Category Archives: Issues in Science

Organic Foods: Worth the Hype?

Unfortunately there is no simple answer. Many consumers believe that if something is more expensive, the better it must be for you. This may not necessarily be the case when it comes to organic produce.

BC has emerged as a leader in organic farming in Canada. Over half of BC consumers are buying organic. A 2003 opinion survey showed that 53% of BC consumers purchase organic food at least occasionally. Consumers are willing to pay double for food with an organic label.

Canadian Organic Seal via Wikimedia Commons, author Canadian Food Inspection Agency.

In organic farming, farmers often use the phrase “Feed the soil, not the plant”. Produce by organic farming is grown without synthetic pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers.  Farmers create healthy soils by promoting biodiversity, growing a variety of crops instead of just one single crop. Biodiversity allows the soil time to rest and replenish nutrients. These methods allow for the reduction of greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming, prevention of soil erosion, improvement of soil fertility, protection of groundwater, and conserves energy.

One of the main differences between conventional farming and organic farming is the use of pesticides. Many people don’t realize that organic farmers spray their produce with non-synthetic chemical pest-killers. Many of these “natural” chemical killers can be toxic. Natural pesticides can be just as harmful as synthetic pesticides.

Organic products are not necessary better and more nutritional than products made by conventional farming. Both are actually equally likely to be contaminated by bacteria. A study done at the University of Minnesota looked at the presence of E.coli in organic and conventional farming produce. E.coli is a large group of bacteria that can cause stomach cramps, diarrhea, and vomiting. Deadly strains of E.coli can actually lead to kidney failure. Results of the study found that organic produce contained approximately six-fold greater concentrations of E.coli than conventional produce.

E. coli bacteria via Flickr, author NIAID_Flickr

Health Canada, United Kingdom’s Food Standards Agency and France have stated that there is no evidence to support that there is greater safety or nutrients in organic produce.

Maybe you aren’t buying organic food for the “nutritional” value but for taste. Time.com food writer Josh Ozersky along with New York city chefs went out to see if there was a taste difference between organic and non-organic foods.

http://healthland.time.com/2012/09/04/is-organic-food-more-nutritious-and-healthier-than-conventional-varieties/

Josh Ozersky and New York chefs for Time.com went out to test conventional and organic eggs, carrots, and cheese.

Although buying organic may not be worth it, there may be some foods where it might be beneficial to buy organic. Apples and leafy greens such as lettuce are foods that contain one of the highest levels of pesticides. Eating berries in the winter means that these berries are shipped from warmer climates that may not have strict regulation of pesticide use. Meat and dairy is also recommended to buy organic. In conventional farming, more animals are concentrated meaning that there is a higher risk of disease and more antibiotics which eventually ends up in the food we eat.

Apples via Wikimedia Commons, author Scott Bauer.

Buying organic is a personal choice. It is all up to consumer’s preference.

Christine Wong

ACHOO syndrome: not your usual sneeze

When we step outside into bright light with other people, we can occasionally hear someone sneezing. Is this merely a coincidence? Or is there a possible explanation for this? It turns out that this desire to sneeze after looking at an abrupt bright light occurs in about a third of the world’s population.

Photo of a man sneezing. Author: James Gathany via Wikimedia Commons

This surreal way of sneezing is called photic sneeze reflex, or, conveniently, ACHOO (Autosomal dominant Compelling Helio-Ophthalmic Outburst) syndrome. Despite being highly prevalent around the world, we know very little regarding this phenomenon. In fact, a study has found that victims of this reflex think this occurs in everyone, whereas “normal” people become bewildered when finding about its existence. This level of unawareness might be due to the little threat that this condition poses to those who have it.

YouTube Preview Image Youtube user: Thomas Denton

Due to the common occurrence of this condition within a family, it is generally regarded as an autosomal dominant trait, which simply means that it is likely for an affected parent to have an affected child. This is surprising, since the sneeze that we are all familiar with is acquired from environmental factors like viruses, regardless of how we are genetically shaped.

So how is it then that the sun or any other light sources trigger sneezing? Many theories were considered, with the first one dating back to Aristotle’s time. He speculated that the sun’s heat had a direct effect on the nose, causing it to become irritated and therefore induce sneezing. Clearly, this hypothesis was refuted later on, because the sneeze disappears if you close both eyes.

The most supported reasoning behind this involves the cranial nerves, particularly the optic and the trigeminal nerves. It is our trigeminal nerve that is primarily responsible for sending information that leads to sneezing to the brain. However, the complexity and the compactness of our heads allow this nerve occasionally picks up signals from the optic nerve. Thus, when some of us look at a bright light that stimulates the optic nerve, it is erroneously translated by the brain as the body’s need to sneeze.

