Category Archives: Science Communication

The Changing Field of Stroke Medication

Strokes are the fifth leading cause of deaths in North America. If one is fortunate enough to survive a stroke, the rehabilitation process is long and painful depending on the amount of damage done to the brain. There are two types of strokes – ischemic and hemorrhagic. Ischemic strokes are the result of a clot forming in an artery and preventing blood flow, whereas hemorrhagic strokes are the result of an artery bursting and and the brain literally bleeding out.

Many researchers have worked towards improving and developing treatments to reduce the amount of brain damage a patient suffers during a stroke. One of the events that takes place during a stroke is called excitotoxicity, where brain cells literally excite themselves to death.

Receptors like NMDA as well as calcium are key culprits in causing damage to brain tissue. NMDA is a protein that is present on nerve cells and binds to the neurotransmitter glutamate. When a stroke occurs, nerve cells release large amounts of glutamate which bind to these NMDA receptors. The binding of glutamate to an NMDA receptor causes it to open. Calcium which is present in excess on the outside of the nerve cell, enters the cell. The calcium alongside with glutamate go on to wreck havoc in the nerve cell ultimately leading to its death. 

Courtesy of Khashayar.

Dr. Nicolas Weilinger investigated what happens at a cellular level during a stroke and the mechanism which works to damage brain cells. While researching, Dr. Weilinger discovered a new signalling pathway that had broad reaching implications for brain physiology and pathology.

YouTube Preview Image Courtesy of Harnoor Shoker

The findings of this study are important because current treatments in place to protect the brain during and after a stroke are not as effective as they should be. One of the main findings of Dr. Weilinger’s paper was that another channel much bigger than NMDA called pannexin gets activated during a stroke. Pannexin is physically connected to the NMDA receptor so when the NMDA receptor opens it signals pannexin to open as well. The opening of another channel therefore allows more calcium and glutamate to enter at an even faster pace. Using this information, a new drug was designed that would prevent the NMDA receptor from communicating with pannexin – in other words it would block the physical connection between the two proteins.

The wider implications of Weilinger’s paper is to hopefully improve stroke treatment. Future research into Dr. Weilinger’s findings could potentially be the first step in discovering a new drug type that can be used to reduce brain damage suffered during a stroke.

**We would like to thank Dr. Nicholas Weillinger for his time and the SCIE 300 team for guiding us and providing feedback.**

Harnoor, Khashayar, Matthew.

Visions of a Greener Earth

Have you ever been watering plants and wondered just how much water was being absorbed by plants? Is the water you’re using to soak your garden even being put to good use by the plants? It turns out, plants contain an extensive system with complicated processes which allows them to “drink” water via osmosis. A little known fact, plants have an inner and outer layer which they use to filter water. Dr. Jetter, a researcher in the department of botany at the University of British Columbia, completed a study that aimed to figure out the function of each of those layers. He did this by examining eight different species of plants and studying the chemistry of each individual inner and outer layer.

Dr. Reinhard Jetter from UBC Department of Botany. Image courtesy of Daryl’s Camera

Our group had the pleasure of interviewing Dr. Jetter at the Biological Sciences building where he gave us further insight into his research. When our group first read his paper, we expected similar research had already been completed by scientists at other institutions but surprisingly, that was not the case. In fact, Dr. Jetter told us related research had only been done by one other group of scientists located in Germany in 2001. The video below highlights the most important components of Dr. Jetter’s research and what he found:

https://youtu.be/Ex1gqoDKbEQ

Video – Credit to Dr. Reinhard Jetter, Brian Wong, Daryl Kwok and Ying Yu

Plant cuticles were isolated. Image courtesy of Daryl’s Camera

A specially designed water chamber was used to measure how fast water passes through each layer of cuticles. Image courtesy of Daryl’s Camera

