Categories
Government News

New rail line to UBC annouced today!

Peter over at the Cavalier (click) has this story. In short, the province is funding an expansion of the sky train to UBC by the year 2020 as part of a 14 biollion dollar transit bonanza announced for the province today.

From the press release:

UBC welcomes the provincial government announcement today of a $14 billion province-wide transit investment to include $2.8 billion for the UBC Line in addition to increased bus service

Some transport-related questions:

  • How will the transit station work with the current underground busloop plans? Where will the station be?
  • Given the differing timelines, will buses be enough until 2020?
  • How long will our campus be one massive construction site?
  • Will U-pass fees or transit fares be driven up to fund this project?
  • Where will bus services be reduced when the line is in?
  • Are there safety issues with more public stations?
  • Is the rhetoric of sustainability meaninful? How is the line being engineered and built?
Categories
Uncategorized

Allan McEachern

It’s elections season. The posts will be coming fast and furious. Please scroll for Brendon’s thoughtful first Issue of the Day.

UBC’s Chancellor Allan McEachern died last week. And over the weekend had a bit of a chance to reminisce and reflect.

He led a fascinating life. His death is reverberating through the legal community; everybody, it seems, has an Allan McEachern story.

For me, it was that time I cornered him at a reception after discovering that he’d been the Commissioner of the CFL. 1967-68 was at a critical time for football in Canada, as our neighbours to the South had just created the “Super Bowl” and the creation of the modern NFL was not far off. He was part of the team that negotiated the first agreements with the NFL, and pulled the trigger on the famous Joe Kapp transfer to the Vikings. He regaled me for half an hour with stories from the Golden Age of Canadian football, and I loved every second.

Alan McEachern’s legacy, behind the jump.
Of course, that’s not his legacy. First and foremost, he understood the important role of the legal system, its role in society, and the myriad issues surrounding access to justice. Under his leadership, BC took on a leadership role in this area. In 1996, BC was the first jurisdiction to have a court web page on which decisions were posted and publicly available. He even started a personal web page that answered public questions in a public forum, adding a welcome sliver of transparency to the legal system. During his tenure, BC also adopted several rules designed to expedite the trial process, and reduce the cost and time burden on litigants, and strengthened mechanisms for lay litigants to get justice. These are by no means legal minutiae; they have fundamentally changed how litigation is done in BC, and have served as a model for other jurisdictions. And he took significant steps to open the bench up to women, again serving as a model for the rest of the country.

There are also his decisions. He took a lot of heat for one of them, the trial decision in Delgamuukw. Some have called it racist, more measured critics call it ethno-centric. And while it was over-turned on appeal, it’s important to note that it was overturned on evidentiary grounds – his failure to admit oral histories as evidence. But it’s unfair to assess a judge’s career without reference to the rest of his body of work. Even critics acknowledge that his tenure on the bench was exemplary. He wrote an absurd amount of important and critical decisions, in almost every field of the law. It’s the rare research assignment I complete that doesn’t involve a case written by him, and it will continue to be that way for the foreseeable future.

Finally, UBC was well-served by his tenure as Chancellor. He taught at UBC’s Faculty of Law. At Board, he was a better listener than most of the appointees and, in honest discussion, was frank and fair. Though publicly he may have appeared to be just a figurehead, in reality he was anything but. He had a sharp, brilliant mind, and he used it. And he certainly spoke it. He also wasn’t afraid to go against the President, or the Board Chair, or the students, and, usually, when he disagreed, his words carried a force and wisdom that made it hard to disagree. He also chaired the search committee, and was very much responsible for the hiring of Professor Toope as President.

He has had a major impact on your life, in several ways, whether you know it or not. He achieved so much in his life, and those he encountered along the way are fortunate to have been enriched by his presence.

Categories
AMS Elections 2008 Issues

Issue of the Day: Executive Portfolio Reform

This is the first of a series of daily articles that will highlight “UBC issues.” The Issue of the Day provides an in-depth analysis of a certain topic that may require more background information to understand, or more analysis of the pros and cons and factors to consider. We will try to focus on key issues that come out of the debates and this year’s election, but there are some tried and tested issues too that can’t be ignored.

