“A Beginners Guide to Joining the Instructional Technology Blog Scene” — Part II (Electric Boogaloo)

David Wiley has posted an excellent primer for anyone in this field who has been watching the EduBloggers and who would like to get in on the action.

David’s piece covers most of the necessary bases, and he even provides a handy OPML file to load into your RSS aggregator — which is, as David correctly notes, as important a tool as your weblogging system.

Just to confuse matters, I thought I might add a few tips and pointers of my own — I don’t claim to be an expert, and hope that some of the other smart folks in our cozy little lovenest of Ed Tech subversion will offer their own thoughts as well…

Make it your own: One of the coolest things about weblogs is that it’s your own piece of virtual territory. Observe webloggers you admire, copy what works for you and ignore the rest. If you want to do something with your weblog, but you don’t see anybody else doing it, that’s a sure sign you should go ahead and do it. Don’t hesitate to bring in elements that are somewhat tangential to Ed Tech — if readers aren’t interested in a post, they’ll simply ignore it.

Publish your postings as soon as possible or you might lose them. Things move fast, and can get drowned out in the buzz. (Remember, your weblog might also serve as your own personal repository of useful resources.) Most weblog applications have links you can put in your browser’s toolbar, which can speed the posting process along considerably. If you don’t have time to compose your thoughts, go ahead and simply post a raw link and/or quote (with attribution) — it’s better than nothing. Maybe you’ll go back and elaborate later. Which leads us to…

Write imperfectly. Write clearly enough to respect your reader, but don’t agonize over every word. The corollary of this not to freak out if another weblogger uses a phrase you don’t particularly care for, or if you detect a minor flaw in the argument. Chances are that the weblogger was writing quickly, so cut some slack. I’m not saying constructive criticism is inappropriate — a friendly correction in the “comments” field is always welcome — but I’ve been part of some promising weblogging communities that have imploded under the weight of endless and pointless flamewars.

Roll ’em if you got ’em: Blogrolling (listing the weblogs you are regularly reading) serves lots of purposes… It gives the sites you link to a nice plug, and when your URL starts popping up in their referral user statistics they’ll probably check out your page — if only to see what you are saying about them. The power of narcissism plays a vital role in the creation of weblog communities.

Your blogroll, and sidebar links in general, also serve as something of a signature for your site. When I visit someone’s home I instinctively scan their bookshelves to get a read on the inhabitant, when I check out a new weblog I find myself skimming the blogroll for a sense of what it’s about.

Somewhat related…

Crosslink: When another weblogger turns you on to something you post, credit them with a quick link as a reference. Not only is it a nice thing to do, but it’s also an informal backbone to the semantic web, a way that online communities develop. And if readers like your posting, they know where to go for more.

Check out a few metablog tools: a virtual universe of metawebloggia is out there. It’s easy to get lost, but I’d recommend two sites: MIT’s Blogdex and Technorati each perform three vital functions.

1) They filter the “top stories” that webloggers are posting today. These lists are a quick way to get a sense of what’s hot online.
2) You can enter a URL of an interesting resource you’ve found online, and see who else has linked to it. (An excellent way to find other webloggers with similar interests.)
3) You can enter your own URL, and see who is linking to you. Loads of fun, or frustration. What was that about the power of narcissism?

MOST IMPORTANT: Have fun, and fasten your seatbelts. I’ve learned more about my field in the past couple of months than… well, ever actually. My fellow webloggers have been the best teachers I could ask for, and the Internet is one groovy classroom. I honestly believe that my own experience is proof of concept, and underlies my conviction that the ideas that we are peddling can provide a framework for Education worthy of a capital E.

Posted in Webloggia | Comments Off on “A Beginners Guide to Joining the Instructional Technology Blog Scene” — Part II (Electric Boogaloo)

Yet more webloggia and WebCT…

There’s been lots of fun buzz on RSS and LOs the past couple of days, much of it coming from Alan and D’Arcy’s experiments with Trackback features… (the latest developments here and here). If you’re anything like me, this bit of background on Trackback that Scott Leslie linked to yesterday helps flesh out how this might prove quite useful.

