Tag Archives: accounting

Client AI Adoption and Auditing: Evidence from Process- and Product-Oriented AI

Park, Jaecheol, Pauline Wu, Rajesh Vijayaraghavan, Gene Moo Lee. “Client AI Adoption and Auditing: Evidence from Process- and Product-Oriented AI”, Under Review.

  • Presentations: TBD.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming firms’ information production, operations, and business models, with important implications for financial reporting and external auditing. We examine how auditors respond to client AI adoption, focusing on audit pricing and audit outcomes. Using textual disclosures in Form 10-K filings, we construct a novel firm-year measure of client AI adoption and further decompose it into AI embedded in internal processes and AI embedded in products and services. Using U.S. public firm data from 2010 to 2022 and a long-difference research design, we find that client AI adoption improves reporting discipline but does not lead to systematic changes in audit fees, consistent with offsetting efficiency and risk effects. When we distinguish between types of AI adoption, however, we find opposing audit responses. Process-oriented AI adoption leads to lower audit fees and improved reporting discipline, consistent with audit efficiency gains. In contrast, product-oriented AI adoption increases reporting complexity and risk, leading auditors to increase monitoring and scrutiny. Consistent with increased monitoring and error detection, product-oriented AI adoption increases the likelihood of subsequent financial restatements but not material misstatements, suggesting improved detection rather than deterioration in reporting quality. Cross-sectional analyses show that these effects vary with client complexity, operating performance, governance, and auditor industry expertise. Overall, our findings indicate that client AI adoption reshapes how auditors allocate effort, assess risk, and deploy monitoring, highlighting how technological change alters the audit production process and the financial reporting environment.

Predicting Litigation Risk via Machine Learning

Lee, Gene Moo*, James Naughton*, Xin Zheng*, Dexin Zhou* (2020) “Predicting Litigation Risk via Machine Learning,” Working Paper. [SSRN] (* equal contribution)

This study examines whether and how machine learning techniques can improve the prediction of litigation risk relative to the traditional logistic regression model. Existing litigation literature has no consensus on a predictive model. Additionally, the evaluation of litigation model performance is ad hoc. We use five popular machine learning techniques to predict litigation risk and benchmark their performance against the logistic regression model in Kim and Skinner (2012). Our results show that machine learning techniques can significantly improve the predictability of litigation risk. We identify two best-performing methods (random forest and convolutional neural networks) and rank the importance of predictors. Additionally, we show that models using economically-motivated ratio variables perform better than models using raw variables. Overall, our results suggest that the joint consideration of economically-meaningful predictors and machine learning techniques maximize the improvement of predictive litigation models.