Category Archives: Working conditions

CUPE 2278 TAs Escalate Strike at UBC

CUPE 2278 President Trish Everett leading the Union to a fair settlement

CUPE 2278, Teaching Assistants at the University of British Columbia (UBC), escalated their strike with picket lines at the Geography and Math buildings. The strategy at this point is rolling picket lines, increasing momentum across the campus. The energy was evident as the numbers of the TAs on picket lines continue grow and get increasingly visible and vocal. Geography TAs Catriona Gold and Sam Robinson were upbeat about giving the University a wake up call. Gold noted that “we’ve had some really good responses from students” while Robertson stated that “a lot of this is just about getting your voice out there at this point.”

 See Videos and Slides:

Chan v UBC Hearing Scheduled at BC Supreme Court

The BC Supreme Court has scheduled a Hearing date for the Jennifer Chan v UBC and others [Beth Haverkamp, David Farrar, Jon Shapiro, Rob Tierney] racial discrimination case for Tuesday 13 November 2012 at 10am.  In January this year, BC Human Rights Tribunal decided to move the case to Hearing. In March, UBC petitioned to the BC Supreme Court for a judicial review to challenge the BCHRT’s decision. The Hearing is now in front of the BC Supreme Court and open to the public:

The Supreme Court is located at 800 Smithe Street (between Hornby and Howe).

The case involves the David Lam Chair in Multicultural Education selection process in Fall 2009. Please see the Ubyssey’s (UBC student newspaper) feature article for background to the case.

Two new, similar complaints were accepted for filing by the BCHRT:
1) by an aboriginal Law Professor at UBC alleging denial of Tenure and Promotion on the basis of race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, marital status, family status and sex.

2) by an anonymous Professor in BC alleging denial of Tenure and Promotion on a basis of her ancestry and place of origin.

CUPE 2278 UBC TAs: “We’re Here to Put the Pressure On the Employer”

Teaching Assistants (CUPE 2278) at the University of British Columbia (UBC) picketed the main building (Buchanan Tower) of the Faculty of Arts this afternoon, effectively disrupting and shutting down business as usual. In solidarity, the graduate students were joined on both sides of the tower by CUPE 116, CUPE 2950, and faculty members of the FAUBC.

CUPE 2278 President Trish Everett explained that the current proposal from UBC “just isn’t going to cut it,” and asserted that the graduate students were on the picket line “to put the pressure on the employer.” The Union approved two strike votes in the last six months, indicating a sustained will to escalate for a fair settlement.

For videos, see:

 

CUPE 4627 Picket Line at Vancouver Community College

Support staff at Vancouver Community College (VCC) set up picket lines before dawn this morning. CUPE 4627 represents library technicians, clerical workers, administrative, technical, warehouse, program assistants and cafeteria workers at VCC. The Union explains:

  • The key feature of the Cooperative Gains Mandate is that it provides public sector employers with the ability to negotiate modest wage increases using savings found within existing budgets.

We believed the college had done their submission to the government and all this would just be a formality.

After speaking with our friends at CUPE National, we discovered that the real date for the Ministry to withdraw the mandate is rumoured to not be the end of November but very early in November. We don’t believe the College has mislead us, but we believe we have been mislead. There isn’t a lot of time to stop the inequity that is being delivered. We will most likely not be the only support staff union at a College who is prepared to fight this. There are a few others and they are just a week or two behind us in regards to bargaining. We have a short window to get their attention and have them right this wrong.

Menzies: The longer the picket, the shorter the strike

Photo by Kai Jacobson

Right now, teaching assistants at UBC are gearing up for a strike. They have been patient in their negotiations to a fault. But now they’ve served strike notice and the picket signs are being made ready. Expect picket lines outside your classroom soon.

