Author Archives: AJung

Creating Connections… at UBC

Dear incoming and existing Mech Eng graduate students,

On behalf of myself and I (which doesn’t speak for much), I would like to send you an early (for the incoming students) and late (for those current students whom I haven’t met yet) yet warm welcome to UBC Engineering. It’s mid August already, and I thought I would’ve graduated by now, but I am happy to let you know that I will be around for a couple of more months to blog here, and hopefully get to know you a little bit.

Today, I would like to talk about a serious issue many students have that may be more relevant to you than you currently may think. The issue is this – how do you get to know people, to a comfortable enough level, such that you can call them up and hang out with them on a regular basis? In other words, how do you ‘get a life’ outside your lab, when the first set of people you’ll get to know and learn to rely on are the people at your lab? It may be it’s your first time in Canada/Vancouver/UBC/grad studies, and you know there are tons of things the city/campus/country has to offer that are waiting for you to explore. To put it a little more bluntly, where do you find people outside the lab???

Coming alone to UBC? Don't worry, we'll get you settled down no problem. You just need to come out a little, and be willing to get to know new people.

Your labmates, who may have been around for months/years, will probably know enough to guide you through your curious appetite to poke around different parts of your new habitat. They will probably be a good resource for you to ask questions such as “Where can I get a fob access to the lab?”, “What’s a fob?” (that was one of my questions when I first came here. lol), “Where do you usually go for groceries?”, and “Am I supposed to be in the lab 9-5 everyday?”.

But the feedback I’ve been getting from people regarding their ‘settling down at UBC’ experience as a Mech Eng grad student is that there are benefits to meeting people who are going through the same things (i.e,.  the same ‘settling down at UBC phase’), who are not necessarily your labmates, and it’s also hard to get to know people outside the lab whom you can hang out with – so that you’re not always hanging out at the lab.

I happened to be lucky to have come to UBC with a whole bunch of my classmates from undergrad that I didn’t have much problem of looking for people to hang out with. But that’s not always the case for most people.

If you are anything like me — who is totally not athletic, never has the time to cleanse myself of my lab-loving workaholic tendencies, enjoys hobbies that don’t necessary require interactions with other people (i.e., watercolour painting, playing the flute, and blogging) — then you really don’t get to meet a lot of new people. I even joked with some of the MEGAers at last week’s MEGA meeting that if I were to use Facebook’s CheckIn functions a lot more, and checked in at the places I go to everyday, then my Facebook wall would look something like this:

AJung has checked in at the Lab.

AJung has checked in at Home.

AJung as checked in at the Lab.

AJung has checked in at Starbucks (2 min. walk from the lab).

AJung has checked in at the Lab.

AJung has checked in at Home.

AJung has checked in at the Lab.

Funny, yet sadly true.

So where do you meet new people who will eventually become your social circle. And if you have a social circle already, how do you diversify your social circles?

MEGA is going to do its best to bring new and current students together during the orientation week, but I think people would definitely benefit from taking advantage of some of the social things during the first couple of months – while things are not so busy, you’re loaded with coursework rather than research work, and everything is new and exciting.

First, check out MEGA – Mech Eng Grad Association. You’ve come to UBC to become the world’s most sought-out researcher in your field, and you don’t have time to get involved in student associations. No worries, I get it. But as grad students, there comes a time when you’d like to talk about your supervisors without the presence of them (Mike & Elizabeth: don’t worry, I don’t say anything bad about you guys.. eh hem..!), and need someone to echo your heartache over Mech 598 seminars, get the latest news about deals on Groupon that you don’t want to miss out – i.e.,  ‘get a life’ the grad student way. MEGA runs weekly coffee socials, so that you don’t have to get involved in the administrative stuff behind the association, but you come out to chill, eat cookies, and drink coffee/tea/whatever is there for free. It’s definitely a good way to meet people within the department I think. MEGA has its own Facebook page, website, a Google Calendar, and a mailing list, so that you can stay informed of our next beach party, hike, free pizza/movie nights, and more.

