Author Archives: christinewong

Ozone: Friend or Foe?

Did you know that living in a city with with high levels of air pollution increases your risk of getting lung cancer by 20%? Every year humans are spewing more and more pollution into the Earth’s atmosphere with CO2 attracting the most attention. While CO2 has major effects on the Earth’s climate and subsequently our way of life, ozone is one pollutant that does not receive nearly as much attention as it should. The main view that the general public holds regarding ozone is its ability to block harmful sun rays which may cause skin cancer in humans. Although this is true, it mostly applies to ozone in the upper parts of the atmosphere. Ozone levels in the actual air we breathe has many negative effects that very few people know about.

Below is a recorded newscast of how ozone has affected the lives of many:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Ozone-1,3-dipole by Benjah-bmm27 via Wikimedia Commons

Ozone is an oxidant which has harmful effects on biological life. At the University of British Columbia (UBC), Dr. Steyn, a professor of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, has recently modeled past ozone trends in the Lower Fraser Valley using various computer simulations. To gain a better understanding of the issue, we interviewed Dr. Steyn about his study and the motivations behind his research. Steyn was interested in comparing past ozone trends with emissions, “to understand which part of the emission reductions have actually had the effect, and then for [policymakers] to use that to build the policy.” More often than not, various governments have rushed plans into action. For example, “Metro Vancouver has made two air quality management plans” that Steyn considers to be made “without  scientific guidance.” Therefore, he “deliberately framed the research in a way that the results could be used for policy…Metro Vancouver has a big process going to understand ozone and what reductions they need to make further.”

Here is a video outlining Dr. Steyn’s study of harmful ozone pollution  and its effects in the Lower Fraser Valley:

YouTube Preview Image

SCIE 300 OUTREACH_SECTION 210_GROUP 2 by kyuuke1013SK

Although we have a clear idea of the present worsening ozone trends, there are still many difficulties, especially emission reductions. Society must strike a balance between the life of convenience that we are accustomed to and the general health of the public. In general Canada manages to  balance things  very well but areas like the Lower Fraser Valley have room for improvement. Our publicly funded healthcare system makes it possible for us to clearly and precisely determine what the cost of degraded air quality is compared to the cost of improving air quality in areas such as Fraser Valley; and we know that the cost of cleanup is a great deal cheaper than the health care costs.

This model is a tool that can be used by researchers and policy makers to increase our understanding of what must be done to ensure the best air quality possible. The health problems that arise from pollutants such as ozone must be avoided at all costs. Progress towards this goal has been made, but there is still much more that needs to be done before we can take a deep sigh of relief!

– Alex Gibson, Stella Meng, Earvin Remandaban, Christine Wong

 

Organic Foods: Worth the Hype?

Unfortunately there is no simple answer. Many consumers believe that if something is more expensive, the better it must be for you. This may not necessarily be the case when it comes to organic produce.

BC has emerged as a leader in organic farming in Canada. Over half of BC consumers are buying organic. A 2003 opinion survey showed that 53% of BC consumers purchase organic food at least occasionally. Consumers are willing to pay double for food with an organic label.

Canadian Organic Seal via Wikimedia Commons, author Canadian Food Inspection Agency.

In organic farming, farmers often use the phrase “Feed the soil, not the plant”. Produce by organic farming is grown without synthetic pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers.  Farmers create healthy soils by promoting biodiversity, growing a variety of crops instead of just one single crop. Biodiversity allows the soil time to rest and replenish nutrients. These methods allow for the reduction of greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming, prevention of soil erosion, improvement of soil fertility, protection of groundwater, and conserves energy.

One of the main differences between conventional farming and organic farming is the use of pesticides. Many people don’t realize that organic farmers spray their produce with non-synthetic chemical pest-killers. Many of these “natural” chemical killers can be toxic. Natural pesticides can be just as harmful as synthetic pesticides.