Teaching assistants are a key part of a great education. In a gigantic lecture hall, it’s more likely the TA, not the prof, that a student gets to meet on a regular basis. The TAs lead discussion groups, hold office hours and meet with students. I know: I’ve been a TA and I teach a course with four TAs. The TAs who have worked with me over the years have all been dedicated, hardworking teachers and scholars. They do this without very much pay and oftentimes do more then they are expected to.

The TA union is concerned that their action will have an impact on students, staff and faculty. I am sure it will. But every important social justice win has required some small amount of sacrifice. The TAs struggle is really a struggle over the type of education system we have and want. Do we want a system that only those with the money to pay can attend? Or do we want an education system that is available to those who have the capacity and desire to learn?

Most graduate students are only able to afford their graduate studies because they get a chance to have a teaching assistantship. It doesn’t pay much, but it makes the difference and opens the doors to a lot of people who wouldn’t otherwise be able to take a post-graduate degree. My own graduate study was funded in large part by being able to work as a teaching assistant and a research assistant during my two post-graduate degrees. Without that kind of funding, I wouldn’t have been able to continue my studies. That’s the case with many of the teaching assistants here at UBC as well. When it comes down to it, TAs aren’t really asking for much — just the chance to have a fair contract that values the hard work that they do.

We can quietly sit by and hope that nothing happens, or we can actively support the teaching assistants in their struggle for a just settlement. Of course, UBC admins will remind us that we have a responsibility to do our normal jobs even if there is a strike. The tone of these reminders may even, at times, come across as vaguely threatening. Don’t be cowed. There is strength in numbers.

I, like many other faculty, will be honouring the TAs picket lines and making sure that no student, no colleague, no TA will be discriminated against because they have the courage to stand up for social justice. Remember — the longer the picket line, the shorter the strike.

Charles Menzies is an associate professor in the department of anthropology.

Ubyssey, 29 October 2012

CUPE 4627 Mobilizes for Strike at Vancouver Community Collage

Support staff in CUPE 4627 at the Vancouver Community College (VCC) are mobilized for a full strike beginning Tuesday morning.  CUPE 4627 chief steward Jo Hansen says the 420 members are tired of waiting for the government’s Public Sector Employers’ Council (PSEC) to approve the college negotiating in good faith for a settlement. Their last contract expired more than two years ago in 2010. The union notes that “the goal of our picket line is to help gain the attention of the provincial Government to convince the Public Sector Employers’ Council (PSEC) to allow us to achieve the settlement that they have already given to so many others in the post secondary education sector.”

FAUBC Encourages Members to Support TA Strike

Message from Nancy Langton, President, Faculty Association of UBC

The Faculty Association Executive strongly supports CUPE 2278 and the job action that it will begin this week… show your support for them in whatever ways you can doing their job action. Fair wages and fair tuition increases are the hallmark of great universities.

CUPE 2278 TAs at UBC Appeal for Faculty Solidarity

A Message from CUPE 2278:

Like our sister locals—and no doubt the Faculty Association—we are frustrated and disappointed that the university claims that it is unable to afford a reasonable wage increase for its employees.  Despite Vancouver’s ever-increasing cost of living and yearly tuition rises, we had accepted no increase in wages or benefits over the past two years because of the provincial ‘net zero’ mandate.  So it was especially galling for us to discover that senior administrators had substantial increases in remuneration during the same period of time.  We understand that this remuneration came in the form of bonuses and merit clauses (including an increase in excess of 9% for our university president), but why has Human Resources flatly denied us even the possibility of seeking similar forms of protection against future government mandates?

Contrary to what you might have heard, our expectations regarding wage increases are quite realistic. In January of this year, we asked for the equivalent wages and job protection as the TAs at the University of Toronto.  UBC administrators are in the habit of comparing UBC to UofT, and we agree that the comparison is apt.  Although we do take as much pride in our work as UofT TAs (and believe we perform comparably), we also saw this as an opening gambit in a process of negotiation and bargaining.  To be frank, there has been little bargaining.  Despite forcing us into Labour Board mediation in April, UBC HR refused to even table an offer to the mediator until August 24. And the offer was 0%-0%-1%-1% (2010-14) and ‘no’ to all other costed items including greater job security for our members.  After we made significant concessions in our package – concessions the employer acknowledged – they upped their offer to 0%-0%-1.5%-1.5% and the possibility of 5th year preference for PhDs (but they would not discuss the language on this until we had agreed on wages).  That was when we realized mediation was going nowhere.  We do not have the option of going into arbitration, so we are left with the only tool we really have that might make Human Resources treat us with a modicum of respect – job action.  We do not take this step lightly.