This year’s Exec team. Should their portfolios be shuffled?

For our first Issue of the Day, we are focusing on portfolio reform. We think that it might be a good topic to start with because it gets people thinking about the basic political divisions of the organization – the way in which we divide the Executive portfolios actually says a lot about the priorities of the Society.

The debate last year:

The issue came up in last year’s elections, specifically regarding the VP Finance and the VP Administration. At that time, it was suggested that these two portfolios could be merged into a VP Operations (or VP Internal) in order to introduce a new Executive portfolio, such as a VP Student Life, that could address different issues, such as social life, events, and possibly even lobbying the University around student life issues (sorry, I’m a lobbyist at heart…). I wanted to link to an article from last year’s election, but after 40 minutes of searching for it, am giving up. Please try to find it though if you want to read more about that debate.

Why does it matter?

I personally took quite a liking to the idea of a VP Student Life, but I think it doesn’t illustrate the importance of Executive portfolio reform very well. At U of T and York for example, there is a VP Equity. Imagine dedicating one fifth of the AMS’ highest level of elected representatives solely to the issue of equity and diversity! It would tell a very different story about the priorities of the AMS.

Of course, addressing issues of equity and diversity better (or any others, like student life for that matter), could be done without Executive portfolio reform. But, it wouldn’t have the same effect on lobbying priorities, who gets attracted to the positions (or other aspects of the AMS for that matter), and the type of political work that the portfolios do. Currently the Safety Coordinator works on issues around equity, diversity and social justice, but because the place in the organization that the position fits, its difficult for the position to do effective lobbying. It’s up to the VP Academic, who the Safety Coordinator reports to, to lobby on these issues and bring the work of the Safety Coordinator into the strategic directions of Council and the Executive better.

Creative options…behind the jump. Other options:

You could conceive of a lot of options, besides a VP Operations/VP Student Life reform. I’ve always been a fan of either Tim or Spencer’s idea (sorry, I forget who initially proposed it), to take the VP Academic and VP External portfolios and create a VP Education (fed/prov lobbying and all academic issues) and VP University Affairs (campus development, governance, translink, sustainability, etc). Part of the reasoning behind this option is that the VP External portfolio is often criticized for not having as much work as the other portfolios, particularly if there isn’t an election in a given year. Also, the current division doesn’t always make sense – for example, as VP Academic, I became well-versed in UBC academic issues, but had little to do with bringing that conversation to provincial/federal representatives. Also, I did a lot of work on student housing this year, and brought that issue to the GVRD and municipal representatives, normally reserved for the VP External. Lastly, the VP Academic works on a lot of issues around transit as it relates to internal UBC development, but the VP External works with lobbying translink. These are just examples, keep in mind. But, on the other hand, there are many benefits between intersecting responsibilities between portfolios.

Also, as I’m sure most readers can tell, I’m quite privy to a VP Equity & Diversity (or any other name), as it would do a lot to make the AMS more effective in addressing social justice issues. You could conceive of a VP Sustainability (like at Concordia’s student union), a VP Social Issues or a VP Student Issues. The possibilities are endless. What really matters is that we can be creative about the way the AMS works, and not get stuck in the status quo for no other reason than it’s easy. The AMS Should be thinking forward, always thinking of better ways to structure itself and represent what matters to students.

What other ways do you think the Executive portfolios could be organized? Share your thoughts.

Categories
AMS AMS Elections 2008 Media

VFM 2008 has already failed.

Dissillusioned VFM sponsor Mark Latham and I chatting yesterday. I’m not picking my nose, I swear! Photo Peter Rizov.

Poor Mark Latham. Well, actually he’s not on the street yet, but the AMS is definitely living in the doghouse.