Second, go do the orientation stuff. I know I know… some of the things may sound boring or ‘not your thing’ for you. But just do it. Just for the orientation week. Because otherwise, you may never get the chance to do the potentially awkward stuff with strangers, which means the strangers will remain strangers to you – and not your buds. GSS usually plans some epic events, such as the boat cruise (which I thoroughly enjoyed).

A pic from Creating Connections 2007. I am in this picture somewhere, and so are a number of my current friends who were mere strangers back then.

Third, if you are a lady engineer, like myself, consider going to the Creating Connections 2.0 event. They ran it a couple of years ago when I first came to UBC, and it was an epic event to meet people, not only grad students, but also industry people and professors who are females and share the same pains and pleasures of being a lady engineer in Canada. The best thing about it is that it’s filled with opportunities to meet other lady engineers at other departments, like ECE, Civil, etc., while getting inspired by fabulous guest speakers who gives you these straight-from-experience words of wisdom.

Lastly, share your passion with others. There are good deals throughout the city that are tailored to suit your tastes and hobbies. For example, the Access Pass at the Vancouver Symphony Orchestra is one thing that I think all students should have, because they allow you to go to these fabulous concerts at the Orpheum for only $10, which is uber cheap – for those of you who dig classical music like I do. And see? You wouldn’t have known about the deal if I hadn’t told you about it. So please feel free to share your passion – whether it be free leftover food at a seminar you attended, or a cheap kayaking/ski trip you came across – with other students through MEGA (you can send emails to mega@mech.ubc.ca and someone — i.e., me, at the moment — will help you forward it to the entire Mech grad students) or leave a note on Facebook and be open to fellow students joining in on sharing your passion.

Along that line of thought, Josh Groban is coming to town on Aug. 30th and there’s student discount at ticketmaster. Woot woot!

Anywho, I hope all the new students have a safe trip to Vancouver, and don’t go through too much trouble finding housing. If you have any questions/comments, feel free to post them here. I’d love to hear from you! 😀

A Note on Choosing Courses – For Prospective MASc students

Hello everyone,

It’s been a while since my last post. Between that post and this post, I had an epic trip to Europe, got to think about things other than my thesis for a few days, and relaxed. Now that my inbox is caught up to date and I have had my first meeting with my supervisors since I got back, I think it’s time that I get back to blogging.

And this time, I am hoping it’s somewhat helpful to the incoming grad students. If you are not a prospective grad student for this year, but thinking about grad school at UBC, I just found out that Ambrose Chan,  my labmate and the president of MEGA(Mech Eng Grad Association — join our facebook here 😀), is featured on a recruitment video – woot, woot! Ambrose, you’re a super star!

If this video convinced you enough, or you didn’t need convincing in your decision to come to UBC, then this post may be of help to you. Because this course is on choosing courses.

I actually came across the same kind of questions from multiple prospective graduate students regarding courses, that I think it’d help you out in the registration process. I remember going through this process myself a couple of years ago as a prospective MASc student, so I will mainly focus on that. This is an improved version of answers I gave to a prospective student recently by the way (sorry, super lazy over here).

Alright, here we go.

First of all, I am guessing all of you are familiar with the Program Guide and Registration page on the mech.ubc.ca website. If not, it’s pretty helpful, so give it a try (http://mech.ubc.ca/graduate-students/program-guide-and-registration/). You’ll find out soon enough that you need to get at least 30 credits to get your MASc. It’s a bit confusing at first, because… of the 30 credits, your thesis counts as 12 credits. It’s also named under this weird course number, MECH 599B. Yes, you need to enroll in it to let the world know that you’re in the UBC Mech master’s program — and no, they don’t give you 12 credits per year for your thesis, so there’s on advantage of staying longer to finish your master’s. On top of that, you have this mandatory seminar course called MECH 598 that everyone need to enroll in. Unlike most courses, which gives you 3 credits per course, this course unfortunately gives you 2 credits. Why is it unfortunate? Well… to do the math, 30 – 12 credits is 18, and 18 is quite nicely divided by a bunch of threes (six of them to be exact), but 18 – 2 is 16 which isn’t evenly divided by a bunch of threes. So this means that, excluding the 12 credits you automatically get as a master’s student, you end up enrolling in this mandatory seminar course, and are left to fill up 16 credits with courses. Here at UBC, we usually get 3 credits for a 3 hour class commitment per week (I think it’s true for most North American university credit systems). So you see why things that nicely divide by threes are kind of important…

That means you need to take 5 (if you happen to take four 3-credit courses and one 4-credit course) to 6 courses throughout your entire master’s program in order to meet the credit requirements.