The other CUPE locals settled for 0-0-2-2% raises, but we cannot accept 0-0-1.5-1.5 and nothing more.  Because paying tuition is a condition of employment for teaching assistants, any wage increase is immediately clawed back, given the university’s habit of raising tuition by 2% each year (and 3% for international students this year).  A 2% increase for other collective agreements effectively amounts to a zero for many of your TAs, and in fact, becomes a net loss in disposable income because we live in a city with skyrocketing housing costs, high child care fees, and high inflation in general. Our membership has decided that if the employer expects us to accept any wage increase on par with other bargaining units, it will need to guarantee it with some measure of tuition protection. Nothing less will be acceptable. We hope you support us in this, as we support your struggle to get a fair agreement too.

CUPE 2278 FAQ for undergraduates about Job Action

FAQ for Undergraduate Students at UBC
on Teaching Assistant Job Action

  • What is a union and why is it important? 
    • A union is an organized group of workers who come together to make decisions about the conditions of their work. Through union membership, workers can impact wages, work hours, benefits, workplace health and safety, and other work-related issues. Historically, because of the work of unions, we now have awesome things we kind of take for granted like weekends, the 40-hour work week, compensation if you’re injured on the job, unemployment insurance, job safety standards, minimum wages and so on. By coming together unions give a group of people a stronger voice in trying to advocate for themselves with their employer and to achieve collective benefits. Think of the student union for instance who advocate on your behalf to keep tuition and fees lower, provide space for student groups on campus, advocate for students’ rights on campus etc.
  • What are the big issues for the TAs at UBC?
    • TAs have asked the university for the following key items
    1. An increase in wages (which have not changed since 2010, and were first agreed to back in 2005)
    2. Job security in the form of extended hiring preference (because the average time it takes to complete a masters or doctorate degree is way longer than the two or four year contract currently in existence.
    3. A tuition waiver of some kind (because we must be students to work as TAs so a tuition increase means a de facto pay cut)
    4. A Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) for wages so that the province cannot freeze TA wages arbitrarily as they have done with their “Net Zero Mandate” that covers 2010-2012. (Management at UBC got an average of 3% increases each year in remuneration during this time because of their contract language, while TAs got nothing.)
    5. Assistance with childcare costs, which have gone up dramatically in the last few years at UBC and pose a substantial burden on young families that is often the economic equivalent of an additional rent payment each month.
  • What is a strike?
    • A strike is “any cessation or refusal to work by employees, in combination or accordance with a common understanding, where the goal is to restrict or limit service to the employer.”  (Labour Relations Code, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 244, s. 1)
    • This can encompass everything from a refusal to work overtime, to rotating strikes (where only part of the union is on strike at any one time), to creative ways of drawing attention to our labour power. This can also mean a full-blown stoppage of work. Each Job Action/Strike is different and depends largely on the specifics of the union engaging in such activity.
  • What does a strike entail?
    • Remember, it is the university’s responsibility to ensure that you have a stable teaching workforce who are adequately compensated for their experience and training. You might consider adding your own pressure by contacting the university and demanding they offer a fair deal so a settlement can be achieved and life can get back to normal.
    • Depending on what job action the union members are doing on a given day you may experience nothing unusual, you may come across a picket line, you may get fliers and hand outs, you may see parades and marches, who knows… each strike is different and each union does it differently.
    • For most grad students, being a TA is the best part of the experience! As such, we hope to minimize disruption to the learning environment as much as possible while still getting the attention and the respect of the university. If there is no cooperation on the part of the university, pressure will likely increase over time as the job action escalates and you may feel a bigger effect.
  • What is a picket line?