Why is this research significant? Well for one, North America suffered major droughts from 2012-2015 due to record-breaking heat waves. Acres of vegetation died off and as a result, entire ecosystems were disrupted. Additionally, water became an extremely scarce resource and states such as California were so desperate for water, they were buying it from Canada. So what are the nitty-gritty details regarding the composition of how plants control water loss? Furthermore, what are its applications to the general public? We examine this in the podcast below:

Audio –  Credit to Dr. Reinhard Jetter, Brian Wong and Ying Yu

Like all studies done in the name of science, there exist limitations. Each individual plant’s chemical components are not analogous, the water-loss barriers will vastly differ within each species. For example, in Dr. Jetter’s study, some plant species had up to 100 times water-loss prevention effectiveness versus other species. This variation is due largely to the interaction between chemical compounds within the plant itself. As a result, it would be an extremely extensive task to accurately record every individual plant species’ ability to control water-loss.

With Dr. Jetter’s research as a basis, huge potential exists in developing technologies that would drastically reduce the negative effects of drought. In the future, if scientists can fully understand and utilize the level of water loss between plant layers, vast farmlands which are highly dependent on weather conditions could be alleviated of disastrous levels of crop loss. Undoubtedly, Dr. Jetter’s research serves as the pioneering basis for a frontier of unspoken possibilities to benefit our great big green planet Earth.

-Group 3: Brian Wong, Daryl Kwok and Ying Yu

What could global warming bring for our cities?

From the pre-industrial carbon concentration of 240 parts per million, human activities have steadily increased the amount of carbon in our atmosphere to current levels of 400 parts per million. Carbon in our atmosphere interacts with oxygen to become carbon dioxide, CO2, which acts as a greenhouse gas. Greenhouse gasses are effective at trapping heat that is leaving from the surface of our planet. As a result, our planet gets warmer since less heat is able to escape to space and instead linger around in our atmosphere where it is then reflected back to the surface.

What changes could we be expecting?

We are aware that the increase of CO2 is causing global warming and scientists estimate that if we continue to release carbon at the same rate we are emitting now, there could be up to 4.5°C increase in global temperature by 2100.

A 4.5°C increase temperature does not sound like a lot but according to the IPCC report in 2007, this could bring 0.26-0.59 meters increase in sea levels and another study predicted a much higher increase in sea level of 2 meters by 2100.

Climate Central released numerous visualizations of what major cities around the world will look like after carbon emissions have had their affect on sea levels using recently published data.

Screen Shot 2016-03-21 at 6.39.15 PM

City of Durban after 2°C rise (left) and 4°C rise (right). Image from Climate Central

Screen Shot 2016-03-21 at 6.43.27 PM

City of Rio after 2°C rise (left) and 4°C rise (right). Image from Climate Central

Screen Shot 2016-03-21 at 6.40.50 PM

City of Mumbai after 2°C rise (left) and 4°C rise (right). Image from Climate Central

Screen Shot 2016-03-21 at 6.41.59 PM

New York City after 2°C rise (left) and 4°C rise (right). Image from Climate Central

What does that mean for us?

Vancouver, being a coastal city, is not safe from rising sea levels either. To prevent damages done to the buildings and infrastructures in the city, city planners recommend that the flood plains be raised by 1 meter than current height, to a total of 4.6 meters. They think that this change to the bylaws will provide safety net for predicted sea level increase of year 2100.

Lots of CO2 emissions come from fossil fuel combustion from industrial activities, however we could also do our part to reduce CO2 emissions in effort to reduce the impact on climate change we have. Simple steps we could take include reducing usage of personal cars and taking public transportation or biking instead. Remembering to turn off lights in unused rooms also help since producing electricity is also a big source of CO2 emissions.

YouTube Preview Image

Top 10 countries in danger from future sea rise

video by The Daily Conversation

 

Alana Lee

Stop smoking to make a big difference to your health

Nowadays, it’s hard to find a person who hasn’t heard about how harmful smoking is to our overall health. Each year, cigarette smoking is responsible for nearly 20 percent deaths in the United States and more than 6 million of people in the world died from smoking-related diseases. Smoking is harmful to every part of the body and can lead to serious health problems, such as cancer, heart diseases and respiratory problems.

