Tag Archives: Students

#OutWithStudentDebt video project

I thought I only had to come out once!  In 1996, at 22 years of age, I came out of the closet – the most liberating thing I’ve ever done.  Now, I’m coming out again:  My name is Robert Applebaum and I have $88,000 worth of student debt!

We’ve recently partnered with over a dozen organizations to launch what we’re calling the #OutWithStudentDebt video project.  The goal of this project is to collect as many of your 1-2 minute videos that will be featured on our websites, with the goal of shedding the stigma of shame and embarrassment that comes along with being buried under mounds of student loan debt.

Please click on the graphic above to view StudentDebtCrisis.org’s Artistic Director, Aaron Calafato’s sample/instructional video and then learn how to go about submitting your own #OutWithStudentDebt video!

Over the course of the next 3 weeks, we will be collecting these #OutWithStudentDebt stories and featuring them on our website, after which, we’ll be asking the general public to vote for their favorites.

Please be sure to follow the instructions for uploading your video so that it can be properly entered into the #OutWithStudentDebt Video Project.

Be honest.  Be concise.  Be brave!  You are NOT alone!  You are in the company of nearly 40 million Americans who are similarly struggling under the weight of their own student loans.  Please join us by creating your own video and telling your personal story.  Let’s put human faces on the ever-growing crisis of over $1.2 Trillion in outstanding student loan debt.

You can also help out by spreading the word – simply click here to tweet about the #OutWithStudentDebt Project, or click here to post it to Facebook.

Thank you, as always, for your continued support.  Now, let’s all come #OutWithStudentDebt!

Sincerely,

Rob, Natalia, Kyle, Aaron & The StudentDebtCrisis Team.
Follow us on Twitter
Join us on Facebook

P.S. We’d like to give a special thanks to Contest.is for providing the platform for the #OutWithStudentDebt Video Project!

“Let Freedom Ring” events for culmination of 50th Anniversary of March on Washington and MLK dream

AP/ Civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr., waves to supporters from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial 28 August, 1963, on The Mall in Washington, DC, upon giving the ‘I Have a Dream’ speech.

The King Center, July 16, 2013– The King Center and the 50th Anniversary Coalition are calling on people and organizations across America to help culminate the 50th anniversary of The March on Washington and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech with “Let Freedom Ring” bell-ringing events at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on August 28th, a half-century to the minute after Dr. King delivered his historic address. In other nations, there will be bell-ringing ceremonies at 3:00 p.m. in their respective time zones.

“We are calling on people across America and throughout the world to join with us as we pause to mark the 50th anniversary of my father’s ‘I Have a Dream’ speech with ‘Let Freedom Ring’ bell-ringing events and programs that affirm the unity of people of all races, religions and nations,” said King Center C.E.O. Bernice A. King. “My father concluded his great speech with a call to ‘Let freedom ring,’ and that is a challenge we will meet with a magnificent display of brotherhood and sisterhood in symbolic bell-ringing at places of worship, schools and other venues where bells are available from coast to coast and continent to continent.”

Local groups are encouraged to present diverse commemorative programs, which bring people together across cultural and political lines to celebrate the common humanity in creative and uplifting ways in the spirit of the dream. Ms. King especially urges that all of the programs involve children and young people, since children are mentioned in several passages of her father’s “I Have a Dream” speech.

There will be a “Let Freedom Ring” Commemoration & Call to Action” on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. on August 28th.  The program begins with an interfaith service from 9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial on the Tidal Basin, followed by the “Let Freedom Ring” Commemoration and Call to Action at the nearby Lincoln Memorial from 1:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. that includes the bell-ringing ceremony at 3:00 p.m.

Groups are already planning bell-ringing events in places as diverse as Concord, New Hampshire, Allentown PA, Lutry Switzerland and Tokyo Japan. Governors of the 50 states have been asked to support the bell-ringing, and many have already responded enthusiastically, with more expected to join the effort.  The King Center requests that all groups planning programs submit a brief description of your 50th anniversary ‘Let Freedom Ring’ bell-ringing event to website@thekingcenter.org.

“Let Freedom Ring” will conclude seven-days of events commemorating the March on Washington and Dr. King’s Dream speech. For the millions who can’t come to Washington, D.C. for the seven-day program, the local ‘Let Freedom Ring’ programs will provide a unique opportunity to get involved in a poignant nation-wide and global day of unity in their respective home towns.

“Our World, His Dream: Freedom – Make it Happen” is the theme for the “Let Freedom Ring” commemoration and call to action.  This theme is undergirded by the three sub-themes: “Freedom to Prosper in Life;”  “Freedom to Peacefully Co-Exist;” and “Freedom to Participate in Government.”

For more information about the 50th Anniversary of the I Have A Dream speech, please contact The King Center (Atlanta, GA) at 404-526-8944, sklein@thekingcenter.org or visit the websitewww.mlkdream50.com.  To stay in touch with updated details, participate with the following:  Twitter twitter.com/DCMARCHMLK50; Facebook www.facebook.com/Mlkdream50; Pinterest pinterest.com/mlkdream50/; and Intstagram mlkdream50.  The Hashtag is  #mlkdream50.