So, I took six 3-credit courses throughout my master’s, but spread out mainly across my first year master’s.  I know that in undergrad, people are used to taking five to six courses per term. So you are probably thinking, why not get all the courses over with in the first term? Yea… I don’t actually know anyone who has done that. I think taking more than three courses is a bit too much in grad school – although taking four is doable. I am not saying that to mean the course load is super heavy for grad level courses (it’s not that bad imho), but I am saying that because you end up working on and caring more about research than course work. Sometimes courses come with course projects, which can take up whatever time they take up (sometimes quite a lot, sometimes not at all). So I recommend doing the 3 courses per term in first year type schedule. I found that the seminar course (MECH 598) actually take a lot out of you on the second term of your first year because a lot of people stress out for weeks preparing for presentations for the seminar. I wouldn’t recommend taking any more than three courses during the first W2 term, but that might just be me.

On the courses I took.. I took three courses the first semester, two courses the second semester, and one course during my second year – if I remember correctly.

3 credits – CPSC 505 (Image), First year W1 term
3 credits – PSYC 545 (Stats), First year W1 term
3 credits – INDS 502 (Ethics), First year W1 term
3 credits – CPSC543 (User Interfaces), First year W2 term
3 credits – MECH520 (Sensors & Actuators), First year W2 term
3 credits – MECH522 (Controls), Second year W1 term
2 credits – MECH 598 (Seminar Course), First and second year, W1 and W2 term

So, as you can probably tell, I took quite a few courses outside of Mech. Part of the reason is that my research project is highly interdisciplinary. So I was able to find courses outside of Mech Eng that were quite relevant to my study and I think it worked out quite nicely for me that way.

Another thing to note is that, unlike undergrad course registration process where you make your decisions on courses as you like, in grad school it’s always recommended that you speak with your supervisors about your chosen list of courses. So, before registering for your courses and sticking by them, you should just send your supervisor an email saying “Here are the courses I would like to take. What do you think?” I think grad school is a bit more closed-loop with you and your advisors in the sense that they are like your research parents – them parenting your way through your research, including your course selections.

And it’s also good to contact people from your lab regarding the kind of courses that they have taken. That way, you know what you are getting into – i.e., you can filter out the courses that are highly discouraged by your future labmates due to hard marking professor, not an interesting course etc.

That’s it for now. I hope this helps, and happy enrolling everybody! 😀

Freedom and Choices…

Time spent making choices are deceivingly exciting yet seriously dreadful.

When I talk to prospective graduate students, one of the questions I often get is “How, and when did you decide on your research field/project?”.  But more often I get comments rather than questions of the same sort, “you’re lucky that you have a project you really enjoy. I don’t have a project idea yet, so I don’t even know how to approach professors and whom.” (i.e., they’re envious that I’m signed my life away with a project, and don’t have to make a decision about it.) This of course is assuming that the professor does not have a fixed project for you to take on.

The truth of the matter is that making the decision to do some sort of research in itself is exciting. Pondering on the quest to new knowledge, imagining yourself coding away while someone happens to watch you in admiration, picturing yourself in front of a room full of people talking about new things that the audience never knew but know now because of your work…. the glamour, the excitement, the journey!!

Although I dread at the thought of living a student life for the next four/five(?!) years as a PhD student starting next year, I still jump for joy imagining all the things I could do as a PhD student/candidate and (hopefully, one day) as Dr. Moon (LOL, oh wow, I can’t help but to laugh every time I think of this title).