Yup, this is a media on media story, so have your cringe and be over with it. Voter-Funded Media (VFM) is the media contest that ran in parallel with last year’s AMS elections and prompted the birth of this blog and other student media groups. The contest’s sponsor, Mark Latham, in his quest for a worldwide media revolution, chose UBC and the AMS as a testing ground for his idea. Theoretically, publicly rewarded media would increase quality of information, inform more people, and thus improve the health of democracy. He gave the AMS 8 grand for a prize pool, spent months discussing and planning with the VFM committee and then-VP external Ian Pattillo, and finally saw the launch and conclusion of the contest. The first VFM, though it was fraught with issues, (late start, lack of “non-insider” entrants, non-serious entrants in it for the money, lack of publicity), seemed promising. It didn’t increase voter turnout, but it was a great resource, a hell of a lot of fun, and probably increased the level of knowledge for the people that did vote. It could have worked. It could have grown.

This year, there was no excuse for making the same mistakes again.

(the rest behind the jump).
Yet, if possible, this years’ contest has been worse organized than last year. The VFM committee completed its code changes in October, when they were passed at AMS council. Since then, a bureaucratic lapse on the part of Matthew Naylor, who’s the VP responsible for the project, seems to have doomed the project to another year of middling results and poor participation. “He just became totally unresponsive,” said a VFM committee member of Naylor. The VFM coordinator, Paul Gibson-Tigh was only hired in mid-December. As of today, TODAY, not a shred of publicity for the contest has been seen, though it officially opened (unbeknonst to me) near the end of exams. Nothing on the AMS website. No ad in the Ubyssey. No attempt to reach out to parts of the writing and journalism communities. The VFM page on the elections site still has last year’s entries. How are media groups supposed to get organized and cover elections if they have no idea themselves? Currently, I know of three media groups, including this one, all of which are snugly within the circle of “AMS insiders”. The lack of media voices paired with the sham of contest organization will be sure to spell poor results.

The intent of voter-funded media was never to have a perfunctory cash-grab over the course of a desperate two-week campaign. It was always meant to start earlier, end later, and eventually become a sustained and continuous media reward system. This vision is clearly giving way to something entirely less useful, and much more brief. Mark Latham, for one, is not amused. “What the hell was that? I don’t get it,” he interjected when I asked him about the contest’s lack of any outward vital signs. He made it clear to me last night that he would not be sponsoring the contest again unless a change in approach occurred soon. “To me, this is water under the bridge already … I’m game to sponsor VFM again, starting next month.” Not next December. “I wrote the check today. I could have said I wouldn’t write it, but I follow through. I didn’t want to be the bad guy.” The AMS has the check, but that won’t save the remarkable opportunity the AMS has had from being wasted. It’s a crying shame.

Categories
AMS Elections 2008 News

The Campaign: important dates to remember

This years’ campaign period is short, and tightly packed. The nicety of an extra week of leeway time between the closing of nominations and the beginning of official campaigning has been dispensed with. That means we don’t have much time to get to know all the candidates, and they don’t have much time to convince us. So take full advantage of the debate forums happening all through this coming week and the next. Online voting starts promptly this Friday, and you will find detailed instruction on the AMS elections website.

The AMS Code of Procedure requires that elections be over by the end of January. I asked Elections Administrator Brendan Piovesan why the campaign had been shortened this year. He said that by conducting informal chats with candidates from last years’ election, it was decided (note the infamous passive voice) that the extra week and longer campaign period was too big a time-drain on candidates, who suffered academically throughout almost the whole month of January. Fair enough. We’ll do our best to make the week and a half we have informative, fun, and debate-y.

The full list of elections dates and times are located behind the jump.

Forum: Tuesday, Jan. 15th
12:00 PM – 1:00 PM
SUB Conversation Pit

  • President
  • Board of Governors
  • VP Academic
  • VP External

Forum: Wednesday, Jan 16th CANCELED
5:00 PM – 6:00 PM
Place Vanier in the Shrum Lounge

