Evan posts some thoughts on the nature of communication in the Ed Tech weblog (non?)community:
I have a visual representation in my head of the blogging community. A bunch of people talking out loud, but never actually talking to each other. They are all commenting on the same thing, but never having their eyes meet. The room can be deafening with all the clamor, but no one is acknowledging that they are standing right next to each other.
Maybe it’s just me, but I feel so much less of a community with blogging than anything else. I’ve had contact with several bloggers both face-to-face and through email this past month or so. It may start out as interaction through commenting, or running into someone at a conference, or the realization that we share a six-degrees-of-separation circle of friends, or working together. I may read someone’s blog, and not realize that they read mine.
… Perhaps blogging is the ideal form of geek communication. You never have to worry about who accepts/rejects your ideas because unless you seek out who is referring to you, you just never know. And you don’t need to really worry about social mores, because again, unless they seek you out to comment, your blog is your idealized soapbox.
… I’m not sure what I’m searching for – I don’t think it’s there yet. It’s a melding of the two. I wonder how we can create a technology to accomplish it.
I think my own social experience via this weblog has been more satisfying than it has been for Evan. I suspect that’s because I’m one of those geeks who prefers to spout off on top of my own idealized soapbox. My natural shyness is ameliorated by the knowledge that if people don’t want to read what I write, then they’ll simply ignore me. People ignore me all the time, so there really isn’t any novel rejection involved.
I depart from Evan’s analysis, however, on the need for us to “create a technology” to promote more meaningful interaction between webloggers. Between comments, email, RSS, trackback, Technorati, Blogrolls, etc… I think the technology is there. If we are still engaged in a cacaphony of monologues, it probably is a reflection of our temperaments… as she notes.
Like most other communities or social groups, online collectives usually depend on a “social organizer” type to take the reins…a matchmaker who is fed by promoting interaction amongst peers. One example of this type of person is Beth from Cassandra Pages. Though she has a very different approach to weblogging than I do, she has been extraordinarily supportive of my efforts — penning encouraging emails when I disappear, posting friendly comments — and she is very active in fostering community amongst a group of place bloggers, both through her weblog and via the ecotone wiki, a space where place bloggers loosely organize and support each others work. (I’m not suggesting that Beth is the “leader” of this group, or even the most active participant… I just happen to have had contact with her.)
A few Ed Tech webloggers have made an effort to deepen the social element of this loose community of ours, but I suspect that the people in our field could never comfortably coalesce as tightly as the “place bloggers” do. Part of that is temperamental, and I suspect another factor is that our weblogs are part of our professional lives. I don’t wish to suggest that people are any less passionate about work-oriented weblogs, and most Ed Tech bloggers do sprinkle some personal bits into their pages. But I do think that the professional orientation of our weblogs does influence the character of the community.
I should add that my formulation of an “Ed Tech weblog community” may well exist only in my feverish imagination.
In-Flux