Here is a video that gives a very simplified explanation:

YouTube Preview Image Youtube user: 2ManyVid3os

 

As I mentioned before, this condition is generally harmless to those who have it. However, it can still pose serious risks in certain situations. For example, it is common for drivers to get a sudden outburst of sunlight shone onto their eyes. Two-thirds of the population would squint their eyes and pull down the sun visors. The remaining third on the other hand, would experience an uncontrollable movement caused by the photic sneeze reflex. Considering that they are driving, you can imagine how dangerous that can be.

Although you may find it hard to believe, there is a perk to inheriting this condition. I am sure that all of us had a moment where we had a desire to sneeze, but was not able to produce it. However, this is not a problem for around 2.3 billion people, including myself, since we can deliberately produce a sneeze. Besides, who wouldn’t want to feel elevated, given that a sneeze is 1/8 of an orgasm?

-Sanggi(Daniel) Hong

Action Games: Tools for Improving the Mind?

Student playing Counterstrike Source
By ario_ via Flickr Creative Commons

Often, when we are asked to describe a “video gamer”, we think of a person lazing around in front of their computer or tv, wasting time playing games as their brain turns to mush. Personally, I enjoy playing video games once in a while, but I didn’t think much of them, other than for entertainment. That was until I took a psychology course at UBC and discovered that people who played action video games often had better spatial attention than the average non-gamer.

Busy Restaurant Scene
By kenudigit via Flickr Creative Commons

What is Spatial Attention?

Imagine that you’re at a restaurant with some friends; people nearby are chatting loudly, waiters and waitresses are hurrying back and forth with plates, phones are ringing, background music is playing and yet, you are able to ignore these distractions and focus on the conversation you are having with your friends. This is your spatial attention at work. You are shutting out the unnecessary sensory inputs and only engaging in the information relevant to your conversation.

Gamers vs. Non-Gamers

study conducted at the University of Rochester by D. Bavelier and associates, found that VGPs (video game players) displayed greater suppression of irrelevant information than NVGPs (non video gamer players). Subjects were asked to press a button to indicate whether a specific shape was present or not in the  given visual stimuli, which included various shapes and moving distractors. As a result, the researchers concluded that VGPs expressed shorter reaction times, suggesting that they are more effective in filtering out irrelevant information. Furthermore, fMRI brain imaging showed that areas involved in spatial attention were less engaged in VGPs than in NVGPs. In other words, non video game players required more effort to ignore distractions, unlike video game players who seemed to do it almost automatically.

In an attempt to identify differences in cognitive functions between VGPs and NVGPs, researchers assessed numerous individuals in their attention, memory and executive control skills. Compared to non-gamers, it was found that those with gaming experience could track faster moving objects, had better visual short term memory, switched between tasks more quickly and were more effective in mentally rotating objects. Interestingly enough, the researchers also suggest that non-gamers could potentially improve their cognitive skills with increased video game experience.

Have 18 minutes to spare? (probably not..) But for those who are really interested, here is a video of cognitive researcher Daphne Bavelier giving a talk about the effect of video games on our brains. She addresses topics such as eyesight, attention, multi-tasking and much more. I found this quite interesting.

YouTube Preview Image

Youtube video from user TEDtalksDirector

Although  video game players overall display better cognitive performance than non-video game players, it does not mean you should spend most of your time now playing video games in place of studying or other important tasks. However, the next time you decide to take a study break, consider playing an action game. With the right dose, you can de-stress and potentially improve your spatial attention at the same time!

– Grace Lam

 

 

Ancient Earth’s Geochemistry Unveiled

        YouTube Preview Image

       Have you ever thought how Earth came to be as it is today? As far as scientists are concerned, Earth is very very very ancient.

From the time of its origin to present days, Earth has undergone continous modification. Continents have been flooded by vast seas. They also have ponderously drifted across the face of the globe and slowly collided with other landmasses to form lofty mountain ranges. Massive glaciers have buried vast tracts of forest and prairie.

Earth’s spectacular history deserves to be closely examined, for it permits us to see the future. We expect that many phenonmena of the past will happen again such as volcanic eruptions that caused great forests fires, unexpected earthquake that shook a whole city from peacful lives, and tsunami that washed and flooded a city of milions of people just to name a few

Radiometric dating data from various sampled rocks found on Earth and on other meteorites and planets pushed the history of the Earth as far back as roughly 4.56 billion Years ago. Earth formed around 4.54 billion (4.54×109) years ago by accretion from the solar nebula. Volcanic out gassing likely created the primordial atmosphere, but it contained almost no oxygen and would have been toxic to humans and most modern life. Much of the Earth was molten because of extreme volcanism and frequent collisions with other bodies.