  • Senate
  • VP Administration
  • VP Finance

Forum: Thursday, Jan 17th
12:00 PM – 1:00 PM
SUB Conversation Pit

  • President
  • VP Academic
  • VP Finance

Forum: Thursday, Jan 17th
5:00 PM – 6:00 PM
The Gallery Lounge

  • VP Administration
  • VP External

Form: Monday, Jan 21st
12:00 PM – 1:00 PM
SUB Conversation Pit

  • Board of Governors
  • Senate

Forum: Tuesday, Jan 22nd
11:00 PM – 1:00 PM
SUB Conversation Pit

  • President
  • VP Administration
  • VP Finance
  • VP External
  • VP Academic

Voting: January 18th – 22nd, inclusive
ONLINE BALLOTING
12:00.01 AM to 11:59.59 PM
Via the Elections Website (http://www.ams.ubc.ca/elections)

Voting: January 24th
PAPER BALLOTING
9:00 AM-5:00 PM
Various Locations Around Campus

Party: January 24th
5:00 PM to Late
The Gallery Pub
All Candidates, Friends and Well Wishers

Categories
News

The new AMS bulletin board: right here.

Seems like this here little blog is in some demand for plugging all and sundry AMS postings. Maybe we should start charging for them. Anyhoo, here’s two things y’alls might want to know about:

From VP Admin Sarah Naiman:

From AMS Executive Coordinator of Student Services (ECSS) Shagufta Pasta:

AMS EXECUTIVE COORDINATOR OF STUDENT SERVICES The AMS is seeking an Executive Coordinator of Student Services for a one-year appointment from March 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009. This position requires a full-time commitment
of about 35 hours per week. Remuneration for the year is $19,622 and is open to
all registered UBC students.

Position Description: The Executive Coordinator of Student Services is responsible for providing general supervision and guidance for the AMS Service Coordinators and their Assistant Coordinators in the effective operation of the AMS Services. The ECSS is also the main point person between the AMS Executives and AMS Services and participates as a non-voting member at the Council and Executive meetings. AMS Services include SafeWalk, SpeakEasy, Tutoring, Sexual Assault Support Centre, AMS Connect, Food Bank, Minischool, and Advocacy. Duties &

Responsibilities:

  • Oversee the management and administration of all AMS Student Services and facilitate the achievement of their goals in a team based and supportive environment.
  • Ensure effective internal and external communications and promotional campaigns for the various Services.
  • Act as the liaison between the AMS Executive Committee and the AMS Services.
  • Liaise with University Administration on behalf of AMS Services on initiatives,
    programming, and funding.
  • Participate in various committees, including the Executive Committee, Communications Planning Group, Safety Committee, and other duties as assigned from time to time.

Qualifications:

  • Demonstrated team building skills and experience
  • Comfortable and flexible in the role of mediator, initiator, and problem-solver
  • Strong communications and presentation skills and a sense of diplomacy
  • Supervisory/managerial skills with volunteers and employees an asset
  • Understanding of workplace safety and equity issues
  • Knowledge of the AMS services and resources

Only short-listed candidates will be
interviewed for this position. Interested applicants should submit their cover letter, with three references, no later than Friday, February 1, 2008 to: Bernie Peets, AMS General Manager gm@ams.ubc.ca . Include position title in subject.

Categories
AMS AMS Elections 2008 Student Politics

AMS All-Candidates meeting! And the nominees are:

The nominees for this years’ AMS elections are:

President:

Matthew Naylor
Michael Duncan
“Che” Allison
Erin Rennie
Rodrigo Ferrari-Nunes

VP Academic:

Rob McLean
Alex Lougheed
Nathan Crompton
Fire Hydrant Peets

VP External:

Freeman Poritz
Stefanie Ratjen

VP Finance:

Stash “Irish Courage” Bylicki
Andrew Forshner
Tim Monachello – Dropped out
Chris Diplock

VP Administration:

“scary” Mike “the rabbi” Kushnir
Sarah Naiman
Jonathan Yiannis Messoloras

Senate:

Colin Simkus
Rob McLean
Blake Frederick
Aidha Shaikh
Eileen Harder
Philip Edgcumbe
Azim Wazeer
Alex Lougheed
Alfie Lee

Board of Governors:

Timothy Blair
Andrew Carne
Bijan Ahmadian
Genevieve “Malt Likkah” Sweigard
Cris Marincat
Rodrigo Ferrari-Nunes

read how it all went down, behind the jump

Yesterday at 5:00, fifty or so people gathered for the Elections All-Candidates’ Meeting to find out just who they were running against in this year’s AMS elections race. They were almost disappointed. Contested in this elections race are all five AMS executive positions, two positions on the Board of Governors, and five positions on the UBC Senate.

