You Shall Not Pass – Breaking the Blood-Brain Barrier

The blood-brain barrier is a protective covering that surrounds the brain and prevents contaminants, pathogens and other toxins from entering the brain. Sounds amazing, right? Yes! It’s the brain’s own defence mechanism to protect itself, however it can come in the way when trying to treat brain disorders like Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s or even brain tumours.

Blood Brain Barrier. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Blood Brain Barrier. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Well, the problem is that the barrier only allows certain molecules such as water, glucose, lipid soluble molecules and some gases to pass and enter the brain. When designing drugs to combat brain diseases, researchers must find ways to bypass the blood-brain barrier which isn’t as easy as it seems. The cells that make up the barrier are tightly clustered together making it nearly impossible for drugs to enter into the brain.

In order to overcome this problem, researchers in Toronto designed a technique that was a breakthrough in breaking the blood-brain barrier. The technique, which has not yet been named, is currently being tested on patients with brain tumours. The first step in this technique is to administer a dose of a chemotherapy drug and also inject the patient with microbubbles which are smaller than red blood cells. The microbubbles and drug travel to the brain and come face to face with the blood-brain barrier. The patient is then placed in an MRI machine and the exact location of the tumour is identified.  Once the tumour has been located, ultrasound waves are emitted to that specific region causing the microbubbles to vibrate really fast.

Courtesy of Newswise

These vibrations cause the tight junctions of the cells that make up the blood-brain barrier to loosen up, creating a small passage for drugs to pass through. Once the ultrasound waves stop, the microbubbles are reabsorbed by the lungs and the passage which forms closes within a six to twelve-hour window.

Current techniques being used to penetrate the blood-brain barrier are invasive and not as targeted as this technique. If researchers can find a way to bypass the blood-brain barrier in a non-invasive manner, it will change therapeutic approaches to treating brain disorders. Like any other procedure which involves opening the blood-brain barrier, there are risks associated with this technique as well. The blood-brain barrier remains open for several hours after the initial procedure is done and during this time toxins and other contaminants can enter the brain through that passage. This technique is currently undergoing clinical trials but if it proves to be effective it can revolutionize the way we treat brain diseases.

YouTube Preview Image Courtesy of Sunnybrook Hospital

Harnoor Shoker

Link

Ocumetics’ Bionic Lens: Prefect vision for everyone?

Are you suffering from poor vision? Do you ever complain about wearing eye glasses because they may ‘ruin’ your look? Have you ever imagined there would come a day to have perfect vision?

Recently, a new bionic eye lens named The Ocumetics Bionic Lens has got a lot of attention in media. This lens was developed by Dr. Garth Webb of Ocumetics Technology Corporation, who has dedicated his professional life to finding a way to improve and correct human vision regardless of patients’ eye conditions. This new bionic lens is able to correct human vision at all distance and give patients approximately three times vision enhancement for an entire lifetime. See the following YouTube video for a brief description of this new bionic lens.

YouTube Preview Image

 

These specialized lenses are beneficial because they offset the risk of acquiring cataracts. This is because your eye’s natural lenses, which tend to deteriorate over time, have been replaced by these super stable bionic ones. In addition, compared to laser eye surgery, which involves corneal reshaping to improve visual acuity, this new bionic lens is perfectly safe; it does not cause any physiological changes to the eyes or other side effects that laser surgery may have, such as inflammation, astigmatism and decreased night vision.

How does it work?

According to Ocumetics’ website, this remarkable lens can be implanted into human eyes via a painless and outpatient surgery without anesthesia and hospitalization. The operation only takes 8 minutes, aiming to replace the eye’s natural lenses with the bionic ones. Ten seconds after the surgery, the bionic lenses unfold and wrap up over your eyes on its own, immediately correcting a patient’s impaired vision.

This remarkable lens looks like a small button. Image from www.cbc.ca

Is it affordable?

Dr. Webb claims the cost of the surgery is around 3000 dollars per eye. Is it overpriced? Compared to the laser eye surgery, which costs around 2000 dollars per eye, a total cost of 6000 dollars for lifelong perfect vision seems quite cheap for what is involved. In fact, this surgery may cost less than eye glasses or contact lenses in the long run because the new bionic lenses do not need to be replaced as often. Also, as the product and the technology become more mainstream in the market, the price will eventually go down.

Who can benefit from it?