George Mason University course to examine Trayvon Martin case

Holly Hobbs, Fairfax Times, July 18, 2013– As the nation reflects on the verdict in the trial of George Zimmerman in the shooting of Trayvon Martin, a college course this fall will offer an academic look at the case’s impact outside of the courtroom.

George Mason University Professor Rutledge Dennis, a professor of sociology and anthropology, will teach “From Homer Plessy to Trayvon Martin: Issues in Race, Culture, and Politics,” which he said would look at historic cases involving race and their impacts on society. The course title has been abbreviated on Mason’s website: Plessy to Martin: Race and Politics.

“I hope our students will get out of it a sense of how racial, political and cultural issues impact how we interact,” Dennis said.

While the course aims to introduce students to historic themes through a contemporary example, Dennis and the university garnered much criticism online, mostly from conservative bloggers and media outlets like The Daily Caller, The National Review and Red Alert Politics.

“I have received a lot of nasty, hateful emails about this course because people assume it’s a course [only] about Trayvon Martin,” Dennis said. “Trayvon Martin is just one case.”

The course begins with coverage of the landmark 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case, which upheld “separate but equal” racial segregation of public facilities. Students also will study other historic cases, such as the 1931 arrests of the “Scottsboro Boys,” a group of nine black teenagers who were accused of raping two white women in Alabama. The course includes a number of contemporary high-profile trials like the 1992 trials of Los Angeles police officers accused of beating construction worker Rodney King and the murder trial of former NFL running back O.J. Simpson, which ended in 1995.

Many of the trials included in the course syllabus occurred before most current undergraduate students were born. The Trayvon Martin case offers a current example and context for undergrads, Dennis said.

“The Trayvon Martin case is important academically because race and issues around race are academic issues,” Dennis said, adding that the humanities often study gender and class; so why not race? “While this case did not begin as a racial case, it ended as one.”

Mason Provost Peter Stearns says criticism of curriculum is not a common occurrence for the university, but it is also not unheard of.

“Regularly, university faculty deal with topics that have different viewpoints. [Previously] George Mason University has been accused of being too liberal and too conservative,” he said. “One of the challenges in teaching is you want to make sure students understand the historical context and themes. But we also want to make sure they can apply this knowledge to current issues.”

Dennis said he hopes his course will offer students the opportunity to debate why Martin’s death and Zimmerman’s trial sparked intense media coverage and debate.

“I think it got attention for many people because we have an unarmed teenager who was shot by someone of another ethnic group,” Dennis said. “Young black men have been taken advantage of by the system. … And this becomes, for many, another example of a young black man being taken advantage of by the system.”

As of Wednesday, 16 students had registered for Dennis’ class (AFAM 390), which is cross-listed as both an African and African American Studies and Sociology/Anthropology course.

#IdleNoMore torches still burning : : Sovereignty Summer events planned

Jonathan Charlton, The StarPhoeinix, June 17, 2013–  The Idle No More movement may have slipped off the front pages, but there is still support below the surface.

“I think we’re at a place where we’ve generated momentum, got people around the world excited, have people active in their own communities and on a global level,” said Alex Wilson, an education professor at the University of Saskatchewan.

Wilson, Sheelah McLean, Erica Lee and Sylvia McAdam, leaders of Idle No More, gave a seminar about the movement and their personal experiences at the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association (NAISA) conference Saturday.

It was one of the best-attended talks of the week and they received a standing ovation. Other academics posed for pictures with them, bought Idle No More T-shirts and asked the women to sign them.

The movement is ambitious and wide in scope, but the women said it focuses on environmental, democratic and social justice issues.

“The end goal will be the day after there is no racism, the day after there’s no sexism, the day after there’s no homophobia, the day after there’s no systemic inequalities in society. It’s ongoing and ever changing,” Wilson said.

Idle No More has more events planned for what’s being called Sovereignty Summer.

“Really Sovereignty Summer is about encouraging people to do events in their own communities in their own way,” said Lee, a 23-year old youth representative, “because part of Idle No More is about encouraging people to break out of this idea of pan-Indianism, like we’re all the same monolithic tribe.”

But they also want to educate the Canadian public about aboriginal issues and improve relations between the two groups.

“For so long, we’ve only been told one side of Canadian history – so it’s not people’s fault for being ignorant of indigenous issues, because they’re not taught in school,” Lee said.