Elections Administrator Brendan Piovesan presided shakily over the meeting (if it could really be called that). While a typical meeting of this sort marks the firm end of nominations, and consists of a formal introduction of the candidates to each other, followed by a thorough brief on elections rules and procedures, such formalities are evidently not Piovesan’s way. He essentially collected some candidates’ nomination forms, then opened the floor up to questions, then called the meeting to a close. Restlessness and confusion in the room visibly increased until a few people voiced their concern that the candidate lists had not been read out, and declared their willingness to wait until they were announced. The miffed elections administrator seemed surprised at these declarations, but obligingly went on to list the candidates off very quickly, (and with notably careless pronunciation).

People to note in (or not in) the list:

  • Colin Simkus, who withdrew his nomination from the VP finance race at the meeting, noting that commerce students had been concerned about a lack of selection for the finance position and asked him to run, but since “there was more selection than anticipated,” he no longer felt the necessity to do so. He remains in the race for Senate.
  • Sarah Naiman, the incumbant VP Admin, is also absent due to apparent technicalities, but likely to re-appear in the VP Admin race.
  • Fire Hydrant Peets, making a triumphant return
  • The five solitary women in this elections campaign, three of which fall into the “joke candidate” category.

Unlike last year, when inebriated CiTR DJ Maxwell Maxwell staggered into the room dressed as a pirate and decided to contest the presidential race on the spot, this year’s meeting was less exciting, though considerably more irate. Everyone seemed to be dressed normally, though certain candidates, like “Che” Allison (who wants his fist platform point to be noted as “fuck democracy”), Genevieve “Malt Likkah” Sweigard, and Stash “Irish Courage” Bylicki may be a note or two removed from utter seriousness.

Despite the slightly weird start to the elections campaign, it looks like several races will be interesting. I’m very happy to note the presence of numerous new and unfamiliar names. As students get to know the candidates, and they get to know the AMS, I hope what they find will be mutually worthy. Good luck to all the candidates, and campaign hard!

(photos courtesy of Peter Rizov)

Categories
BoG News Senate

Allan McEachern, Chancellor of UBC, dies at 81.


Allan McEachern, UBC’s chancellor passed away last night. No more details are available at this time. McEachern became UBC’s chancellor in 2002, and this year marked the end of his term. A UBC alumnus several times over, McEachern earned his Bachelor of Arts and his Law degree here. In 1990 he was awarded an honorary doctor of Laws degree.

Throughout a long and distinguished career both in legal practice, and as a judge, he was involved in many significant cases and handed down several landmark rulings, including one that denied aboriginal title to the Gitskan first nation, setting the precedent for aboriginal land settlements through government treaty processes, not the courts. McEachern served as the Chief Justice of both the B.C. Supreme Court, and the B.C. Appeal Court, the highest court in the province. Justice McEachern only retired from the bench in 2001 at 75, the next year accepting the appointment as UBC’s chancellor at the recommendation of the UBC Alumni Association.

May he rest in peace.

More on Allan McEachern’s life and career to follow from Tim.

Categories
AMS Elections 2008 BoG President

Candidate Questionnaire: Rodrigo Ferrari Nunes

Rodrigo is a candidate for both BoG and AMS President

Why do you want to be the BoG representative for students and President of the AMS?
First of all because I am proud of being a UBC student and alumni. My model of representation is participatory engagement with the implementation of a transparent structure for governing AMS and serving students responsibly according to their own demands.

One idea we are considering for the transparent budget is the following:
-Students log in to SSC or AMS link, and can access the ‘services’ webpage. To ensure presidential and executive responsibility, transparency and accountability, students will allocate a portion of their AMS fees into particular services, projects, and decisions.

-Agenda items will be posted online by AMS councillors, committees, and execs, as well as clubs; these posts will be all time-stamped and will be subsequently categorized by the president as soon as received.