 Smoking-related diseases

Smoking is one of the leading causes of cancer and it accounts for more than 30 percent of all cancer deaths in the U.S each year. The reason behind it is that smoking can trigger DNA mutations and damage the genes that protect us from cancers. Studies have shown that cigarette smoke contains more than 7000 chemicals and more than 69 of them are known to be carcinogens, which can cause varying degrees of DNA damage. As a result, people who smoke are more likely to develop certain types of cancers, such as lung cancer, throat cancer and liver cancer.

Additionally, cigarette smoking can cause heart diseases by damaging the function of your heart and the structure of the blood vessels. First, smoking produces carbon monoxide that can reduce the oxygen level in the bloodstream and hence increase heart rate to supply the body with enough oxygen. Second, some chemicals in cigarette smoke have been shown to cause the fatty plaque build-up inside the arteries. This will increase the risk of getting stroke, heart attack and atherosclerosis.

images_235

The image shows how smoking can affect arteries in the heart. Image from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Furthermore, smoking is also the primary cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is a type of progressive lung disease that can cause respiratory problems and lung infections. The main symptoms of COPD include coughing, wheezing and shortness of breath. Cigarette smoking can also cause damage to lung tissues and reduce the airflow in and out of the lungs, resulting in many breathing-related problems.

YouTube Preview Image

Youtube video – Smoking and its effects on Health. By iheedinstitute

Benefits of quitting smoking

Quitting smoking can lower the risk for smoking-related diseases and largely improve our overall health. Recent studies have shown that quitting smoking before the age of 40 can reduce the risk of early death from smoke-related diseases by 90 percent and increase the life expectancy by 10 years.The following graph shows the timeline of recovery effects after quitting tobacco.

quit_timeline1

Timeline of health benefits after stopping smoking. Image from http://www.tobaccofreeco.org

In summary, cigarette smoking can cause negative health effects in many ways and it is also a major risk factor for developing cancers and other preventable diseases. Quitting smoking can help regain your health to the same level as those of non-smokers. It is never too late to stop smoking and start a healthy lifestyle!

-Ying Yu

How is your 2GB iPhone 6s faster than my 4GB LG G5?!

Picture of an iPhone 6S side by side to an LG G5. Is the iPhone slower just because it's older? (image: PhoneArena)

iPhone 6S next to an LG G5. Is the iPhone slower just because it’s older? (image: PhoneArena)

This is an expansion/continuation on my first blog post, and I will be referring to terms already explained previously. So if you haven’t read that one yet, you might not understand this post as much as you should, so please go read it!

Done? Then here we go!

Now that you’re familiar with what components we as consumers should know, it’s time for me to take all those knowledge throw them away. Unfortunately, in the real world, higher specs does NOT always mean better performance. This is especially the case for smartphones. Don’t believe in me? Take a look at this video first.

YouTube Preview Image

The video compared 4 of the most recent phones in 2015/16 from 4 different companies. The iPhone 6s Plus by Apple, the Galaxy S7 Edge by Samsung, the Moto X Pure Edition by Motorola, and the Nexus 6P by Huawei. I’ve linked the their individual specs from the website GSMArena (a fantastic site if you want to know more about smartphones) so that you can compare with me. Scroll down to the platform and memory sections and see for yourself.

With what you were informed before (higher number is better), it would be logical to assume that Galaxy S7, with 16.8 Ghz total for CPU and 4GB of RAM, should be the fastest phone. The other phones should be much slower than the S7. But the iPhone, with the lowest CPU clock speed (3.68Ghz) and RAM (2GB), was the fastest by a long shot! The S7 only came second after nearly 18 seconds, immediately followed by the 6P, then the Moto X came last. How is this even possible? The S7 on paper should excel at doing so and trump the 6S.