The company is currently performing clinical trials on animals and blind human eyes. If the product was clinically approved to be able to cure blindness, it would be a great news for the blind. Also, for those people who are unhappy with wearing corrective lenses, this new bionic lens can provide them a better option in terms of cost, vision correction and ease of use.

Ying Yu

Image

Clinical Depression: Its Biological Mechanisms and It’s Treatments

One in four Canadians have depression that is to a degree worthy of clinical assessment, and treatment. With a number as alarming as this, why do we see that this particular mental health issue is so infrequently spoken about?

This is because there is an enormous stigma that surrounds clinical depression. In particular, polls show that 46 percent of Canadians believe that people suffering from depression are using the diagnosis as an excuse for their behaviours. This is not the case.

This stigma (held by nearly half of the nation) can be discredited by the scientific research that has gone into deciphering the physiological mechanisms of this mental health issue.

In particular scientists at the NIMH have concluded that depression is associated with a deficiency in a neurotransmitter known as serotonin. This is a di-cyclic compound that activates neurons within the central nervous system, promoting the feeling of happiness or well-being.

https://healthpsych.psy.vanderbilt.edu/2009/StopSadness_files/image010.jpg

https://healthpsych.psy.vanderbilt.edu/2009/StopSadness_files/image010.jpg

Mechanistically, serotonin is released from the axon of one neuron, and taken up through a channel protein within the dendrite of an adjacent neuron. In individuals suffering from depression, the channel protein’s ability to accept serotonin is not optimal, and essentially the feeling of happiness, and well-being elicited by the transmission of serotonin, is lost or not optimal. How is this treated?

Antidepressants are used as a treatment for this disorder by acting directly upon serotonin’s mechanism. In particular, the administration of a class of drugs known as “selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors”  are prescribed. Essentially, this class of drugs allows serotonin to remain in the “synaptic cleft” (the extracellular space between the two neurons) for a longer amount of time. This is done by inhibiting the axon’s serotonin re-uptake channels, which are channels responsible for allowing serotonin to flow back into the axon from which it was released. Essentially SSRI’s are compounds that chemically interact with (and physically block) these re-uptake channels.  In doing so, this provides the disabled dendritic channel proteins with a longer period of exposure to the serotonin, and consequently, are able to take up near normal amounts of serotonin.

In conclusion, the symptoms felt by those suffering from depression, such as hopelessness, sadness, lethargy, and many more; are in part, caused by a proven physiological deficiency. With no control over the processes that we have discussed today, we can also conclude that those suffering from depression are unable to control particular behaviours (to a certain degree).

Nanotechnology: The Tools of Tomorrow

I’m certain some of you remember back to an old ‘Magic School Bus’ episode where Ms. Frizzle shrinks the class on an adventure to see Arnold’s digestive system. While the method would probably not be practical, the idea of using micro-sized machinery to enter the human body system definitely is.

Enter: Nanobots!

Molecularpropeller

Molecular Nanotechnology. Source: Wikimedia Commons (by: Petr Král)

In the past, ideas like the PillCam was one of the pioneers for nanotechnology in medicine. In the current age,  nanotechnology is the current fad with new innovations coming out each year. By being able to send robotics one-thousandth the size of your hair to do complex tasks, we pave a new path for science. However, what’s more amazing are the applications that this futuristic technology can bring to healthcare.

 

Using Nanobots to Battle Cancer

Dr. Ido Bachelet of Israel developed nanobots made entirely of DNA which he said it could be used to combat cancer. These nanobots would follow the traits of the immune system and actively find and destroy cancer cells, but would not harm able-bodied cells.

The DNA nanobots model after white blood cells and flow through the bloodstream, looking for signs of cancer by examining proteins on the surface of cells. If cancerous surface proteins are found, the nanobots deliver a lethal dose of drugs and effectively kill the cell. After, these nanobots will naturally degrade as DNA.

Results have already been found as these nanobots successfully eliminated the cancerous cells out of a mixture of healthy and cancer cells, while leaving the healthy cells unharmed. Human trials are expected to be underway.

Here is an interesting video of Dr. Bachelet talking about his research:

YouTube Preview Image

‘DNA Origami’ – A New Drug Delivery System

Another application of nanotechnology is the creation of ‘DNA origami’ by Dr. Paul Rothemund of Caltech. His invention allows for nucleotides to make complex shapes for many purposes. One such purpose is a drug delivery system, which has many benefits as it’s of the molecular scale.

drug delivery

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9OAKXlPsDw (by: Emmanuel Ho)

Kurt Gothelf of Denmark has made a box out of DNA origami in which he hopes would be able to store drugs and sufficiently deliver them inside a cell.

