak, you need to first have a higher understanding of the language.

 

 

Studies also debunk the media fuelled idea of preteens being responsible for creating and using confusing letter and number mash-ups in their daily communication- practically ‘speaking another language’. In actuality, it’s young adults, 18 to 24-year-olds, which are using and developing this language. One linguist adds that in texts, 90% of the words are in proper English, and further argues that abbreviations have limitations in properly conveying ideas. In fact, people will type out “please” and “thank you” three times more than “pls” and “thx”. Moreover, he brings up that textisms really aren’t a new phenomenon, but have been around for dozens of years.

 

Watch the SourceFed video below and follow their links for more interesting facts!

YouTube Preview Image

 

In the last decade texting and text-speak has become a major form of communication, specifically for adolescents. The fact that our language is constantly changing overtime also needs to be taken into consideration and accepted. How people spoke in the 1800s is nowhere near how we speak today just like our future generations’ language will evolve as well. Whether texting’s lasting effect will be positive or negative on the English language, conflicting studies say it can go either way.

– Rachel Chang

The language of DNA

Within each and every living organism, there are millions of books describing things from “how to move” to “how to eat”. These books are written in DNA: language of life. Ultimately, DNA is how nature writes about how to live, and the readers are how all living (and some “dead things”) survive. Even your own body is reading from your own library as you read this blog.

But within this massive collection, we, as people, cannot read most of it because we do not yet understand the language.

However, what we have figured out, thanks to genetics, cellular biology, and biochemistry, are the basic letters of these books; we have the codon table.

Codon Table

The codon table encoding the 20 essential amino acids used in all walks of life. Obtained as a screen capture from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_codon_table

What this codon table tells us is the 20 letters of the DNA alphabet, representing the 20 amino acids. When there are multiple letters together, they can spell a word, also known as a protein.

We have also figured out some parts of these books through areas called open reading frames. These areas use a process called transcription and translation, which is described in the following video found on youtube posted by redandbrownpaperbag.

YouTube Preview Image

We also have clues and insights into some other parts of these books, namely the promoter and termination sequences. These parts tell us where there is an open-reading frame, essentially acting as quotation marks to direct the cell’s attention to a specific location.

Despite all these advances in understanding the language, we know very little in reality.

First of all, there are no known “rules” to writing words, because a word can be as short as 2 letters to as long as a million letters.

Secondly, we do not have a clear picture of how different areas within the genome that are neither open reading frames nor promoters/terminaters interact with the cell, or why those books are there in the first place. These sequences are currently hypothesized as useless, but may be useful as the ENCODE project suggests.

Finally, some words, even with the same spelling, can have many different meanings when they are in different compartments of a cell, so figuring out what they actually mean is quite difficult.

The secret language of DNA might one day be uncovered; someone who can speak “DNA” might be able to take a piece of DNA and then tell us exactly what that DNA is used for, which can advance science from treating and preventing disease, finding new applications for cells (i.e. sustainable fuel), or even figure out what consciousness is. Knowing how to read DNA can open up a brave new world in understanding life as we know it.

Just like how the discovery of the Rosetta Stone lead us to understand the Egyptian language, we may be able to slowly construct our own Rosetta Stone, through genetics and biochemistry, to unravel the mystery of DNA.

The hope is that one day, understanding an organism will be as simple as reading a book.

– Tony Hui