The kings of smartphone, battle face to face. (image: TrustedReviews)

The kings of smartphone, battle face to face. (image: TrustedReviews)

This is due to something call optimisation. Apple is responsible for designing the components and the software of the iPhone, so they are familiar with what they’re dealing with. This give the iPhone a huge advantage of using all of the available resources it has. On the other hand, Samsung is responsible for neither the hardware nor the software of the phone. The S7 runs Android made by Google while they use CPU (Snapdragon 820) made by the company Qualcomm. Imagine two people with limited food sources, the one that knows how to ration the foods daily will still be able to survive longer than the one that doesn’t even if he/she has more food.

The reason I’m saying this, as a continuation of the previous post, is to make a point that things might often not be what they seem like. This is very much like science, correlation does not necessarily mean causation. An example might be that animals with bigger brains are generally more intelligent, a nice counter argument would be humans compared to elephants! Our preconceptions on things might lead to faulty science!

Until next time!

Ivan

Baked potato chips: Are they actually healthier than fried chips?

Fried potato chips are one of the most common and popular snack around the globe.  Often classified as junk food because of it’s high fat and sodium content, food manufactures have been offering a seemingly “healthier” alternative: baked potato chips.

Baked potato chips manufactured by Lay's Source: Flickr Commons

Baked potato chips manufactured by Lay’s (source: Flickr)

Baked potato chips must be healthy, correct?  They have been prepared without the deep frying process, therefore contain much less fat than the conventional potato chips. For comparison, one cup of conventional potato chips contains about 10 grams of fat while baked chips contain about 6 grams. In addition, baked chips contain much less saturated fat. According to the American Heart Association, saturated fats increases the level of cholesterol therefore the risk of heart diseases.

Since the fat content is lower, baked potato chips may seem like a healthy alternative, but is this really the case?  Studies show that the sodium content of baked potato chips is higher than normal potato chips. Is it suspected that to compensate for less flavour than fried chips, manufactures add more artificial flavouring to baked chips thus increasing sodium content.  Research shows high sodium intake leads to higher blood pressure, which is a leading cause for cardiovascular diseases.

The process of making baked potato chips is very different from fried chips.  Prior to baking potato chips, the potatoes are dried prior to the baking process.  During this drying process, potatoes are heated to high temperatures and releases the chemical compound acrylamide. Acrylamide is a cancer-causing chemical and according to a study by U.S. Food and Drug Administration, baked potato chips contain up to three times the amount of acrylamide compared to fried potato chips. To get an idea of how potato chips are made, have a look at the clip below by NFB:

YouTube Preview Image

 

Along with the addition of extra flavouring for baked chips, we may even find additional ingredients used such as corn oil. While we are removing the frying process with vegetable oil, the corn oil in baked potato fries are just as unhealthy!

Baked potato chips has its benefits of being low in fat content.  However, consider the other components you are putting into your mouth before you indulge yourself into a bag of baked chips. They may not be so “healthy” after all.

 

Daryl Kwok

 

 

Dark Matter and Dark Energy – the key to the fate of the Universe

Since the Big Bang explosion, the universe keeps expanding and the expansion is accelerating right now, while you are reading this post. However, we still don’t know if the universe will keep expanding forever or it will stop expanding and stay like that or it will collapse at some point in the future.

In the universe, there are approximately 1011 to 1012 galaxies and they are made of stars, gas, dust and dark matter.

Oh wait!! Dark matter? What is it?

The galaxies are rotating due to their gravity just like the way planets orbiting around the Sun. According to Newton’s Law of universal gravitation, gravity is proportional to the mass of the objects and inverse proportional to squared of the distance between them. Therefore, it is expected that the further a star is from the centre of the galaxy, the small its velocity is. In reality, however, when measure the rotational speed of stars in the outer region of galaxies, it turns out to be much much higher than the calculated values, so there must be a very large unseen mass other than ordinary matter that accounts for this . In 1933, Fritz Zwicky, a Swiss astrophysicist, came up with a hypothesis that there must be the existence of a type of matter that couldn’t be seen and he called it Dark Matter.

The graph shows how the rotational speed of a galaxy varies with the distance from its centre

By using rotational speeds of galaxies, the mass of dark matter can be estimated. Surprisingly, dark matter accounts for more than 85% mass of matters in the universe. According to the standard model of cosmology, the universe is made of 5% ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons…), 25% dark matter and the rest is dark energy (a hypothetical type of energy).

Yes, Dark Energy, you didn’t misread the term!

Without dark energy, the universe would collapse as with the large amount of dark matter and ordinary matter, gravity is very large and it could cause the universe to collapse. Dark energy provide the force that overcomes gravity and pushes the matters outwards. It is the reason why the universe is expanding.

This figure shows how dark matter and dark energy account for the expansion of the universe

However, we know very little about dark matter and dark energy. We don’t know the exact amount, or how they distribute in the universe. And they have become one of the most hottest topics in physics of this century.

As physicists believe that dark matter is composed of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), so it can be detected by either direct or indirect methods. But with dark energy, physicists have no clues what it is so the only way to search for it right now is by indirect methods such as exploding stars, sound waves, distortions.

YouTube Preview Image

If we successfully confirm the existence of dark matter and dark energy, we will open the door that leads to the answer of the fate of the universe. However, it is still a long way to go until we can fully understand our universe. Therefore, the fate of the universe is still uncertain.

Ryan Tran.

Earphones vs. Headphones: Which one is safer?

Have you ever wondered if accessories can lead to hearing loss?

Lately, I have been thinking a lot about the difference between earphones and headsets, and if they negatively affect the user’s sense of hearing. I decided to do some research on this topic to find out about the differences between both and how it can cause damage to the ear drums.

So What is the actual difference between earphones and headphones?

ES-IN17

Earbuds – also Known as earphones. Wikimedia commons by Rekeylee

Earphones are commonly known as earbuds. They are less expensive to manufacture compared to headsets, less bulky, and more portable as well. They are usually inserted into the ear canal.

Headphones are often called headsets, which rests on our outer part of ear. Although, headsets are quite expensive, they are capable of producing good sound quality, especially when it comes to bass. There are two different kind of headphones: on-ear headphones and full-size headphones.

On-ear headphones are also known as earpad headphones. They are comfortable and less likely to cause overheating ears. Although they are easy to transport, the bass quality and noise-isolating feature is not as great as full-size headphones.

Full-size headphones are also known as over-the-ear headphones. The earcups in the headphones cover the ears fully. Some advantages include powerful bass, excellent sound quality, and complete outside noise cancelling. On the downside, these headphones are not very portable and can interfere with glasses, earrings and some hairstyles due to their size. Thus, it is considered best for home use rather than portable use. 

Headphones_1

Headsets: on-ear headphones. Wikimedia commons by PJ

Headsets also known as over-the-ear headphones. Wikimedia commons by

Headsets also known as over-the-ear headphones. Wikimedia commons by Pertsaboy

 

 

 

 

 

 

So which one causes hearing loss?

It is important to know a few things about the anatomy of ear before we find out what type of accessory is responsible for hearing loss. The following YouTube video by Brandon Pletsch describes about the anatomy of the ear and how the sound waves travel through different parts of the ear and transfers its signal to the Brain. 

YouTube Preview Image

 Sound pressure is measured in decibels (dB). On average, human ear can hear sounds down to 0 dB. However, sound that reaches 85 dB or stronger can lead to permanent damage to our hearing. Earphones and headsets have the ability to produce sound up to a maximum of 100 dB. In that case, a person’s hearing can be permanently damaged after using them for just 15 minutes per day. 

In addition to that, earphones naturally add about 9 dB of sound due to the fact that it sits close to our ear canal. Also, it does not isolate any outside noise which causes us to increase the volume even higher, which is considered as unsafe. In contrast, Over-the-ear headphones covers the ear fully and blocks the outside noise which decreases the chances of us increasing the volume higher. Due to these reasons, doctors recommend over-the-ear headphones rather than earphones to preserve our hearing. 

– Shayini Kanageswaran