 

Read More: The StarPhoenix

Third General Assembly, Ontario Common Front

THIRD GENERAL ASSEMBLY, ONTARIO COMMON FRONT

August 19, 2013 9am – 5pm Holiday Inn Yorkdale
3450 Dufferin St, Toronto

Student, social movements and labour activists from across Ontario will come together to build alternatives to a right-wing agenda of austerity, poverty and repression. We believe a future is possible that respects democracy, environment, land and human rights. But we need deep organizing. Speakers include:

  • Dr. Henry Giroux, Global Television Network Chair in Communications studies at McMaster University. In 2004, Dr. Giroux wrote the book, The Terror of Neoliberalism.
  • Brigette DePape, Ottawa page that raised the ‘Stop Harper’ in the Senate Chamber during the Throne Speech in Ottawa.
  • Missy Elliott is Haudenosaunee, Tuscarora Nation Turtle clan from Six Nations of the Grand River Territory. She is 22 years old and has been protecting the land, building the nation, and organizing in her community since she was 13. She co-founded Spirit of the Youth Working Group in 2004 which organized 4 Unity Runs from 2004-2007.
  • Deena Ladd, Coordinator of the Workers’ Action Centre in Toronto. She is currently busy leading the provincial minimum wage campaign.
  • Pam Frache, Graduate student in labour studies at McMaster University and former Director of Education|Research at the Ontario Federation of Labour

For more information: http://weareontario.ca/index.php/ontario-common-front-general-assembly-august-19-2013/

US Congress Fails Student Loan Borrowers Once Again

After Congress failed to keep interest rates on federally subsidized Stafford Loans from doubling on July 1st, just yesterday, the U.S. Senate failed to take up a bill that would have reset interest rates at 3.4% for another year, falling short of the 60 votes needed to begin debate.

Simply put, Congress has, once again, failed the American people.  But this isn’t the end of the fight –this is just the beginning.

Throughout this debate, many of you have asked “What about me?” as the vast majority of you wouldn’t be affected by this rate hike anyway.  Well, we’ve heard your voices and we think you’re absolutely right!  The recent debate over interest rates has sucked most of the air out of what should be a much larger debate over how we fund higher education in America.

Because Congress has remained tone-deaf to the will of the American people, we need to raise our voices even louder!  To that end, we’ve started a new petition, demanding that Congress take up Comprehensive Student Debt reform.  Rather than focusing on just one small piece of the overall student debt crisis, we’re asking that Congress take a holistic approach to the issue and completely overhaul the student lending system.  Among the reforms we’re asking for in this new petition are:

  • Restoration of basic consumer protections, such as bankruptcy rights and statutes of limitations on the collections of student loan debt;
  • The right to refinance student loans so as to allow borrowers to take advantage of historically low interest rates;
  • Elimination of the $2,500 cap on the deductibility of student loan interest paid;
  • Elimination of the practice of interest capitalization on student loan debt;
  • The ability to consolidate private student loans with federal loans; and
  • Making all federal and private student loans eligible for income-driven repayment programs, such as IBR and Pay As You Earn, that limits payments to ten percent of income and provides forgiveness after a certain number of years;

This list is by no means exhaustive.  There are countless ways we can reform the way in which higher education is paid for in America, but Congress needs to find the political will to get to work.  Please add your name to this petition today so that we can demonstrate to those who purport to represent us that we’re not only deadly serious, but that we’re not going to give up this fight!

To further help spread the word, please click here to automatically share the Student Debt Crisis image  with your friends on Facebook.  Then, click here to Tweet about the new petition.

Thank you, as always, for your continued support.  Now, let’s raise our voices even louder than they’ve been before and let Congress know: they have a job to do and we’re not going anywhere until they do it!

Sincerely,
Robert Applebaum, Co-Founder & Executive Director
StudentDebtCrisis.org

Elizabeth Warren’s Student Loan Fairness Act goes to vote

Huffington Post, July 9, 2013– Elizabeth Warren’s proposal, presented in May, would offer the same interest rate on federal Stafford loans as the one that banks receive from the Federal Reserve. Under her plan, the rate on government-issued student loans would fall from 6.8 percent to 0.75 percent, saving students thousands over the life of their loans.”

“The proposal in Congress to extend current rates does not do enough to help students with mounting debt,” the professors’ letter reads. “Congress should address this urgent problem by passing Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s bill to let students borrow money at the same low rate as banks.”

More than 1,000 college professors from 568 higher education institutions around the country have signed a letter calling on Congress to pass legislation authored by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) that would dramatically lower interest rates on federal student loans.

Student Debt Crisis Team, July 9, 2013– The U.S. Senate is finally expected to vote tomorrow on whether to keep interest rates low on students loans.  

Because they failed to reach a deal by the July 1st deadline, rates have doubled from 3.4 to 6.8 percent. Unless reversed, this means the average student will owe an extra $1,000 per year of their loan, affecting nearly 7 million borrowers.   

In light of soaring education costs and a tough economy for recent graduates, now more than ever is the time to keep college affordable.
  

Please make this message clear by sharing this image now: 
http://bit.ly/13HiPMu

Thank you for making your voices heard!