    • Picketing is a form of protest in which people (called picketers) congregate outside a place of work or location where an event is taking place. Often, this is done in an attempt to dissuade others from going in (“crossing the picket line”), but it can also be done to draw public attention to a cause.
    • It can have a number of aims, but is generally to put pressure on the party targeted to meet particular demands and/or cease operations. This pressure is achieved by harming the business through loss of customers and negative publicity, or by discouraging or preventing workers and/or customers from entering the site and thereby preventing the business from operating normally. Picketing is a common tactic used by trade unions during strikes, which will try to persuade members of other unions and non-unionized workers from working. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picketing_(protest))
  • What does it mean to cross a picket line?
    • Crossing a picket line means you ignore the union’s demonstration and go into the building or place they are picketing. off. You are legally allowed to cross a picket line and no one should prevent you from doing so, but they may try to convince you to support their cause.
    • Crossing a picket line is something you should not do without first considering the effect it may have.
    • The point of a picket line is to draw attention to a group’s cause when they feel they are being treated unjustly. By ignoring that, you are telling the group and their employer that you do not support their cause and that the status quo is okay. If you do not agree that the CUPE 2278 workers deserve a living wage and job security, then let your conscience be your guide.
    • If you absolutely need to get past a picket for some reason, but still support the cause, seek out the picket captain who is in charge and explain to them what’s going on, especially if it affects your studies, and you will be allowed to cross with their ok. Ultimately the decision to cross a picket or not is a personal choice and we can’t tell you what to do, so please give this some thought before you come across a picket.
  • I don’t want to cross the picket line. What do I need to do?
    • See http://vpstudents.ubc.ca/news/strike-action/#3for more information from UBC
    • If you choose not to cross the picket line, you must inform the Dean of the Faculty in which you are registered that you intend not to cross the picket line. Students choosing not to cross picket lines must, within two working days of the commencement of a strike or prior to their first exam, whichever comes first, inform the Dean of the Faculty in which they are registered or in the case of graduate students, the Dean of the Faculty offering their program of study. Students must inform the Dean in person or in writing (i.e. letter or e-mail,) that they will not be attending classes or writing examinations during the strike.
    • Students must provide: their full names, their UBC student IDs, and the course(s) in which they are currently registered. You may not declare your intentions retroactively. If you do not inform your Faculty, the University will assume that you are attending all examinations, classes and course-related activities.
    • Please note that even if you decide not to cross the picket lines, you are required to come to campus to determine whether there is a picket line at all entrances to the building in which your exam is scheduled at the time of the scheduled class or examination, or if there are picket lines set up at all entrances to the University.
  • How long will this last?
    • This is impossible to predict. The strike will end when the union and employer agree on a new contract or when bargaining resumes and is deemed productive by both sides.
  • Why should I support the TAs?
    • Nobody wants to strike and nobody likes the disruption job action has on a campus, but the TAs are asking for reasonable improvements to their job contract with UBC and the university and the province are not respecting the needs of this large group of highly trained workers. TAs are a large group on campus, about 3000 or so, and not respecting their right to demand a fair contract perpetuates an unequal and unjust community on campus.
    • A TA who is economically secure and who feels respected and valued by their employer can focus more of their energies on giving YOU, the undergraduate students, the best educational experience possible, the best guidance, feedback and advice on labs, papers, projects, and future endeavours. We care about our students and look forward to getting back to work under respectful working conditions so we can continue to be a valuable and committed part of your UBC education.
  • Where can I find out more information about this?

