A Martian Sends a Postcard Home

by Craig Raine, 1979

Caxtons are mechanical birds with many wings
and some are treasured for their markings–

they cause the eyes to melt
or the body to shriek without pain.

I have never seen one fly, but
sometimes they perch on the hand.

Mist is when the sky is tired of flight
and rests its soft machine on the ground:

then the world is dim and bookish
like engravings under tissue paper.

Rain is when the earth is television.
It has the properites of making colours darker.

Model T is a room with the lock inside —
a key is turned to free the world

for movement, so quick there is a film
to watch for anything missed.

But time is tied to the wrist
or kept in a box, ticking with impatience.

In homes, a haunted apparatus sleeps,
that snores when you pick it up.

If the ghost cries, they carry it
to their lips and soothe it to sleep

with sounds. And yet, they wake it up
deliberately, by tickling with a finger.

Only the young are allowed to suffer
openly. Adults go to a punishment room

with water but nothing to eat.
They lock the door and suffer the noises

alone. No one is exempt
and everyone’s pain has a different smell.

At night, when all the colours die,
they hide in pairs

and read about themselves —
in colour, with their eyelids shut.

To me, this poem represents technology, which is not limited to Apple-like products. This poem also shows how humans themselves are part of this strange world that we live in. This poem begins with the idea of a book (caxton), which to me is a form of technology in the early days WAY before my time as well as being related to the concept of text. But the poem continues to talk about other forms of technology such as the car or the television. In my opinion, this poem helps to prove that each of us will have a different idea of what technology is and we will all come up with different definitions and examples. But in the end, when technology is put to sleep, we all dream.

Posted in Technology | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Text is a fingerprint

Text. I chose this picture for a couple of reasons.

  • It was a picture that came up when I Googled the word text. I was curious to see what type of images appeared for this four letter word. I was not shocked to see that most of the images were that of words in various languages and fonts.
  • Of the many text images that Google displayed, I chose this particular one because of its shape. It reminded me of a fingerprint. The word text has many definitions:
    • The OED online quick search results gave us definitions with which I’m sure we are all familiar
    • Wikipedia gives a list of examples of what a text may refer to:
      • the representation of written language
      • Text (literary theory), a concept in literary theory
      • Another name for a literary work
      • A particular Bible passage, sometimes a single verse or verse fragment
      • Textbook, a standardized instructional book
      • in electronic communication and computing (Plain text (unformatted text), Text file, a type of computer files, Text display, an electronic alphanumeric display device, Text mode display, Text messaging, the sending of short messages by mobile phone, Text segment, another name for the code segment of a binary executable computer file)
      • in arts and entertainment (Text (song), a 2010 song by Mann, TEXT, a Swedish band formed by 3/4 ex-Refused Members TxT (film), a 2006 Filipino horror film)

Because of the variations of what a text is, I felt that it was similar to a fingerprint. Fingerprints are also one of a kind; therefore, each an every one of us will likely have a slightly, if not drastically, different definition or concept of what text is – which is clearly visible in all of our posts here on the Web Blog.

References:

Text. (August 27, 2012). Retrieved from Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text

Posted in Text | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Proper use of technology

This summer, I completed EPSE 410, a super-amazingly fantastic course on the use of technology in special education. In this course, I discovered all sorts of tools developed specifically for students who had different types of sight, hearing, communication or developmental disabilities. I learned about the importance of creating a thorough and robust implementation plan. This involves determining the needs of the student in question, selecting the best technology to help them, planning training sessions for parents, teachers and the student, among other things. I also learned that technology developed for special education is often extremely expensive because of all of the research and deveopment that goes into making these tools as useful as possible for the student, and most effective in the long run.

Unfortunately, apps are being developed by people who are not necessarily trained in education, psychology or treatment of various disabilities. These apps are competing against the much more expensive and more effective technologies that are available. It is scary, then, to see images like this: https://twitter.com/sjunkins/status/246784029519667201/photo/1/large

The image in the link above offers the promise of apps for special education at a lower cost, and there is only one feeeble statement about their effectiveness. There is no mention of technology being part of a comprehensive education program.

Some of these apps may be amazingly effective. However, a lot may not be, and parents and teachers may underestimate the importance of planning when integrating new technology into a child’s education program. If the plan fails, the student may get frustrated with the technology or education and time will be wasted. We all know that educational resources are limited, so we can’t afford to use what appear to be simple solutions without thinking through our options.

My point, to generalize to all forms of technology, is that any tool is only useful if we know how to use it properly (which sometimes involves R&D) and for appropriate purposes. Technology alone is never the answer.

