Category Archives: Science Communicators

A New Planetary Nebula Disovered by Hubble Space Telscope

YouTube Preview Image

    Have you wondered what was the solar system was like in the very beginning. How does one get from a mixed ball of stardust to a giant planet with concentric structure such as inner and outer core and layered atmosphere?

YouTube Preview Image

     Surprising, it turns out that a giant planet indeed has it own unique history. According to the nebular hypothesis, a planet originally is distilled from a rotating cloud of dust particles  and gases known as the solar nebula. These elements forming the gases and particles originally are byproducts of nuclear reactions within some other stars. Then they were scattered everywhere after cataclysmic explosions that  mark the death of stars. These essential elements in the cloud were hydrogen, helium, oxygen, silicon and carbon.

YouTube Preview Image

     Evenutally the dust cloud began to rotate and contract. It did not shrink into a round ball as some early scientists expectm but into a disk. Gravity attracted the particles to one another, and clumps of these space matter began to form. Smaller particles merged to build clumps up to several meters in diameter, and these larger bodies in turn swept up finer particles within their orbital paths. Although much are known about these planetary nebula, the researches are still ongoing.

 

      On  October 11th, 2012, scientists discovered a planetary nebula in  the making. Among these numerous stars, planetary nebulae are probably one of the most fascinating objects to behold in the night sky. The names arises becuase most of these objects resembled a planet when they were first discovered through early telescopes. The NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope reported that the observed planetary nebula is Hen 3-1475. It glows brightly because of the radiation that arise from a hot compact core that reains after the outer envelope is ejected. These radiation is so powerful that they make the gossamer shells shine.

YouTube Preview Image

         Several days after the initial discovery, scientists at Hubble Space Observatory reported that Hen 3-1475 is positioned i the constellation of Sagittarius roughly 18,000 light-years away from us. The central star is more than 12,000 times as bright as our sun. The most striking part about the nebula is its two S-shaped jets that emerge from the pole regions of the central star. Experts report that these jets are long outflows of gas particles moving at a speed of hundreds of kilometers per second.

Hen 3-1475

Hen 3-1475. (Credit: ESA/NASA)

        The formation of these bipolar jets has left many space scientists searching for explanations for a long time. Many experts are still currently investigating the possiblities behind these observations. Although no clear evidences are found, some experts suggested that the unique shape of the planetary nebula is due to a central source that ejects streams of gas in opposite directions and these processes only occur once every couples of thousand years.  Modern researches is still ongoing and more updates will be provided as soon as any breaking news emerge.

More stories can be found at:

 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/
121011142336.html

– Jing Xiang Yang

Why I Wouldn’t Follow Dr. Oz Down the Yellow Brick Road

Dr. Mehmet Oz was educated at Ivy League universities, has won numerous medical awards, is a professor and vice-chair of surgery at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and came to prominence giving medical advice on the television show Oprah. Sounds highly credible right? On paper yes, but let’s take a closer look.

Photo of Dr.Oz at the Time 100 Gala. Author: David Shankbone, via Wikimedia Commons

First, let’s talk about those “miracle supplements” Dr. Oz so commonly refers to; in particular, Garcinia cambogiaDr. Oz stated that this was “the newest, fastest fat-buster.

YouTube Preview Image

From YouTube user: garciniacambogia009

No exercise, no diet, no effort? It sounds too good to be true, right?  It is.

Slate.com was first to bust this “find” and stated that in 1998 a study looked at its effects as an “antiobesity agent” in 135 people and found that Garcinia cambogia pills were no better than placebo for weight loss. More recently, a study involving 706 participants was unable to provide support that Garcinia cambogia extract had any impact on weight. In some studies, a few trials showed short-term slimming, but the overall effects were so small and most studies were so flawed that the authors were unable to conclude any results. Dr. Oz handpicked data to support his claims because really, who wants to watch a television show exclaiming “Garcinia cambogia: Proven to do nothing!” It seems Dr. Oz has sold his scientific morals for ratings.

Experiencing large disapproval from the scientific community, Dr. Oz decided to conduct his very own experiment to prove he still has his roots firmly planted in the scientific method. Unfortunately, Dr. Oz only managed to add supporting evidence that he does not follow good scientific practices. Looking for toxic levels of arsenic, he tested apple juice from five popular juice makers in the U.S. claiming that he found toxic levels in all five. There are too many problems with this study. First, Dr. Oz asked a lab to test for total arsenic, but there are two forms of arsenic: Organic and inorganic. Organic is found everywhere and is practically harmless. He received a warning letter from the FDA stating that arsenic occurs naturally in many foods and that only inorganic forms are toxic. Testing for total arsenic can therefore not be used to determine whether a food is unsafe. Second, never replicated his own results. He didn’t even question the numbers he got from the lab, which the FDA warned were giving erroneously high results. Yet, Dr. Oz  showed no hesitance when reporting the results on his show. He didn’t express even the slightest uncertainty about his findings. Even the media caught on. ABC’s medical editor interviewed Dr. Oz who danced around the accusations.

YouTube Preview Image

From YouTube user: ABCNews 

These are just a couple instances of Dr. Oz demonstrating a lack of adherence to scientific principles. He may have the brains and the heart for science, but Dr. Oz needs to find his courage as he presents himself as the cowardly lion far too often.

-Nicole Gehring