Sincerely,


Rob, Natalia, Kyle, Aaron & The 
Student Debt Crisis Team
Follow us on 
Twitter
Join us on 
Facebook

Coalition of Graduate Employee Unions (CGEU) conference August 1-4, 2013

You are cordially invited to the 22nd annual Coalition of Graduate Employee Unions (CGEU) conference and the 9th annual Canadian Coalition of Graduate Employee Unions conference, hosted concurrently by United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America Local 896/Campaign to Organize Graduate Students (COGS).  This year’s conference will be held on the campus of the University of Iowa from August 1-4, 2013.  The conference will begin in earnest Friday morning and wrap up by noon on Sunday.

The C/CGEU was formed to support the organization of new graduate student employee unions; to strengthen established unions; and to provide a forum for graduate employee unionists to meet, share information, and work together toward common goals.  The annual conference features workshops on organizing, leadership development, negotiation strategies, and member mobilization.

We invite you to participate on panels and/or in workshops on a variety of subjects. Possible topics might include:

• Organizing in a Right-to-Work (for less) State: Examples and Strategies

• Fighting “Back Door Tuition”: Bargaining Against Increased Student Fees

• The Affordable Care Act: Anticipating Changes and Using Them to Your Advantage

• Effective Use of Social Media

• Higher Education and the Labor Movement: Where Do We Fit In?

• Developing New Leaders

• Building Coalitions On and Off Campus

• Political Action and Legislative Fightback: On ALEC and other Woes

• Strengthening Steward System/Training

You’ll find other options on the registration form, including panels on bargaining contexts.  If you would like to propose a panel or workshop not listed above, there will be a space on the electronic registration form to do so.  We look forward to your suggestions.

Please join us in Iowa City in August to meet unionists from throughout Canada and the United States.  To register for the conference, please use the following link at the bottom of the page or click on the CGEU tab of our website, cogs.org.  For a discounted registration rate of $45, please submit your registration by Monday, July 1, 2013.  After that date, registration will increase to $50.  Please be sure to bring your conference registration fee with you to the conference if you choose not to mail it in advance.

In Solidarity,

The CGEU 2013 Organizing Committee

Registration Form

Elizabeth Warren’s QE for Students: Populist Demagoguery or Economic Breakthrough?

Ellen Brown, Truthout, 17 June 2013– On July 1, interest rates will double for millions of students – from 3.4% to 6.8% – unless Congress acts; and the legislative fixes on the table are largely just compromises. Only one proposal promises real relief – Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s “Bank on Students Loan Fairness Act.” This bill has been dismissed out of hand as “shameless populist demagoguery” and “a cheap political gimmick,” but is it? Or could Warren’s outside-the-box bill represent the sort of game-changing thinking sorely needed to turn the economy around?

Warren and her co-sponsor John Tierney propose that students be allowed to borrow directly from the government at the same rate that banks get from the Federal Reserve — 0.75 percent. They argue:

Some people say that we can’t afford low interest rates for students. But the federal government offers far lower rates on loans every single day — they just don’t do it for everyone. Right now, a bank can get a loan through the Federal Reserve discount window at a rate of less than one percent. The same big banks that destroyed millions of jobs and broke our economy can borrow at about 0.75 percent, while our students will be paying nine times as much as of July 1.

This is not fair. And it’s not necessary, either. The federal government makes 36 cents on every dollar it lends to students. Just last week, the Congressional Budget Office announced that the government will make $51 billion on the student loans it issued this year — more than the annual profit of any Fortune 500 company, and about five times Google’s yearly earnings. We should not be profiting from students who are drowning in debt while we are giving great deals to big banks.

The archly critical Brookings Institute says the bill “confuses market interest rates on long-term loans (such as the 10-year Treasury rate) with the Federal Reserve’s Discount Window (used to make short-term loans to banks), and does not reflect the administrative costs and default risk that increase the costs of the federal student loan program.”

Those criticisms would be valid if the provider of funds were either a private bank or the American taxpayer; but in this case, it is the U.S. Federal Reserve.  Warren and Tierney assert, “For one year, the Federal Reserve would make funds available to the Department of Education to make these loans to our students.” For the Fed, completely different banking rules apply. As “lender of last resort,” it can expand its balance sheet by buying all the assets it likes. The Fed bought over $1 trillion in “toxic” mortgage-backed securities in QE 1, and reportedly turned a profit on them.  It could just as easily buy $1 trillion in student debt and refinance it at 0.75%.

Read More: Truthout

For Profit U Survey

Have you attended a for-profit university, such as the University of Phoenix?

If so, we’d like to hear about your experiences.

For Profit U is a project of Service Employees International Union centered on improving transparency and increasing student and faculty success at for profit universities. We need input from you. Click the link to take a short survey about your experiences as a student at a for-profit university: http://action.seiu.org/page/content/for-profit-students/

For-profit colleges enroll between 10 to 13% of college students, yet receive 25% of all federal financial aid dollars. Ninety-six percent of for profit students take out student loans, and almost one-quarter default default within 3 years of entering repayment. By sharing your experiences, we can work to improve transparency and student outcomes at for-profit schools. Take the survey here: http://action.seiu.org/page/content/for-profit-students/

If you haven’t attended a for-profit university but know someone who has, please forward the survey to them. Thank you, as always, for your continued suppport.