A couple of webloggers here in the UBC community had interesting responses to yesterday’s post on displaying RSS feeds within WebCT.

From Cyprien Lomas, Learning Objects in our Weblogs?

In the same way that much of the linking in ‘blogging’ seems to rest on a referral system, adding trackback to Learning Objects should help build a similar ‘social’ aspect to Learning Objects.

It also seems to short circuit some of the necessity of complete tagging of a learning object. It seemed to me that a weak point in LO theory is the arduous task of metatagging. I keep thinking that nobody is motivated to tag their objects thoroughly enough to make them useful. Looking at existing repositories shows that most of them have more untagged objects than tagged.

If I were a Biology instructor and I

Posted in Emergence, Webloggia, XML/RSS | Tagged | Comments Off on Yet more webloggia and WebCT…

How-to for RSS in WebCT

A few people have added comments to the post below, asking for a clearer set of instructions on how it’s done.

Thankfully, my colleague Cyprien Lomas has just built one…

And of course, as David Carter-Tod notes, this application is hardly limited to WebCT. It can be applied in almost any context that publishes to the web. I have an RSS feed of this weblog running on the LOs @ UBC page (which will be getting a redesign soon, honest).

Posted in Objects, Webloggia, XML/RSS | Tagged | Comments Off on How-to for RSS in WebCT

Displaying RSS Feeds in WebCT


click to see full-size image

Above is a screenshot of three live RSS feeds displayed within a WebCT course in Geology — one of LOs, one of industry white papers, and a third of general science news from New Scientist.

It was assembled by Michelle Lamberson and myself in about an hour (and would have been much quicker had we the faintest notion of what we were doing), and it demonstrates just how easily RSS allows dynamic content to be imported and rendered. It’s safe to say that when it comes to code that both of us are more hacks than hackers.

The script required was built using Adam Curry’s RSS Box Viewer, which was found via a very handy RSS workshop from the Utah State Library Division. (Curry’s parser was just the first one we tried, many more can be found here.)

As Michelle said to me this morning, assembling and packaging these feeds could be an invaluable service that librarians or support staff could provide to developers.

Posted in Emergence, Objects, Webloggia, XML/RSS | Tagged | 6 Comments

Shhh! Don’t tell anybody…

I’ve been lucky enough to play around with Alan Levine of the Maricopa Learning Exchange and D’Arcy Norman of CAREO, bouncing email back and forth around the intersections between LOs, weblogs, RSS, and all that groovy stuff.

Truth be told, their skills are so much stronger than mine that they’ve been doing most of the bouncing…

But it’s been fun watching these guys work, and throwing in my cheerleading and ill-informed opinions along the way. Today D’Arcy summarizes some of the potential applications:

Imagine this: “Person A” is searching a LOR and comes across a really cool LO that they want to use. They have some comments that they might be wanting to share with a community outside of the LOR. They publish these comments to their weblog (say a departmental or institutional or even personal LO-related weblog), and include a trackback to a URL provided by the LOR for that specific LO.

Sometime later, “Person B” is searching the LOR for some content, and finds the same object that “Person A” found. They click the “Details” button to learn more about the LO, including the metadata context stored in the LOR, and all trackbacked weblog entries related to this LO. They are able to see “Person A”s comments directly in the LOR, providing some addition outside-of-mandated-metadata-schema context that wouldn’t have been available otherwise.

“Person C” is surfing the LO-related weblogs, and come across the post from “Person A” about a LO. They click the link, and are brought to the LOR’s “Details” page for that LO, where they can see the “official,” centralized metadata, as well as all informal, distributed metadata and comments aggregated by the Trackback feature of the LOR.

This could be quite cool.

