Tag Archives: COCAL Updates

COCAL Updates

NOTE:  Many subscribers to COCAL UPDATES are also scholars who write for publication in academic journals, or know those who do. I am personally on the Editorial Board of Labor Studies Journal, the peer reviewed journal of the United Association for Labor Education, published by Sage. For you folks I have two requests:

1. If you write in a field related in any way to labor, please try to include citations to articles from LSJ if possible. This makes our ranking in the journal world go up and also increases the visibility of pro-labor academic writing generally. LSJ is fully indexed online back to 1998 at http://lsj.sagepub.com/content/by/year and previous indexing is printed in the back of hard copies annually. It is also indexed in a number of online and hard copy indexes. See <http://www.sagepub.com/journals/Journal201857/abstractIndexing>

2. Many of you also go to conferences, including labor related conferences, where you and others present papers on contingnet faculty and other related topics. Please consider submitting this writing to LSJ for publication. The guidelines for authors can be accessed at http://www.sagepub.com/journals/Journal201857/manuscriptSubmission. Articles have 2-3 blind reviewers prior to possible revision and/or publication both online and hard copy.

UPDATES IN BRIEF AND LINKS

1. Two of the best reactions to the Boston Marathon bombings I have seen

http://ouleft.sp-mesolite.tilted.net/?p=1338&utm_source=CCDSLinks+weekly+-+April+19%2C+2013&utm_campaign=CCDSLinks&utm_medium=email

2. More on the University of Indiana strike

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLDnXPm0LhM

3. Michigan teachers, profs and grads deal with right to work.

http://www.labornotes.org/2013/04/coping-michigans-right-work-law

4. SEIU urges ACA coverage for adjuncts

http://www.seiu.org/2013/04/seiu-urges-aca-coverage-for-part-time-workers-adju.php

5. Sign petition for lesbian teacher at Catholic high school who was fired after her sexual orientation became public and a parent complained.

https://www.change.org/petitions/diocese-of-columbus-reinstate-faculty-member-carla-hale?utm_source=action_alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=22785&alert_id=iqGmsHKJqX_tkbypwkmBk

6. Our colleague, Chester Kulis, at Oakton CC and OAFA, IEA/NEA gives a good argument about why we should include all contingents, even one class adjuncts, in the bargaining unit and why they should want in too. See below

7. Our colleague Tim Sheard (of the Lenny Moss mystery series) is now publishing other worker-writers at his Hardball Press. He is looking for good manuscripts by worker writers. <hardballpress.com> or contact Tim directly at Tim Sheard <sheard2001@gmail.com>. This could be a great opportunity for some contingent faculty and/or some of our students.

8. Recent positive arbitration on employer changes in retiree health insurance. See below for details.

9. Petition on computer grading of high stakes essay tests

http://humanreaders.org/petition/

10. New journal of contingent labor, “Cognitariat”

http://oaworld.org/index.php/cognitariat

11. New UUP faculty bulletin from SUNY New Paltz chapter (Peter Brown, Chair) . Lots of contingent news.

12. Another piece on the metro organizing strategy

http://leftlaborreporter.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/metropolitan-organizing-strategy-seeks-to-build-union-power-for-adjunct-faculty/

13. U of IL, Chicago, shop steward for SEIU Local 73 suspended for doing his job

http://www.fightbacknews.org/2013/4/19/uic-local-73-steward-suspended-union-activity

14. Pieces by Marc Bousquet on NLRB and religious exemptions for colleges.

http://chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/beyond-yeshiva-nlrb-tackles-both-church-and-state/31246

and http://chronicle.com/blogs/conversation/2012/09/20/clergy-fellas-vs-the-steelworkers/

15. Job opening at National Union of Healthcare Workers (NUHW)   See below.

16. May 1 action at U of Akron (OH)

http://optfa.com/optfa-rally-for-equity-at-the-university-of-akron-on-may-1/

17. More on colleges cutting hours to avoid ACA mandates

http://chronicle.com/article/Colleges-Curb-Adjuncts-Hours/138653/

and http://www.kjzz.org/content/1304/maricopa-community-colleges-limit-hours-some-temporary-workers-and-adjunct-instructors

and results of IRS hearing where many organizations testified about proposed rules for counting adjuncts’ hours

http://chronicle.com/article/Adjuncts-Advocates-Call-for/138757/?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

and http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/04/24/more-institutions-cap-adjuncts-hours-anticipation-federal-guidelines

and a great blogpost by Maria Maisto, NFM President

http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/04/23/colleges-cheating-adjunct-professors-health-insurance

18. Loyalty and adjuncts

http://chronicle.com/blogs/onhiring/loyal-but-in-which-direction/38001?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

19. New book by our colleague Keith Hoeller out next January, 2014 (edited volume with chapters by many of our leading colleague-activists.)

http://www.vanderbiltuniversitypress.com/index.php/books/571/equality-for-contingent-faculty

20. Fast food and retail (nearly all contingent and pt) workers set to walk out in Chicago

http://portside.org/2013-04-23/fast-food-walkout-chicago

and a good blog about it from a Chicago labor educator

http://domesticpolitics.wordpress.com/2013/04/24/a-former-burger-king-worker-on-fast-food-workers-strikes-and-the-need-to-unionize-the-service-sector/

21. Worker Memorial Day (for workers killed on the job)

http://huckkonopackicartoons.com/making-a-killing-texas-style/

22. Paid sick leave needed for all workers

http://www.aflcio.org/Blog/Organizing-Bargaining/MomsRising-Blogger-Carnival-Paid-Sick-Leave-It-s-Business-Friendly-Too

 

COCAL Updates

Another group of contingent and precarious workers, like us, takes successful collective action, Los Angeles port truckers. See below.

and http://grimtruthattollgroup.com/2013/01/09/truck-drivers-clinch-new-power-with-first-union-contract-at-l-a-ports/

2. Two articles on another huge group of contingent workers who are organizing worldwide – domestic workers
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/domestic_workers_worldwide_lack_legal_protections/?source=newsletter
and
http://www.dw.de/many-domestic-workers-without-labor-protection/a-16508972

3. Report on many adjunct activities at MLA convention
http://www.copy–paste.com/mla-2013-convention-and-the-year-of-the-adjunct/

4. More on hours cuts for adjuncts due to bosses attempts to avoid giving us health care under the health care act

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/08/irs-adjunct-faculty_n_2432924.html?utm_hp_ref=college
and
http://www.adjunctproject.com/unintended-consequences-of-the-affordable-care-act/

and http://www.mpnnow.com/topstories/x1781255788/FLCC-Health-care-law-impacts-adjunct-professors

and on MSNBC http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/01/14/colleges-roll-back-faculty-hours-in-response-to-obamacare/

5. Colorado CC adjuncts organizing group and events (now postponed until later in March or April) and also setting up crowd sourced data base on adjunct conditions in cc in CO. See below

6. More on U of Phoenix accredition review
http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2013/01/10/university-phoenixs-accreditation-review

7. Bob Samuels, Pres. of U of CA, AFT Council, on a recent meeting of online tech ed providers. Very interesting
http://changinguniversities.blogspot.com/2013/01/a-failure-of-interaction-report-from.html

8. Interesting comment by Chicago adjunct activist on technology and online learning
See below

9. Bil Fletcher on his new book, “They’re Bankrupting Us and 20 other myths about unions”.
http://labortribune.com/whats-needed-to-prevent-right-wing-from-destroying-unions/?utm_source=CCDSLinks+weekly+-+Jan+11%2C+2013&utm_campaign=CCDSLinks&utm_medium=email

10. Courageous teachers in Seattle have refused to administer some standardized tests. Is there a lesson here for us?
http://www.labornotes.org/blogs/2013/01/when-teachers-refuse-tests

and http://dianeravitch.net/2013/01/12/ballard-high-school-teachers-say-no-in-solidarity-with-garfield-teachers/

11. Review of new book about organizing in Catholic hospitals and non-profits. Some lessons here for contingents in Catholic and private non-profit higher ed.
http://www.labornotes.org/blogs/2013/01/book-review-god-our-side

12. See latest issue of “Rethinking Schools” magazine, on “rethinking teacher unions”. K-12 focus, but lots relevant to us in it too.
http://www.rethinkingschools.org/opt-in/130111.shtml

13. Another college, Palm Beach State in FL, says it will cut adjuncts’ hours to avoid health insurance payments
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/10/palm-beach-state-college-health-insurance_n_2441927.html

14. New TESOL president-elect is ally of contingents, has been at COCAL conferences
See below.

15. New AFT “On Campus” magazine has two articles about us, p. 4 on grad employees victory at U of IL Champaign-Urbana and, p5, on the downsizing of adjunct loads to avoid paying health insurance
http://www.aft.org/emags/oc/oc_janfeb13/index.html#/2/

and an aft 60 minute webinar on implications of Affordable Care Act and adjuncts, including employer penalties and law’s definition of FT employee. Jan. 22 2 PM ET or Jan 23, 2 PM ET. register at http:/tinyurl.com/cv9hpn8

16. Good blog post from Canada on the recent poor quality coverage of higher ed and faculty in mainstream for-profit publications. This online publication, “University Affairs/Affaires Universitaires”, is a good Canadian parallel to CHE or IHE and might be worth checking out regularly for activists, even non-Canadian ones.

http://www.universityaffairs.ca/speculative-diction/more-higher-ed-media-madness/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SpeculativeDiction+%28Speculative+Diction%29

17. AAUP seeking nomination for excellence in higher ed reporting award. See below.

18. Colorado CC Adjuncts organizing and seeking crowd sourced info on others in CO. See below for press release.

19. Very good protest at City College of SF where large number of faculty walked out on the Chancellor’s back-to-school speech and rallied for better budget priorities and a real fight against the rogue accreditors persecuting the college. Many media there, but no electronic coverage. Please call media and protest. See below for numbers. National too.

20. Oregon Labor Board say RA’s can unionize
http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2013/01/14/oregon-labor-board-research-assistants-can-unionize

21. Need to do more for contingent writing faculty
http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/college-ready-writing/starting-do-more-contingent-faculty

22. Check out the great billboard (scroll down as bit) on the current issue of Too Much (edited by the former NEA publications Director, Sam Pizzigatti)
http://www.toomuchonline.org/tmweekly.html

23. New petition for Mexican teacher fired for showing the movie “Milk” to middle schoolers.
http://www.change.org/petitions/lomas-hill-school-officials-publicly-apologize-to-cecilia-hernandez-for-unfair-dismissal-after-showing-milk?utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=url_share&utm_campaign=url_share_before_sign&alert_id=LNAXNeOJGw_vImpmMRLtI

24. REport of national meeting of Labor for Single Payer Health Care in chicago recently
http://www.laborforsinglepayer.org/
Updates in full
1. For Immediate Release: Wednesday January 9, 2013
Contact: Coral Itzcalli, 310-956-5712
TJ Michels, 415-213-2764

Truck Drivers Clinch New Power with First Union Contract at L.A. Ports; Collective Workplace Action Cited as Key to Winning 50% Hourly Raise, Retirement, and Real Health Care

Triumph over Global Employer Toll Group Fuels Hope for More U.S. Workers Organizing to End Low Wages, Poor Conditions in Retail, Food, and Supply Chain
LOS ANGELES –A set of truck drivers who haul shipments of imported merchandise from our shores to America’s brand name stores will kick start 2013 with a raise that doubles their hourly pay. The extra $6+ change is part of a first-ever contract that shifts a bulk of their health care costs to their employer, grants overtime, paid sick leave and holidays, offers guaranteed hours and other terms for job security – not to mention a pension plan. The collective bargaining gains in an otherwise union-free private sector rival 21st century agreements in long-organized markets.
“Justice…it’s sort of indescribable and overwhelming to finally have the American Dream at our reach,” said Jose Ortega Jr., a driver for global logistics giant Toll Group who served on his co-workers’ bargaining committee along with representatives from the International Brotherhood of Teamsters/Local 848 in Long Beach, Calif. The Australian corporation operates at port complexes on both U.S. coasts and handles accounts for Guess?, Polo, Under Armour, and other sportswear lines sold at big box and department retailers like Walmart and JC Penney.
The Toll drivers’ efforts mirror the collective action that has recently erupted in retail and fast food chains. The landmark agreement culminates more than 24 months of worker struggle and employer resistance in which these truckers – aided by a community coalition, their children, and clergy – borrowed bullhorns, leafleted consumers, gathered signatures, practiced their picket lines, staged noisyprotests, and crashed shareholder meetings in a dogged campaign to end the Third World working conditions they once endured.
U.S. port drivers are the most underpaid in the trucking industry: A typical professional earns $28,873 a year before taxes. Their net incomes often resemble that of part-time or seasonal workers though they clock an average of 59 hours a week. They possess specialized skills and licensing to safely command an 80,000 lb. container rig, but they fit the profile of America’s working poor. Food stamps, extended family, or church pantries are needed to get by; their children often lack regular pediatricians or only receive care at the public ER.
With American wages in freefall due to the imbalance of power enjoyed by multinational corporations, the scope and significance of such a labor accord with a transportation titan that operates in some 55 countries is a jaw dropper alone. What observers further find remarkable: The 65 workers who secured these middle-class benefits with their $8 billion employer are blue-collar Latino-Americans who hold jobs within a deregulated, virtually union-free industry at the ports.

“It upends the common wisdom that a workforce that lacks rights on the job cannot build the strength to take on the Goliaths of the global economy. But these drivers, like the workers at the warehouses and Walmart and Wendy’s, cannot raise families on such low wages, so they are coming together to rewrite the playbook,” noted Dr. John Logan, the director of Labor and Employment Studies at the College of Business at San Francisco State University. “The faces of this new movement are ordinary parents and churchgoers and community members who value the influence of a local priest as much as the expertise pouring in from strong trade unions overseas. Not only do they have the guts to strike – they have the faith they can win.”
Their collective resolve paid off. Mr. Ortega, a single father who works the night shift, will see his new per-hour rate of $19.75 reflected on his next paycheck, along with any overtime that will now be paid at a time-and-a-half rate of $28.
“As a truck driver, I wanted the assurance that things would be okay for my daughter if I was injured, that I could take her to see the doctor if she got sick,” the 36-year-old explained. “When we started organizing ourselves, we weren’t asking for anything out of this world. Dignity. A fair day’s pay for a hard day’s work. Decent, sanitary facilities to make a pit stop, rest, eat…you know, to perform our jobs safely.
“But we knew winning respect would take a fight at every turn. So if we were afraid to lose our jobs, we asked our allies for help. When it was time to take action, we prayed for courage to speak out. And we always stuck together, and never gave up.”
Elected leaders quickly praised the union contract as both a middle-class builder and noted its high-road business merits.
“We’re talking about the men and women who are the backbone of our regional and national economy, yet they have never shared in the prosperity of the corporations they make so profitable,” said Los Angeles Councilman Joe Buscaino, whose district includes the largest port in America. “The standards that Toll Group, its workers, and Teamsters Local 848 set make it possible to reward and attract responsible port businesses that want a level playing field to compete on innovation and quality, rather than who can pay Los Angeles’ vital workers the least.”

Contract Highlights include (Click here for a full summary & graphic comparison):
Fair wages –The day shift hourly rate increased from $12.72 to $19, and the night shift hourly rate from $13.22 to $19.75. In addition to the over $6/hour increase in hourly pay rates, drivers won $0.50/hour per year raises over the life of the contract, giving Toll port drivers over a 60% hourly wage boost over the life of the 3-year contract. Overtime pay of time-and-half kicks in after a typical full time 40 hour week, which is extremely rare in an industry where truckers are exempt from federal overtime laws and an average week hovers around 60 hours.
Secure retirement –Prior to the contract, less than a dozen Toll drivers could spare any extra dollars, even pre-tax, to participate in the corporate 401(k) plan. As Teamster Local 848 members, they have been automatically enrolled in the union’s Western Conference Pension Trust. Such a retirement plan at the port has rarely been seen since trucking was deregulated in 1980. Toll will make a pension contribution of $1/hour per driver until 2014, and a $1.50/hour per driver by 2015.

Affordable health care – The Toll Group health care plan was financially out of reach for most of its truck drivers. The few who managed to meet the premium, deductibles, and copayments will now keep significant more money in their pocket without sacrificing coverage, and the rest of their co-workers finally have access to quality, affordable health insurance coverage, including dental and vision care. The company will pay 95% of the premium for individuals and 90% for family coverage. Drivers who previously had to shell out $125/month for individual or $400/month per family will drop to roughly $30 or $150, respectively.
Stable work hours and paid time off – Most truck drivers lose a day’s pay if they cannot work, are penalized by dispatchers for being unable to haul a load, and lack paid sick or holiday leave, making it stressful for family budgets and planning. But Toll drivers made substantial gains in all these areas. They will receive seven paid holidays, three paid personal days, and six paid sick days annually. They will accrue one or two weeks of vacation within the first two years of service, with longtime employees earning up to a month. They can also bank on guaranteed full- or half-day of pay regardless of seasonal slowdowns if they are scheduled to work.
Competitive growth incentives to raise market and living standards – The agreement establishes a high-road business model that recognizes Toll’s competitors have not yet embraced fair wages and conditions. Provisions to encourage a level playing field and wide-scale unionization allow drivers to re-negotiate more gains when a simple majority of the regional market is organized.
“We commend these truck drivers for their leadership in challenging the status quo at the ports. Workers everywhere are standing up to say enough to poverty wages, and Toll drivers have demonstrated that working families will fight for middle-class paychecks in America,” said Teamsters General President James P. Hoffa.
“For too long companies in the global supply chain have gamed the system by undercutting U.S. businesses that actually create good jobs. Toll Group and its drivers have raised the bar for responsible competition, and the Teamsters will not stop until the rest of the nation’s port drivers have a shot at the American Dream.”
Additional Background
The landmark contract caps over two years of struggle for union recognition that workers took online, to the truck yard, and in the LA streets; they zig-zagged to other U.S. seaports to shore up support, and even continent-crossed to meet their Aussie union workmates who stood in solidarity at their joint employer’s doorstep.
In so doing, this group of Latino immigrants became an unlikely symbol of hope for their underpaid counterparts – union and not-yet-union, working in an adopted homeland as well as American-born workers – who must endure low-wage jobs in other profitable sectors in the U.S. food, retail, and global supply chain industries.
The victory is also being celebrated across the Pacific Ocean where the Melbourne-based Toll Group employs some 12,000 of Australian drivers united in the Transport Workers Union (TWU). The members view their U.S. counterparts as their “workmates” and have supported the port drivers from Day One to ensure that as Toll enters new global markets, the company replicates the constructive labor-management relations that made it so profitable Down Under.

“We couldn’t be prouder of our mates in America. From the beginning we said ‘your fight is our fight’ and today we say your victory is our victory,” said TWU Acting National Secretary Michael Kaine. “The standards of fairness and respect for workers should be upheld by Toll no matter where they operate. The message to industry is clear, in this global economy workers and unions across continents are already in alliance with each other and we will continue to support one another until we have a strong voice in our workplaces everywhere.”
The newly-inked contract with the Teamsters further gives another shot in the arm to the movement of port drivers fighting to overcome “misclassification” – illegally denying workers W-2 employment and benefits, a scam that keeps the American Dream out of their reach.Workers are coming forward with evidence for state and federal authorities as part of a coast-to-coast multi-industry crackdown on employers who disguise their employees as independent contractors to evade taxes, commit wage & hour violations, and quell unionization. The controversial practice is widespread in the deregulated trucking sector.

###
See here for an infographic and a summary of the contract. For more background on the Toll drivers’ campaign for justice, visit their website . Information on the blue-green coalition behind the nationwide movement to drive up worker standards and clean up U.S. seaports can be found here: www.CleanAndSafePorts.org

_______________________________________________
Ualeindiv mailing list
Ualeindiv@uale.org
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/ualeindiv

———————
5.
>
>>>
>>> On Dec 31, 2012, at 4:05 PM, C. M. Lawless wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Joe Berry,
>>>
>>> I am writing to you on behalf of Colorado Adjuncts, a nascent group
>>> advocating for change in Colorado’s community colleges (a system that
>>> employs approx. 4,000 adjuncts). Our group is small but we have made many
>>> strides in our first year. You can see some of our work on our Web site,
>>> Colorado Adjuncts under “Did You Know?” We are in a difficult situation on our campus. We are
>>> banned from putting any communication in faculty mailboxes, using the
>>> faculty e-mail system, etc.
>>>
>>> However, we have done so much in our first year, and are now forming an AAUP
>>> chapter.
>>> https://sites.google.com/site/coloradoadjunctswiki/home
>>>
>>> At present, we are promoting your book, “Reclaiming the Ivory Tower,” and
>>> are asking adjuncts and adjunct supporters to make a comment on our
>>> anonymous, online book blog. We follow your COCAL updates, of course.
>>> Everyone who has read the first chapter of the book is buzzing with
>>> confirmation, ideas, energy, etc.
>>>
>>> We are planning a second Film Series event in February, with a panel of
>>> state legislators and AAUP officials to field questions from the audience.
>>> We have no money, of course. However, I was curious if perhaps you might be
>>> in Colorado in February on some other business and would like to be on our
>>> panel. Our first Film Series/Panel was modestly successful, and we got some
>>> coverage on the local NPR affiliate. We would go after that again, of
>>> course, and in our press release explain your background and national
>>> stature in the movement. I would like to see if this NPR affiliate would do
>>> a longer interview with you prior to the event.
>>>
>>> I realize ours is a very poor request, but I am making it, regardless, on
>>> the off-chance you might be out this way in February on other business. Even
>>> if you cannot attend our modest event, I wonder if you might be willing to
>>> post a small comment on our anonymous book blog (on our Web site). It would
>>> be like a shot in the arm, Mr. Berry.
>>>
>>> Thank you for any consideration you give this idea and even if you can do
>>> none of this, thank you for your excellent, helpful book. It is like a
>>> bright light in a dark storm to us, you can imagine.
>>>
>>>
>>> Caprice Lawless
>>> Co-Founder, Colorado Adjuncts
>>> coloradocaprice@gmail.com
>>> Ph. 720-939-3094
>>> 601 Lois Drive
>>> Louisville, CO 80027
>>>
>> —————–

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Jan. 10, 2013
Contact: Caprice Lawless, Communications Director, Colorado Adjuncts
coloradocaprice@gmail.com
Ph. 720-939-3094

Colorado’s Community Colleges 99% Speak Out

While no official in the State of Colorado would admit that higher education for Coloradans doesn’t matter, the Colorado Community College System places such a low value on higher education that it pays its part-time faculty (also known as adjuncts, who are 71 percent of its faculty) no benefits and an average of $15,000 per year. It has done so for more than five years. These adjuncts, many of whom teach ¾ time, teach 70 percent of all classes. They earn a tiny fraction of what campus full-time teachers, deans, administrators, specialists and even custodians are paid.
Community college enrollments have skyrocketed to 151,000. Budget-minded students (and their parents) benefit from low-priced courses, as compared to Colorado’s four-year colleges and universities. The general public is unaware, however, of the devastating blow this Wal-Mart model is delivering to higher education.
It is not uncommon for community college adjunct faculty to apply for food stamps, county services and emergency family assistance to meet their bills. They qualify for (and receive) hardship and charity-status at local health clinics and hospitals. Because they have neither health insurance nor sick leave pay, they go to work when ill. They work two or three jobs to make ends meet, and their teaching often reflects the stress. They cannot qualify for unemployment between semesters because they have no long-term contracts with the CCCS. As a result, hundreds of community college teachers are leaving the profession each year. Many qualified to teach walk away from job offers when they discover the low pay. What happens when there are no more qualified teachers, and word gets out in graduate schools that teaching in colleges is a dying profession? How will Colorado attract good jobs if its front-line teachers work in a type of academic apartheid?
Meanwhile, according to a recent CCCS report, the system has a $3 billion impact on the state each year, and taxpayers receive a $1.70 return on every dollar spent. The rosy pictures painted by such studies fail to include hidden costs to taxpayers when low wages in higher education are the norm. The growing Colorado Adjuncts Index (available on our Web site) reveals the thorns amid the roses. Take a look, and send us your thoughts. Your comments will be useful to us in our forthcoming presentations to Colorado lawmakers.

Caprice Lawless, Sandra Keifer-Roberts and Carolyn Elliott
Co-Founders, Colorado Adjuncts
https://sites.google.com/site/coloradoadjunctswiki/

Colorado Adjuncts Index

Percentage of faculty in the Colorado Community College System (CCCS) who are adjunct: 71% 1
Percentage of all courses taught by adjunct faculty: 70% 2
Annual average, before-tax income, CCCS adjunct faculty members: $15,000 3
Annual median salary, Colorado State Employee Custodian III: $33,420 19
Living wage, minimum, Jefferson County, Colorado, one adult: $19,275 4
Number of adjuncts at work in CCCS, 2006-07(recent figure unavailable on CCCS Web site): 3,500 5
Number of times the terms “adjunct,” or “adjunct faculty” appear in the CCCS Strategic Plan: 0 6
Ranks of concern for salaries for full-time faculty and deans in 2011 CCCS Salary Survey: Top two 7
Recommended change to adjunct wages , 2011 CCCS Salary Survey: 0 7
Average salary, full-time faculty (9-months/year), per 2011 CCCS Salary Survey: $46,618 8
Average salary, CCCS deans, per 2011 CCCS Salary Survey: $74, 959 8
Average salary, CCCS vice-presidents, in 2010 per 2011 CCCS Salary Survey: $101,845 8
Average salary, CCCS level III directors, per 2011 CCCS Salary Survey: $86, 703 8
Annual Salary, CCCS President Nancy McCallin, 2009: $266,695 9
Total CCCS revenue, all sources (tuition and government), 2009-10: $543.494 million 10
Total CCCS expenses, 2009-10: $493.196 million 11
Total CCCS full and part-time faculty and staff, 2009-10: 5,634 12
Total CCCS full and part-time faculty and staff, 2009-10 less 3,500 adjunct faculty: 2,134
Total CCCS combined payroll, 2009-10: $268.633 million 13
Estimated CCCS adjunct payroll (3,500 x $15,000), 2009-10: $52.5 million 14
Number of students, CCCS statewide, 2009-10: 151,000 15
Value of unpaid labor CCCS adjunct faculty annually donate to Colorado taxpayers: $19 million 16
Price tag, one-stop student center, completed 2012, Westminster campus: $5.253 million 17
The number of people teaching in American colleges and universities: 1.5 million 18
The number of those teachers who are adjunct or contingent faculty: 1 million 18

Sources
1 Colorado Community College System. “Our Funding,” Colorado Community College Sourcebook,
2008, p. 4. Web Jan. 6, 2013.
http://www.cccs.edu/Docs/Communication/sb/Funding.pdf
2 Colorado Adjuncts. “An Informal Q&A with President Andy Dorsey.” Adjunct Network, 1.2, p.
4, Spring, 2012, Web 6 Jan. 2013.
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxjb2xvcmFkb2FkanVuY3Rzd2lraXxneDo2OGEzMmU3MzczOTUwNGQ0
3 Colorado Community College System. “Our Funding,” Colorado Community College Sourcebook,
2008, p. 3. Web Jan. 6, 2013.
http://www.cccs.edu/Docs/Communication/sb/Funding.pdf
4 Gastmeier, Amy and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “Living Wage Calculation,
Jefferson County, Colo.” Living Wage Calculator: Poverty in America, 2012, Web 6 Jan. 2013.
http://livingwage.mit.edu/counties/08059
5 Cashwell, Allison. “Factors Affecting Part-time Faculty Job Satisfaction in the Colorado
Community College System.” Diss. Colorado State University, 2009, p. 5. Web 21 May 2012.
http://digitool.library.colostate.edu///exlibris/dtl/d3_1/apache_media/L2V4bGlicmlzL2R0bC9kM18xL2FwYWNoZV9tZWRpYS84MDMyNQ==.pdf
6 Colorado Community College System. Strategic Plan, n.d., CCCS, Web 6 Jan. 2013.
http://www.cccs.edu/Docs/About/StrategicPlan.pdf
7 McDonnell, Barbara (Executive Vice President, CCCS). Salary Survey Discussion. State Board of
Community Colleges and Occupational Education, May 11, 2011, p.1, Web 6 Jan. 2013.
http://www.cccs.edu/Docs/SBCCOE/Agenda/2011/05May/051111-WrkSessionAgnda%20I-J-Salary%20Survey%20Discussion.pdf
8 Heier, Cynthia (Executive Director, Human Resources, CCCS). Salary and Benefits Comparison. State
Board of Community Colleges and Occupational Education, May 11, 2011, pp. 63-87, Web 6
Jan. 2013.
http://www.cccs.edu/Docs/SBCCOE/Agenda/2011/05May/051111-WrkSessionAgnda%20I-J-Salary%20Survey%20Discussion.pdf
9 Perez, Gayle. “CSU Chancellor Lower Pay Not Uncommon,” The Pueblo Chieftain, July 25, 2009,
Web 6 Jan. 2013.
http://www.chieftain.com/news/local/csu-chancellor-s-lower-pay-not- uncommon/article_29919f7a-7540-5305-ae0c-31ee7393f26e.html
10 Economic Modeling Specialists, Int. Economic Contributions of the Colorado Community College System,
Main Report, Jan. 2012, p. 11. CCCS, Web 7 Jan. 2013.

Home


11 Economic Modeling Specialists, Int. Economic Contributions of the Colorado Community College System,
Main Report, Jan. 2012, p. 12. CCCS, Web 7 Jan. 2013.

Home


12 Economic Modeling Specialists, Int. Economic Contributions of the Colorado Community College System,
Main Report, Jan. 2012, p. 11. CCCS, Web 7 Jan. 2013.

Home


13 Economic Modeling Specialists, Int. Economic Contributions of the Colorado Community College System,
Main Report, Jan. 2012, p. 11. CCCS, Web 7 Jan. 2013.

Home


14 Cashwell, Allison.)“Factors Affecting Part-time Faculty Job Satisfaction in the Colorado
Community College System.” Diss. Colorado State University, 2009, p. 5. Web 21 May 2012.
http://digitool.library.colostate.edu///exlibris/dtl/d3_1/apache_media/L2V4bGlicmlzL2R0bC9kM18xL2FwYWNoZV9tZWRpYS84MDMyNQ==.pdf (using Cashwell’s figure of 3,500 adjuncts, 2006-07) and annual salary, per adjunct, of $15,000 per: Colorado Community College System. “Our Funding,” Colorado Community College Sourcebook, 2008, p. 3. Web Jan. 6, 2013.
http://www.cccs.edu/Docs/Communication/sb/Funding.pdf
15 Economic Modeling Specialists, Int. Economic Contributions of the Colorado Community College System,
Main Report, Jan. 2012, p. 12. CCCS, Web 7 Jan. 2013.

Home


16 Colorado Adjuncts. “Signs for Library Display, Campus Equity Week Oct. 22, 2012.” Colorado
Adjuncts, Web 7 Jan. 2013.
https://sites.google.com/site/coloradoadjunctswiki/home/the-books
17 Colorado Community College System. “Our Funding,” Colorado Community College Sourcebook,
2008, p. 15. Web Jan. 6, 2013. http://www.cccs.edu/Docs/Communication/sb/Funding.pdf
18 Bérubé, Michael. “From the President: Among the Majority.” Modern Language Association, n.d.,
Web Jan. 6, 2013.
http://www.mla.org/blog?topic=146
19 Nesbitt, K., Layton-Root, D. “Appendix B: Salary Survey Reference.” Annual Compensation Survey Report for
FY 2013-2014, Colorado Department of Personnel & Administration. Aug. 1, 2012, p. 30. Web
10 Jan. 2013.
http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1251812147170&ssbinary=true

# # #
—————
8. YES, but do it quickly before I end up under the Oakton train.

From: Joe Berry
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:42 PM
To: Chester Kulis
Subject: Re: HYBRID COURSE (LOW CLASSROOM OVERHEAD) + ADJUNCT (CHEAP EXPLOITED LABOR) = $$$ PROFITS

can I circulate this on COCAL Updates?

Joe
On Jan 10, 2013, at 12:14 AM, Chester Kulis wrote:

> Adjunct unions need to take up issue of adequate training and compensation for implementing new technology such as Pearson’s MyLab textbook and D2L.
>
> Adjuncts are not opposed to new technology. But administrators should give us an estimate about how many hours adjuncts were expected to spend learning about MySocLab and D2L and then actually incorporating them into their courses. These hours are beyond their office hours, class time, and normal preparation of the material. We should also be fairly compensation for the additional time we spend.
>
> For an adjunct who teaches just one or even two courses a semester, making this commitment is problematic. We are already overworked and underpaid. Do any of us want our kids to be an adjunct?
>
> There also seems to be inconsistent expectations and rules. Some colleges and departments suggest that we should try to incorporate these new technologies gradually and at our comfort level, while others expect them to be implemented yesterday and make technology part of the evaluation process. Often the technology still has glitches.
>
> Training for these new technologies is usually geared to the FT faculty during the daytime, often during their Orientation Week when they have to be on campus. Training is not offered in the evening or on weekends when adjuncts might be available. FT faculty learn these technologies as part of their salaried responsibility, while adjuncts don’t get additional compensation and much of their effort is on their own time at home. Administrators even expect adjuncts who work FT elsewhere to use their vacation time to get trained at their college during the day.
>
> Per Board policy Oakton Community College will be developing 40 “hybrid courses” (1 1/2 hour in class and 1 1/2 hour online) within the next four years. I thought that using adjuncts was the cheapest way to go. But now Oakton has come up with an even cheaper pedagogy. Using adjuncts + hybrid courses = cheap labor exploitation + less overhead in classroom use. The bottom line: more profits for the educational establishment and higher salaries for administrators.
>
> D2L technology even allows teachers to “spy”on their students to see whether they did readings or assignments, since the program will actually show when a student began and ended a chore. I was surprised to hear of this capability and asked whether the students were told about it. No, an administrator replied, they had not, but the “spying was for a good purpose.” I replied that so is waterboarding and drones.
>
> One administrator was unapologetic about this new technology which he claimed is the future. “It’s about time that everyone realizes that the train is leaving the station.” Maybe some faculty might end up under the train. He suggested that adjuncts could be personally trained by him and that would be our training, if we cannot make it to training during the day.
>
> Many adjuncts have spent 20-30+ hours just mastering the basics of these two new technologies and implementing them into their courses – without adequate training and fair compensation.
>
> At a recent meeting the D2L system crashed during the orientation.
>
> I just hope that the administration did not have D2L cameras in the ceiling spying on us.
>
> Chester Kulim
> Member
> Oakton Adjunct Faculty Association
———————–
14. I just learned that Dr. Yilin Sun, from Seattle Central Community College
has been elected President-Elect of TESOL (Teachers of English to Speakers
to Other Languages).

She is a tenured professor of ESL, but has been supportive of non-tenured
faculty issues. She’s attended two COCAL conferences, COCAL IV in San Jose
in 2001 and COCAL VIII in San Diego in 2008. I got to know her in the late
1990’s as when she chaired the Sociopolitical Concerns committee of the
Washington state affiliate of TESOL (WAESOL).

She will assume her position as President-Elect at the March 2013 TESOL
convention in Dallas and then will become TESOL president at the 2014
convention in Portland, Oregon.

Best wishes,

Jack Longmate

———
17. —– Forwarded Message —-
From: aaup-news
Sent: Sat, January 12, 2013 9:41:25 AM
Subject: FW: Iris Molotsky Award for Excellence in Coverage of Higher Education

In 1970 the AAUP established a Higher Education Writers Award, which was presented for outstanding interpretive reporting on higher education. The award was presented annually until 1986, when its presentation was suspended. Because of AAUP’s strong belief in the importance of providing the public regularly with reliable and informed information about higher education issues, the Association is again offering the award, renamed the Iris Molotsky Award for Excellence in Coverage of Higher Education. Ms Molotsky served as the AAUP’s Director of Public Information for 19 years.

The purpose of the award is to recognize and stimulate coverage of higher education nationally and to encourage thoughtful and comprehensive reporting of higher education issues. The AAUP Award is given for outstanding coverage of higher education exhibiting analytical and investigative reporting. Entries will be judged on the basis of their relevance to issues confronting higher education.

Entries for the award must have been published between January 1 and December 31 of the prior year. Entries may be single articles or a series, but editorials and columns will not be considered for the award.

Submissions may be made by media organizations or employees. Applicants may be self-nominating. Each application must be accompanied by an entry form. Download information and the application form. (.pdf)

Entries must be postmarked by April 15.

Please contact Robin Burns at the AAUP’s Washington office for more information.

Robin Burns
Assistant Director for Media Relations
American Association of University Professors
1133 19th St., NW, 2nd Floor
Washington, DC 20036
rburns@aaup.org
http://www.aaup.org/AAUP
Follow the AAUP on Facebook, Twitter, and Flickr.
_______________________________________________
adj-l mailing list
adj-l@adj-l.org
http://adj-l.org/mailman/listinfo/adj-l_adj-l.org
>
>
————-
19 Hi everyone,

Yesterday CCSF had a very successful activity to let San Francisco voters know about the situation with Proposition A funds and how it is affecting our students. The media was there during the press conference. However, I have not seen this activity repeated in many TV news programs.

• Please call the following TV channels and request the program director to show the footage in their news programs.
• If you are outside the Bay Area, ask the program director that you would like to be informed about what is going on in CCSF and to please show the footage of the CCSF activity.
Now is the time you can help in our struggle.

KCSM (650) 574-6586
KRON (415) 441-4444
KTVU (510) 834-1212
KPIX (415) 756-0928
KQED (415) 864-2000

These telephone numbers are the general information numbers. If you have other telephone numbers or emails addresses, spread the word.

Thank you for your cooperation,

Hugo Aparicio
Business Instructor
City College of San Francisco
Business Department C-310 Box 128
50 Phelan Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94112
(415) 239-3695
——————————————
Please use
510-527-5889 phone/fax
21 San Mateo Road,
Berkeley, CA 94707

“Access to Unemployment Insurance Benefits for Contingent Faculty”, by Berry, Stewart and Worthen, published by Chicago COCAL, 2008. Order from

“Reclaiming the Ivory Tower: Organizing Adjuncts to Change Higher Education”. by Joe Berry, from Monthly Review Press, 2005. Look at for full information, individual sales, bulk ordering discounts, or to invite me to speak at an event.

See Chicago Coalition of Contingent Academic Labor, for news, contacts and links related to non-tenure track, “precarious” faculty, and for back issues of the periodic news aggregator, COCAL Updates. Email joeberry@igc.org to be added to the list.

See for information on the Tenth (X) Conference on Contingent Academic Labor in Mexico City, August 10-12, 2012 at Univ. Nacional Auto. de Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City.

To join international COCAL listserve email If this presents problems, send an e-mail to vtirelli@aol.com
or, send “Subscribe” to

COCAL Updates in brief

Updates in brief and links

1. Chicago Teachers vs the Fat Cats — a great new You Tube Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1eV8EHII5Q

2. Good letter to the editor of Cape Cod local paper by our colleague Betsy Smith
http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130101/OPINION/301010339&cid=sitesearch

3. Good piece on administrative bloat at I of Minnesota (see below)

4. Piece on musicians and adjunct faculty by our colleague Paul Haeder
http://dissidentvoice.org/2013/01/symphony-blues-low-wages-no-benefits-but-plenty-of-applause/

and another of his blogs at
http://dissidentvoice.org/2013/01/i-am-an-english-teacher/

and http://dissidentvoice.org/2013/01/what-the-majority-is-to-the-minority/#more-47090

5. Advice for parents of prospective college students re: Adjuncts.
http://thenewfacultymajority.blogspot.com/2012/07/quick-reference-guide-for-parents-on.html

and http://www.thecollegesolution.com/the-dangers-of-being-taught-by-part-timers/

and http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505145_162-57554450/do-colleges-exploit-their-professors/

6. New NLRB complaint issued against East-West U in chicago over firing (non-re-employmnent) of adjunct union activists there (see below)

7. “For Profit” play to be shown at Bates College, Lewiston, Maine. See below for details or http://www.bates.edu/mlk/

8. How the FBI and others coordinated the crackdown on Occupy last fall. some lessons for us here.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/29/fbi-coordinated-crackdown-occupy

9. Adjunct Project 2.0 website up. Check it out.

http://www.adjunctproject.com/new-year-new-website-new-victories/

10. Plans for Campus Strike at Indiana U, Bloomington
http://socialistorganizer.org/campus-strike-indiana-university/

11. Private for-profit businesses are now taking over hiring an d employment of school workers for some districts.

see http://www.source4teachers.com/

12. More on IRS and calculating adjunct hours and % of load for health care act purposes: proposed rules out for comment
http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2013/01/07/irs-starts-address-issues-adjunct-faculty-hours

and http://chronicle.com/article/IRS-Says-Colleges-Must-Be/136523/?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

13. More on new Adjunct Project site with CHE
http://chronicle.com/article/Adjunct-Project-Show-Wide/136439

14. Chris Eckhardt dies, one of the original protestors in the famous Tinker vs Des Moines Board of Ed black armband anti-war demonstration case in 1965-6, from which came the famous quote, “neither students nor teachers leave their first amendment rights at the schoolhouse gate.” Wish it were more honored now. (Personal privilege, I, Joe Berry, was also one of this small group of protestors and knew Chris Eckhardt at the same Theodore Roosevelt High School. One of the proudest moments of my life, but very scary too.)
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2013301020030

14. A good movie recommendation by Bill Fletcher, leading union activist, labor educator and contingent faculty member.
http://atlantadailyworld.com/201301022818/Viewpoints/oliver-stone-s-untold-history-of-the-united-states-cannot-be-hushed-up-or-brushed-aside

15. Making the Case for Adjuncts (good comprehensive article)
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/01/09/adjunct-leaders-consider-strategies-force-change

16. U of Phoenix faces accredition problems, stock prices and enrollment drops
http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/confessions-community-college-dean/burying-lede

17. Accreditors respond negatively to Longmate complaint about Washington CC.
http://chronicle.com/article/Regional-Accreditor-Rejects/136527/

18. Overall article on state of contingents in Canada (Thanks to Frank Cosco)
[Note to Canadians and other internationals: please send me relevant articles like this when they appear so I can resend them.]

http://www.universityaffairs.ca/sessionals-up-close.aspx

COCAL Updates

Updates in Brief and Links
1. Former Obama aide now doing communications for Kaplan U, among other corporations.

2. Debra Leigh Scott on Washington DC radio show about us
Hey everyone —

Just wanted to give you a heads up that I’ve been invited to be on a radio program tomorrow morning at 11:00 am, “Clearing the FOG: Speaking truth to expose the Forces of Greed.” It airs live on 1480 am in Washington, DC, is livestreamed on WeActRadio.com and is archived on our website,ItsOurEconomy.us. Kyle McCarthy is guest hosting (he’s one of the movers and shakers in the student loan debt push back), and I’ll be second on the show, from about 11:15 to 11:30. One of Kyle’s associates from his organization will be first. I’ll be second. Then there’s someone named Steve Horn — does anyone know him? – who will be talking about the privatization push K-16.

I’m not sure if there is a call in part to the show, but if anyone is around and can call in, that would be great.

Best,
D

3. New blog on academic work and us

www.debraleighscott.com
Other Likely Stories by Debra Leigh Scott

——-

4. Article from America Mag (Catholic) about Duquesne adjuncts fight to unionize

5. Some updated analysis of the Adjunct Project’s accumulated dates by the originator, Josh Boldt

6. Unemployedworkers.org seeking stories about employment and benefits for presentations to Congress regarding renewal of UI extensions for 2013. Se below for details.

7. An interesting update on the fight at City College of SF. and also a letter from the union president, AFT 2121, Alisa Messer. See below.

8. Nippon TV of Japan looking to do a story on people with post-grad degrees who are on public aid or otherwise have trouble economically. See below for details.

9. Campus Equity Week report from U of Colorado. see below

10. Story about Freelancers’ Union Jill Horowitz

11. Draft declaration on student tuition and fees by Higher Ed section of Education International (the international organization of education unions world wide, which unions in the US, Canada and Mexico are part of) issued at the their September Buenos Aires conference

12. American U adjuncts nearing agreement on first contract

13. Results of new faculty study by Higher Ed Research Center at UCLA

14. Global Education Strike called for Nov. 14-22

15. Very good Angry Adjunct comic about austerity on campus

16. U of Phoenix Reloads

17. New blog entry on Adjunct Project, worth looking at

18. More remembrances of labor hero Jerry Tucker, these from Labor Notes.

Updates in full

6.

Dear Joe,

Are you currently unemployed? Have you been unemployed in the last few years and now back at work? Are you engaged in a long, tough job search?

If you answered “Yes” to any of these questions, your stories are needed right now. We are compiling these stories for a campaign we’re ramping up to do two things:

1. Renew the current federal unemployment insurance extensions for 2013, and

2. Expand and strengthen reemployment services for unemployed workers, including those who may have exhausted unemployment benefits as well as current recipients.

Right now, more than 2 million unemployed Americans are facing an abrupt and total cut-off of federal unemployment insurance between Christmas and New Year’s if Congress fails to renew the current Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) benefits program before it expires December 31st. Another 2.8 million currently receiving regular state unemployment benefits will not have access, if needed, to those federal EUC extensions in 2013 — unless Congress acts.

This is a looming disaster we just cannot let happen. Here’s how you can help right now:

There are three specific kinds of stories we are looking for:

• If you among the millions of Americans currently unemployed and receiving either federal EUC or regular state UI benefits, please click here to tell your story. We urgently need these stories from workers who would be cut-off of unemployment insurance if Congress fails to renew the federal extensions for 2013.
• If you were unemployed but are now back at work, and thankful for having had unemployment insurance to help sustain you and your family during your job search, please click here to tell us your story. Some who have opposed benefit extensions have falsely asserted that unemployment insurance discourages people from actively seeking or accepting new work. They say it’s a “disincentive”. We want to counter that false assertion — with stories from people who have found new jobs before their benefits ran out.
• If you are looking for work and experiencing a long, tough job search, please click here to tell us that story. Federal EUC benefit weeks were reduced in many states this year even as unemployment remains high and the average unemployed worker’s job-search still lasts about nine months. Finding new work is so tough for many unemployed workers that millions remain jobless even after unemployment benefits are exhausted. We need to renew federal EUC benefits for 2013, and make effective, expanded reemployment services readily available to more job-seekers, including benefit recipients as well as those who have exhausted benefits.
With your help, we’ll bring as many stories as we can to the halls of Congress over the coming weeks. But please, don’t delay — send us your story today!

And if you know of others who can help with their stories, feel free to forward this email to them.

Many thanks.

The UnemployedWorkers.Org Team

Mitchell, Chris, Maurice, Judy, Mike, Rick, George, Claire and Norman

www.Unemployedworkers.org

This email was sent to: joeberry@igc.org
To unsubscribe, go to: http://www.nelp.org/page/unsubscribe/.
To subscribe, go to: http://www.nelp.org/site/get_updates.
————————-
7. On Oct 21, 2012, at 3:00 PM, steven Miller wrote:

The San Francisco Chronicle continued its role as Patron of Austerity and Popularizer of Privatization on Sunday, October 21, 2012 in their lead front page story. The full story is attached below these comments:

“The Mess at CCSF – how it all began”
Subheadline — “Faculty influence many have gotten too strong”

Strange conclusion, since it states later in the article: that CCSF has lost “$25 million… since 2008”.

The scolding tone of the article is full of similar statements, damning the school for successfully putting the faculty in leadership, actually paying them well, and then blaming them for the collapsing economy:

“The story of what brought a vast college to its knees could fill a business course syllabus or, better, a novel.”

In 1990, Chancellor Evan Dobelle, “rewrote the way the college was going to be governed.” Dobelle had a different vision that the corporate privatizers, their political minions and the corporate press, “There can never be a faculty that is too empowered.”

Dobelle cut back on administrators and gave the faculty lots of power. The Chronicle even states, “ ‘Problems with the system might have emerged sooner if money had been tight. But that wasn’t the case.’ ”

In other words, everything was fine until Wall Street broke the economy in 2008. It really isn’t about a strategy that didn’t work. The problem is with cuts and choices that California state government has made in implementing Austerity. We know these policies all too well as the “slash and burn” policies that government enforces against working people, against the poor, even as they refuse to raise taxes on corporations a single dime!

As with attacks on K12 public schools, the privatizers always go after the governance first. They have to break to control of the public, otherwise they cannot turn public education into private corporate profits.

The article also details significant underassessments of financial issues and the interesting conviction of past-Chancellor Phillip Day in 2011 for “diverting college funds into bond campaigns”. This crime was so severe that “a judge reduced the felonies to misdemeanors”. Wouldn’t it be nice if the criminal system was so kind to protestors who sit down in the street! This is just a diversionary tactic.

Governors Schwarzenegger and Brown both get for the Oscar for handwringing in public, while dispossessing the public in practice. They are unified in the typical Austerity lie, pronouncements that “there’s just no money” and “there’s nothing we can do.”

Well, there actually was a lot that people could have done, there’s a lot they still can do. Instead of protecting corporate loopholes and turning more of the budget over to guarantee corporate profits (high speed rail, cutting pensions, diverting water through the Delta Tunnels, maintaining corporate tax loopholes), either governor could have taken a simple step that would, just by itself, guarantee that budget cuts did not need to happen at all.

Every Californian pays more than 9% in sales taxes. However, corporations in California make vast purchases every day that run to many billions of dollars, and these are not taxed at all. We are talking about the hyper-mega market for speculation, accessed by banks, investors, hedge funds and financiers.

Every day these unsavory elements borrow money to speculate in financial markets. They make billions of dollars in purchases every day. These are computer-driven speculations, bets that can be made over the change of a price by a millisecond, a second, a minute, hour, day, week, month – whathaveyou. They can make money betting that the price will go up or go down.

Either way, none of these purchases are taxed. If they were taxed, say at 4.75% – half of sales tax – there would be billions of dollars in excess revenue for the state. Nothing would have to be cut! This form of tax is currently called the “Robin Hood Tax”, even though it hardly “robs” the rich to help the poor.

Forget the “Millionaires Tax” – this generates incredibly more amounts of money for people. We could easily return to the hallowed days of yore that prevailed in the early 1960s,when there were no tuition or fees at all in the state. This of course is exactly in line with the higher-education Mission Statements that the corporate boys tell us we now have to change.

So it’s a choice. It’s straight up just a choice. There is no getting around it. These are the only conclusions it is possible to draw from the Chronicle article. Of course, we are not supposed to consider what this all means.

Actually though, addressing this question is kind of urgent. As soon as the elections are over, the Democratic and Republican Parties have conjured up the on-going drama of the dreaded “Fiscal Cliff” soap opera. This will hit on January 1 and 2 when the “perfect storm” of federal automatic trigger cuts hits. The Bush tax brakes for the ultra-rich, as well as the so-called “Middle Class Tax Breaks”, will end. At the same time, the federal government will start getting smashed with automatic trigger cuts for every sector of the budget, supposedly even including the hallowed Defense Department.

These triggers are reversible only by legislation, something the new Congress and President might or might not take up. Thank Gawd that “Patriotic Americans” are already working on legislation to exempt the Defense Department from the barrage!

The cuts to social programs will be perhaps the greatest in the history of the United States – all in the name of Austerity! No one has yet calculated the devastation that they will cause across the country to public programs.

Of course, we could tax all the financial transactions in the country and then the only problem is how to keep spending the surplus to benefit people in new and exciting ways.

This option is could be a reality, but it is only a dream since the capitalist system cannot make the choice to reduce private corporate profits by a single penny. This is not “corporate greed” and goes way beyond “corporate personhood”. It is mandated and guaranteed by the Rule of Law: corporations must legally maximize their profit. Period.
Does anyone really think it is possible to reform this???

Since this train wreck is headed right at us, maybe we should consider what we, the public, can do. We can continue the never-ending discussions about quick fixes; we can keep hoping that somehow a new hero will appear; we can exhaust ourselves, running around the endless maze of electoral politics; we can keep hoping that the old days will return.

But when all is said and done, Austerity is a policy, a set of choices that we allow government to make that directly and openly benefit corporations. We can allow that choice to happen; in fact, we can’t stop it – even though it does appear as a set of legislative policies. We can’t stop it because the working class does not yet have the political power to do so.

This “choice” is a concerted part of a strategy of an entire class of capitalists, financiers and corporations that operates consciously and for-itself. This is the class that holds political power in this country. They are using their political power to make Austerity happen. This leads to privatization of every governmental function as a profit-making venture and fuels the Wall Street speculative market.

We can however begin to discuss how to enforce a program that attacks this head on. This program must go in the other direction: in a rich country, when it’s the choice of eliminating a program, make it free to all, with completely equal access, instead. Who cares if the corporations say they will not afford this?

Government in America is still based on the assumption that it’s value is to benefit people, not corporations. That too is still law. We must hold every politician accountable to the public good. They are forcing us to take up the issues of transformation. Let history not say that we were not up to the challenge.

CCSF is the college where the working people of San Francisco send their children for their one chance at education. How dare any politician work against this! Put every politician on the record on this one. That is the strategic direction to break the stasis and hold their feet to the fire.

Steven Miller
October 21, 2012

*****************************************
SF City College money woes have long history

Nanette Asimov

This originally appeared on the SF Chronicle front page as:
The Mess at CCSF – how it all began

Subheadline — “Faculty influence many have gotten too strong”

Updated 11:11 p.m., Saturday, October 20, 2012
On a brisk November day in 1990, the new chancellor of City College of San Francisco offered a rare gift to employees who had felt ignored or trampled by the previous chief just ousted.
“We stand by like jackasses in a hailstorm, and we take it, and we take it, and we take it. And, by God, we are not going to take it anymore!” ChancellorEvan Dobelle proclaimed in his inaugural address to enthusiastic applause.
With that he announced the promotion of 11 employees, mostly faculty, to administrative posts and told reporters: “You just saw the faculty appointed to run the district.”
Soon he would fire more than a third of the 71 administrators, paring them to 46 at the school of 65,000 students. The number of administrators fell to 39 in 2012, though enrollment neared 90,000.
Dobelle’s topsy-turvy move was the beginning of a transformation at City College, a seed that today’s administrators say helped cultivate, 22 years later, the field of managerial and financial troubles that now threatens California’s largest public school with the loss of accreditation and possible closure.
By the time the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges issued its sharply worded report in July giving City College until March 15 to fix its problems – including too few administrators – a psychology professor had risen through the ranks to become chancellor himself, committed to shielding the college from layoffs and course cuts even as the economy and his budget crumbled around him.
Complicated tale
The story of what brought a vast college to its knees could fill a business course syllabus or, better, a novel. It’s a tale of innovation and self-protection, against a backdrop of generosity.
“The college had a very big heart and tried to do a lot for a lot of people,” interim Chancellor Pamila Fisher told the state Board of Governors for the college system recently. But she acknowledged that that was her “elevator speech about how our wonderful college got into this mess.” More to the point, she said, Dobelle “rewrote the way the college was going to be governed,” and a subsequent chancellor, Philip Day, spent money to keep it going.
The system Dobelle started let certain faculty members – department chairs with their own labor union – for the first time make key decisions that had financial implications, such as who would teach what classes and when, and to influence hiring and tenure decisions.
The deans who formerly made those decisions retired and were not always replaced. As their numbers dwindled, they “could no longer make decisions without the approval of people lower in the structure,” said John Rizzo, the current board president.
Dobelle, now president of Westfield State University in Massachusetts, remains committed to the system. “There can never be a faculty that is too empowered,” he said. But he declined to comment on the transformation’s long-term impact on the college.
The trustees accepted the move to faculty-centered governance, said Bob Varni, a trustee until 2001.
“We on the board really didn’t understand the whole concept, so we didn’t do anything to slow it down,” Varni said. “It seemed like a nice family operation. What do they say? Kumbaya.”
By 1998, when Day took the chancellor’s job, the U.S. economy was robust and California was in the midst of the dot-com boom.
“We had a lot of money, and Phil Day used it,” said Natalie Berg, a trustee since 1996. “The department chairs got a big boost in their pay. The unions got raises, too. We had the money to give.”
Problems with the system might have emerged sooner if money had been tight. But that wasn’t the case.
Not only did City College begin paying its faculty more generously than other colleges, including 23 paid holidays, but the college also began accumulating employees. The accreditation team would later marvel that City College employed almost twice the number of tenured faculty for every thousand students as did comparison college districts, with many more part-timers as well.
Costly labor agreements in place since the 1970s also persisted: lifetime health benefits kick in for any 50-year-old hired before 2009 who has worked just five years. And employees still don’t contribute to their retiree health program, a condition that set up the college for what is today an unfunded liability of at least $180 million.
“Our problems started when we started overpaying, which was not sustainable,” Berg said. “We should have been forewarned. It was the staff’s responsibility to tell the board. People did say, ‘This is the budget,’ but not in a way that made the board understand that this was a problem.”
Ambitious plans
Day, meanwhile, had big plans. Voters approved a $195 million school facilities bond in 2001, and another for $246 million in 2005, and Day laid the groundwork for new campuses in Chinatown and the Mission District, as well as a new athletic center and other buildings for the main campus at 50 Phelan Ave.
Those dreams coincided with a harsher reality. In 2006, it was City College’s turn for an accreditation review, which occurs every six years. An accreditation team identified eight major problems, including poor financial planning that kept reserves too low, gobbled too much of the budget on salaries and benefits, and jeopardized the college’s future with the ballooning retiree health obligation.
Although accreditation teams issue recommendations, not requirements, making the fixes are necessary for colleges to stay in business. California does not fund unaccredited institutions.
Had college officials taken the recommendations seriously, it’s unlikely that City College would now be in its desperate race for survival. But in April 2007, the first Chronicle article appeared revealing Day’s involvement in an illegal scheme to divert college funds into the facilities bond campaigns.
Instead of focusing on the problems cited by the accreditation team, Day found himself the subject of an investigation into money laundering by then-District Attorney Kamala Harris.
That wasn’t Day’s only problem. Rizzo, who joined the board in 2007, said he and trustees Julio Ramos and Milton Marks pushed for performance audits that uncovered $40 million of construction expenses unapproved by the board or approved after the money was spent.
“We found unfiled paperwork that filled 64 boxes – unpaid invoices, contracts the board never saw that we didn’t know existed,” Rizzo said. “It was amazing.”
Yet Day still enjoyed support from a majority on the board. He couldn’t be fired, so Rizzo and his allies hounded him out with unusual demands and nitpicking questions.
“We were making his life miserable,” Rizzo recalled.
Day left in 2008. Three years later he pleaded guilty to three felony counts of diverting $100,000 of college funds into the bond campaigns. A judge reduced the felonies to misdemeanors.
Day’s successor was Don Griffin, a veteran psychology professor who had risen through the ranks as department chair, dean of instruction and vice chancellor.
The state’s economic crisis hit just as he took office. Almost immediately, City College learned it would lose about $7 million a year in state funds earmarked for student services – Griffin’s former department – which included counseling and other nonacademic support.
Making one-time cuts
Mark Robinson, the new vice chancellor in charge of student services, presented a budget that proposed layoffs and across-the-board cuts to the many departments in his area. Griffin, however, balanced the budget with one-time cuts from elsewhere, in a move appreciated by faculty.
Robinson wasn’t the only administrator advocating for longer-term budget reductions.
But the short-term cuts continued.
“We cut everyone’s salary for the third year in a row,” said Peter Goldstein, vice chancellor of finance and administration. “We greatly restricted hiring, and we tried to save money through attrition.”
By 2011, that strategy blew up. City College faced a $13.75 million loss in state funding – part of $25 million lost since 2008. Trustees dipped into reserves, reducing the emergency fund to dangerously low levels that brought the college to the brink of bankruptcy.
Griffin, who retired in April to have surgery to remove a brain tumor, did not respond to requests for comment.
Fisher, the interim chancellor, took over in May.
Two months later, the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges gave City College just nine months to repair all 14 significant problems that had been years in the making or lose its accreditation.
And because there was no guarantee that could be done, the accrediting team also ordered City College to prepare for closure.
“From the beginning, we’ve had people saying the accreditation report was part of a far-right conspiracy designed to take us down because we’re so liberal,” Fisher told the college system’s Board of Governors.
She said the intentions of those who led the college to this point reflect “San Francisco values of which we’re all very proud – but which sometimes get in the way of making good decisions.
“Yes, our board will have to make very hard, fiscal choices. Just making the fiscal decisions won’t save us. We’ll need the cooperation of all constituency groups.”
Nanette Asimov is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: nasimov@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @NanetteAsimov

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/education/article/SF-City-College-money-woes-have-long-history-3968316.php#ixzz29xvOycdr

————————-
You have received this email because you (or someone you know) signed up.
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email with the subject unsubscribe%20ga to sympa@lists.occupyeducationca.org

——————
Friends,
Alissa hits it out of the ballpark here. FYI.
Bill

____________________________
Bill Shields
Chair, Labor and Community Studies
City College of San Francisco
1400 Evans Avenue, Room 224
San Francisco, California 94124
415-550-4473 (phone)
415-550-4400 (fax)
From: AFT 2121
Date: October 24, 2012 2:16:40 PM PDT
To: wshields@ccsf.edu
Subject: Progress? An open letter to the Board of Trustees, 10/24/12
Reply-To: aft@aft2121.org

October 24, 2012

To: Board of Trustees, City College of San Francisco

CC: Chancellor Fisher, Chancellor Scott-Skillman, college community

Re: Progress?

Despite what some naysayers predicted, the College has done it—produced a comprehensive document that maps out how CCSF will meet the gauntlet thrown down by the ACCJC. Because all constituencies have worked hard, a number of recommendations have already been met and the College has produced a progress report that should impress upon our critics how seriously the District takes this task. Even under a relentless timeline, the October 15 Special Report represents a significant response to the recommendations. It also represents significant changes.

As a College, we do well to remember that there are areas where we can improve. At an institution that has in some cases been too slow to make smart changes, we note that thoughtful, carefully implemented measures—and we do mean thoughtful, nuanced, and responsible measures—to improve enrollment and scheduling, streamline management, and implement improved technologies are possible. Such changes will make better use of shrinking resources and have less damaging impacts on students or the workers who serve them.

We are, however, fully concerned that some changes will have severely negative impacts on students and the education we offer them and on positive working conditions that support educational quality Change is not bad on principle, and maintaining our accreditation is essential, but reforms that are made thoughtlessly, too quickly, or without consultation will surely beget unintended, negative consequences. Some solutions are better than others, and some “solutions” are not solutions at all.

As we have said, even in these troubling times, we do not believe this College must wholesale shift its priorities away from quality education, the needs of our students and community, or care for the workers who serve those students. Some of the proposals the Board now has before it run just this risk, and in the extreme. The October 25 agenda item proposing drastic restructuring of our academic programs is an alarming example of an extreme and foolhardy swing of the pendulum.

This proposed restructuring has been made without consultation and without, as far as we can tell, necessary consideration of the education we provide. There has been no opportunity for discussion or understanding of these enormous changes that will affect every sector of the College. Questions abound. Whose “best practices” are these? What content knowledge and expertise will Deans and Chairs of multiple programs be able to bring to the day-to-day workings of our programs? Who will schedule hundreds of classes and faculty members, pursue and manage grants, and establish community links to employers and internships—just a few of the responsibilities our Department Chairs currently oversee? Without legally mandated oversight, how will our celebrated Career and Technical Education programs such as Nursing and Fire Science maintain their accreditations? And is the goal a more effective structure or to bust the Department Chairs’ Council, a certified bargaining unit? These questions necessitate bargaining, explication, and input from those who best understand the impacts.

This proposal needs to go back to the drawing board, so to speak; by no means should the Board approve it.

But this non-inclusive proposal is simply the latest and most extreme manifestation of a growing problem our college community is facing—the manner in which changes are being imposed at City College and the devaluation of the expertise of those doing the work of educating and supporting our students. This is not progress: unilateral, top-down proposals lead to deficient proposals.

Faculty expertise and students’ and workers’ concerns must be genuinely considered—at the bargaining table, on accreditation teams, in governance, and in all major decisions affecting the future of CCSF. Indeed the future of the college and the education we offer students depend on it. Decisions made without sufficient expertise and input can lead to disruption and confusion rather than improvement—and can jeopardize the College’s well-being.

We have already challenged the Board, collectively, to consider and address with integrity the task before you. We have called attention to the lack of transparency and the importance of constituency input. The wealth of expertise and dedication evident at CCSF should not be ignored or trampled.

We likewise reiterate our expectation that the Board respect collective bargaining and ensure that all negotiable items are brought to the appropriate bargaining tables. Labor and collective bargaining are not at fault here.

Even the CEO of FCMAT, Joel Montero, is clear on this point. “Labor is not the villain,” he pointed out to the Board of Governors earlier this month in speaking of City College’s difficult financial situation. “Those issues should not be laid at the feet of labor.” He went on to note that in public education “we spend most of our money in the category of people,” reporting that in the K12 system, for “salary and benefits, [districts are] spending in the neighborhood of $0.94 of every $1, up from $0.84 prior to 2007-2008.” That number is expected to rise “as the state’s issues continue to exacerbate funding and support programs at the local level.” We are hardly alone in our fiscal crisis; in fact, there is agreement among some that if Proposition 30 fails, the resulting trigger cuts would likely cause the demise—the actual disappearance—of several smaller community college districts in the state.

Faculty and employee groups have consistently stepped up to the plate in addressing the current crisis, yet we have been left out of any authentic decision-making process and unilateral changes are being implemented. We have also heard consistently from students that they are being excluded from the process. And it increasingly looks as though Board members, who say they invited a Special Trustee (rather than have one imposed) in order to retain their stewardship of the District, are nonetheless ready to abdicate their role in the decision-making process as well. Is it not our joint responsibility to maintain our accreditation, our fiscal solvency, and most importantly the ability to serve our students well?

We have been criticized for being “too generous” and told that we are flawed because we have “San Francisco values.” We reject these notions, and we reject the wholesale downsizing of a college that has done so much for San Francisco.

We have not been criticized for the quality of the education we provide to students or the dedication of those who do that work. It would be a tragedy beyond measure if the Accreditation Commission’s visiting team returned in March to find a College that was unrecognizable, a College no longer serving its community well, no longer able to meet the needs of its diverse and deserving student population.

Avoiding that tragedy depends in part on the outcome of November’s election—on passing Proposition A locally and Proposition 30 statewide. But it also depends on the “hard choices” this College makes and how they impact our students and those who do the work of educating and supporting them. It depends on the ability of the Board and administration to work with the entire college community collaboratively and with integrity to make smart—even if tough—decisions.

On behalf of AFT 2121,

Alisa Messer

President

Contact AFT 2121 at 415-585-2121 or visit us online at aft2121.org. Follow us on Facebook

To update your email address, please let us know at aft@aft2121.org. Click here to unsubscribe.

Please post, distribute, and otherwise share this information
with interested colleagues who may not be receiving emails.

—————————

8. Colleagues,

The AAUP has been contacted by a producer for Nippon Television (NTV), Japan, looking to do a story on individuals with advanced degrees who are receiving public assistance, specifically food stamps (technically now under the acronym “SNAP,” by the way). If you are interested in speaking with this producer, the complete request and contact information are below. On a personal note, I would counsel you to think twice about whether you are interested in pursuing this; it could be a platform for useful advocacy, but it might also be a negative personal experience.

Many readers of this list will recall the Chronicle of Higher Education article on the same topic: “The Ph.D. Now Comes With Food Stamps” (May 6, 2012). Available athttp://chronicle.com/article/From-Graduate-School-to/131795/ (link may require subscription). That article turned out to be pretty well presented, I would say, but that is not always the case with media coverage of complex issues.
Regards,
John W. Curtis, Ph.D.
Director of Research and Public Policy
American Association of University Professors
1133-19th Street NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 737-5900 Ext. 143
E-mail: jcurtis@aaup.org

“Academic Freedom for a Free Society”
Support AAUP by joining today! http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/involved/join/
AAUP on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/AAUPNational

From: Takuya Katsumura (NTV NY) [mailto:takuya@ntvic.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 6:30 PM
To: John Curtis; ROBIN BURNS
Cc: NTV NY
Subject: Japan’s NTV’s Inquiry/Request: AAUP

Dear Mr. John Curtis and Ms. Robin Burns,

Hello, my name is Takuya Katsumura and I am a television news producer with Nippon Television (NTV), Japanese broadcaster.
NTV is the largest and oldest commercial television network in Japan and I am based in New York City.

I am contacting you because NTV is currently looking to cover a news story on the economy in the U.S. and it’s impact on people, especially those who have higher education degree.

In our story we will be talking about how regular Americans, even those with higher education, are struggling to pay the bills.
We understand that there is still a strong image that most media give their audiences that people that are on public assistance are dropouts or irresponsible.
This is why we are trying to show the reality of American society to our viewers.
We would like to fairly show that so many people are living on public assistance when they have a great education, career and jobs.
And it is our hope that our viewers can learn something out of our story and possibly break their stigmas against people receiving such aid. Moreover, I hope we all have an opportunity to think about how we can turn around the economy and the systems that allow defunding even higher education.

Mr. Curtis and Ms. Burns would you kindly be able to introduce us to someone who matches the criteria below?
We are looking for someone who has master/Ph.D degree and who is receiving food stamps, and who allows us to…
■ Film interview at home
■ Film him/her go shopping using food stamps.
■ Film him/her commute to the workplace (school/college/university)
■ Film him/her work at the school/college/university if it’s possible

We are looking to do this coverage by the end of this month. Hopefully this week.

I understand those people that are receiving assistance are having a tough time, but I hope you understand the possible learning opportunity this segment might be able to give our audiences to know what many people’s lives in America are like right now.

I would greatly appreciate it if you could kindly consider this request and reply this email.
You can always reach me on my mobile at 2016815127.

Thank you very much.

Best Regards,
Takuya


* * * * * * * * * *
Takuya Katsumura
NTV New York News Bureau
645 Fifth Avenue Suite 303, New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212-765-5076 (office main)
212-660-6966 (direct) 201-681-5127 (cell)
Fax: 212-265-8495
E-mail: takuya@ntvic.com
http://www.ntv.co.jp

P Please consider the environment before printing this email

**** A little bit about Nippon TV ****

Nippon Television Network (NTV) is Japan’s largest, oldest and most watched commercial television network. NTV was the first network in Japan to be granted a license to broadcast television in 1952 and has always focused on excellence in their programming, news coverage, sports coverage and entertainment. NTV has had some of the highest ratings of all Japanese networks for more than ten years.

NTV has the largest cable television news network in Japan called NNN or Nippon Network News. We have around 30 affiliate stations in Japan, and our coverage and our viewers broaden out throughout Japan. NTV is a leading provider of news with more than 6 million people tuning into their news broadcasts on a nearly nightly basis.

Nippon Television also covers the entire world with bureaus in Washington D.C., Moscow, Cairo, London, Paris, Beijing, Bangkok, Seoul and others. Together with 12 bureaus throughout the world connected by a sophisticated satellite network, NTV is able to bring its millions of viewers the most comprehensive news coverage amongst Japan’s many commercial television networks.

_______________________________________________
adj-l mailing list
adj-l@adj-l.org
http://adj-l.org/mailman/listinfo/adj-l_adj-l.org
————————–
9. Jeff –

As is likely the case on most campuses, adjuncts here fear losing their jobs, making it difficult to organize. Nevertheless, we’ve been focusing on Campus Equity Week for months, ever since we learned about it through AAUP. It’s been energizing. I’ll list a few details here so other adjunct groups strapped for resources might use an idea like this.

Looking ahead to October, earlier this summer we researched adjunct titles and then asked our library to order them. In August, we worked with library staffers to develop what is now a permanent collection of titles housed in a new section of the reserve area devoted to “Professional Development.” We want them kept on reserve in case certain, er, un-adjunct individuals would accidentally on purpose check them out indefinitely. Our thought is to make them available for browsing, at least, and perhaps the reading of a chapter or two at a nearby table, as reserve books cannot leave the library.

In September, we designed and printed colorful bookmarks announcing Campus Equity Week, with the instructions for an online book blog on the reverse side. These were 4-up to a sheet, so we made 160 for around $40.

On Oct. 19th, to promote both CEW and the book club, we put on display in the library’s 12 foyer windows our favorite adjunct titles, accompanied by posters beside each one. On the poster (sheet of legal-sized paper) for each book, in 36-point type, is its title, and below, in 20-point type, the blurb from the back page or inside flap of each book. The titles of some of the books are edgy and compelling, so having the posters in the windows draws passersby to take a closer look.

In two of the windows we’ve put “Did You Know?” posters about the adjunct working situation, and another containing a tally of estimated hours unpaid labor (prep, grading, advising) adjuncts on our campus are donating to state taxpayers annually.

This week we are handing the bookmarks to adjuncts when we see them, as we are barred from any distribution of anything in faculty mailboxes.

By moving our campaigning online and by capitalizing on library protocols in regard to freedom of information, we have been able to offer adjunct faculty some ideas and a place (online) to converse about them.

This is our first attempt at Campus Equity Week. We are having a great time with it and look forward to its expansion.

Colorado Adjuncts

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Jeff wrote:
I want to thank everyone who responded to me. I will present the idea of promoting CEW at our next council meeting. Even if there is not a national effort, it would make sense to do it locally.

_______________________________________________
adj-l mailing list
adj-l@adj-l.org
http://adj-l.org/mailman/listinfo/adj-l_adj-l.org

_______________________________________________
adj-l mailing list
adj-l@adj-l.org
http://adj-l.org/mailman/listinfo/adj-l_adj-l.org

——————————————
Please use
510-527-5889 phone/fax
21 San Mateo Road,
Berkeley, CA 94707

“Access to Unemployment Insurance Benefits for Contingent Faculty”, by Berry, Stewart and Worthen, published by Chicago COCAL, 2008. Order from

“Reclaiming the Ivory Tower: Organizing Adjuncts to Change Higher Education”. by Joe Berry, from Monthly Review Press, 2005. Look at for full information, individual sales, bulk ordering discounts, or to invite me to speak at an event.

See Chicago Coalition of Contingent Academic Labor, for news, contacts and links related to non-tenure track, “precarious” faculty, and for back issues of the periodic news aggregator, COCAL Updates. Email joeberry@igc.org to be added to the list.

See for information on the Tenth (X) Conference on Contingent Academic Labor in Mexico City, August 10-12, 2012 at Univ. Nacional Auto. de Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City.

To join international COCAL listserve email If this presents problems, send an e-mail to vtirelli@aol.com
or, send “Subscribe” to

COCAL Updates

1. Presidential Forum at MLA

2. New S CA adjunct resources page

3. Oregon grad student may get to trial on case alleging that university and faculty advisor(s) discriminated against her because she complained about treatment of female grad students and she was thereby prevented from finishing her dissertation and PhD.

4. Study shows “deregulation” (partial defunding and privatization effectively) of public universities does not work.

5. Adjunct hunger games

6. Special radio show in Vancouver, Canada community radio station, on education in many aspects, including interview with Karen Lewis of CTU in Chicago, Joe Berry in CA and others. 10/20/12, Sat. Listen on line. See below for details.

7. Contingent faculty in SEIU blog alerts us to article in new issue of NEA 2012 Thought and Action on contingent faculty by our colleague Claire Goldstene

8. Petition to Obama about Social Security and changing the “Windfall Elimination Provision” that will cut many our our SS benefits.

9. More on Walmart Strikers

10. IHE on CA prop 30 and possible tuition hikes if it fails

11. For-Profits and MOOCs

12. Legendary union reformer in UAW and other venues, Jerry Tucker, died this AM.

13. On the destruction of public higher ed in CA

COCAL Updates

Updates in brief and links

Important note:

As of Monday Sept. 10, the Chicago Teachers Union, AFT Local 1, is on strike against the Chicago Public Schools and Mayor Emanuel, who appoints the entire Board of Education. This strike is the most important fight against the corporate neoliberal attempt to privatize and destroy our public schools and, as such, deserves the support of all of us. Please go to https://afl.salsalabs.com/o/4013/c/468/p/salsa/donation/common/public/?donate_page_KEY=7204 to make a contribution to CTU’s solidarity fund and also check for local solidarity actions in your areaq. Such actions are being planned all over the nation, and even internationally. CTU is the second largest local teachers union in the US and the first, under its new leadership, to attempt to stand up to the privatizers. If they lose, all of us, even in higher ed, will see increased pressure in this direction of corporate “education reform”.

thanks for your solidarity,

Joe Berry

1. Hollywood now turning its propaganda machine on teachers and public schools
2. As Chicago teachers head toward strike, Democrats turn on their union

3. Solidarity with Chicago Teachers, from Professional Staff Congress at CUNY (see below)

THE PROFESSIONAL STAFF CONGRESS STANDS IN SUPPORT OF THE CHICAGO TEACHERS UNION

Whereas the Chicago Teachers Union (AFT Local 1, the nation’s first teachers’ union) is locked in a protracted contract battle that has important consequences for educators everywhere; and

Whereas Chicago teachers have rallied, marched, won the support of parents, and mobilized for a contract that includes fair compensation, meaningful job security for qualified teachers, smaller class sizes and a rich curriculum that includes art, music, physical education and foreign language; and

Whereas the CTU has published a report, The Schools Chicago’s Students Deserve, which eloquently argues in favor of proven reforms that would improve the education of the city’s 400,000 students, including offering pre-kindergarten for all, guaranteeing vital support services (counselors, nurses, social workers and school psychologists), having a fully-staffed library in every school, ensuring quality school facilities, ending school board practices that have increased racial segregation, and reducing class size (currently one of the highest in the state); and

Whereas 92% of the CTU membership participated in a vote to authorize a strike, and 98% of those voting voted yes; and

Whereas the CTU is opposed by an array of “reform organizations” created and financed by wealthy hedge fund managers and businessmen, in alliance with Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who together are trying to impose a regimen of evaluating teachers based on students’ standardized test scores, imposing a “merit” pay scheme for teachers while eliminating traditional salary increases for seniority and additional education, and mandating a longer school year and school day without a proportional increase in salary; and

Whereas the opponents of the CTU have used the deep pockets of wealthy supporters to launch a torrent of ads attempting to discredit the union and promote charter schools; and

Whereas the CTU has established a “CTU Solidarity Fund” to raise money to respond to the negative ads of their opponents and circulate its own report, The Schools Chicago’s Students Deserve; and

Whereas a victory for Chicago teachers would greatly encourage teachers everywhere who are resisting attempts to blame educators for low student achievement rather than point the finger at inadequate school funding and widespread poverty, and standing up to forces who would eviscerate hard-won tenure and seniority protections and salary levels, as well as weaken teacher unions; and

Whereas a victory for the Chicago Teachers Union would be a victory for public-sector employees nationally as we struggle to resist the imposition of austerity conditions; a victory for CUNY faculty and staff, as we face a regime of testing and standardization; and a victory for all who oppose the privatization of public resources and the plundering of public assets; therefore be it
Resolved that the Professional Staff Congress/CUNY (Local 2334, AFT) support the Chicago Teachers Union in its fight to negotiate a contract that meets the needs of its members and their students; and be it further
Resolved that the Professional Staff Congress contribute a sum of $3,500 to the CTU Solidarity Fund; and be it further
Resolved that the Professional Staff Congress urge the NYC Central Labor Council to adopt a similar resolution; and be it further
Resolved that the Professional Staff Congress encourage its members to show support in any or all of the following ways: signing petitions in support of the CTU struggle, making individual donations to the CTU Solidarity Fund, writing letters of support, becoming Associate Members of CTU, and attending local solidarity events.

Cocal Updates

1. More analysis from Senate report on for-profits, this time on cost differences with public schools

2. Action alert – help requested

Teachers and other public sector workers in Swaziland have been engaged in a battle that has become increasingly hard to watch – police have used rubber bullets and tear gas on strikers, nurses and civil servants have been fired upon, and hundreds have been sacked including the entire executive of the teachers union.

3. Law blog and journal discuss adjunct teaching for lawyers

4. The workplace: where free speech goes to die [All workers need free speech on the job, not just academics who need “academic freedom”.]

5. How low can contingent pay go – to zero? See below for Craig’s List ad for free work for Christian colleges

5. Next step by business in the push to privatize K-12 education. Can higher ed be far behind on their list?

6. No surprise – for-profit colleges their execs put profits above student success, Congress says.

7. If you haven’t bee reading this week’s Doonesbury, check out
http://doonesbury.slate.com/strip/archive, starting with August 6.

and see (defensive) comment on it by IHE blogger at
http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/technology-and-learning/doonesbury-profit-higher-ed

8. Adjunct pay and teaching quality

9. If anyone on this list reads Hebrew, here are the links to the webpages of the unions that represent contingent faculty (called “junior” there) at two universities in Isreal. If anyone can check them out and give a brief report in English for this update, that would be great. I got them from two FTTT profs there who I happened to meet recently.
http://cmsprod.bgu.ac.il/units/zutar
http://www.zutar.org.il/

10. Updated call for conference on contingency in Pittsburgh April 5-7, 2013, sponsored by contingents and the USW. Joe Berry is an invited speaker. See below

11. For-profits now discounting tuition (like many private non-profits have been doing for years) in an attempt to counteract their recent enrollment declines.

12. University teachers strike in Sri Lanka

13. Even without a contract post-Katrina, United Teachers of New Orleans, LFT/AFT successfully fights on. A real lesson for all of us in the contingent faculty movement.

14. Newly organized adjuncts in NH cc’s (in SEIU) are having trouble getting a first contract. See below to help them.

15. Here is an important message from the Bay Area Occupy Education list that realates to attempts by LUMINa foundation, and allies like Bill Gates to buy the regional accreditors and especially attack community colleges, like the current attack on City College of SF. See below.

16. Mother Jones on the for-profits

Updates in full

5. How low can pay go for teachers? Craigslist is now advertising for college professors to volunteer their time by donating online materials for an alleged Christian university start up.

Professor (Philadelphia)

Date: 2012-08-05, 10:05AM EDT
Reply to: ncxmn-3185200753@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]

New college (startup) projected to begin January of 2013 requests college professors to volunteer (essentially donate time and training) services by offering a college course that will be presented locally, but also made available online (e/distance learning) and in DVD-format. Opportunity for future payment. College will be a non-profit Christian University that will offer courses throughout the United States, and be affiliated with World Christian University. Courses will also be made available to offenders who are in state and federal prisons. Possibility of volunteer work leading to full-time academic position. Startup institution will offer extremely low cost college courses, and will begin with limited capital–therefore the need to get started with volunteer teaching. Courses could be made available on tape, and online, and therefore some courses could be prepared for presentation in as little as two weeks taping time. Thanks and God bless. Please contact Dr. Will Korey at 215-687-6971
Location: Philadelphia
it’s NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
it’s OK to distribute this charitable volunteerism opportunity for inclusion in 3rd party web sites that have been approved by craigslist
_______________________________________________
adj-l mailing list
adj-l@adj-l.org
http://adj-l.org/mailman/listinfo/adj-l_adj-l.org

————-
10. Apologies if anyone has already forwarded this–I’m new to the list. I’m also one of the organizers, so please feel free to email me if you have any questions. Regards, .R.

— Call for Participation —

Countering Contingency:
Teaching, Scholarship, and Creativity in the Age of the Adjunct
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
April 5-7, 2013

Inspired by the Non-Tenure-Track (NTT or adjunct) conversation sparked by Web sites like the New Faculty Majority and the Adjunct Project, a push to improve NTT working conditions by the MLA, and the effort to organize by NTT Faculty at Duquesne University, this conference offers an opportunity to think more deeply about the state of contingent, non-tenure-stream faculty. We invite proposals for papers, panels, workshops, roundtables, and creative presentations highlighting, critiquing, and theorizing how the unstable and unsustainable working conditions of NTT faculty impact intellectual work; narrating or analyzing the logistical challenges of serving as NTT teachers, scholars, and artists; discussing the working conditions that call for revision. Contingent labor constitutes the majority of faculty, yet NTT faculty are the lowest paid and most overburdened workers. We represent the foundation of academic experiences at the undergraduate level and offer irreplaceable interactions with students. We are artists, scholars, researchers, and examples of inspired teaching. This conference is an invitation to imagine the answers to crucial questions raised by our tenuous position: How can we use what we know to create a more sustainable and equitable labor and educational system, one that will benefit everyone at the university? What change is most needed? What does it mean to constitute the new faculty majority at your college or university?

Proposals for papers, panels, or roundtables are invited on the following topics:
–maintaining a scholarly or creative life in an era of non-tenured faculty invisibility
–documenting the institutional experiences of contingent faculty and their students
–comparative analyses of salary, contracts, and other aspects of employment
–histories of academic labor struggles
–best practices for contingent faculty
–unionization for contingent faculty
–the proletarianization of the professoriate
–links between this labor struggle and others past and present (especially in the Pittsburgh area)
–any topic related to these concerns

Proposals for non-traditional modes of participation are welcome as well. Some formats for these might include:
–art and creative writing panels (framed by your experience of creating this work under NTT working conditions or about the experiences of NTT faculty)
–interactive workshops that seek audience participation in ways that help us all to analyze and think reflexively about higher education institutions, funding, or any aspect of academic labor and life
–short performance pieces or multimedia presentations
–any other ideas you have for participation, just give us the details

Please email nttconference@gmail.com if you are interested in participating in, helping to plan, or attending the conference. For paper proposals, please send a 250-word abstract and short bio paragraph. For panels and roundtables, please send a 250-word panel description, plus 250-word abstracts of all papers/comments and bio paragraphs for all participants. For non-traditional ideas for participation or workshops, please send a 250- to 500-word description of your idea and a short bio paragraph for each participant. The deadline for submission of all proposals is September 15, 2012. Participants will hear back from the planning committee around October 15 at the latest, but please send your materials early and let us know if you need an early decision in order to facilitate travel funding requests at your institution. Informal inquiries before sending formal proposals are welcomed and encouraged for non-traditional presentations and workshops. Proposals from workers and scholars in the Pittsburgh region will be given priority.


Robin J. Sowards, Ph.D.
Duquesne University
English Department
600 Forbes Avenue
631 College Hall
Pittsburgh, PA 15282

“Not merely the objective possibility, but also the subjective capacity for happiness, can only be achieved in freedom.” Theodor W. Adorno, /Minima Moralia/

“Madet orbis mutuo sanguine, et homicidium cum admittunt singuli, crimen est: Virtus vocatur, cum publice geritur.” [‘The world is drenched in mutual blood, and when individuals commit homicide, it is a crime; it is called a virtue when it is done in the name of the state.’] St. Cyprian, Bishop of Carthage, Letter to Donatus (par. 6)

_______________________________________________
adj-l mailing list
adj-l@adj-l.org
http://adj-l.org/mailman/listinfo/adj-l_adj-l.org
————————

14. Hello All,

Adjunct Faculty members of The State Employees’ Association of New Hampshire/SEIU 1984 are facing a formidable challenge by the Community College System of New Hampshire, as we bargain for our first contract.

In the past few months, their mgmt. team: cancelled sessions, made regressive counter-proposals, and disrespectful remarks about our function and role in the community college system.

We are reaching out to all like-minded academic partners and friends. Will you show support for adjunct faculty by signing our petition?

http://1984.seiu.org/page/s/adjunctpetition

We would appreciate your support by signing and circulating our petition to your friends, colleagues, and adjunct faculty that are struggling to improve their quality of life.

http://1984.seiu.org/page/s/adjunctpetition

Once you sign the petition you will be automatically redirected to a share page.

Thank you for your support.

CCSNH Adjunct Faculty
SEA/SEIU Local 1984

_______________________________________________
adj-l mailing list
adj-l@adj-l.org
http://adj-l.org/mailman/listinfo/adj-l_adj-l.org
——————

15. the Lumina Foundation along with Bill Gates gave WASC 1.5 million dollars. It is important for these mafia criminals to have complete control of all accrediting agencies for then they can use them, much like Wall St. id with Moodys and Standard and Poors, to rate schools for hostile takeover. This is all part of the takeover, hostile as it is, of the 112 community colleges.

The accreditation agencies are really being used to lower the ratings on community colleges to provide the excuse to take them over. SF CC must be seen in this light.

The Lumina Foundation has ten members which serve on its board that have ties with Sallie Mae and the Lumina Foundation is proposing four tenets of a program for community colleges that will include mandatory full time status to receive grants meaning that Student Loans will be needed for full time community college students hardly exist they have to work.

Take a look at Lumina Board members:

http://closedstudentsuccess.ideascale.com/a/dtd/Who-is-behind-this-/316120-12397

Lumina is not only a secret parliament that is now working assiduously to overtake through hostile takeover community colleges, but they have upped their budgets and targeted superficially post secondary education. Below are the four steps in order to get Lumina Funding and thus philanthropy money.

They will turn community colleges into a boot camp for low, entry level,low paid work and those who malinger, i.e. go to school to get an education, will be punished. Below you will see their four step program for dismantling access to and public education.

Lumina meets in luxury hotels where newly arriving, usually non-union immigrants or first generation immigrants serve them lavish luncheons with drinks, on cloth covered tables attending to all their needs while they plan the decimation of these same workers’ childrens’ future.

while the attention is on K-12 and testing and billionaires, Gates has upped his stake in post secondary and works closely with Lumina in creating the material conditions for school to work programs and community colleges as factories for ‘skills’.
Lumina’s “Four Steps to Finishing First ” program lays out a plan to achieve their goal of 60% attainment by 2025. Their method – use business type modeling to “increase productivity” (degree attainment); the assumed outcome of which will be more jobs created. The “Four Steps”:

1. Performance Funding – Don’t fund schools in the traditional budgeting process. Tie funding to performance. Legislators should “provide financial incentives to schools that help students clear certain milestones on their academic journeys or finish work toward their degrees or credentials.” More degrees = more money.

THIS IS THE SCHOOL TO WORK IDEOLOGY, FUNCTIONALISM AND INSTRUMENTALITY

2. Student Incentives – Legislate tuition discounts and incentives to students who do not exceed the number of credits required for graduation. Limit financial aid to the required number of credits for graduation. In other words – better not change your major.

THEY PROPOSE PUNISHING STUDENTS WHO TAKE EXTRA CREDITS, TAKING AWAY PELL GRANTS FROM STUDENTS NOT REGISTERED FULL TIME, AND PAYING STUDENTS NOT TO TAKE CLASSES

3. New Models – Institute low-cost approaches (specifically online degree programs) “substituted for traditional academic delivery whenever possible to increase capacity.”

THIS IS THE CYBER LEARNING PART WHERE 154,000 STUDENT CAN BE IN ONE CLASS ON MOOCS. ALL O THIS IS BEING DEVELOPED AS WE SPEAK. THIS WILL MEAN NO NEED FOR MUCH FACULTY AND ALSO NO TENURE TRACKS. THE WALMART TEACHING MODEL WITH LOW PAID ADJUNCTS WORKING MILLIONS OF STUDENTS

4. Business Efficiencies – Implement business practices that “Produce Savings to Graduate More Students.” Part of the plan to be more “efficient” :

“At the state level, policymakers should limit the number of research institutions…research can be a problem at institutions that aspire to attract research funding, because fulfilling these aspirations can increase costs and reduce productivity in terms of serving undergraduate students.”

RIGHT SO NO MORE IMAGINATION OR RESEARCH, ONLY BOOT CAMP FOR OLIGARCHIC SOCIETY

“Cut athletic funding – Competitive athletic programs almost always require substantial subsidies from colleges and universities that pull money away from academics.”

“Employee contributions to health care and retirement plans also deserve scrutiny and should be measured against other private sector, competitively established contribution and benefit levels.”

The plan cites The University of Maryland as a great example

RIGHT, AUSTERITY CUT BENEFITS AND HEALTH CARE NO MOR PENSIONS 401k OR NOTHING at success story in controlling costs…students and facultyexperiencing the deep program cuts imposed on that institution may disagree.

CONTROLLING COSTS MEANS CUTTING BACK ON EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, FACULTY AND STAFF

It is a vicious cycle – with ALEC and Lumina Foundation at the center. ALEC pushes legislation and policy which imposes draconian cuts to public higher education funding. Lumina lends financial and policy support to the agenda – and positions itself to step in with a “Four Step Plan” to fill the void. Lumina offers a brilliant talking point – “follow our plan, and more people will get college degrees, which means more people will get jobs…because (as everyone knows) people with degrees get hired more than people without.”

BY THE WAY, THIS IS ALL DUE TO OBAMA TELLING US HOW MUCH EVERYONE NEEDS A COLLEGE DEGREE WHICH MERELY TURNS EDUCATION INTO A COMMODITY, DIPLOMA MILL, AND THUS IT IS THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION THAT IS SUPPORTING THIS, CORPORATE DEMOS ARE BEHIND IT BOTH ON A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL

While these are lofty goals and wonderful ideals (for education is truly the cornerstone of democracy); with Lumina, the devil is in the details. There is a clear push in this agenda to privatize and take an opportunistic approach to a continuing economic recession (or as Paul Krugman more accurately says, depression). Educational Foundations such as Lumina and the Gates Foundation are taking on a greater roll in developing policy, as opposed to direct awards – and it is having an enormous effect, again, because of the draconian cuts being endured by public colleges and universities.

There are two questions to be addressed…first, what does this outsized financial influence by a select few on public education policy mean, and where are they taking us. And second – will more college degrees, as is the goal of Lumina, create more jobs… http://bdgrdemocracy.wordpress.com/2012/06/22/alec-higher-education-and-lumina-foundation-policy-money-and-setting-the-agenda/

It is important to note that this is now called ‘Advocacy philanthropy’ and although Lumina was in ALEC and is now out (due to publicity) they do not need ALEC. They have philanthrpy money (stolen from working people) at a time of austerity and this will give them leverage to completely overhaul through hostile takeover the entire CC system. They want a boot camp, or school to work with punishments for taking extra classes and forcing students to be on work tracks.

Here are a few other foundations, media groups and political leaders who have close ties to Lumina:

Friedman Foundation

Kipp Foundation

Hillsborough Education Foundation

The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching

McKnight Foundation

Yahoo! Finance

Sheila Simon

Jamie P. Merisotis

Center for Student Opportunity (CSO)

The Fiscal Times

BORSHOFF

Washington Area State Relations Group

Education Commission of the States

New America Foundation

American Association of Community Colleges

Excelencia in Education

The Education Trust

Achieving the Dream

As to SMC

a few searches for Dr. Tsang, Santa Monica College and the Lumina Foundation found they are in close contact.

Here is one of the agendas from a recent meeting where Lumina representatives and Chui Tsang and Louise Jaffe were highlighted guest speakers:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=7&ved=0CFEQFjAG&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acct.org%2FFullDailySchedule.pdf&ei=TWIkUI6OIea62wXc-4D4CQ&usg=AFQjCNGVbsk6KSk5Jmcdmc-fjuyzZUeyEg

And there is more. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=10&ved=0CFkQFjAJ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccleague.org%2Ffiles%2Fpublic%2FCCCT11-11ag.pdf&ei=eVIlUPbPDoqE8QSj6YHAAw&usg=AFQjCNGcOgNdFFyVsehHGlb1i5o0wjeHDQ&sig2=IPmc40qIraRD9kBYo18H-w

Louise Jaffe, SMC board of trustee was also involved in the conference with Chui Tsang which was sponsored by Lumina Foundation.

AB515 was Lumina based, they had their fingerprints all over it as the Student Success Task Force. they have now decided after the blowup at SMC that they will target, using their accrediting agencies and false data they derive from private data chop shops, that this campus or that campus must be taken over and perhaps even driven into receivership.

SMC has both federal and state lobbying firms.

SMC has a contract with the lobby firm: Statregic Education Services: see below. Please note the lobby firm’s other clients are privatization agenda companies- Connections is now owned by Pearson- the testing giant!!! K street consulting is another lobby firm. (Oakland Unified is one of K Street’s clients). there are major conflicts here between public instituions such as SMC and private education companies. Brownley is backed by the privatizers such as Edvoice. SF community college possible closure- not an accident as the privatizers continue to line the pockets of government decisions makers. Kathy The Student Success Task Force was written by individuals at CSU sacramento Institute for higher education leadership and Policy (IHELP). Dr. Wesley Apker was involved in IHELP-worked at IHELP and is a bad actor!!! He failed to disclose his economic conflicts on his required FPPC 700 form.

http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000056437&year=2011

In addition, the SMC hired lobbyist, John P McAllister is a revolving door executive who formerly worked for congressman Bud Shuster (R) of PA in the 112th District who received his top support and lobbying from Republicans. In fact, all of his top contributions were made to and from Republicans.

Furthermore, Congressman Bud Shuster is a well known support of privatizing of education. In fact, his votes in congress further charter schools and the privatization of education.

http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientlbs.php?id=D000056437&year=2011
http://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/rev_summary.php?id=15621
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cycle=2002&cid=N00001395&type=I

http://www.ontheissues.org/PA/Bud_Shuster_Education.htm
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/S000394

The recent $82,500 expenditure in 2011 was costly and very bad timing given the current budget projections. Also, we are we supporting republican tied lobbyist who are known revolving door executives.

2011 was also the year that Julia Brownley was pushing AB515 at the state level. Regarding other wasted budget spending, SMC spent over $100,000 on a new logo in 2011. Many private schools also spend much money on branding and marketing, rather than properly funding their campus and opening new classes, hiring new teachers or providing excellent benefits to their workers.

In a message dated 8/12/2012 1:09:37 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, susan4@jps.net writes:
Beezer — Thanks for this info.

The accrediting group us WASC — Western States Schools and Colleges, in case anyone wants to do more research.

At 12:26 PM 8/12/2012, Elizabeth de Martelly wrote:
> Summary of May 2012 Student Union Meeting in Santa Monica
> Over 100 students from 26 campuses met in LA’s Santa Monica College in May. At this meeting, they passed a mandate outlining the basic principals of an action-oriented, participatory democracy-based statewide student union that will fight educational austerity and privatization and work in solidarity with campus laborers to connect our struggles (please see the attached document and CA Student Union website for details: http://castudentunion.wordpress.com/). Importantly, participants at this meeting also agreed that students in NorCal should plan a follow-up conference to discuss the structure of this union formation, passing the baton to us!
>
> Campus/Union Reportbacks
> City College of San Francisco
> ~In June, WASK (a private accreditation firm) threatened to take away CCSF’s accreditation unless the campus overhauled just about everything. Critically, WASK is connected to the Student Success Task Force (bills intended to deny access and ration education).
> ~WASK has red-flagged 60% of the K-14 institutions in its jurisdiction, and many believe that the fate of CCSF could determine what happens to these other schools (i.e., if WASK wins in re-structuring CCSF, it will go after other schools).
> ~On October 15, CCSF must submit a preliminary report to WASK about how they will alter the institution to meet the firm’s requirements (many people commented that following WASK’s requests will result in a much less democratic, much less accessible, and significantly under-resourced institution).
> ~CCSF is mobilizing to fight this threat and call it out as bu….
> UC Berkeley
> ~There are new threats of fee hikes, where Prop. 30 is being used to de-mobilize and re-route our anti-austerity movement.
> ~This year, two unions (AFSCME and UAW) are entering into contract negotiations, and at least UAW is preparing to strike next year.
> ~Students interested in forming a statewide union have continued to meet and are forming/joining broad coalitions to start a wider conversation about educational austerity and ways to combat it.
> CSU
> ~CSU faculty settled their contract and will not strike.
> UESF
> ~UESF held secret negotiations and settled for half of the sum they had asked for, which will mean significant budget cuts. A “no vote” campaign is being organized.
> ~Prop. 30 is destructive and teachers are being forced to lobby for it rather than put their energies into building a long-term, sustained movement.
>
> Proposals that Passed
> 1. To plan a conversation-based forum (referred to in this meeting as “Bay Area Solidarity Forum”) to discuss the purpose of a student union and to build for a larger conference.
>
> Location: TBD (ideas that came up: somewhere in SF, at CCSF, or at UC Berkeley)
> Timeline: before larger conference (likely mid-late September)
> ~good to have this forum in earlier in the semester, like September 15
> ~this forum doesn’t necessarily have to be on a weekend
> Ideas/Scope:
> ~conversations/brief presentations about the purpose of a student union and international models
> ~focus on international solidarity and international student union leaders can come to this event (if not to the conference)
> Follow-Up:
> ~Location/Date Committee: Meleiza (bottlomlining), Millie, Juan, and Alex
> *At the August 25 meeting, this group will present a proposal for potential dates and locations for the Bay Area Solidarity Forum.
>
> 2. To hold a large student union conference where proposals for the structure of the union will be discussed and voted on, and where there may be some educational component, potentially on a second day.
>
> Location: preferably at CCSF, but if students are unable to mobilize, then UC Berkeley will be a back-up
> Timeline: between mid-September and October 20
> ~late September/early October: organizing far ahead of elections will help people see this movement as an alternative to electoral politics
> ~October 6: it would be better to have an organizing body in place before the WASK report is due (October 15) so that students can take on significant actions on the 15th (like shutting down the campus through mass walk outs or occupying a building–one person mentioned that such tactics may be the only way to stop WASK); October 15 was chosen for us, so we have to build our struggle around it and create the awareness/momentum before the 15th
> ~October 20: the Saturday following the October 15 deadline where CCSF will have to submit a preliminary proposal for how it will satisfy the accreditation committee’s demands; people will be angry, and this could help mobilize them
> Ideas/Scope:
> ~solicit as many proposals as possible about how the student union will function/be structured
> ~bring in international union leaders from Mexico, Chile, Quebec, Mexicali, etc. and/or do fundraising to help with the fines and fees many unionists are facing
> Follow-Up:
> ~Location/Date Committee: Beezer (bottomlining), Carla, Kitty, and Carlos
> *At the August 25 meeting, this group will present a proposal for potential dates and locations for the Student Union Conference, where CCSF is our first choice, and UC Berkeley is a back-up.
>
> 3. To assemble a group of people to draft a proposal for the structure of the union.
>
> Summary of Working Groups
> Bay Area Solidarity Forum Location/Date Committee:
> Meleiza (bottlomlining), Millie, Juan, and Alex
> *At the August 25 meeting, this group will present a proposal for potential dates and locations for the forum (likely mid-late September)
> Statewide Student Union Conference Location/Date Committee:
> Beezer (bottomlining), Carla, Kitty, and Carlos
> *At the August 25 meeting, this group will present a proposal for potential dates and locations for the conference, where CCSF is our first choice, and UC Berkeley is a back-up (likely early-mid October).
> Outreach Committee:
> Andy and Juan (bottomliners), Carlos and Kitty (fliers)
> *These folks will create fliers for outreaching the August 25 meeting; create/update a facebook page; upload content onto the student union website; and they will draft/help draft a longer call for the forum and conference once the dates and locations are finalized (this call should include information about what’s happening at CCSF as well as the October 15 WASK deadline)
> Facilitation and Agenda Planning for August 25 Meeting:
> Carlos, Rea, and Beezer
>
> **If anyone wants to join any of these committees, just respond to this thread! Folks in SoCal: we can’t wait for you to plug in, but we gotta put a few more pieces in place first :)**
>
> Schedule of Upcoming Student Union Planning Meetings
> Saturday, August 25 at 12pm: UAW Hall (2070 Allston Way, Suite 205 in Berkeley)
> Saturday, September 8 at 12pm: Redstone Building (2926 16th St. in SF)
>
> Announcements and Upcoming Actions
> Monday, August 13 at 4pm: meeting at CCSF’s Ocean Campus
> ~will discuss actions for CCSF’s opening week of classes, which start August 15
> Monday, August 13 at 6pm: The Women’s Building (3543 18th St. in SF)
> ~Occupy SF Forum and teach-in about CCSF and educational austerity/privatization
> Wednesday, August 15 from 10am-2pm: CCSF Ocean Campus (50 Phelan Ave. in SF)
> ~an informational picket on the first day of classes to educate students about what’s going on at CCSF
> Sunday, August 23 at 6pm: at Francesco’s Italian Restaurant (8520 Pardee Dr. in Oakland)
> ~OEA Skyle conference
> Monday, September 17 all day: Occupy SF
> ~anniversary of Occupy and “Hell no, we won’t pay” actions
> ~Occupy Education NorCal voted to sponsor this meeting and outreach for attendance
> Content-Type: application/pdf;
> name=”CA Student Union – Public Statement.pdf”
> Content-Disposition: attachment;
> filename=”CA Student Union – Public Statement.pdf”
> X-Attachment-Id: f_h5sfr4bz0
>
> ————————-
> You have received this email because you (or someone you know) signed up.
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email with the subject unsubscribe%20ga to sympa@lists.occupyeducationca.org

————————-
You have received this email because you (or someone you know) signed up.
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email with the subject unsubscribe%20ga to sympa@lists.occupyeducationca.org
————————-
You have received this email because you (or someone you know) signed up.
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email with the subject

COCAL Updates

Updates in brief and links

1. More responses to the Delphi report on the changing faculty and support for adjuncts
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/08/03/new-effort-discuss-adjuncts-and-faculty-jobs

2. Cost of misclassifying workers as independent contractors (this happens to some teachers especially in extension and similar programs)
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/02/1115763/-Daily-Kos-Labor-digest-Workers-and-states-lose-big-bucks-from-employee-misclassification

3. Grad unions active while awaiting NLRB ruling on their right to unionize under NLRA
http://labornotes.org/blogs/2012/07/eager-unionize-grad-workers-wait-nlrbs-thumbs

4. Cyber learning and the for-profits
http://www.dailycensored.com/2012/08/05/cyber-earning-the-big-enchilada-point-and-click-education-in-the-age-of-irrationality/

5. A Philly, PA area adjunct deal with cancer while teaching up to 7 classes.
http://articles.philly.com/2012-08-05/news/33049741_1_adjuncts-cat-scan-entire-class#.UB-8aXls3k4.gmail

6. Good blog on workplace issues by Cory Robin, a TT prof in CA and formerly a leader of the Yale grad union (and author of the great book, “FEAR, the history of a political idea” which has a wonderful chapter on fear as a factor in the workplace, drawn largely from his Yale expereinces. See his blog at:
http://coreyrobin.com/category/laborworkplace/

COCAL Updates

Updates in brief and links

1. A good short discussion about strikes and general strikes, public and private. Appropriate for us and for Mayday. Go out and make some noise on May Day. See below.

2. Latest edition of Too Much, the newsletter about the superrich and economic inequality
http://www.toomuchonline.org/tmweekly.html

3. A very good post on the issue of conflicts/commonalities of interest with FTTT faculty, joint unions, etc, by our wise friend in Vancouver, Frank Cosco. He posted this as after a notice of the new combined union forming at U of OR and subsequent disucssion on the ADJ list. See below

4. More report, on workshop on contingent faculty at Green River College, WA. http://youtu.be/JptEezAjvjQ.
and see below

5. A reminder of the roots of May Day and why it is both dangerous and important to teach about it (and other labor history)
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=10111

6. And more on May Day http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=10113

7. And a poem for May Day, from Christy Rodgers at Whatif@igc.org (see below)

8. For-profits schools fighting proposed regulations in CA
http://www.baycitizen.org/government/story/more-transparency-sought-vocational/?utm_source=Newsletters&utm_campaign=a8f60dbca3-May_2_Daily_Newsletter&utm_medium=email

9. Colorado State Adjuncts: the new majority http://www.collegian.com/index.php/article/2012/05/colorado_state_adjuncts_the_new_majority

10. CA State U faculty in SFA vote overwhlemingly for rolling strike authorization
http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2012/05/03/california-state-u-faculty-authorizes-rolling-strikes

11. Walmart forced to pay millions in lost overtime. [Is there a lesson here for us?]
http://www.laborradio.org/Channels/Story.aspx?ID=1697462

12. Kalamazoo CCC (MI) contingents file for union recognition with AFT local.
http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2012/05/part-time_instructors_forming.html

13. What a difference did MayDay make?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/may/02/occupy-wall-street-panel-may-day

14. A new adjunct reflects on our status
http://www.sentinelsource.com/opinion/columnists/guest/is-there-any-hope-for-college-adjuncts/article_a0c2b645-e176-5c1a-bc9c-d2aaed39b71c.html

15. The April 20 “The Solution to Faculty Apartheid” conference held at Green River Community College in Auburn, WA, which featured Keith Hoeller, Frank Cosco, Kathryn Re, and me, is described in a feature in that college’s student newspaper, The Current, at http://issuu.com/thecurrcentgrcc/docs/issue10volume46. Click on the issue and then advance to page 10. It has a nice picture of Frank and Keith.
To view the Youtube video of the conference, select http://youtu.be/JptEezAjvjQ.
Jack Longmate

16. Lettert exchange in CHE http://chronicle.com/article/At-Salem-State-U-We/131751/

17. Student debt ande adjunct wages
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matthew-ross-smith/student-debt-loan-interest-rates_b_1474141.html?ref=money

18. PT lecturers in Taiwan protest wage gap http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2012/05/02/2003531800

19. Contingent faculty on welfare http://chronicle.com/article/From-Graduate-School-to/131795/

20. Adjunct Hero http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/education-oronte-churm/adjunct-hero-andrew-mcfadyen-ketchum

Updates in Full

1. https://t.co/qoRke0ut

“If you want a General Strike organize your co-workers”
An Interview with Joe Burns, author of Revivingthe Strike

at Lawrence, Mass.Bread and Roses Centennial April 28th, 2012

by Camilo Viveiros

Introduction: Many in the Occupy movement have called for a general strike on May 1stbut most Occupy activists aren’t involved in labor organizations or organizedin their workplaces. While General Assemblies may be somewhat effectiveinstitutions at reaching the agreement of assorted activists around future directactions, workplace stoppages require the large scale participation of workersin decision-making structures. The interview below gives some organizing advicefor those who have called the general strike. I hope that this interview willinspire Occupy activists to consider the difficult work ahead that is needed tobuild democracy in the workplace. We are the 99%!

Camilo: You’ve written this very important book Reviving the Strike that gives us a lot of insight about some ofthe challenges, but also the importance of strikes as a tactic. Thank youfor your work promotingthe increased use of the strike as a tool to use building working class power. In”Reviving the Strike” you argue that the labor movement must revive effectivestrikes based on the traditional tactics of labor– stopping production andworkplace-based solidarity. As someone who sees the strike as avital tactic to achieve economic justice I want to ask you a few questions.

Right now Occupyand other activists across the country have been agitating for a general strikeon May 1st. Resolutions have been passedat General Assemblies around the country.

There are alot of new activists that have joined the Occupy Movement, some never havinghad any organizing experience or labor organizing experience. Could you share some of the examples of creativeways that newer activists and established labor activists can think about thiscoming year, maybe toward next May 1st or toward the remote futureof how people can embrace new creative strategies to organize toward strikesinvolving larger numbers of folks.

Joe Burns: First of all, I think the fact that people are talking about this strikeand the general strike is a good thing because it starts raising people’sconsciousness about where our real source of power is in society, which isultimately working people have the power to stop production because workingpeople are the ones who produce things of value in society. On the other hand, if you look back throughhistory about how strikes happened, how in particular general strikes happened,what you’ll find is that they’re organized in the workplace by organizersorganizing their co-workers. And that’sreally the key aspect here. If you lookat how most general strikes in the United States have come about, it’s becausethere’s been strike activity in the local community, people have built bonds ofsolidarity. And then, let’s say oneLocal goes out on strike, they put out an appeal for other Locals to help them,and then eventually it breaks out beyond the bounds of the dispute between justthem and their employer and becomes a generalized dispute between all theworkers in the city and the employers in the city. So it really happens as part of a process ofsolidarity being built step by step.

“It hasn’treally happened where people have put out a general call saying let’s strike,let’s do a general strike on this day. “

It hasn’treally happened where people have put out a general call saying let’s strike,let’s do a general strike on this day.

One of thethings that I focus on in my book, is the need to refocus on the strike. And to do that, that really takes workplaceorganizing in both union and non-union shops, where people go in and do thehard work of talking to their co-workers, forming an organization, andultimately walking out together. I thinkit’s scary to do, to strike, to ask people in these isolated workplaces tostrike all by themselves makes it very difficult.

“…people goin and do the hard work of talking to their co-workers, forming anorganization, and ultimately walking out together”

Camilo: What do you think it would take to actually organize, to bring back thecapacity to have a general strike in the United States?

Joe Burns: In order to have a general strike I think we need to have a workers’movement that’s based in the workplace. If you look at, in the early 1970’s there’s a good book called Rebel Rank and File that a number of folks edited and it’s got articles. It’s really about how the generation of 60’s leftists,a lot of them went back into the workplaces and did organizing, and that in theearly 70’s there were tons of Wildcat strikes which aren’t authorized by theunion leadership. Some of them, like thePostal Strike of 1970 involved 200,000 postal workers striking against thefederal government, in an illegal strike. But that didn’t happen just by itself, it happened because people wentin to their workplaces and organized it. So, how are we going to get a general strike in this country? I think it’s going to be because we redevelopa labor movement or a broader workers’ movement that’s based on thestrike. I think the efforts of Occupyfor the class-based sort of thinking will help in that. Ultimately, though, I think we need at somepoint to devote our attention to the workplace, because the workplace is thesite of where the strike and struggle need to generate from.

Camilo: During the takeover of the capital building in Wisconsin somefolks speculated that what should have happened is that public sector workerswho were under attack should have gone on strike. But in some ways public sector workers areeven more restricted around strike guidelines than private sector workers andso they have less right to strike. Whatare your thoughts around public sector workers who are really bearing a largebrunt of the attack on labor over the last year, and what would the challengesbe to building the solidarity necessary to consider strikes of public sectorworkers?

Joe Burns: I think what you find studying labor history is that even though strikeswere illegal up until 1970, Hawaii became the first state to authorize a legalstrike, regardless of that workers struck by the hundreds of thousands, publicsector workers in the 1960’s. And infact the laws giving them the right to strike were done after the fact, andthey were only passed because workers were striking anyway and legislaturesdecided to set up an orderly procedure to govern strikes. So what you find is hundreds of thousands ofteachers striking throughout the 1960’s, and that’s really how public employeesbuilt their unions. And they did it inthe face of injunctions, so a judge may order them back to work and startjailing leaders, but like in Washington state in a rural community all theteachers showed up together, everyone who was on strike, and told the judge toarrest them all. And the judge backeddown because it didn’t look good.

So that’sreally how we won our unions to begin with in the public sector, in the 1960’s,so when you fast forward to today and look at strikes in the public sector, whenyou look at Wisconsin in particular, clearly the Wisconsin teachers is what reallykicked off the whole Wisconsin battle. They organized calling in sick, and two-thirds of Madison teachersdidn’t show up to work and that’s what really kind of fueled the beginning ofthe takeover of the capitol, along with the grad students and so forth. So it was based on a strike. Some people wanted that to expand into ageneral strike, but that really wasn’t going to happen unless the people mostinvolved which were the public employees, took the lead on that. And they chose, and made a strategic decisionafter four days to go back to work and fight by other means. I think that’s the strategy that they wantedto do and that made sense for them.

Camilo: With union density not at its peak what are the some of theopportunities for non-union organizations to use striking as a tactic? What aresome of the lessons we can learn from the Wildcat strikes of the 70’s, and howcan we have enough flexibility to try to go beyond the stranglehold that Laborlaw has on workers’ organizations right now?

Joe Burns: I think there’s been a lot of good movement in recent yearsto look at different forms of worker organization beyond the traditionalunions. So you’ve had workers’ centers,you’ve had various alternative unions, the IWW and so forth, all looking at howdo you organize particular groups of workers. The question that all of them eventually run into is, you can have youralternative form of organization but ultimately it’s a question of power, anddo you have the power to improve workers’ lives. And to do that traditionally, that’s been atthe workplace the ability to strike or otherwise financially harm anemployer. So I think part of what movingforward we’ll see with the revival of the workers’ movement in this country isa lot of coming together of these different forms of organizations, embracingtactics such as the strike. And reallysome of them are the best situated to do it, because they don’t have the hugetreasuries and buildings and conservative officials that you find in a lot ofunions.

“…ultimatelyit’s a question of power, and do you have the power to improve workers’ lives.”

Camilo: So, what would your advice be to a non-union Occupy activistwho maybe voted for a general strike during a general assembly, or who wants tosee a general strike come to fruition at some point, what would your suggestionsbe for those activists that are out there who are seeing the need for thistactic to be embraced.

Joe Burns: I think go into your workplace. The strike and strike activity needs to berooted in the workplaces, and if it’s based on people outside of the workplacecalling on people to engage in strike activity, that’s not going to work. Not saying you need to just bury your head insome local place, you need to have a broader perspective and broader activism,but if you really want to see a general strike, go out and organize workers,your co-workers or however you want to do it to build forms of organizationin the workplace.

Joe Burns is staff attorney and negotiator, withthe Association of Flight Attendants/ Communications Workers of America andauthor of Reviving the Strike.http://www.revivingthestrike.org

Camilo Viveiros has been a multi-racial economicjustice organizer for over 20 years. Hehas developed organizing trainings for the Occupy movementwww.popularassembly.org and does campaign and leadership development,popular education, strategy and direct action trainings for grassroots groups. 401-338-1665 camilo@activism2organizing.org

On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Michael wrote:
May Day has generated a lot of talk about “general strikes.” Here’s what the unions in Ontario said about what it took to organize a real general strike there years ago (attached).

General strikes are like heaven. Everyone who talks about it isn’t going there.

To be effective, movements need to be credible in the eyes of their constituents. When they start to speak in terms that are hyperbolic, bombastic, exaggerated, flatulent, or wishful thinking, they lose credibility.

The class struggle is not a ‘dream state’ in which one gets to conjure up fantastic plans and have them turned into reality. Unlike the little engine that could, repeating the words frequently does not make it possible to do what social reality says can’t be done(in that moment).

Magical thinking is not a good substitute for careful planning, painstaking organizing, and the demonstrated readiness of massive numbers of people to take responsibility for constructing a new social reality.

General strikes are always mass protests. All mass protests, however, are not general strikes. It pays to know the difference.

Michael

_______________________________________________
Ualeindiv mailing list
Ualeindiv@uale.org
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/ualeindiv
_______________________________________
3. Evening
It is good news when a new union gets going…it’s a really difficult process with lots of emotion, fears and doubts. Not nearly as tough as it was in the past but still tough.

In our post-sec world the fear of conflict of interest as this thread is called is real because single units composed of the “in” group and the “out” group too often haven’t measured up to the unity implicit in the word union. There are too many examples of the “out” group ending up even weaker. The result is that people sadly end up in the seemingly-bizarre but realistic position of arguing that two unions have to be better than one.

Any objective view cannot justify the inequities of privileging overtime for one group of members while denying pay equity for the other. The same goes for the privileging of one group with the right to continually evaluate the other (acting as the worst type of unprofessional manager) in ways that are hard to distinguish from bullying.

Doesn’t have to be that way. Hope the Oregon effort ends up on the better side of the history around these efforts. It won’t be at all easy for a single unit. They would have to tread new ground just to make life less contingent for their contingents. To create a really equitable situation will probably require new vision and concerted effort by the safer and more secure full-time leaders over a couple of decades.

The 20 or so federated post-sec unions in FPSE in BC, Canada, have worked hard at it for most of thirty years and still can’t point to wall to wall success although we have some significant examples of equitable situations. What started as a system of only community colleges has seen a half dozen of its institutions morphed into universities with mixed research, teaching and service workloads within “teaching” university contexts. Sad to report that the unions in a couple of the new universities have succumbed to the strange allure the privileged and stratified model but happily most of them have retained the equitable model that is in the genes of FPSE locals.

Last year, FPSE developed a set of bargaining policies and principles for universities. They can be viewed at the fpse.ca website (type university bargaining principles or something similar into the site’s search box). It is an attempt to provide useful guidelines for approaching the challenges of university bargaining. (Questions and comments welcome.)

In the Program for Change (check it out at the vccfa.ca website from May) Jack Longmate and I have set out a wide longterm agenda/menu for change that can really make life better for folks. There are successes in the States to point to. Many aspects of work life are under the control of faculty and can start to change in 2012 without any cost at all, with or without a union. We are not completely helpless.

In a unionist view, there’s nothing magical about the research or service part of one’s work. If it’s work that the boss paying for, it’s work. Those faculty leading unions need to think as unionists first and faculty second.

Frank Cosco
VCCFA & FPSE
Vancouver

Quoting Jack Longmate :

Hi Karen,

Pleased that we have concurrence about overloads. With course overloads, it
makes it very difficult for full-timers to argue that they are overworked
and underpaid, so the practice amounts to being self-inflicting wound apart
from contributing to the dysfunction of the system. To get those full-time
faculty invested in teaching course overloads to recognize that is easier
said than done. I don’t believe it’s ever happened voluntarily. (When the
limit on course overloads was imposed on my campus–no more than 167 percent
of full-time workload–one union officer complained about how this
restriction would cause an economic hardship for her family. That is, she
had customarily taught about 167 percent of a full-time load.)

In Washington community and technical colleges, part-time faculty are
restricted by a workload cap and cannot teach full-time at a given
institution period, so a simply status conversion, unfortunately, is a not a
realistic at present. In Vancouver, by contrast, conversion from
probationary “term” status to non-probationary “regular” status is a natural
progression. It’s helped by the fact that part-time and full-time faculty
are paid from the same salary scale and have the same set of expectations
(unlike here where part-timers are hired to “just teach”).

—–Original Message—–
From: adj-l-bounces@adj-l.org [mailto:adj-l-bounces@adj-l.org] On Behalf Of
Karen Thompson
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 5:40 PM
To: Contingent Academics Mailing List
Cc: Contingent Academics Mailing List
Subject: Re: [adj-l] Conflicts of Interest

Of course there should be no overloads for full-timers (except perhaps for
summer), but faculty need to negotiate a variety of ways to make sure their
salaries are deservingly high. Part-time faculty who teach a full-time load
must be converted to full-time. Limits on part-time teaching are necessary
to make sure those teaching s full-time load are considered full-time
faculty. These are simultaneous goals in negotiations. Again full-time and
part-time faculty can be on the se page here: limits AND conversion.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 28, 2012, at 6:58 PM, “Jack Longmate”
wrote:

Hi Mayra,

Course overloads are certainly allowable through collective bargaining.
At
my college, Olympic, the current CBA imposes some limits on full-time
faculty overloads: no more than 167 percent of a full-time load. Since
its
ratification, at least one full-timer for one term taught at 297 percent,
that is, approximately three times a standard full-time workload. I wrote
about that in http://www.cpfa.org/journal/10fall/cpfa-fall10.pdf, pages 12
and 9. (Before that limitation was enacted, I had heard rumors of similar
percentages about some full-time faculty.) But while I’m pleased that my
college has imposed some limits, those limits only affect overloads in
excess of 167 percent–those between 100 and 166 percent, from the
standpoint of the CBA, are consider normal and routine and perfectly fine.

When full-time faculty are able to teach course overloads at will, there’s
very, very little chance for job security to be extended to part-time
faculty, because if part-time faculty jobs were actually protected, it
would
interfere with the ability to teach course overloads. This is sort of the
gist of the conflict of interests.

The other side of the coin are caps on the workload of part-time faculty.
You’re probably aware that in California, there’s been considerable debate
and legislative action regarding the cap on part-time workload–I believe
it’s no more than 67 percent that a part-time instructor can teach in a
given community college district. In Washington state, the cap is a bit
more liberal–I believe it’s 85 percent at my college–but I don’t think
our
pay is close to that of California’s.

In Washington, caps exist in order to avoid cases of backdoor tenure. In
Washington state, by teaching full-time for a period of time, one can
satisfy one of the statutory requirements of tenure. In order to ensure
that it never happens, colleges impose these caps.

In my forays into possible reform of the state tenure laws–to eliminate
the
caps in order to thereby enable those who want and need more work–one of
the obstacles offered by one union lobbyist has been an aversion to
opening
up the state’s tenure statutes for the fear being that tenure might run
the
risk of getting eliminated altogether, which closes the discussion.

The solution, which would avoid the in-fighting that Karen alludes to,
would

_______________________________________________
adj-l mailing list
adj-l@adj-l.org
http://adj-l.org/mailman/listinfo/adj-l_adj-l.org

_______________________________________________
adj-l mailing list
adj-l@adj-l.org
http://adj-l.org/mailman/listinfo/adj-l_adj-l.org
————————-

4. The remarkable workshop entitled “Teach-in on Adjunct Faculty” that took
place at Green River Community College on April 20, 2012, moderated by Keith
Hoeller and Kathryn Re, is available for viewing at

One highlight is Keith’s reading of a statement of support from Cornel West.
It’s at about the 0:01:00 mark.

Frank Cosco, president of the Vancouver Community College Faculty
Association, speaks on “Abolishing the Two-track System”; his remarks begins
at about the 0:06:00 mark.

My portion, “The Overload Debate: Conflict of Interest between Full- and
Part-time Faculty” begins at 0:20:30 is synchronized with a set of
Powerpoint slides–should anyone wish a copy, please let me know.

The video was masterfully edited by Mr. Dave Prenovost.

Best wishes,

Jack Longmate

_______________________________________________
adj-l mailing list
adj-l@adj-l.org
http://adj-l.org/mailman/listinfo/adj-l_adj-l.o—
———————

7.

A Poem for May Day

By “Mr. Toad” former Detroit autoworker, 1980
(with thanks to Shaping San Francisco)
The eight hour day is not enough;
We are thinking of more and better stuff.
So here is our prayer and here is our plan,
We want what we want and we’ll take what we can.

Down with wars both small and large,
Except for the ones where we’re in charge:
Those are the wars of class against class,
Where we get a chance to kick some ass..

For air to breathe and water to drink,
And no more poison from the kitchen sink.
For land that’s green and life that’s saved
And less and less of the earth that’s paved.

No more women who are less than free,
Or men who cannot learn to see
Their power steals their humanity
And makes us all less than we can be.

For teachers who learn and students who teach
And schools that are kept beyond the reach
Of provosts and deans and chancellors and such
And Xerox and Kodak and Shell, Royal Dutch.

An end to shops that are dark and dingy,
An end to bosses whether good or stingy,
An end to work that produces junk,
An end to junk that produces work,
And an end to all in charge – the jerks.

For all who dance and sing, loud cheers,
To the prophets of doom we send some jeers,
To our friends and lovers we give free beers,
And to all who are here, a day without fears.

So, on this first of May we all should say
That we will either make it or break it.
Or, to put this thought another way,
Let’s take it easy, but let’s take it.