Image of southwest Greenland. (Credit: Jacques Descloitres, MODIS Land Rapid Response Team, courtesy of NASA Visible Earth)

 

 

Scientists still have much to learn about the volcanism that shaped our archaic planet’s early history. Recently, new evidence from a team led by Frances Jenner of Carnegie Institution for Science demonstrates that some of the tectonic processes driving volcanic activity, such as those occurring today, has a history as early as 3.8 billion years ago. This groundbreaking work is published in Geology.

Upwelling of Earth’s mantle at mid-ocean ridges, as well as the eruption of new magmas on the seafloor, drive the continual tectonic activity of the oceanic crusts. As the oceanic crust drifts away from the mid-ocean ridges and cools it becomes denser than the underlying mantle. Over time the majority of this oceanic crust sinks back into the mantle, which can trigger more volcanic eruptions. This process is known scientifically as subduction and it takes places at plate boundaries.

Because volcanic eruptions that are triggered by subduction of oceanic crust are chemically different from those erupting at mid-ocean ridges and oceanic island chains, these differences between the chemistry of magmas generated at each of these tectonic environment provide “geochemical fingerprints” that can be used to try to identify the categories of tectonic activity dominated early in Earth’s history

 YouTube Preview Image!

New fossil sites and trace fossils are being discovered all the time – in part because it is getting easier to access remote areas of the planets… Sometimes as a result of new exposures being made accessible below retreating ice at the pole or even your backyard would be a place for new fossils.

As new discoveries are being made everyday, scientists are prepared to accept new and changing ideas regarding the evolution of the Earth System including the dynamic classrooms of SCIE 300 and their directed studies.

ACHOO syndrome: not your usual sneeze

Have you ever experienced a desire to sneeze after looking at an abrupt bright light, like the sun? I know I have, along with about a third of the world’s population.

Photo of a man sneezing. Author: James Gathany via Wikimedia Commons

This surreal way of sneezing is called photic sneeze reflex, or, conveniently, ACHOO syndrome. Despite being highly prevalent around the world, we know very little regarding this phenomenon. In fact, a study has found that victims of this reflex, including myself, think this occurs in everyone, whereas “normal” people become bewildered when finding about its existence. This level of unawareness might be due to the little threat that this condition poses to those who have it.

YouTube Preview Image

Due to the common occurrence of this condition within a family, it is generally regarded as an autosomal dominant trait, which simply means that it is likely for an affected parent to have an affected child. This is surprising, since the sneeze that we are all familiar with is acquired from environmental factors like viruses, regardless of how we are genetically shaped.

So how is it then that the sun or any other light sources trigger sneezing? Many theories were considered, with the first one dating back to Aristotle’s time. He speculated that the sun’s heat had a direct effect on the nose, causing it to become irritated and therefore induce sneezing. Clearly, this hypothesis was refuted later on, because the sneeze disappears if you close both eyes.

The most supported reasoning behind this involves the cranial nerves, particularly the optic and the trigeminal nerves. It is our trigeminal nerve that is primarily responsible for sending information that leads to sneezing to the brain. However, due to the complexity and the compactness of our heads, this nerve occasionally picks up signals from other sources, like the optic nerve. Thus, when some of us look at a bright light that stimulates the optic nerve, it is erroneously translated by the brain as the body’s need to sneeze.

Here is a video that gives a very simplified explanation:

YouTube Preview Image

 

As I mentioned before, this condition is generally harmless to those who have it. However, it can still pose serious risks in certain situations. For example, it is common for drivers to get a sudden outburst of sunlight shone onto their eyes. 66% of the population would squint their eyes and pull down the sun visors. The remaining 33% on the other hand, would experience an uncontrollable movement caused by the photic sneeze reflex. Considering that they are driving, you can imagine how dangerous that can be.

Although you may find it hard to believe, there is a perk to inheriting this condition. I am sure that all of us had a moment where we had a desire to sneeze, but was not able to produce it. However, this is not a problem for around 2.3 billion people, including myself, since we can deliberately produce a sneeze. Besides, who wouldn’t want to feel elevated, given that a sneeze is 1/8 of an orgasm?

-Sanggi(Daniel) Hong

Living with Only Half a Brain?

It is actually possible! There are many cases around the world where people are living with only half a brain. This ability for people to live with only half a brain is due to a brain phenomenon known as plasticity.  Plasticity is the capability of the brain to be modeled by experience. Experiences that we gain throughout our lifetime changes our brain, like modelling clay.

Brain development begins before birth and continues rapidly after. Connections in the brain are created through synapses which allow electrical signals to be transmitted from one area of the brain to another. These synapses are the changes that are responsible for the brain’s plasticity.

