Ryan Eby: Trackback, Pingback, and LOR’s

An impressive, and apparently new site from Ryan Eby, with a thoughtful suggestion:

Phil has an interesting post on the differences between trackback and pingback. I agree with his comments on when trackback and pingback are relevant. I think this is something that should be looked into more for content/learning object repositories. For example, if I find a learning object such as MLX #467 on Atomic Structure and decide I want to write a review of it or something similar, then I would want to send it a trackback so that others can find my post on it, if they are browsing the objects. However, if I actually use the flash animation in some sort of online setting (as part of a lesson, etc.) then it would probably be wiser for me to send a pingback as just a way of showing I’m using it. Pingback is structured so you can ping any file and so it probably a more sensible thing for when I’m just using an image or something for a site I made.

… This is a topic that will have to be covered more in-depth for repositories. Trackback is an important feature, but I also think pingback is extremely important as well. Pingback could be another method of showing the links between/to objects used in a learning example. Back to the MLX example, some cards also have multiple parts to them and a ping to a specific part such as an image, animation or handout would probably be more useful if I was using them, instead of just to the object overview. It is unlikely that I would use everything from some of the objects that contain complete lessons or unit plans. I guess this also brings up the question of how generic a repository item should be. Should it be split up to it’s components, i.e handouts, graphics, etc.? Or should they be grouped together as a lesson and then pingback be used as a way to reference the parts within it?

Via Carving Code (and Scott)

Posted in Emergence, Objects, Webloggia, XML/RSS | 1 Comment

Ryan Eby: Trackback, Pingback, and LOR’s

An impressive, and apparently new site from Ryan Eby, with a thoughtful suggestion:

Phil has an interesting post on the differences between trackback and pingback. I agree with his comments on when trackback and pingback are relevant. I think this is something that should be looked into more for content/learning object repositories. For example, if I find a learning object such as MLX #467 on Atomic Structure and decide I want to write a review of it or something similar, then I would want to send it a trackback so that others can find my post on it, if they are browsing the objects. However, if I actually use the flash animation in some sort of online setting (as part of a lesson, etc.) then it would probably be wiser for me to send a pingback as just a way of showing I’m using it. Pingback is structured so you can ping any file and so it probably a more sensible thing for when I’m just using an image or something for a site I made.

… This is a topic that will have to be covered more in-depth for repositories. Trackback is an important feature, but I also think pingback is extremely important as well. Pingback could be another method of showing the links between/to objects used in a learning example. Back to the MLX example, some cards also have multiple parts to them and a ping to a specific part such as an image, animation or handout would probably be more useful if I was using them, instead of just to the object overview. It is unlikely that I would use everything from some of the objects that contain complete lessons or unit plans. I guess this also brings up the question of how generic a repository item should be. Should it be split up to it’s components, i.e handouts, graphics, etc.? Or should they be grouped together as a lesson and then pingback be used as a way to reference the parts within it?

Via Carving Code (and Scott)

Posted in Emergence, Objects, Webloggia, XML/RSS | Comments Off on Ryan Eby: Trackback, Pingback, and LOR’s

Contrary thought of the day:

7 Habits of an AntiBlogger from Internet Alchemy:

* Think before posting
* Write for tomorrow
* Google is a means not an end
* Traffic isn’t everything
* Write clean, valid markup
* Add value, not links
* Memes don’t need your help

[insert value-add here]

Via dive into mark

Posted in Webloggia | Comments Off on Contrary thought of the day:

Movable Type to offer hosting…

Not knowing anything about cgi-bin scripts, I needed David’s help to get started with Movable Type. Soon, technomorons such as myself will have an alternative to pestering their friends for assistance…

TypePad is an upcoming hosted service providing powerful tools for creating full-featured weblogs. Built in response to the needs of webloggers, online diarists and writers, TypePad harness the power of Six Apart’s popular Moveable Type personal publishing system into a turnkey service, suitable for beginners and experts alike.”

Via lightningfield

Posted in Webloggia | 2 Comments

Fotolog — it’s too easy…


Just one example of how lame a Fotolog can be

… there’s gotta be a catch. I checked out Fotolog based on a recommendation from Marc’s Voice:

Think of an identity browsing system like Ryze, but it’s about your photos – not where you used to work and what you want from somebody.

Posted in Webloggia | Comments Off on Fotolog — it’s too easy…

Fotolog — it’s too easy…


Just one example of how lame a Fotolog can be

… there’s gotta be a catch. I checked out Fotolog based on a recommendation from Marc’s Voice:

Think of an identity browsing system like Ryze, but it’s about your photos – not where you used to work and what you want from somebody.

Posted in Webloggia | Comments Off on Fotolog — it’s too easy…

Fischli and Weiss flack Hondas?

I’m a great admirer of Fischli and Weiss’s 1987 The Way Things Go, and thereby got a kick out of this Honda Ad (Flash 6 required) — once I got over my discomfort about the whole co-optation thing. (Here’s hoping the original filmmakers at least got a whack of filthy lucre for the rights.)