Imagine this going one step further… There is no reason for Trackbacks to be restricted to weblogs… They could just as easily be generated by other LORs, or even other completely unrelated software. Imagine a user on CAREO being able to trackback a LOR in MERLOT. Or vice versa. Or a CAREO user being able to trackback and comment on something in the Corbus collection. Or an instructor working on a BlackBoard course being able to search for and add to comments on LOs in LORs all around the world, in the context of their course…

Anyhow, Alan has started up a demo weblog running RSS feeds of LOs, and he’s apparently got the trackback feature going. I wasn’t sure if he wanted it public at this early stage, but seeing how D’Arcy has already plugged it, I might as well do so too…

Another angle

To me, the coolest thing about weblog tools is that they allow a relative novice to publish well-formatted content to the web with ease. The basic applications are as easy as email, and advanced functions have evolved in response to the desires of the user community. I can’t help but wonder if the elements that have made weblogging adoption grow so rapidly can’t be applied in our own sphere. Obviously, I’m not alone.

Scott Leslie of EdTechPost has mused about looking at some of the tools building toward structured blogging for CD/DVD/book reviews, and reworking them for LOs. And it looks like George Siemens and others over at the Open Source Content discussion group have similar ideas.

My brain hurts. But I kinda like it.

Posted in Emergence, Objects, Webloggia, XML/RSS | Tagged , | Comments Off on Shhh! Don’t tell anybody…

Shhh! Don’t tell anybody…

I’ve been lucky enough to play around with Alan Levine of the Maricopa Learning Exchange and D’Arcy Norman of CAREO, bouncing email back and forth around the intersections between LOs, weblogs, RSS, and all that groovy stuff.

Truth be told, their skills are so much stronger than mine that they’ve been doing most of the bouncing…

But it’s been fun watching these guys work, and throwing in my cheerleading and ill-informed opinions along the way. Today D’Arcy summarizes some of the potential applications:

Imagine this: “Person A” is searching a LOR and comes across a really cool LO that they want to use. They have some comments that they might be wanting to share with a community outside of the LOR. They publish these comments to their weblog (say a departmental or institutional or even personal LO-related weblog), and include a trackback to a URL provided by the LOR for that specific LO.

Sometime later, “Person B” is searching the LOR for some content, and finds the same object that “Person A” found. They click the “Details” button to learn more about the LO, including the metadata context stored in the LOR, and all trackbacked weblog entries related to this LO. They are able to see “Person A”s comments directly in the LOR, providing some addition outside-of-mandated-metadata-schema context that wouldn’t have been available otherwise.

“Person C” is surfing the LO-related weblogs, and come across the post from “Person A” about a LO. They click the link, and are brought to the LOR’s “Details” page for that LO, where they can see the “official,” centralized metadata, as well as all informal, distributed metadata and comments aggregated by the Trackback feature of the LOR.

This could be quite cool.

Imagine this going one step further… There is no reason for Trackbacks to be restricted to weblogs… They could just as easily be generated by other LORs, or even other completely unrelated software. Imagine a user on CAREO being able to trackback a LOR in MERLOT. Or vice versa. Or a CAREO user being able to trackback and comment on something in the Corbus collection. Or an instructor working on a BlackBoard course being able to search for and add to comments on LOs in LORs all around the world, in the context of their course…

Anyhow, Alan has started up a demo weblog running RSS feeds of LOs, and he’s apparently got the trackback feature going. I wasn’t sure if he wanted it public at this early stage, but seeing how D’Arcy has already plugged it, I might as well do so too…

Another angle

To me, the coolest thing about weblog tools is that they allow a relative novice to publish well-formatted content to the web with ease. The basic applications are as easy as email, and advanced functions have evolved in response to the desires of the user community. I can’t help but wonder if the elements that have made weblogging adoption grow so rapidly can’t be applied in our own sphere. Obviously, I’m not alone.

Scott Leslie of EdTechPost has mused about looking at some of the tools building toward structured blogging for CD/DVD/book reviews, and reworking them for LOs. And it looks like George Siemens and others over at the Open Source Content discussion group have similar ideas.

My brain hurts. But I kinda like it.

Posted in Emergence, Objects, Webloggia, XML/RSS | Tagged , | Comments Off on Shhh! Don’t tell anybody…

Shhh! Don’t tell anybody…

I’ve been lucky enough to play around with Alan Levine of the Maricopa Learning Exchange and D’Arcy Norman of CAREO, bouncing email back and forth around the intersections between LOs, weblogs, RSS, and all that groovy stuff.

Truth be told, their skills are so much stronger than mine that they’ve been doing most of the bouncing…

But it’s been fun watching these guys work, and throwing in my cheerleading and ill-informed opinions along the way. Today D’Arcy summarizes some of the potential applications:

Imagine this: “Person A” is searching a LOR and comes across a really cool LO that they want to use. They have some comments that they might be wanting to share with a community outside of the LOR. They publish these comments to their weblog (say a departmental or institutional or even personal LO-related weblog), and include a trackback to a URL provided by the LOR for that specific LO.

Sometime later, “Person B” is searching the LOR for some content, and finds the same object that “Person A” found. They click the “Details” button to learn more about the LO, including the metadata context stored in the LOR, and all trackbacked weblog entries related to this LO. They are able to see “Person A”s comments directly in the LOR, providing some addition outside-of-mandated-metadata-schema context that wouldn’t have been available otherwise.

“Person C” is surfing the LO-related weblogs, and come across the post from “Person A” about a LO. They click the link, and are brought to the LOR’s “Details” page for that LO, where they can see the “official,” centralized metadata, as well as all informal, distributed metadata and comments aggregated by the Trackback feature of the LOR.

This could be quite cool.

Imagine this going one step further… There is no reason for Trackbacks to be restricted to weblogs… They could just as easily be generated by other LORs, or even other completely unrelated software. Imagine a user on CAREO being able to trackback a LOR in MERLOT. Or vice versa. Or a CAREO user being able to trackback and comment on something in the Corbus collection. Or an instructor working on a BlackBoard course being able to search for and add to comments on LOs in LORs all around the world, in the context of their course…

Anyhow, Alan has started up a demo weblog running RSS feeds of LOs, and he’s apparently got the trackback feature going. I wasn’t sure if he wanted it public at this early stage, but seeing how D’Arcy has already plugged it, I might as well do so too…

Another angle

To me, the coolest thing about weblog tools is that they allow a relative novice to publish well-formatted content to the web with ease. The basic applications are as easy as email, and advanced functions have evolved in response to the desires of the user community. I can’t help but wonder if the elements that have made weblogging adoption grow so rapidly can’t be applied in our own sphere. Obviously, I’m not alone.

Scott Leslie of EdTechPost has mused about looking at some of the tools building toward structured blogging for CD/DVD/book reviews, and reworking them for LOs. And it looks like George Siemens and others over at the Open Source Content discussion group have similar ideas.

My brain hurts. But I kinda like it.

Posted in Emergence, Objects, Webloggia, XML/RSS | Tagged , | Comments Off on Shhh! Don’t tell anybody…

An Open Source Reading List

Books and Articles

Via open education content, via Dave Beckett

Tagged | Comments Off on An Open Source Reading List

A History of Interaction Design

A real fine presentation (PDF 3.2 MB) from Marc Rettig… and you can actually pull some sense from the slides.

Via David Crow, via Anne Galloway, via peterme

Posted in Objects | Comments Off on A History of Interaction Design

Three Objections to Learning Objects

Lots of bloggers have linked to Norm Friesen’s latest paper, with justification. I would think that the toughest part of writing a paper like this is limiting the objections to three.

Objection 1: What’s a learning object, anyway?