Brain development happens through synapses, which are responsible for creating connections. Image obtained via wikimedia commons author US Government.

There are two types of processes that model the brain: experience-expectant plasticity and experience-dependent plasticity.

Experience-expectant plasticity are experiences that every healthy individual expects to gain in their lifetime. For example, vision. With this type of plasticity comes a sensitive time period. If this experience is not met within this limited time period, the window closes and the skill can no longer be developed.

The other type of plasticity is called experience-dependent plasticity. These are neural connections that are created through experience, which can occur throughout the lifetime. These experiences include riding a bike and learning a musical instrument.

The brain’s plasticity can be seen in Michelle Mack, who was born with only the right side of her brain. To compensate for the missing side, the right side of her brain was rewired to take over the functions of the left.

Human brain’s division into the right and left hemispheres. Image obtained via wikimedia commons author Gvdmoort.

Due to the sensitive time period, a child’s brain has a better chance than an adult’s brain to reorganize itself and recover from a brain injury or surgery. 

This sensitive period plasticity is demonstrated in a girl in North Carolina named Cameron Mott. At age 3, she was experiencing 10-15 seizures a day due to an inflammation of the right side of her brain. She underwent surgery to remove the inflamed side of her brain which paralyzed the left side of her body. Immediately after the surgery, she was put into intensive therapy to recover the left side. Due to the brain’s plasticity and her young age, the left side of her brain was able to take over the functions of the right side.

A segment called Today’s Health on the Today Show interviewed Cameron Mott and her family about Cameron’s extraordinary condition:

YouTube Preview Image

The Today Show’s segment, YouTube video from username ichoosepeople.  

Scientists used to believe that the brain was hard-wired and could not undergo changes once the brain was developed. There was the belief that children with only one side of their brain would not be able to live but these real cases have shown the brain’s capability to change known as plasticity.

– Christine Wong

Why I Wouldn’t Follow Dr. Oz Down the Yellow Brick Road

Dr. Mehmet Oz was educated at Ivy League universities, has won numerous medical awards, is a professor and vice-chair of surgery at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and came to prominence giving medical advice on the television show Oprah. Sounds highly credible right? On paper yes, but let’s take a closer look.

Photo of Dr.Oz at the Time 100 Gala. Author: David Shankbone, via Wikimedia Commons

First, let’s talk about those “miracle supplements” Dr. Oz so commonly refers to; in particular, Garcinia cambogiaDr. Oz stated that this was “the newest, fastest fat-buster.

YouTube Preview Image

From YouTube user: garciniacambogia009

No exercise, no diet, no effort? It sounds too good to be true, right?  It is.

Slate.com was first to bust this “find” and stated that in 1998 a study looked at its effects as an “antiobesity agent” in 135 people and found that Garcinia cambogia pills were no better than placebo for weight loss. More recently, a study involving 706 participants was unable to provide support that Garcinia cambogia extract had any impact on weight. In some studies, a few trials showed short-term slimming, but the overall effects were so small and most studies were so flawed that the authors were unable to conclude any results. Dr. Oz handpicked data to support his claims because really, who wants to watch a television show exclaiming “Garcinia cambogia: Proven to do nothing!” It seems Dr. Oz has sold his scientific morals for ratings.

Experiencing large disapproval from the scientific community, Dr. Oz decided to conduct his very own experiment to prove he still has his roots firmly planted in the scientific method. Unfortunately, Dr. Oz only managed to add supporting evidence that he does not follow good scientific practices. Looking for toxic levels of arsenic, he tested apple juice from five popular juice makers in the U.S. claiming that he found toxic levels in all five. There are too many problems with this study. First, Dr. Oz asked a lab to test for total arsenic, but there are two forms of arsenic: Organic and inorganic. Organic is found everywhere and is practically harmless. He received a warning letter from the FDA stating that arsenic occurs naturally in many foods and that only inorganic forms are toxic. Testing for total arsenic can therefore not be used to determine whether a food is unsafe. Second, never replicated his own results. He didn’t even question the numbers he got from the lab, which the FDA warned were giving erroneously high results. Yet, Dr. Oz  showed no hesitance when reporting the results on his show. He didn’t express even the slightest uncertainty about his findings. Even the media caught on. ABC’s medical editor interviewed Dr. Oz who danced around the accusations.

YouTube Preview Image

From YouTube user: ABCNews 

These are just a couple instances of Dr. Oz demonstrating a lack of adherence to scientific principles. He may have the brains and the heart for science, but Dr. Oz needs to find his courage as he presents himself as the cowardly lion far too often.

-Nicole Gehring