The makers of the commerical swear they used no jump cuts, no computer graphics. One clean take. Of course, it took 606 of them.

Posted in Objects | Comments Off on Fischli and Weiss flack Hondas?

Blogs! Dogs!


online labs

Alan Levine has moved his hub of online activities to a new weblog, cogdogblog, which is my nominee for best Ed Tech weblog title going… (the explanation in the title graphic).

As you may know, Alan’s been throwing off some very intriguing ideas concerning LOs, RSS, and weblogs — and building the applications to back them — so this space should prove well worth watching.

And best of all, Alan has some of the best online canine photo galleries this side of Dean Allen. Sometimes poignant, oft-times just plain awesome. I’m currently dogless, so Alan’s photos stir up deep paternal longings in my soul — don’t tell Harry.

Posted in Webloggia | Comments Off on Blogs! Dogs!

Do you have a metadata repository with a SOAP layer?

Or know of one?

If so, please email me: brian.lamb@ubc.ca

We’d like to do some testing.

Posted in Objects | 3 Comments

“A Beginners Guide to Joining the Instructional Technology Blog Scene” — Part II (Electric Boogaloo)

David Wiley has posted an excellent primer for anyone in this field who has been watching the EduBloggers and who would like to get in on the action.

David’s piece covers most of the necessary bases, and he even provides a handy OPML file to load into your RSS aggregator — which is, as David correctly notes, as important a tool as your weblogging system.

Just to confuse matters, I thought I might add a few tips and pointers of my own — I don’t claim to be an expert, and hope that some of the other smart folks in our cozy little lovenest of Ed Tech subversion will offer their own thoughts as well…

Make it your own: One of the coolest things about weblogs is that it’s your own piece of virtual territory. Observe webloggers you admire, copy what works for you and ignore the rest. If you want to do something with your weblog, but you don’t see anybody else doing it, that’s a sure sign you should go ahead and do it. Don’t hesitate to bring in elements that are somewhat tangential to Ed Tech — if readers aren’t interested in a post, they’ll simply ignore it.

Publish your postings as soon as possible or you might lose them. Things move fast, and can get drowned out in the buzz. (Remember, your weblog might also serve as your own personal repository of useful resources.) Most weblog applications have links you can put in your browser’s toolbar, which can speed the posting process along considerably. If you don’t have time to compose your thoughts, go ahead and simply post a raw link and/or quote (with attribution) — it’s better than nothing. Maybe you’ll go back and elaborate later. Which leads us to…

Write imperfectly. Write clearly enough to respect your reader, but don’t agonize over every word. The corollary of this not to freak out if another weblogger uses a phrase you don’t particularly care for, or if you detect a minor flaw in the argument. Chances are that the weblogger was writing quickly, so cut some slack. I’m not saying constructive criticism is inappropriate — a friendly correction in the “comments” field is always welcome — but I’ve been part of some promising weblogging communities that have imploded under the weight of endless and pointless flamewars.

Roll ’em if you got ’em: Blogrolling (listing the weblogs you are regularly reading) serves lots of purposes… It gives the sites you link to a nice plug, and when your URL starts popping up in their referral user statistics they’ll probably check out your page — if only to see what you are saying about them. The power of narcissism plays a vital role in the creation of weblog communities.

Your blogroll, and sidebar links in general, also serve as something of a signature for your site. When I visit someone’s home I instinctively scan their bookshelves to get a read on the inhabitant, when I check out a new weblog I find myself skimming the blogroll for a sense of what it’s about.

Somewhat related…

Crosslink: When another weblogger turns you on to something you post, credit them with a quick link as a reference. Not only is it a nice thing to do, but it’s also an informal backbone to the semantic web, a way that online communities develop. And if readers like your posting, they know where to go for more.

Check out a few metablog tools: a virtual universe of metawebloggia is out there. It’s easy to get lost, but I’d recommend two sites: MIT’s Blogdex and Technorati each perform three vital functions.

1) They filter the “top stories” that webloggers are posting today. These lists are a quick way to get a sense of what’s hot online.
2) You can enter a URL of an interesting resource you’ve found online, and see who else has linked to it. (An excellent way to find other webloggers with similar interests.)
3) You can enter your own URL, and see who is linking to you. Loads of fun, or frustration. What was that about the power of narcissism?

MOST IMPORTANT: Have fun, and fasten your seatbelts. I’ve learned more about my field in the past couple of months than… well, ever actually. My fellow webloggers have been the best teachers I could ask for, and the Internet is one groovy classroom. I honestly believe that my own experience is proof of concept, and underlies my conviction that the ideas that we are peddling can provide a framework for Education worthy of a capital E.

Posted in Webloggia | Comments Off on “A Beginners Guide to Joining the Instructional Technology Blog Scene” — Part II (Electric Boogaloo)