-The president will then select agenda items and post the agenda before hand online, where all councillors and constituents will be informed of upcoming items and solicited to post comments and suggestions by all UBC students.

-This will create a large accumulative database of engaged student discourse, time stamped and linked to specific individuals. A solution to apathy is the production of online polls for each agenda item and the circulation of paper ballots by AMS councillors between each cycle. This will provide the student body with valuable information on student needs without restrictions.

-Duncan is cited on the Knoll, which endorses my campaign, saying that he wants to hold round-table discussions with student ‘leaders’. The very idea of putting in a separate category ‘student leaders’ and ‘non-student leaders’ marginalizes 90% or more of potential student discourse and ‘discussion’.

As AMS President, I will engage professors in all departments to suggest projects centered on understanding UBC and making it am even better place. Professors should allow and encourage academic projects focused on the UBC campus, its services, facilities, activities, and so on.

How would you use your position on BoG to enhance students’ voice on campus?
I will communicate extensively with not only UBC students, media, faculty, and staff, but also Student organizations from other universities and media sources around the world. The will ensure, through external pressure, that the Board of Governors serves student needs by being directly and constantly informed by them (e.g., through dynamic blogging of committees and agenda items, the AMS budget and student service choices). Communication with outside student associations and media outlets will transmit our issues far and wide, and elicit public responses that constraints the university from making terrible decisions (e.g., underground diesel bus loop) without being subjected to extensive critique.

What specific changes to the University Boulevard project would you advocate?
If possible its immediate halting due to reported warnings by Translink itself that it is not large enough. The galleries that are being excavated on indigenous lands now despite extensive and concerted student protest and loud criticism, could be transformed in a feature of Trek Park, endorsed officially by David Suzuki, and destroyed by the UBC administration without warning.

What experience(s) and skills do you have that will enable you to convince the Board appointees that your point of view is preferable to theirs?
I am a UBC alumni with a double major (2006), a Master Student and a Teaching Assistant. I am also older than most of the other candidates (30 years old- born in 1977)I have always been an International Student at UBC. I am officially endorsed by the Knoll newspaper, which endorsed the current AMS president’s campaign last year. I have extensive training in social sciences, and languages (Portuguese, English, Italian, Spanish, German [Recipient of the German Government Book Prize], Classical Latin [average 84 in 24 credits], and Classical Greek. Now passionate, I was once also apathetic, and by studying through participatory engagement the AMS and GSS Councils, and most importantly, the differences between them, I am now in a position to understand and to engage with apathetic students. Thence my resolution of attending different classes throughout my term, in several departments, to engage students directly and to experience the kind of education they are getting. My knowledge of languages and cross-cultural experiences allow me to represent International Students. I am not an AMS ‘hack’ and I am passionate about serving student needs.

What is your vision for the governance model of UBC?
In one phrase: Transparent, engaging, responsible, responsive, participatory and collaborative.

Categories
AMS Elections 2008 President

Candidate Questionnaire: Mike Duncan

Mike Duncan is a candidate for AMS President. Here are his answers.

Why do you want to be the president of the AMS?
I am a very strong supporter of campus engagement. The AMS quite simply has not done an acceptable job engaging the broader campus community. I believe my skill set and the experience I bring to the position can change this. The time where we only listen to a small set of AMS hacks needs to end.

Vancouver is one of the most active and involved cities in the World. We are praised for this fact. Despite this, we still do not have a free gym and intramural fees are absurdly expensive. In order to have a healthy lifestyle, recreation is essential. I will ensure that we engage with UBC Athletics and use the new SUB Renew process to help remedy this fact and help make staying healthy and active an easy thing to do on a student budget.

Finally, I would like to draw your attention to the wall of my facebook site. The first post on there is from a first year student that I really don’t know that well. She took it upon herself to join my group without an invite and write a post on the wall stating how I impacted her on her first day here at UBC, how she was amazed that, despite the craziness of the first day of term, I was still able to take the time to talk to her about how to get involved. It is people like that, people who you impact in your life, that really make me want to be AMS President. That is the reason I am involved.