CUPE 2278 TAs Give Strike Notice at UBC

CUPE 2278 served 72 hour strike notice late this afternoon.  The TA Union at the University of British Columbia advises to “expect job action on Monday.” From all indications, the University has pushed the students and pressed its luck for too long.  Contracts have been rolled over since 2005, effectively freezing wages for employees who are trying to cope against rising tuition, supply costs, the cost of living, and housing while administrators enjoy 5% annual increases. CUPE support workers at UBC will stand in solidarity with the graduate students while librarians, faculty members, and undergraduate students are encouraged to do the same.

ICES Speaking Truth to the Power of Employer Bargaining Reports

In British Columbia, in late July 2002, the Liberal government amended the Labour Relations Code to increase the scope of what employers could communicate to employees. Section 8 was amended from granting managers “freedom to communicate to an employee a statement of fact or opinion reasonably held with respect to the employer’s business” to “the freedom to express his or her views on any matter.” Employer speech within captive audience settings attenuates the freedom of the employee to not listen.

One result at UBC has been a deluge of bargaining reports broadcast to employees. Sure enough, today came the University’s Bargaining Bulletin #48, bemoaning failures of bargaining with the Faculty Association of UBC: “The University is extremely disappointed… the University tabled a salary offer of a 1.5% increase for all Faculty spread over two years… the Faculty Association tabled a general wage increase proposal of 5% in each of the next two years commencing July 1, 2012. A general wage increase of 5% per year is significantly out of step with other wage settlements in the Province, and with recent staff settlements at UBC.” And so on.

Thankfully, E. Wayne Ross countered with an employee broadcast to correct the record:

  • UBC faculty salaries rank #19 in Canada.
  • UBC faculty professional development funds are lowest in BC.
  • UBC administration promotes the idea that the university is “world class”
  • UBC administration offers faculty 0.4% then says it’s “extremely disappointed” an agreement can’t be reached?
  • I guess we’re supposed to feel lucky because we’re not teaching in the NHL …

CUPE 2278 TAs Approve and Mobilize for Strike at UBC

The count is in and the Graduate Teaching Assistants in CUPE 2278 at the University of British Columbia, readily and predictably approved an escalation of job action to strike. The Union Executive advised:

Dear [CUPE 2278] members,

We conducted the vote yesterday, and the results: 76% were in favour of
taking job action.

Therefore, we will be booking out of the Labour Relation Board mediation, and we will serve the employer with a 72 hour job action notice when ‘booking out’ is confirmed.

Continue your normal duties until further notice.

Please stand by for more information, and keep checking the website,
facebook and twitter for updates.

In the meantime, the Faculty Association of UBC , which gave up its right to strike moons ago, advised its faculty members that it was preparing for a round of binding arbitration with the University.

CUPE 2278 TAs Have Everything to Gain with Strike Vote at UBC

On Wednesday, 24 October, CUPE 2278 teaching assistants at the University of British Columbia (UBC) will take a strike vote.  For each and every one of the graduate students, this should be a ‘no brainer’ yes, to escalate labour action: Yes to solidarity with CUPE 116 and SFU’s CUPE 3338 support staff on strike; Yes to migrating the student movement from Quebec to BC; Yes to taking a stand for equity and fairness, and yes to the future of education.  This escalation comes at a strategic time across the province as CUPE support staff collectively takes stands against years of employer and government suppression of wages.  Universities and government have for too long designated the likes of public school teachers, support staff, and teaching assistants as net zero workers.

As GTA wages at UBC have been stagnant (i.e., 0%), administrative salaries have skyrocketed.  From 2005, the year UBC began to merely roll over CUPE 2278 contracts, to 2011, the last year of accessible data, the President’s salary rose from $434,567 to $528,504 (22% increase).  The Provost’s salary increased from $230,887 to $321,023, a whopping 39% increase!  The salary of VP Human Resources, who manages bargaining for the University, jumped from $191,793 to $230,704 (20% increase).  The Director of Faculty Relations’ salary rocketed from $119,615 to $198,209 (41% increase).  And so on.  Deans have made certain that there is similar progress with their salaries.  For example, the Business Dean’s salary bounced from $334,196 to $422,304 (26% increase) while the Education Dean’s salary leaped from $216,519 to $261,732 (21% increase).  Through 2010, the Arts Dean’s salary quickly grew from $191,408 to $249,816 (30% in 6 years).  It is no mystery why the ranks of managers at UBC have swelled in numbers over the past few years.  The transition of Associate Deans and others to management via the 2010-12 Collective Agreement merely instrumented trends and ambitions.