Sincerely,
Rob, Kyle, Natalia, Aaron & The Student Debt Crisis Team

Students, the PMO might ‘do ya a Duffy’ and pay off your debt #DoYaADuffy #BCpoli

With the Office of the Prime Minister (PMO) open to ‘do ya a Duffy’, how about paying off the loans bankrupting a generation? If you can write a $90,000 cheque, no questions asked (NQA) to Mike Duffy to pay off questionable housing expenses, surely you can write cheques for the debt-burdened students’ loans, NQA. Understandably, when the PMO sets out to ‘do ya a Duffy’, a cheque leaves a trail, so just dole out the newly minted $90,000 bills—you’d go from zero to hero and, unlike the NQA case of Mike Duffy’s payout, there’d be no need to request that student debtors remain silent! So how about it PMO, NQA?

Nereid Lake documenting her $60,000 student loan debt. Photo by Steve Bosch.

Although it is silly to present facts for the PMO to ‘do ya a Duffy’, there are nonetheless a few for the record. Debt is the biggest stressor for students, not academic studies, with an average at about $28,000 per undergraduate student and easily about $20,000 on top of undergraduate debt load per PhD student (note that PhD–“piled higher and deeper” now refers to the crap side of debt and not the crap side of knowledge). With an average of $15,000 per year for an undergraduate education in Canada, and federal loans up to $12,000 per year and provincial up to about $6,000, debt adds up quickly. Most students will report that graduate studies requires that this level of government or private debt continues apace for the advanced degrees.

Student protests have been intense, especially in Quebec, as most universities in Canada raise tuition fees annually. In British Columbia and Nova Scotia, for example, budgets are balanced on the backs of students. “The real cost of balancing the budget—even if we accept this thoroughly discredited [Liberal] government’s assumptions—is being paid out of the pockets of working families, students and those least able to afford higher fees and service charges,” the CUPE BC Secretary-Treasurer recently observed.

In BC, universities are given an annual green light to raise tuition 2%. And what do they do? What are the effects? As the Canadian Federation of Students reminds us: “Recent studies reveal the effects of high tuition fees on access to post-secondary education for students from low- and middle-income backgrounds. Statistics Canada reports that students from low-income families are less than half as likely to participate in university than those from high-income families.” For the graduate students, “high levels of debt are the inevitable result of massive fee hikes and the deregulation of tuition fees in graduate programs,” says the National Graduate Caucus of the CFS. And with the economy tanking and jobs for youth descending to low tide, it is “under/grad to unemployed” and underemployed (about 40% of the few jobs for the grads do not require a baccalaureate). So there you have it, with laws preventing students from declaring bankruptcy, student debt is nevertheless bankrupting a generation.

Education, the biggest loser in the BC election, negative politics hardly to blame #bcpoli

The BC NDP may have ‘snatched defeat from the jaws of victory’, but education is one of the biggest losers in this week’s election of the fourth consecutive Liberal majority government in the province. In addition to education, the handful of biggest losers in the election includes labour, students, youth, and the increasing volume of people scraping to get by in general.

With more than a decade of labour disputes over the Liberals’ irresponsible and often careless bargaining practices, the BC Teachers’ Federation is now bracing once again to enter the fray of contract negotiations. The past dozen years of degraded labour relations included a range of arbitrations and trips to courts to stave off the Liberals’ intentions of stripping bargaining rights from teachers and alarming erosions of their academic freedom and civil liberties writ large.

Blind to the stunning turn of election fortunes this week, universities in the province were holding their breath for the NDP’s promises to invest millions in education. Flush in the face, now there is not much more for the Presidents to do but go begging for more or just morph into real estate, as UBC has, and build more, oh yes, and raise tuition. In the backyard of the provincial legislature, the University of Victoria is cutting staff and raising tuition once again.

Actually, most universities in the province, such as UBC, raise tuition 2% annually to build on the students’ backs. Smarting from the trend, students are realizing that they are “paying significantly more” and “getting less,” as Melissa Moroz of the Professional Employees Association observed. Students are also waking up to the hard facts of the fictitious economy presented to them in low res 3D: the job market for youth is actually the worst in decades and sinking to new lows. Indicators for the summer 2013 summer job market point to bleak months ahead while university graduates are left praying and hoping for mere job ads as jobs for University grads become the stuff of the past. Education PhDs, for example, anxiously open the CAUT Bulletin and University Affairs month after month only to find blank columns and a job ad section less than full enough to fold a single paper airplane.

Meanwhile back on the mainland, students at Capilano University are burning and destroying their artwork in protest of impending cuts of entire arts programs. This past year, strikes and other forms of labour action at SFU and UBC marked the sign of the times of universities, over-extended and under-funded, unable or unwilling to pay fair wage increases. Next month begins an arbitration between the Faculty Association of UBC and the University to settle a contract bargaining dispute now in its second year. There isn’t much to bargain for or with, as for the Liberals, the universities’ staff, students, and faculty remain net zero workers.