A team of scientists in China has also tested DNA origami as a carrier for drug delivery for cancer therapy as being both efficient and safe.

This is only the tip of what nanotechnology can provide for us. Besides healthcare, it also has significant research in energy, cleaning water systems, warfare (such as stopping wounds immediately), etc.

With this fast expanding industry on the horizon, we’ll surely see the problems of today become something of the past.

 

Henry Liu

 

 

Link

Hospitals: More Dangerous Than You Think?

If someone suffered a heart attack or was involved in a car accident, the first place we would turn to is the nearest hospital, right? It happens almost every day; someone is carried into the ER on a stretcher and leaves smiling, walking on their own two feet. Generally, hospitals are perceived to be a safe place of medical assistance, treatment, and recovery, however, there is growing data to suggest that a stay in the hospital may actually come with risk.

Health care-associated infections (HAI), also called nosocomial infections (from the Greek word nosokomeíon, meaning hospital), are classified as infections that occur during a hospital admission and up to 3 days after discharge. They are a growing cause of lengthened hospital stays, medical complications, and even death in patients. In fact, it is estimated that these infections rack up a cost of one billion pounds for England’s National Health Service and over $35 billion for U.S. hospitals.

The intensive care unit (ICU) has one of the highest rates of HAI. Courtesy of Wiki Commons

The intensive care unit (ICU) has one of the highest HAI rates.
Courtesy of Wiki Commons

In 2011, the United States had almost 722,000 cases of HAI, ranging from surgical site infections to pneumonia. The Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program also found an increase in the incidence of a specific bacterium, called C. difficile, from around 42 cases per 100,000 in 1992 to 160 per 100,000 in 2003. Additionally, the severity and reoccurrence also spiked, with more severe outcomes recorded, including perforated large intestines, shock, and death.

A common misconception is that only the elderly are at risk for HAI due to their weaker state of health. This is untrue, as studies find increasing numbers of these infections in children’s hospitals, maternity wards, and in the young adult population. A study published in 2014 found a more than triple increase in incidence of flesh eating disease, known as necrotizing fasciitis, in pregnant women that were admitted to hospital for delivery over the past decade. Children also experience a high prevalence of HAI, with the highest percentages recorded in intensive care (19%) and transplant units (27%).

So what can be done?
Unsurprisingly, poor hand washing has been attributed to 40% of infection transfers in hospitals, thus focusing on improving hand hygiene habits can have a positive impact. Increasing compliance of wearing protective accessories including gloves, masks, and aprons is also critical. As well, creating a system that immediately isolates patients who have contracted a severe infection is key to prevent further spreading.
Careful attention to sanitation must also be emphasized, as it was found that an antibiotic-resistant bacteria that attacks the intestinal tract can also be transferred between patients through the use of  thermometers.

The issue of HAI is a global problem, however it is not all doom and gloom when it comes to the future of patients’ well-being. Much research is currently underway to find new methods to decrease the prevalence. Take a look at the video below from the Mayo Clinic, where they tested the effectiveness of UV light disinfection. They found an impressive 30% decline in C. difficile infection in the UV-treated rooms!
YouTube Preview Image

Kerrie Tsigounis

Multivitamins- A waste of money ?

It’s common understanding that maintaining adequate levels of essential vitamins and minerals is crucial for good health. For this reason, it comes to no surprise that the popularity  of multivitamins has surged over the past few decades and that they are now the most commonly used dietary supplement in the world. At the same time, there has been growing attention at the potential role these multivitamins may or may not play in improving overall health.

Multivitamins: Should You Take One?

Image Courtesy of: Flikr Commons

Like many others, I was under the notion that consuming 1-2 multivitamins a day would help satisfy any shortcomings of important nutrients my body may be lacking. “It’s reassuringly simple!” I would tell myself. ” Consume a pill and instantly have your bad diet turn into a healthy one.” Now if only that was the case…

As I look online, it’s evident that over the past few years, there have been several debates amongst scientists over the effectiveness of  multivitamins.

Do the promised claims on labels such as increased energy, increased cognitive functions and increased illness recovery hold any merit? One interesting find I came across was that dietary supplements such as multivitamins are not regulated by the FDA. This means that certain claims can be misleading since companies can imply that their products have greater capabilities than what the actual scientific evidence shows.