Some faculty members’ salaries have kept pace, basically for those in Business or jumping at chances for an administrative stipend or retention fund.  Like CUPE, it has been tough slogging for the Faculty Association of UBC and Business made ground only through its own, elite faculty association.  If it were in my power, I would give the TAs 5% per year, no questions asked, and freeze administrative salaries, with a new net zero worker mandate for management fat cats living large, for a decade as a slap on the hand for irresponsibility and status quo.  CUPE support workers deserve the same 5% increases that administrators are receiving on average.

Against this rather comfy scenario for administrators at UBC, who want to leave well enough alone, undergraduates and graduate students, with 0% increases in TA wages, have struggled in or on the brink of poverty.  Students have been burdened with pronounced increases in inflation, tuition costs, supply costs (e.g., textbooks), housing costs, and debt over the decade, and it is getting worse in an economy that itself is top heavy and stalling with inflation, cutbacks, and debt.  The vast majority of PhD students face the worst job market for University faculty employment in Canada in generations— since the Great Depression.  Is there anything for the graduate students to lose by escalating job action?  There is everything to gain.

Inflation or cost of living increases at about 2% per year with larger increases in the densely populated cities such as Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver.  Tuition has risen nearly each year over the decade, with the BC government now forced to regulate increases at 2% per year.  The result is more than a doubling of tuition fees over the past decadeTextbook costs have inflated 10%-30% for some years during the decade.  In BC, landlords likely added about 4% to student rental housing this year and can add about the same next year.  Of course, these rises have been accompanied by unprecedented student debt.  Cumulative student debt across the country is now well over $15 billion with an average debt sentence for graduates in BC at $27,000 and rising.  This potential sentence and a bleak job market for youth make implications profound for already poverty-stricken families.   Graduate students in BC leave with a bit more debt on average– $30,000 – $35,000.  Fair enough some might say, students can readily sign for new credit cards with only 18% interest.

The average age of the professoriate in Canada is 50; in my Department, it’s closer to 55.  The writing on the wall is that faculty jobs have stagnated and are at an all time low.  Month after month in Education, a PhD graduate will pick up the Careers section of University Affairs or the CAUT Bulletin and find the column under “Education” and its related disciplines empty or with just a few openings across the entire country.  In BC alone, an estimated 75 PhDs graduate from Faculties of Education each year.

It is no wonder that the UBC AMS filed an Article #13 complaint to the United Nations on 25 November 2009.  The undergraduate students appealed that the BC government be held responsible for “gross human rights violations” in failing to control tuition, provide sufficient financial support, and provide adequate funding to post-secondary education.  It is no wonder that the Federation of Post-Secondary Educators of BC sent a letter to the BC Minister of Advanced Education on 7 September 2012.  The letter, co-signed by 24 supporters including the President of the Canadian Union of Public Employees-BC (CUPE) concluded: “Like institutional Presidents, our various organizations see the continued underfunding at our institutions as a serious threat to not only local students and local communities, but also a serious undermining of BC’s future.”

The extraordinary steps taken by students in Quebec between February and August of this year will pay dividends for the student movement across the country.  With models of direct democracy, the students managed to topple a government and win immediate concessions by the new government—in its first day of office the PQ government cancelled the pending tuition hike and repealed an anti-protest law that curbed basic freedoms of expression.  That’s inspiring democratic action.  Again, for UBC TAs, is there not everything to gain by escalating job action and moving from the classroom to the streets of campus, Vancouver, and Victoria?