Politics in British Columbia: 14 May election results.

What happened? With all due respect NDP (and I voted NDP), please quit the laughable fiction suggesting that their negative campaign simply overshadowed our positive campaign–their power out-spun our truth. For sure, the NDP was out-campaigned and badly so. Out-witted and out-strategized would be other ways of describing this. What’s worse than a Liberal? A smug Liberal. But hey, at least we have the Vancouver-Point Grey and Vancouver Fairview ridings, two of the few flies on the windshield of that ostentatious red parade float!

Visibly fussed the day after the election, the best the NDP could muster up was the simplistic negative v positive excuse. Even some among the left press, such as The Georgia Straight, could find nothing to say but to parrot the NDP: “It’s sad, but negative politics rule” the Straight began its “NDP Grapples with Stunning Loss” story. NDP candidate George Chow, who went down in defeat in the Vancouver-Langara riding, decried that they lost because “negativity works.” George Heyman, who displaced the Liberal Minister of Health in the Vancouver-Fairview riding went as far as to mystifyingly say that the Liberals’ “negative campaign” “turns people off.” One does not have to be a strategy or policy wonk to know that the Liberals hardly ran a negative campaign and those who argue they did appear clueless, or more generously are understandably squeezing sour grapes from what’s left of the BC NDP’s election machinery. A federal NDP MP joined in nonetheless: the Liberals’ victory “shows the power of negative politics,” he said. C’mon now, who are we trying to kid? The ridings that went red and went to the Liberals– nay, all of us–deserve a believable and better explanation from the NDP for what happened on election day.

What happened? Is not BC a conservative province and the Liberals just as well neoliberals or neocons? Isn’t liberalism and neoliberalism basically the same at this point in time? The glove fits the hand that feeds business, if not business as usual. We know that Canada as a whole has become quite comfortably conservative. In BC, Gordon Campbell brought the Liberals to victory in 2001 and the province took a right turn that obviously sits right with a majority of the people. In this week’s election on 14 May, there were pockets of ‘vote the bums out’, such as in my riding where we did vote out the Liberals’ very astute strategist and standing Premier Christy Clark. But for the most part, if you lean left toward NDP, election night sadly trended from ‘vote the bums out’ to ‘vote the bums in’.

Now, as #IdleNoMore confronts #IdleForeverMore, it is going to be an interesting four more years in BC.

Let Students Pay the Same Interest Rates as the Big Banks!

As you know, on July 1st of this year, the interest rate on federal subsidized Stafford Loans is set to double, from 3.4% to 6.8%.  If Congress does nothing, current and prospective students will be forced to pay an additional $1000 per year, per loan, on top of the exorbitant costs they already face with skyrocketing tuition that force students to borrow that much more simply to obtain a quality education.

In response to this looming interest rate hike, Senator Elizabeth Warren has introduced her first piece of stand-alone legislation in the Senate, called the “Bank on Students Loan Fairness Act” which seeks to set the interest rate on federal student loans at .75%, the same rate at which the big banks are able to borrow at the Federal Reserve discount window.

Please sign Senator Warren’s Petition in Favor of her Bill to Let Students Borrow at the Same Rate as the Big Banks!

As Senator Warren has said, it is fundamentally unfair to make students borrow for their educations at a rate that is nine times higher than the rate at which the big banks that nearly destroyed our economy are allowed to borrow.  The federal government made over $30 Billion in profits off the backs of students last year alone – this practice has to stop!

Even if you aren’t going to be personally affected by this looming rate hike, as someone who cares about the growing issue of student debt, it is important that we stand in solidarity with current and prospective students to protect their interests.

While this is just one front in the battle against the growing student debt crisis, it is imperative that we take a firm stand here to make sure that the student debt crisis doesn’t get any worse!

Please stand with Senator Warren and sign her petition today!

Thank you, as always, for your continued support.  Now, let’s get Elizabeth Warren’s back and help protect current and prospective students from being fleeced on their student loans!

Sincerely,
Robert Applebaum, Co-Founder & Executive Director,

StudentDebtCrisis.org
Follow us on Twitter
Join us on Facebook

We Too Are #IdleNoMore : UBC’s Non-Indigenous Scholars and the Politics of Engaging Indigeneity

We Too Are “Idle No More”:
UBC’s Non-Indigenous Scholars and the Politics of Engaging Indigeneity

Monday
May 27, 2013
8:30am to 5:30pm

FREE and open to the public

A Centre for Culture, Identity and Education (CCIE) Project; in collaboration with the Office of the Associate Dean of Indigenous Education

RSVP : http://tinyurl.com/cwvyqoy
DATE:  Monday, May 27, 2013
VENUE: University of British Columbia, Longhouse, Sty-Wet-Tan
1985 West Mall
Map: http://bit.ly/aiSPhB
TIME: 8:30am to 5:30pm, 5:30 – 6:30 Mingler and further discussion

Welcome:  Elder Larry Grant

Opening Plenary Panel: Blye Frank, Dean of Education & Jo-ann Archibald, Associate Dean of Indigenous Education.