Posted in Technology | 1 Comment

Text as used in theatre

Text took on a special meaning for me last fall when I read the script of a play I was about to see. I read the play twice and thought it was really well constructed with surprising elements and interesting dialogue. Then I saw the play. The script came to life in all sorts of unexpected ways. Had the playwright used different words, the effect would have been different – perhaps more or less intense, or with a different emotional focus.
For fun, read the three pieces below, which essentially deliver the same message, but are for different characters. What kind of person is speaking? What is the setting? What was discovered? And… are the characters necessarily human?

My dearest Sophie, I have made a fascinating discovery and it would be of my utmost pleasure to share this wondrous moment with you.

Sophie! I found something! Come quick! And don’t trip in the mud or Mom’ll get mad!

Sophie girl! Y’ever seen somethin’ like that? Golly! Sure wish I had muh camera right ‘bout now!

I’m going to take a bit of a tangent from the discussion of what a text is. The experience of reading, then seeing a play made me appreciate the work of the playwright who not only has to come up with dialogue and scene direction, but also has to imagine how the words will be delivered. The playwright has to select words that are used for all kinds of real or apparent purposes, and he has to work within the limitations of his medium: number of actors, length of the play, production budget, type and size of stage… The dialogue has to be developed and reworked until it makes sense, is entertaining and conveys specific emotions. The playwright is thus a word craftsman and may be the one person who embodies the link between text and technology. For more about the word “playwright” see “Etymology” on the following Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Playwright

Posted in Text | Leave a comment

My Precious

Steve Jobs, by Walter Isaacson

I’m a techie.  There: I said it.  I love my gadgets and have admittedly been caught shedding tears over the perceived brilliance of some pieces of software.  I own, or have owned dozens upon dozens of “quality Apple products”, dating back to the time I was in the fifth grade.  I’ve spent thousands of dollars doing whatever I could to stay on the bleeding edge of technological revolutions and breakthroughs.  But I’ve never once thrown out, or replaced a book.

To me, there is something absolutely sacred about books.  I’m not a big reader by anyone’s imagination, but there is some intangible quality about books that make them so special.  Having said that, perhaps it is the fact that they are tangible that makes them so important.  You can touch the words.  You can physically feel somebody else’s thoughts and insights.  The glowing phosphors of a computer screen can be turned on and off in an instant, making any fleeting observation unimportant.  But a book: books are forever.

My bias towards the published, written word was crystallized – even to myself – this past Christmas.  When my “good buddy” Steve Jobs passed away, I was moved to read the Walter Isaacson biography, despite it’s impressive weight and length.  Every night, before turning out the lights, I’d read carefully remove he dust jacket, open the pages just wide enough so that I could see from margin to margin, and carefully read each word.  When it was time for bed, I’d delicately fold the dust cover back in place and return the book to the protective safety of the nightstand.  Midway through the book, I purchased the same title on my wife’s new iPad.  I never opened the book again.

I read the balance of the text on my wife’s iPad.  Not because it was better or more fun or somehow more interesting, but for the simple reason that if the iPad broke, I wouldn’t think twice about replacing it.  The book must remain in pristine condition, whereas the iPad’s lifespan was of no concern.

Technology has an established and accepted lifespan in my world.  Books and text do not. I’ve archived my entire University career in boxes and am actively archiving courses from this programme as well.  I don’t know that they’ll ever be of use to anyone, but if I took the time to write it out on paper, it must have been something worth holding onto.

– Eric.

Posted in Technology, Text | 2 Comments

Neutral, it is not

Everywhere we remain unfree and chained to technology, whether we passionately affirm or deny it. But we are delivered over to it in the worst possible way when we regard it as something neutral; for this conception of it, to which today we particularly like to do homage, makes us utterly blind to the essence of technology.

Heidegger

Whether it is the “acceptable loss” of life that car technology affords (O’Donnell, 1999), or the ability to process thought differently through the invention of writing (Ong, 1982 ), technology has the ability to shape the way we look at things, the way we think, the loss and gain we are willing to accept.

 

Heidegger, M. (1953/1977). The question concerning technology. In M. Heidegger, The
question concerning technology and other essays (trans. W. Lovitt) (pp. 3-35).
New York: Harper & Row.

O’Donnel, J & Engell, J. (1999) From Papyrus to Cyberspace: The Cambridge Forum
[radio broadcast]. Retrieved from http://media.elearning.ubc.ca/det/etec540/etec540-audio.html

Ong, Walter. (1982.) Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London:
Methuen.