CUPE 2278 TA’s Mobilize for Strike at UBC

Teaching Assistants at the University of British Columbia, represented by CUPE 2278, will take a strike vote on Wednesday, 24 October. The University narrowly averted a TA strike in mid April (80% of the TAs in favour) through legal means of mediation.  Mediation predictably failed  and merely deferred job action.  Seven months later the union is once again mobilizing for a strike.  The University has fallen back on a comfortable  excuse that the graduate teaching assistants are net zero workers, and accordingly has offered 0%, 0%, 1.5%, 1.5% in increases to TA wages for the years 2010-2014.  As with CUPE 116, the university’s and government’s sentiment has been: ‘Let them negotiate, let them bargain,’ as long as they remain net zero workers.  For the TA’s facing tuition hikes and carrying increasing burdens of responsibility for the University, the 0%, 0%, 1.5%, 1.5% is blatantly unfair.  This is ever more the conclusion given that the University has been merely rolling over contracts for the TA union since 2005.

SFU Behind Picket Lines

CUPE 3338 set up pickets lines this morning, effectively shutting down Simon Fraser University’s (SFU) downtown Vancouver campus.  Stepping up job action, this union of SFU support workers has for months been immensely frustrated with the University’s refusal to negotiate.  The union “reports virtually no progress in more than two years of talks.”  “With inflation, our members are actually falling behind in real terms,” says 3338 business agent John Bannister, “unlike top SFU administers who have been enjoying substantial annual increases while refusing to negotiate with us.”  “SFU has arbitrarily decided it will not sit down and bargain in good faith with us,” says CUPE 3338 president Lynne Fowler. “It has chosen instead to focus on its broken pension plan and deny its CUPE employees the right to negotiate a new collective agreement,” she adds.

CUPE BC Photos

Earlier this month, CUPE 3799 support workers picketed the University of Northern British Columbia’s (UNBC) campus while CUPE 116 escalated job action at the University of British Columbia (UBC). Following failed mediation, CUPE 2278 teaching assistants will take a strike vote next week to likely escalate CUPE job action at UBC.  Undergraduate students at UBC are calling for solidarity with the unions.

Workplace #1 Inaugural Issue Republished!

The Institute for Critical Education Studies (ICES) has embarked on the daunting, yet enjoyable, task of reissuing all back issues of Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor in OJS format.  We begin with the inaugural issue and its core theme, “Organizing Our Asses Off.”  Issue #2 will soon follow.  We encourage readers and supporters of Workplace and Critical Education to revisit these now classic back issues for a sense of accomplishment and frustration over the past 15 years of academic labor.  Please keep the ideas and manuscripts rolling in!

Wayne State U. and Faculty Union Work to Defuse Conflict Over Tenure Rights

The Chronicle: Wayne State U. and Faculty Union Work to Defuse Conflict Over Tenure Rights

Representatives of Wayne State University and its faculty union are beginning talks this week in an attempt to head off a major clash over tenure rights.

The Michigan university’s administration and the faculty union set up a special committee on tenure last week as part of an agreement to extend the union’s contract, which had been due to expire on July 31, until the end of September. The six-member panel, comprising equal numbers of union and administration officials, has been charged with trying to resolve an escalating conflict over a contract proposal from the administration. Union leaders have denounced the proposal as an attempt to gut tenure protections, an allegation that university officials deny.

The conflict centers on an administration proposal, offered in the early round of contract negotiations, that would in effect scrap previously negotiated job protections for tenured or probationary faculty members, as well as seniority-based protections afforded many academic staff members, and replace them with new rules governing the suspension or termination of such employees.

The administration’s proposed contract language would give the university’s president, or an administrator working on the president’s behalf, the power to terminate such employees for a variety of reasons, including a “failure to meet professional responsibilities,” a “failure to perform academic assignments competently,” and a “financially based reduction in force.”

