Categories AMS AMS Elections 2010 2010 Preliminary Election Results Post author By Alex Lougheed Post date January 30, 2010 2 Comments on 2010 Preliminary Election Results But wait, democracy isn’t over just yet! Continuous VFM is continuous! By Alex Lougheed An unusually curious senior undergrad. Editor of UBC Insiders. View Archive → ← Over 6500! → Yes, The Killers Killed the Liquor at Thunderbird Arena 2 replies on “2010 Preliminary Election Results” Committee report, sans VFM. Looking at the results, it’s pretty clear that a lot of people really didn’t want Tim Chu to win. Aaron Palm had 1149 4rd place rankings and only 284 4th, while Chu had 201 third and 1109 fourth. What this tells me (since the other two candidates stay relatively constant through 3 and 4) is that a lot of people put Palm third and Chu fourth. Interesting, condorcet voter intention analysis is really neat. Also, the captcha is telling me to write ‘insiders’ isn’t that kind of like having your name as your password? Comments are closed.
Looking at the results, it’s pretty clear that a lot of people really didn’t want Tim Chu to win. Aaron Palm had 1149 4rd place rankings and only 284 4th, while Chu had 201 third and 1109 fourth. What this tells me (since the other two candidates stay relatively constant through 3 and 4) is that a lot of people put Palm third and Chu fourth. Interesting, condorcet voter intention analysis is really neat. Also, the captcha is telling me to write ‘insiders’ isn’t that kind of like having your name as your password?
2 replies on “2010 Preliminary Election Results”
Committee report, sans VFM.
Looking at the results, it’s pretty clear that a lot of people really didn’t want Tim Chu to win.
Aaron Palm had 1149 4rd place rankings and only 284 4th, while Chu had 201 third and 1109 fourth.
What this tells me (since the other two candidates stay relatively constant through 3 and 4) is that a lot of people put Palm third and Chu fourth.
Interesting, condorcet voter intention analysis is really neat.
Also, the captcha is telling me to write ‘insiders’ isn’t that kind of like having your name as your password?