What personal skills and experiences could you bring to the portfolio?
Where I differ from many other AMS candidates, and many other AMS Presidents throughout past years, is the broad range of experience I bring to the portfolio. I have led teams in the Science Undergraduate Society, in the UBC Aqua Society, in UBC Orientations, and in intramural sports. I haven’t just participated in these activities, but have led these different teams to do great things. Using my teambuilding and leadership skills I have made a great difference in all these above groups, especially the Science Undergraduate Society. I have had to learn how to deal with such a wide variety of teams that I can guarantee that I am well suited to lead the incoming AMS executive team to do great things for the Society.

If there was one thing you could change about the AMS what would it be?
I would change the way we deal with our clubs. Our clubs see us as a burden, not a benefit. Sarah and Brittany have definitely improved how we do this throughout the past year, but more can be done. Right now it is difficult to find clubs, and even more difficult to join them. I would make it easy for clubs to collaborate with us to improve their promotion. I would make a second Clubs Days and in general, dedicate more of the main concourse time to AMS clubs instead of outside vendors. I would also take the current events calendar and make it something the clubs are dying to put their events onto. I would make it a real promotion tool.

How would you be a good leader of the Executive team?
Please see my question regarding what skills I bring to the portfolio.

How will you manage the organization internally given the transition of the General Manager and many permanent staff this year?
The GM and permanent staff that are leaving us this year deserve to be applauded. They have done an amazing job helping our society. Their transition marks an opportunity for some great change in the society. 13 years ago, the AMS hired an independent company to do a review of the society and suggest many things that were not efficient and could be modified. I will look into the feasibility of hiring a company to do this for us again. Even if it isn’t feasible, I will still ensure that we use this opportunity to strategically look at our framework, and to introduce parts of the strategic framework into our society.

What structural changes do you think would make council and committees more effective and cohesive in the organization?
The strategic framework has many recommendations for change capable in our society. Most importantly, it is imperative that we are not standing still just for the sake of standing still. Some reorganization of executive duties needs to take place, especially those regarding the VP External and VP Academic and University affairs. I will also work to empower council more. People don’t work well when everything they do is handed down to them from the top. I will work to ensure council members can take on their own initiatives and set their own goals to help improve the society and what we do.

How will you make the AMS known, relevant, and an attractive place for involvement for all students?
To start, it is important that we make the AMS known. Once it is better known, the rest will fall into place. I believe that to make the AMS known, you need to make it relevant. If we fight for the important issues to students then they will start to see how we are important. I will set up a UBC Roundtable twice a term where we invite campus leaders from across campus to come and discuss current issues that are affecting them. I will also continue the work Jeff has done with AMS Connect to help improve how people get involved with our society. One of the best ways to attain and retain volunteers is to acknowledge their efforts. It doesn’t have to be much, but the sum of many little acknowledgements and benefits can make the difference for many involved students.

Jeff’s role as a governor on the BoG and President seemed effective in giving students a voice. How would manage your relationship with UBC decision makers?
I will most certainly get some criticism for my view regarding UBC decision makers. Many students believe that the only way to deal with UBC Administration is to ‘stick it to the man’. I would approach the situation in a forceful, but respectful way. Students are a force to be reckoned with, but we can’t go into every meeting shouting our heads off because they will learn to ignore us. I still believe we need to be forceful, and to push hard and strong for the change we want to see, but I believe the way to do that is through mutual respect and collaboration.

How would you implement the AMS Strategic Framework?
Inherently, change is difficult for people to accept. We see that with UBC Administration, but we also see that within our own framework. The AMS strategic framework has some very important aspects to it, but I don’t see it ever passing through council in one lump sum. [note: the AMS Strategic Framework passed through council two years ago – Ed.] In order to improve the society, I will select certain important sections of the strategic framework and ensure they get passed. We do need to make progress with this, and this year is a unique opportunity because of the large turnover and the resulting change in ideals. Finally, I will also ensure that any framework that is to be implemented goes through the proper consultation to ensure that council members understand how they are improving their society.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet