Category Archives: Science Communicators

The Changing Field of Stroke Medication

Strokes are the fifth leading cause of deaths in North America. If one is fortunate enough to survive a stroke, the rehabilitation process is long and painful depending on the amount of damage done to the brain. There are two types of strokes – ischemic and hemorrhagic. Ischemic strokes are the result of a clot forming in an artery and preventing blood flow, whereas hemorrhagic strokes are the result of an artery bursting and and the brain literally bleeding out.

Many researchers have worked towards improving and developing treatments to reduce the amount of brain damage a patient suffers during a stroke. One of the events that takes place during a stroke is called excitotoxicity, where brain cells literally excite themselves to death.

Receptors like NMDA as well as calcium are key culprits in causing damage to brain tissue. NMDA is a protein that is present on nerve cells and binds to the neurotransmitter glutamate. When a stroke occurs, nerve cells release large amounts of glutamate which bind to these NMDA receptors. The binding of glutamate to an NMDA receptor causes it to open. Calcium which is present in excess on the outside of the nerve cell, enters the cell. The calcium alongside with glutamate go on to wreck havoc in the nerve cell ultimately leading to its death. 

Courtesy of Khashayar.

Dr. Nicolas Weilinger investigated what happens at a cellular level during a stroke and the mechanism which works to damage brain cells. While researching, Dr. Weilinger discovered a new signalling pathway that had broad reaching implications for brain physiology and pathology.

YouTube Preview Image Courtesy of Harnoor Shoker

The findings of this study are important because current treatments in place to protect the brain during and after a stroke are not as effective as they should be. One of the main findings of Dr. Weilinger’s paper was that another channel much bigger than NMDA called pannexin gets activated during a stroke. Pannexin is physically connected to the NMDA receptor so when the NMDA receptor opens it signals pannexin to open as well. The opening of another channel therefore allows more calcium and glutamate to enter at an even faster pace. Using this information, a new drug was designed that would prevent the NMDA receptor from communicating with pannexin – in other words it would block the physical connection between the two proteins.

The wider implications of Weilinger’s paper is to hopefully improve stroke treatment. Future research into Dr. Weilinger’s findings could potentially be the first step in discovering a new drug type that can be used to reduce brain damage suffered during a stroke.

**We would like to thank Dr. Nicholas Weillinger for his time and the SCIE 300 team for guiding us and providing feedback.**

Harnoor, Khashayar, Matthew.

How is your 2GB iPhone 6s faster than my 4GB LG G5?!

Picture of an iPhone 6S side by side to an LG G5. Is the iPhone slower just because it's older? (image: PhoneArena)

iPhone 6S next to an LG G5. Is the iPhone slower just because it’s older? (image: PhoneArena)

This is an expansion/continuation on my first blog post, and I will be referring to terms already explained previously. So if you haven’t read that one yet, you might not understand this post as much as you should, so please go read it!

Done? Then here we go!

Now that you’re familiar with what components we as consumers should know, it’s time for me to take all those knowledge throw them away. Unfortunately, in the real world, higher specs does NOT always mean better performance. This is especially the case for smartphones. Don’t believe in me? Take a look at this video first.

YouTube Preview Image

The video compared 4 of the most recent phones in 2015/16 from 4 different companies. The iPhone 6s Plus by Apple, the Galaxy S7 Edge by Samsung, the Moto X Pure Edition by Motorola, and the Nexus 6P by Huawei. I’ve linked the their individual specs from the website GSMArena (a fantastic site if you want to know more about smartphones) so that you can compare with me. Scroll down to the platform and memory sections and see for yourself.

With what you were informed before (higher number is better), it would be logical to assume that Galaxy S7, with 16.8 Ghz total for CPU and 4GB of RAM, should be the fastest phone. The other phones should be much slower than the S7. But the iPhone, with the lowest CPU clock speed (3.68Ghz) and RAM (2GB), was the fastest by a long shot! The S7 only came second after nearly 18 seconds, immediately followed by the 6P, then the Moto X came last. How is this even possible? The S7 on paper should excel at doing so and trump the 6S.

The kings of smartphone, battle face to face. (image: TrustedReviews)

The kings of smartphone, battle face to face. (image: TrustedReviews)

This is due to something call optimisation. Apple is responsible for designing the components and the software of the iPhone, so they are familiar with what they’re dealing with. This give the iPhone a huge advantage of using all of the available resources it has. On the other hand, Samsung is responsible for neither the hardware nor the software of the phone. The S7 runs Android made by Google while they use CPU (Snapdragon 820) made by the company Qualcomm. Imagine two people with limited food sources, the one that knows how to ration the foods daily will still be able to survive longer than the one that doesn’t even if he/she has more food.

The reason I’m saying this, as a continuation of the previous post, is to make a point that things might often not be what they seem like. This is very much like science, correlation does not necessarily mean causation. An example might be that animals with bigger brains are generally more intelligent, a nice counter argument would be humans compared to elephants! Our preconceptions on things might lead to faulty science!

Until next time!

Ivan

Energy Drink Commercial: Minimizing the Bad and Maximizing the Good

There is currently a huge market for energy drinks in which young teens and adults consume them on a regular basis. In particular, the five-hour energy shot, having zero sugar content and only four calories, certainly stand out amongst the crowd. However, does this product really cure tiredness and give us energy and nutrition with no side effects? Are the advertisements conveying all the necessary information for viewers to make an informed decision?

In this commercial, there are some misleading and hidden messages in the claims of the product. For instance, a side effect of caffeine is crashing. Nonetheless, the bottle says “no crash!” To resolve this confusion, users need to pay attention to the flashing fine prints that are significantly less noticeable during the commercial. One of which says, “no crash means no sugar crash.”

a snapshot from the YouTube commercial

The use of fine print and repetition in the commercial might not be enough for a client to make an informed decision. Technically, the company did not lie. During the commercial, they did display and mention all the necessary information. However, the way they aggressively minimized the negative factors, and amplified the positive factors are truly misleading. It is really up to the users to interpret the information given, and use their existing knowledge to be informed about the product.

Furthermore, the nutrients added in the five-hour energy drink such as vitamin B6 and B12 do not have any values in boosting energy. It is the caffeine added in it that is giving the feeling of alertness. Vitamin B6 has functions in neurotransmitter, histamine, and hemoglobin synthesis as well as in metabolism and gene expression. On the other hand, vitamin B12 serves the normal functioning of the brain and nervous system. Although both are essential in the human body, none of them attribute to increasing energy. By associating these nutrients with an energy drink, the advertiser again left an open-ended scenario for the viewers to interpret. Most often, people would assume the causal relationship between vitamins and energy-level improvement.

5

five-hour energy drink via flickr

The commercial and product emphasize the positive effects of the energy drink but fail to point out any risks. Aside from developing tolerance and physical dependence on caffeine, cardiovascular, psychological, digestive and other symptoms can develop with long-term use. Cardiovascular symptoms include: high blood pressure and arrhythmia. Psychological issues include: anxiety and nervousness. It can also lead to increased urination, loss of water-soluble nutrients, and dehydration. Other adverse effects include nausea, restlessness, drowsiness, and insomnia.

Overall, users should take the time to do research on any information given before using a product. We shall always seek for scientific evidence that have been supported by experts in the field, peer-reviewed and supported with raw data before believing anything. We should also use our existing knowledge to interpret information.

-Brigette Wee

My low memory computer is too slow to process this graphics intensive video

Razer Blade Stealth by Razer

The 6th Gen Intel Core i7-6500U processor gives the Razer Blade Stealth 2.5GHz of processing power and Turbo Boost speeds up to 3.1GHz.

Above is a picture with a quote taken from Razer – introducing it’s latest laptop. After reading that, you’ll probably fall into one of the two categories: “What on earth does this mean,” or “Razer is obviously ripping people off.”

It intrigues me that most people still know so little about what they’re using at the palm of their hands on a daily basis. Yet it is understandable as to why this is, the jargons that are supposed to help customers make better choices have become the barriers themselves.

Surface Book and Surface Pro 4 by Microsoft

Does it matter if you laptop can split in half?

And some of the biggest companies (Apple, Microsoft, etc.) intentionally leave out the specifications of their products. Imagine buying a furnished house without knowing the capacity of the washing machine.

Fret not! Hopefully, this “guide” will help you up your game so you won’t need to waste hours of your life deciding on a new computer. Some fun stuff will be lying around so to not bore you.

CPU: Central Processing Unit, the brain of the computer, responsible for processing things in your computer, the speed is measured in Gigahertz (GHz). Below is a video of Steve Jobs holding a CPU.

YouTube Preview Image

You might also have heard of cores. I will leave that to one of my favourite tech YouTuber to explain, take it away MKBHD:

YouTube Preview Image

Fun fact: The evolution of CPU (sounds weird I know), was governed by the Moore’s Law until recently, this means that we will only see a significantly faster CPU every two years.

GPU: Graphic Processing Unit, the visual cortex of the computer, responsible for processing visual information. Things that are graphic intensive include videos, games and 3D modelling.

Fun watch: embedded is a video of the legendary Mythbusters explaining the difference between CPU and GPU, though it is old, it is still very relevant now.

YouTube Preview Image

HDD/SSD: Hard Disk Drive/Solid State Drive, governing the long term memories of the computer. Measured in Gigabytes (GB) or Terabyes (TB). Trust me on this when I say you don’t want to have a small capacity (<250GB), don’t say I didn’t warn you when you have to start deleting adorable cat pics just because you didn’t listen to me.

Fun read: Scientists have found another use for helium, which is to fill them in HDD to give HDD a higher capacity!

RAM: Random Access Memory, the short term memory of the computer. They will help store tidbits used for short time like booting up a computer or the amount of tabs you have on your browser (seriously, don’t blame the computer for being slow when you have 30 tabs opened all at the same time). <– Funny Joke

To sum up: Everything is better with higher numbers.

And that’s it for today! Maybe I’ll expand on each aspect in the future blog posts, but until then!

Ivan