Organic products are not necessary better and more nutritional than products made by conventional farming. Both are actually equally likely to be contaminated by bacteria. A study done at the University of Minnesota looked at the presence of E.coli in organic and conventional farming produce. E.coli is a large group of bacteria that can cause stomach cramps, diarrhea, and vomiting. Deadly strains of E.coli can actually lead to kidney failure. Results of the study found that organic produce contained approximately six-fold greater concentrations of E.coli than conventional produce.

E. coli bacteria via Flickr, author NIAID_Flickr

Health Canada, United Kingdom’s Food Standards Agency and France have stated that there is no evidence to support that there is greater safety or nutrients in organic produce.

Maybe you aren’t buying organic food for the “nutritional” value but for taste. Time.com food writer Josh Ozersky along with New York city chefs went out to see if there was a taste difference between organic and non-organic foods.

http://healthland.time.com/2012/09/04/is-organic-food-more-nutritious-and-healthier-than-conventional-varieties/

Josh Ozersky and New York chefs for Time.com went out to test conventional and organic eggs, carrots, and cheese.

Although buying organic may not be worth it, there may be some foods where it might be beneficial to buy organic. Apples and leafy greens such as lettuce are foods that contain one of the highest levels of pesticides. Eating berries in the winter means that these berries are shipped from warmer climates that may not have strict regulation of pesticide use. Meat and dairy is also recommended to buy organic. In conventional farming, more animals are concentrated meaning that there is a higher risk of disease and more antibiotics which eventually ends up in the food we eat.

Apples via Wikimedia Commons, author Scott Bauer.

Buying organic is a personal choice. It is all up to consumer’s preference.

Christine Wong

Living with Only Half a Brain?

It is actually possible! There are many cases around the world where people are living with only half a brain. This ability for people to live with only half a brain is due to a brain phenomenon known as plasticity.  Plasticity is the capability of the brain to be modeled by experience. Experiences that we gain throughout our lifetime changes our brain, like modelling clay.

Brain development begins before birth and continues rapidly after. Connections in the brain are created through synapses which allow electrical signals to be transmitted from one area of the brain to another. These synapses are the changes that are responsible for the brain’s plasticity.

Brain development happens through synapses, which are responsible for creating connections. Image obtained via wikimedia commons author US Government.

There are two types of processes that model the brain: experience-expectant plasticity and experience-dependent plasticity.

Experience-expectant plasticity are experiences that every healthy individual expects to gain in their lifetime. For example, vision. With this type of plasticity comes a sensitive time period. If this experience is not met within this limited time period, the window closes and the skill can no longer be developed.

The other type of plasticity is called experience-dependent plasticity. These are neural connections that are created through experience, which can occur throughout the lifetime. These experiences include riding a bike and learning a musical instrument.

The brain’s plasticity can be seen in Michelle Mack, who was born with only the right side of her brain. To compensate for the missing side, the right side of her brain was rewired to take over the functions of the left.

Human brain’s division into the right and left hemispheres. Image obtained via wikimedia commons author Gvdmoort.

Due to the sensitive time period, a child’s brain has a better chance than an adult’s brain to reorganize itself and recover from a brain injury or surgery. 

This sensitive period plasticity is demonstrated in a girl in North Carolina named Cameron Mott. At age 3, she was experiencing 10-15 seizures a day due to an inflammation of the right side of her brain. She underwent surgery to remove the inflamed side of her brain which paralyzed the left side of her body. Immediately after the surgery, she was put into intensive therapy to recover the left side. Due to the brain’s plasticity and her young age, the left side of her brain was able to take over the functions of the right side.

A segment called Today’s Health on the Today Show interviewed Cameron Mott and her family about Cameron’s extraordinary condition:

YouTube Preview Image

The Today Show’s segment, YouTube video from username ichoosepeople.  

Scientists used to believe that the brain was hard-wired and could not undergo changes once the brain was developed. There was the belief that children with only one side of their brain would not be able to live but these real cases have shown the brain’s capability to change known as plasticity.

– Christine Wong