Recent studies have also even claimed that multivitamins may even be harmful. In particular, an editorial that appeared in the Annals of External Medicine, “Enough is Enough: Stop Wasting Money on Vitamin and Mineral Supplements“, made widespread coverage in the news media. The authors behind this research concluded with a bold statement, ““[W]e believe that the case is closed- supplementing the diet of well-nourished adults with (most) mineral or vitamin supplements has no clear benefit.” However, many scientists are arguing that the case is far from closed and that these studies completely disregarded their unique patient samples, none of which had nutritional deficiencies.

So what is the real answer? Just how effective are these pills of nutritional insurance to our overall health?

I think the best response to this question is that it is “short-sighted to think your vitamin or mineral is the ticket to good health- the big power is on the plate, not the pill”, as stated by Roberta Anding, a spokesperson for the American Dietetic Association.

So, unless you’ve discussed vitamin supplementation with your doctor, the majority of us are better off investing our time and money into acquiring nutrients the way nature intended, with a well balanced diet.

Check out this video below for another interesting take on the effectiveness of supplemental vitamins!

YouTube Preview Image

YouTube video courtesy of: BrainStuff- HowStuffWorks

Thanks for reading!

Posted by: Sahil Mann

 

 

Diabetes type I and Islet cell transplantation

Type I diabetes is a condition characterized by destruction of pancreatic β-cells due to cell-mediated autoimmune attack. Insulin is not produced as result. Insulin  enables cells to take up glucose from blood and use it for energy. It effects about 6% of the adult population worldwide. It accounts for 5-10% of all cases of diabetes. It is believed that the disease is caused by self-activation of white blood cells (responsible for body’s immunity) and instead of attacking foreign particles, they attack body organs and destroy their cells. T-lymphocytes (a type of white blood cell) attacks pancreatic β-cells by recognizing the islet auto-antigens. Auto-antigens are produced in body and immune system produces antibodies against it. As a result, body’s immune system turns against organs in body and starts destroying them.

At the time of diagnosis, almost all of cells are destroyed and the pancreas has lost the ability to produce insulin. This leads to patients using “exogenous” insulin or β-cells replacement, also called Islet cell transplantation. Type I diabetes has been categorized into two subtypes, Type 1A and type 2A. For patients diagnosed with type 1A the pathogenicity of the disease is due to autoimmune factors, whereas for type 2A, which is less frequent, our knowledge is very limited.

YouTube Preview Image

There are three million Canadians living with either type I or type II  diabetes. Canada being one of the leading countries in the research of diabetes helps to improve the livelihood of Canadians diagnosed with type I diabetes. A group of Canadian researches in Edmonton have performed the first transplant using a new method. They were successful, so they published their results the year after, in the New England Journal of Medicine. Islet transplantation is an important method to treat type I diabetes. The Canadian Diabetes Association have spent five million dollars in research on type I diabetes and islet transplantation.

Pancreas_insulin_beta_cells

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons /8/8c/Pancreas_insulin_beta_cells.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

Islet cell transplantation is the only method to this day that re-establishes the endogenous insulin secretion in patients diagnosed with type I diabetes. There are two types of islet transplantation:

  1. Auto-transplantation
  2. Allo-transplantation

YouTube Preview Image

Auto-transplantation is performed following pancreatectomy (complete removal of the pancreas). The pancreas is removed in a hospital setting with the help of general anesthesia. The removed pancreas is extracted and purified. Finally, the islet cells are infused using a catheter into the patient’s liver. Interestingly, patients with type I diabetes cannot receive this treatment. Type I diabetics patients can not receive this treatment because their β-cells are destroyed as a result of autoimmune attack. Thus, removing their pancreas and purifying the cells is useless. This treatment is used for patients diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis (inflammation of pancreas). 

The second method is still an experimental procedure. In this procedure islet cells from the pancreas of a deceased person are purified and injected into another person. It is often required to transplant two or more pancreases in order to stop the need for the insulin.

In conclusion, islet transplantation should be viewed as a method to decrease the onset of hypoglycemic episodes and improve glycemic control. Though, limitations of this procedure indicate that this procedure is not suitable for all type I diabetic patients.

Islet_transplantation_PLoS_Medicine

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5c/ Islet_transplantation_PLoS_Medicine.jpg