The term “learning object” juxtaposes two words that are in many ways incongruous and ultimately, incommensurable: The first, “object,” is a thoroughly and very specific technological paradigm–as specialized terms such as “concurrency,” “polymorphism” and “typing” indicate. It is part of an approach whose basic principles are so specialized as to be difficult to express in everyday language. And the second, “learning,” is equally extreme in its vagueness, generality and broadly non-technical nature. In clear contrast to the dominance of the object-oriented paradigm in programming and software design, there is no consensus among educational experts as to how learning occurs or how it can best be understood. There is no “all-pervasive” approach or “paradigm” for learning or education as is claimed for programming and software design. “Pedagogy as well as instructional design,” as Allert, Dhraief, and Nejdl say, “are ill-structured domains” (2002).

… Using a term that makes sense only in abstruse technical discussions, and that is opaque and confusing to practitioners does not make its potential benefits clear to teachers. Instead, it presents the potential of pitting those responsible for instruction unproductively against those advocating technological change. It is not that the innovation should not come from outside of education, or that it can only come from within. It is simply that innovations must be presented in terms that are meaningful for teaching practice.

Objection 2: Where is the Learning in E-Learning Standards?

It is the contention of this paper that these issues arise not from the particularities of SCORM’s or ADL’s approach to standards and specifications, but from its implied understanding of pedagogy: namely, from its simultaneous claims to pedagogical relevance and pedagogical neutrality.

The very meaning of word “neutrality”–the state of “not assisting, or actively taking the side of” (OED, 1987)–implies a state or position that is antithetical or perhaps even anathema to pedagogy and teaching–the act of appropriately “guid[ing] studies” or “show[ing] by way of information or instruction” (OED, 1987; Merriam-Webster, 2003). The active engagement implied in pedagogy and teaching, in other words, does not admit of the non-involvement and impartiality that is implied in the words “neutral” and “neutrality.” Also, understood more abstractly as a domain of knowledge and research, pedagogy as a whole is not something that can simply be understood as neutral in its relation to technology or technical specification. As a hetergenous and “unstructured field” (Allert, Dhraief, & Nejdl, 2001), the mere term “pedagogy” or “pedagogies” includes areas as diverse as critical pedagogy, performance support, special needs education, home schooling and so on. Each of these approaches to or contexts for pedagogy, moreover, presents various predispositions and factors that would shape its particular relationship to technology and e-learning standardization. Simply put, specifications and applications that are truly pedagogically neutral cannot also be pedagogically relevant.

Objection 3: Education in a Militarized Zone?

Using technical systems and weaponry of ever-increasing complexity, the US Department of Defence attempts to address its ever-growing training needs by employing the same approaches to education as are used in the development and deployment of weapons and command-and-control systems. Not surprisingly, characteristics of the military worldview in general reappear in its approaches to education in particular.

… The end result of this approach is to understand training and the technologies that support it as a means of “engineering” and maximizing the performance of the human components of a larger system. The performance of these human components can then be fine-tuned and optimized in a manner similar to the way their mechanical and electronic counterparts are maintained and refined.

… Public education, despite its radically different goals and levels of funding, can be seen as having embarked on a larger, idiosyncratic “edspecs” enterprise. It is participating actively in specifications development, and seeking to build content and infrastructure according to these specifications. However, given the nature of its funding and goals, the ability of the public education sector to support an “edspecs” project–modeled on military and engineering precedents–is uncertain. In addition to being smaller by several orders of magnitude, funding for educational technology research in public education is typically short-term and project-based (e.g. Roschelle, 1996). The development of specifications, standards and corresponding implementations, on the other hand, is a costly, long-term undertaking. A typical standard will have a development lifecycle of five or more years (Farance, 1999); and multiple standards, following different and sometimes ill-defined development timelines (e.g. Friesen, 2003; Kraan, 2003), are required for the successful interoperation of objects, repositories and other systems.

Posted in Objects | Tagged | Comments Off on Three Objections to Learning Objects