Author Archives: stephanie schaupmeyer

Why you (and everyone else…) call her ‘mom’

You are 10 years old again, and you’re at the grocery store with your mom. The reese’s pieces in aisle 4 caught your eye, but just for a second. You turn around to ask your mom to if you are allowed to get them, but she has disappeared. Frantically, you call out, “Mom!”, but you recoil when nearly every woman in sight turns to find out who was calling their name.

If you wanna talk about ambiguity, the term ‘mom’ pretty  much nails it. Did you ever think how strange it is that nearly everyone in the english speaking language refers to their mother by the exact same name? Even more odd: the name ‘mom’ (ok, slight variations of the name) are common across many languages and cultures.

screen-shot-2016-10-30-at-2-34-56-pm

Example of terms of kinship in English and Spanish

It’s hard to talk in terms of genealogy (or, the study of family history) without using terms of kinship, such as father, auntie or grandma. These words are crucial in describing blood relations to each other; ultimately, terms of kinship are the foundation when  constructing family trees. However, these terms often translate very differently in terms of phonetics. For example, in English we refer to the brother of our father as ‘uncle’, whereas in Spanish he is referred to as ‘tío’.  You see, these two words do not look or sound the same. However, there is something about the term mother that is all too similar across many languages….

In German, they say ‘mutter’. In Afrikaans, it’s ‘moeder’. Swahili? Mama. Catching the drift?

So how did the kinship term ‘mother’ turn out to be so phonetically similar across cultures? Most experts have landed on an explanation provided by Roman Jakobson, and it goes like this:

“Often the sucking activities of a child are accompanied by a slight nasal murmur, the only phonation which can be produced when the lips are pressed to mother’s breast or to the feeding bottle and the mouth full. Later, this phonatory reaction to nursing is reproduced as an anticipatory signal at the mere sight of food and finally as a manifestation of a desire to eat, or more generally, as an expression of discontent and impatient longing for missing food or absent nurser, and any ungranted wish”

I mean, that makes perfect sense, right? But what if I told you that Jakobson presented these findings in 1962, over 50 years ago. The literature on this specific topic hardly goes past the early 90’s, and while Jakobson’s explanation may seem to be bang-on, I am curious if the scientific community has not questioned this explanation thoroughly enough; the biggest flaw I see is how this accounts for all the languages that do not have a phonetically similar variant of ‘mother’.

While some are ready to mark this topic case-closed, I would prefer to leave it open to allow the scientific community to explore it a little longer.

-Steph Schaupmeyer

Cutting too quick?

In 2015 the number of cesarean sections (c-sections) were at a whopping 32% of all births- this is almost double the number of c-sections performed in the 90’s! It is important to note that the risk factors that warrant doctors to perform an emergency c-section are not also on the rise. C-sections are being more and more often performed on low risk pregnancies, inherently putting both baby and mom at a higher risk of complications. The graph below show’s the maternal morbidity rate of women by method of delivery. It is evident that c-sections have a much greater risk than vaginal births!

screen-shot-2016-10-11-at-7-00-52-pm

So if risk factors leading to c-sections are not on the rise and a c-section puts a mother at a higher risk of complications, why is the prevalence of c-sections so high? Lets take a look at some of the possible reasons:

Technology Electronic fetal monitoring begins once a pregnant woman enters the hospital. It tracks the babies vitals and can detect signs of distress. As the only way to really assess the babies safety, it’s a great tool. However, there isn’t extensive research on how to interpret the readings and there are many false positives, leading to more c-sections than probably necessary.

Decline in VBAC V-what? Vaginal Birth After Cesarean. Once a woman has her first cesarean birth- warranted or not-  there are complications involved in a subqequent vaginal birth. This means that a mother who delivers via cesarean will most likely have to deliver by c-section for all subsequent births. This is a positive feedback loop, definitely contributing to the rise in c-sections!

Control  Usually women have the choice of which birthing method they prefer. For some, it is as simple as wanting to choose the day and the doctor that delivers their baby- control only a c-section can give you. While this should still be taken into account, it probably isn’t a huge contributor to the rise in c-sections, as  a recent study found that only 10% of all c-sections were elected procedures.

Commercialization Is it possible that society is turning the most basic and beautiful reproductive right into a business? In a recent study – whose results are shown in the graph below-  it was found that the majority of c-sections occur from Monday to Friday between the hours of 8am and 5pm. Hmm… that’s convenient.  Could the number of c-sections be on the rise because the labor and delivery doc wants to get home in time to eat dinner?

screen-shot-2016-10-10-at-5-52-47-pm

Regardless, it is important that a woman knows her options when she is in the delivery room and it is equally as important that doctors are making the best choice on behalf of the mother, who is in arguably her most powerful and vulnerable state. Whatever factor, or more likely combination of factors, is responsible for the increase in c-sections, it is critical that we don’t lose sight of the most important thing: the safety of both mother and baby.

-Steph Schaupmeyer