Union officials have denounced the proposed contract language as an attempt to do away with tenure and have accused the university’s chief negotiator of explicitly characterizing it as such. Last week the AAUP’s national office began circulating a petition protesting the proposed contract language, which it described as offering “extremely broad” justifications for termination and replacing faculty peer review with the judgment of administrators.

In an e-mail sent to Wayne State’s employees last month, President Gilmour argued that the proposal was “being misinterpreted” as intended to eliminate tenure when instead its goal is to give the administration more leeway to remove faculty members who are not doing their jobs.

“Faculty tenure is an important aspect of academic freedom, and we support it,” he said. “But it cannot be a place to hide for those whose performance or behavior is poor.”

New Issue of Workplace Launched

Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor has just published Issue #20, “The New Academic Manners, Managers, and Spaces.”  This issue includes key conceptual and empirical analyses of

  • the creation and avoidance of unions in academic and business workplaces (Vincent Serravallo)
  • the new critiquette, impartial response to Bruno Latour and Jacques Ranciere’s critique of critique (Stephen Petrina)
  • the two-culture model of the modern university in full light of the crystal, neural university (Sean Sturm, Stephen Turner)
  • alternative narratives of accountability in response to neo-liberal practices of government (Sandra Mathison)
  • vertical versus horizontal structures of governance (Rune Kvist Olsen)
  • teachers in nomadic spaces and Deleuzian approaches to curricular practice (Tobey Steeves)

Workplace Issue #20 Table of Contents:

Parallel Practices of Union Avoidance in Business and Academia

The New Critiquette and Old Scholactivism: A Petit Critique of Academic Manners, Managers, Matters, and Freedom

Cardinal Newman in the Crystal Palace – The Idea of the University Today

Working Toward a Different Narrative of Accountability: A Report from British Columbia

The DemoCratic Workplace: Empowering People (demos) to Rule (cratos) Their Own Workplace

Bridges to Difference & Maps of Becoming: An Experiment with Teachers in Nomadic Spaces for Education in British Columbia

We invite you to review Issue #20 for articles and items of interest. Thanks for the continuing interest in Workplace (we welcome new manuscripts here and Critical Education),

Institute for Critical Education Studies (ICES)
Workplace Blog

Workplace bullying: Family of Journal Editor Who Committed Suicide Sues U. of Virginia

The Chronicle: Family of Journal Editor Who Committed Suicide Sues U. of Virginia

Two years after Kevin Morrissey, a former managing editor of the Virginia Quarterly Review, killed himself following complaints he made about workplace bullying by his boss, the former VQR editor Ted Genoways, Mr. Morrissey’s family has filed a $10-million wrongful-death lawsuit against the University of Virginia, which publishes the award-winning journal.

The suit also names as defendants several current and former university employees, including Mr. Genoways and John T. Casteen III, who is president emeritus and continues as a faculty member at the university.

The lawsuit, filed last Wednesday in Virginia circuit court on behalf of Mr. Morrissey’s siblings and his father by Douglas R. Morrissey, one of Mr. Morrissey’s brothers, says the university failed to adequately respond to numerous complaints Mr. Morrissey made about Mr. Genoways in the weeks before his death. Mr. Morrissey complained at least 25 times, the suit says, to the offices of the president, human resources, and employee relations, saying Mr. Genoways had banned him from the journal’s office for unspecified “unacceptable workplace behavior.”

With Student Learning at Stake, Group Calls for Better Working Conditions for Adjuncts

The Chronicle: With Student Learning at Stake, Group Calls for Better Working Conditions for Adjuncts

Academe needs a new model for the professoriate that better supports the growing number of instructors who are off the tenure track, the participants in a national project about the changing faculty have concluded.

The participants, who represent a cross-section of academe and its stakeholders, also said in a report being released this week that they need to align to gather data that will paint a clearer picture of higher education’s increasing reliance on contingent faculty.

A key reason for those two strategies to improve the jobs of contingent faculty members is that their poor working conditions may harm student learning, says the report, a “working document” produced by the Delphi Project on the Changing Faculty and Student Success.