Posted in Technology | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Text: The Technology of Communication

After reading the course materials on ‘text” and ‘technology’, I feel the two are inseparable as they relate to communication.  Text happens to be the technology of communication.  It is what humans use to share information; to communicate thoughts and ideas between one another.  In this sense, I feel text is much more that letters, words and sentences.  We often ‘interpret’ text by ‘reading between the lines’.  This implies that the text carries more information than what appears at the surface.  If we consider the artwork associated with many medieval and renaissance text forms (see the picture below), we see the authors were attempting to play on the mood of the readers to convey the idea that the most meaning could be derived from the text by being in that mood.  The ability to do this was somewhat lost in the books of the modern age where an emphasis on clarity of type and a lack of extraneous frills meant the presentation was rather dry and the readers are left to their own devices as to interpretation.

Boethius, De Consolatione philosophiae, f.1r, (289 x 218 mm), 15th century, Alexander Turnbull Library, MSR-19.
The idea of text as technology has strong ties to the well-known saying by Marshall McLuhan (1964) that “the medium is the message.”  Applying this to current digital technologies used in communication, we see a growing ability to create messages that are much more than the words on the page.  For example, think of all the different font types now available (see picture below).  Many of them are designed to evoke certain feelings in the reader.  Even the font names like Chiller, Eclectic, Impact, Jokerman, Kartoons and Tragic Vision indicate the message the font designers intended these fonts to carry when used in text creation.  At a deeper level, the use of emoticons has allowed the ‘body language’ of digital communications to approach that of face-to-face communication.  Emoticons have come a long way from the simple exclamation mark.  When will :-), :-(,  ;o), 😉 and (:-o become ‘official’ punctuation?  Could we write a sentence simply using emoticons?

McLuhan, Marshall  (1964)  Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man.  New York: McGraw Hill.

Tim

 

Posted in Technology, Text, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Erosion

Amheida (XIX)

I chose this image of Greek text from Amheida, Egypt, to represent the erosion of text as written authority. As a child I grew up with the concept that if something was in print, it was authoritative and couldn’t be wrong. In this digital age where almost anyone can author and publish (a book, a blog, an encyclopedia entry) the idea of authority and gatekeepers (editors/publishers) of information is changing. We now question printed information, including books that purportedly represent correct information such as encyclopedias and non-fiction works. It becomes necessary for us to teach students that not all text is authoritative and true. They must discern for themselves what is written and not accept it as face value. This is a shift that has happened in our culture as we move from limited to unlimited texts. Our understanding of text has changed.

Posted in Text | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

All encompassing, I believe

Words : a Poem
David A. Reinstein, LCSW

Words to express and
Words to conceal.
To create a dream
Or describe the real.
Words to engage and
Words to reject.
To be in agreement
Or to curtly correct.
Words to make love and
Words to make war.
To hide what we know
Or share what we saw.
Words meant to sooth and
Words meant to fight.
To darken a day
Or lighten a night.

They’ve no life of their own
Or are worth e’en a cent,
But that which we give them
With certain intent.
To use them with care
With our own inner light
Whenever we use them
To speak or to write
Is a goal for all people,
But one hard to achieve-
When internal impulses
Appear on our sleeve.

Words are forever and
Words can be lost.
They seem to be free
But can carry a cost.
Knowing and caring
Are two different things-
As is being aware of
What words can bring.

Words can sing and
Words can cry-
To express our deep feelings
Or reject and deny.
How we use them
Defines our own way
To all those who read
Or hear what we say.

http://voices.yahoo.com/words-poem-912311.html

Posted in Text | 1 Comment

A whole new language…

Remember When

A Poem About Technology

A computer was something on TV
From a sci fi show of note.
A window was something you hated to clean
And ram was the cousin of goat.

Meg was the name of my girlfriend
And gig was a job for the nights.
Now they all mean different things
And that really mega bytes.

An application was for employment.
A program was a TV show.
A curser used profanity.
A keyboard was a piano.

Memory was something that you lost with age.
A CD was a bank account.
And if you had a 3 1/2″ floppy
You hoped nobody found out.

Compress was something you did to the garbage
Not something you did to a file.
And if you unzipped anything in public
You’d be in jail for a while.

Log on was adding wood to the fire.
Hard drive was a long trip on the road.
A mouse pad was where a mouse lived.
And a backup happened to your commode.

Cut you did with a pocket knife.
Paste you did with glue.
A web was a spider’s home.
And a virus was the flu

I guess I’ll stick to my pad and paper
And the memory in my head.
I hear nobody’s been killed in a computer crash,
But when it happens they wish they were dead.

James S. Huggins’ Refrigerator Door – http://www.jamesshuggins.com/h/tek1/remember-when.htm

Posted in Technology | 1 Comment