Closing Plenary Panel: Anna Kindler- Vice Provost, Academic & Linc Kesler- Senior Advisor to President on Aboriginal Affairs

This symposium will involve plenary and regular panels composed of non-indigenous administrators, faculty, graduate students and staff from a variety of units across UBC addressing the details and politics of engaging Indigeneity, with responses from Indigenous administrator and scholar discussants. While the project originates from the Faculty of Education, the aim is to provide an overview and details of work on academic and administrative topics and projects on indigeneity across UBC.  

Symposium Details:

Co-sponsors: Faculty of Education – Year of Indigenous Education, Indigenous Education Institute of Canada, Department of Educational Studies, Department of Language and Literacy Education, Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, First Nations Studies Program, Department of English, Department of Anthropology, Department of Art History Visual Art and Theory and Belkin Art Gallery, Office of the Provost and Vice President, Academic

NDP Leader Adrian Dix calls for pause in Capilano U program cuts #bcpoli

Posted by Capilano University Faculty Association, May 8, 2013:

Thank you for your letter highlighting your concerns about the future of Capilano University’s Studio Arts and Textile Arts programs. We understand that the university is facing a $1.3 million budget shortfall, which has threatened about 220 classes in the areas of studio arts, textile arts, interactive design, applied business technology programs, and more.

Times have been tough for BC universities for the past few years. The BC Liberals’ 2013 budget cut funding for the Ministry of Advanced Education by 2.5 per cent or $46 million over the next three years. Every president of BC’s 25 universities and colleges signed a letter protesting these planned cutbacks in 2012. Colleges throughout British Columbia have been forced to cut budgets and reduce programs as a result – the cut of Capilano University’s Arts and Textile Arts programs is surely a result of this.

Education and skills training is the number one priority of the BC NDP, and our platform commits to a needs-based student grant program as well as investing in skills training and apprenticeships. Eighty per cent of the jobs of tomorrow will require some form of post-secondary education or training and access to education is key to growing a sustainable economy that will attract investment, create good jobs, and build ladders of opportunity into a strong middle class.

The decision to cut these programs is ultimately the decision of Capilano University’s Board of Governors, but we urge them to wait until after the May 14th election. The plan does not need to be rushed through. The decision should wait until a new government in BC has the chance to discuss the future of these programs with Capilano University and determine if any additional funding is available at that time.

Sincerely,

Adrian Dix, BC NDP Leader
Vancouver Kingsway

Save the Capilano University Computer Science Department

Petition to Save the Capilano University Computer Science Department

The Computer Science Department At Capilano University is scheduled to be suspended: The Board of Governors are voting on whether or not to discontinue the program on May 14. Please help us spread the word that the loss of this department would be a blow to the technology sector in BC.

Capilano University’s Computer Science is an integral part of Capilano’s education platform. If there’s any doubt about the value of these programs, there won’t be after you see some of the phenomenal work that’s been created by current and former students. Not only is this a blow to technology and innovation, it also limits the ability of students in other departments to collaborate with someone in the industry. The instructors in this department are both brilliant and motivated to help their students achieve success in the field of computer science from programming to web design and basic computing. They should be praised for their dedication in spite of all these funding cuts… If these Cuts are allowed to take place Students will be Robbed of an Important Educational aspect, which leads to the question:

WHICH DEPARTMENT is NEXT to get CUT!

Academia’s Indentured Servants

Sarah Kendzior, Aljazeera, April 11, 2013– On April 8, 2013, the New York Times reported that 76 percent of American university faculty are adjunct professors – an all-time high. Unlike tenured faculty, whose annual salaries can top $160,000, adjunct professors make an average of $2,700 per course and receive no health care or other benefits.

Most adjuncts teach at multiple universities while still not making enough to stay above the poverty line. Some are on welfare or homeless. Others depend on charity drives held by their peers. Adjuncts are generally not allowed to have offices or participate in faculty meetings. When they ask for a living wage or benefits, they can be fired. Their contingent status allows them no recourse.

No one forces a scholar to work as an adjunct. So why do some of America’s brightest PhDs – many of whom are authors of books and articles on labour, power, or injustice – accept such terrible conditions?

“Path dependence and sunk costs must be powerful forces,” speculates political scientist Steve Saidemen in a post titled “The Adjunct Mystery“. In other words, job candidates have invested so much time and money into their professional training that they cannot fathom abandoning their goal – even if this means living, as Saidemen says, like “second-class citizens”. (He later downgraded this to “third-class citizens”.)