But there is this factor in our decision making process that makes the journey painful. It’s called making the ‘right’ decision.

We feel that we need to always make the best decision possible because, otherwise, we will look dumb. Especially for someone who has an undergrad degree, and is considering to pursue higher level education, it feels important that you don’t make obviously dumb decisions.

So we ask ourselves, numerous, and never ending list of questions: what exactly would be useful for the world? What exactly can I do that will be cool, and will make my time worthwhile? What on earth would I be devoting years of my life for? What dopeople think is cool anyway? Do I just want a fun project? Do I want to go to a big school? Should I stay in the same school? What about the so-called inbreeding factor? Do I know all that I should know before going into this field? etc etc.. the list goes on.

There are good decisions and bad decisions. But you can’t ponder on it for ever.

Sometimes when you find yourself hesitating to make a decision, that’s because you can probably live with any of the available options (i.e., too much freedom on your hands). If there was a clearly bad choice, and a clearly good choice, you won’t have to ask too many questions before you make your decisions isn’t it?

I realized this just now as I looked at my clock and noticed how many hours I spent looking through specs and reviews of tablets. You know, iPads, Galaxy Tabs, Optimus Pads, etc… the fancy devices that don’t seem to have a particular purpose to many, but are hard to resist for some consumers.

I have been pondering over picking out which tablet to purchase since… oh, I don’t know.. Thursday? Yes, that’s right.

On Thursday, I made the decision to go to Europe by myself for the first time. I shall leave on the 4th, and come back on the 14th after having attended a roboethics conference I have been really wanting to attend. It took a couple of painful hours before I clicked on that ‘Complete Purchase‘ button to buy my flight tickets, although the price was really good, because the airline has ‘No Refunds‘ policy.

Then, I started shopping for a tablet to take with me to Europe, because I don’t want to be carrying my 30-minute battery life  >2kg (?? I’m probably exaggerating, but you know what I mean) laptop with me. My plans are to take one backpack, and an internet enabled device of some sort without much planning. That way I would be able to book hostels on the fly, book trains/flights on the go, and also be able to know where I am without needing to carry dozens of maps and guide books.

The possibility of convenience with a tablet opened the Pandora’s box inside my brain: which one should I get? should I get one as a replacement of my current phone? which carrier do I want to get it from? do I want a contract? how much do I want to spend on this? do I want the giant screen or a smaller one? buy into Apple or the Android world? etc etc..

Then something clicked in my brain — an aha! moment.

I remembered that went through the same kind of painful thinking process when I was super stressed a week or so ago.

My stress was somehow redirected to me making a decision whether to cut my hair or not. I spent hours trying to decide, looking at photos of people who has similar facial features and the type of hair I may want to try, trying photoshop etc… Then, when I realized how much time I had spent on making such a tiny decision, I had had it. I realized that I won’t stop thinking about it if I don’t cut it.

So I cut it.

It didn’t matter whether the hair was to be perfectly beautiful. It didn’t matter whether it was a good idea or a bad idea. The point was that these decisions are actually small when you think about it. I can be happy whether I cut my hair or not, but that I was happier once I cut it just because I didn’t have to think about it anymore – the damage was done and irreversible.

I think most of the time, we try to weigh the pros and cons of things that we don’t really know how to measure. We don’t know what to expect, yet we try to blindly predict things so that we can somehow make better decisions.

I think decisions regarding research is kind of like that. Unless you know exactly what you want, you can ponder on and on about whether a project will be really THE project for you, or whether you will have made the right choice in going into a particular field of research. But the truth is, you won’t know it unless you try it out. And chances are, if you have the will, any project you take on will be an epic project for you regardless of whether it’s the next hottest thing on earth or the technology of the former generation. Because you’ll make it an epic project.

On that note, I think I’m going to get a Galaxy Tab, just because it’s cheaper, and move on to the things that matter more (things that don’t occupy my time with weighing pros and cons forever).

And now, here’s a TED talk to go with today’s theme (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTO_dZUvbJA&feature=youtu.be)