With roughly 40 percent of academic positions eliminated since the 2008 crash, most adjuncts will not find a tenure-track job. Their path dependence and sunk costs will likely lead to greater path dependence and sunk costs – and the costs of the academic job market are prohibitive. Many job candidates must shell out thousands of dollars for a chance to interview at their discipline’s annual meeting, usually held in one of the most expensive cities in the world. In some fields, candidates must pay to even see the job listings.

Given the need for personal wealth as a means to entry, one would assume that adjuncts would be even more outraged about their plight. After all, their paltry salaries and lack of departmental funding make their job hunt a far greater sacrifice than for those with means. But this is not the case. While efforts at labour organisation are emerging, the adjunct rate continues to soar – from 68 percent in 2008, the year of the economic crash, to 76 percent just five years later.

Contingency has become permanent, a rite of passage to nowhere….

Is academia a cult? That is debatable, but it is certainly a caste system. Outspoken academics like Pannapacker are rare: most tenured faculty have stayed silent about the adjunct crisis. “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it,” wrote Upton Sinclair, the American author famous for his essays on labour exploitation. Somewhere in America, a tenured professor may be teaching his work, as a nearby adjunct holds office hours out of her car. On Twitter, I wondered why so many professors who study injustice ignore the plight of their peers. “They don’t consider us their peers,” the adjuncts wrote back. Academia likes to think of itself as a meritocracy – which it is not – and those who have tenured jobs like to think they deserved them. They probably do – but with hundreds of applications per available position, an awful lot of deserving candidates have defaulted to the adjunct track.

Read More: Aljazeera

Survey on Student Debt

Survey on student debt, put together by One Wisconsin Now & Institute.  The response so far has been amazing, however,  input is still needed!

Some of the insights we hope to ascertain from this project include:

  • How is the trillion-dollar student debt crisis affecting a household’s purchasing ability?
  • Are student loans affecting auto and home ownership?
  • How about savings for retirement, or for the next generation’s college?
  • Are there opportunities to change the way we finance higher education?
  • Do we need a way to alter the existing debt structure on student loans?

If you haven’t already taken the survey, please take a few minutes of your time to complete it by clicking here:  Student Loan Survey

Just seven minutes of your time will be a huge boost for our shared fight to raise awareness and develop real solutions.

The survey questions that follow ask you about your household circumstances, using questions that are similar to those asked by the U.S. Census Bureau. The survey is designed to honor your privacy and does not collect personally identifiable information such as birth date, social security number, address, or, naturally, your name. Survey respondents will be truly anonymous.

After taking the survey, please share it with friends, family, neighbors and co-workers via Twitter, Facebook & email.

If, after taking the survey, you feel that your story is not adequately captured by the survey, feel free to email your specific story to: own@onewisconsinnow.org

Thank you for all you do and for your help on this critical research project.

Sincerely,

Robert Applebaum
StudentDebtCrisis.org

Protests gathering momentum at Capilano University

Juan Cisneros, May 3, 2013 —  Thank you so much for all your support! Over 4000 signatures [on the Capilano University:  Save the Studio Art and Textile Arts Programs petition]!

As of today the University’s faculty and the students are getting together with their unions in order to find more solutions for this situation. The University is facing a problem that has to be addressed together, not behind closed doors.

On Tuesday, 200 of the school’s faculty and a group of students, peacefully protested outside the President’s office, their presence could be felt through the silence manifested.

More and more people are hearing our voices, but we haven’t finished fighting…. We need all your support and we appreciate the positive response that you have shown so far.

Read More: FaceBook CapuArtEviction

Capilano University needs to hit the pause button on its budget plans

Reg Johanson, Georgia Straight, May 2, 2013 — Capilano University executives responsible for a proposed budget, which would see broad program, course, and staffing cuts, say they didn’t have time to consult with faculty and students. In their haste, they have proposed to cut programs and services to students that took decades to build. This is what happens, as Franco Berardi has said, “when we no longer have time to pay attention. We perceive things badly, we are no longer able to make decisions in a rational manner.”

What is the rationale for the cuts? There is a deficit, and under the University Act, the university must make a balanced budget. The deficit is just over $1 million, yet the cuts total $3 million. We are told that the cuts were made not only, or even most importantly, on the basis of cost, enrolment, or quality, but on whether or not they fit the “strategic vision” of the university.

Philosophy courses, science courses, the German language program, studio and textile arts, art history, computing science, commerce, courses and services offered at the Carnegie Centre in the Downtown Eastside, design and animation courses, student support services of all kinds, music therapy—none of these fit the “vision”.

Whose vision is this? Who was involved in developing it? I know faculty and students were not. I’m certain that the North Shore / Howe Sound Corridor community, which the university primarily serves, was not. If we had been, the budget would look very different.

Instead of giving faculty and students the time we need to find our way as a university, our managers have pre-empted this process to impose their own vision. But they do not know best. The university president has been at Cap for only three years. Several key executive and high-level administrative positions have turned over in this time. Put simply: they don’t know what they’re doing.

Read More: Georgia Straight