VFM launches at SFU

Posted by: | March 7, 2008 | 3 Comments

In my life, there’s always time to kill. And now I have a fresh method of doing it. Mark Latham has begun sponsoring a Voter Funded Media contest of a slightly different stripe over at SFU. Take a look at the SFU VFM page HERE. The idea is broadly the same as VFM here at UBC, but instead of being a one-off coinciding with the student society elections period, prizes are instead being distributed on a monthly cycle of continuous voting. The prizes are $300-$500 per month, which will add up to around $5000 in a year (compare to UBC’s contest which had a prize pool of $8000 for a whole year, given out all at once). Votes are calculated using the interpolated consensus method that we used here at UBC this year.

(Note to newer readers: VFM is the media contest that birthed this blog. According to Latham whose brainchild it is, rewarding media democratically from the public purse will improve democracy. For a previous posts discussing VFM, take a look here, here, here, and here. )

Another interesting difference is that the SFU contest is administered by Latham himself, not the Simon Fraser Student Society, which is equivalent to our AMS. This is interesting to note, because though one would think that having the institutional and organizational support of the student society behind such a project would be a boon, this year’s contest at UBC was magnificently botched by the AMS, both on the political and bureaucratic side. Not surprisingly, Latham has managed to run things smoothly at SFU so far.

The continuous monthly model maps much more closely to the ultimate goals of VFM: providing long-term, in-depth media which are accountable to their readers through a democratic reward process. SFU certainly has a smorgasbord of contentious issues to deal with at this moment, with their SSFS elections and referendum to defederate from CFS, the national lobby they are a member of. Media outlets could certainly provide a valuable service to the SFU community by providing some insight on these issues, and make a buck into the bargain.

All this is to not say that the SFU contest is anywhere near effective. So far, it seems to be marginal in both content and readership. The SFU campus radio station has entered, which I think is a brainwave (hint hint, CiTR), and one or two of the blogs have some content worth reading. Nobody seems to be trying very hard at this point. But these things take time to build momentum, and it seems almost stochastic whether such an idea will catch or not.

The question is, how much of a future does VFM really have? If Mark continues to encounter tepid half-successes, how long can he be expected to fund these experiments? And if he stops before the value has been unequivocally demonstrated through a jump in voter turnout or irrefutable data (which the AMS has yet to collect through exit polls. *strangle strangle*) would student societies be inclined to fund such innovations themselves? According to Jeff Friedrich, the incumbent AMS President, probably not. He told me in a meeting last year, that to him these projects are bonuses, and not as essential as making the AMS democracy itself run well through systemic reform in the AMS structure which has yet to be achieved. To me, innovative democratic projects like VFM (or a students’ assembly) should be looked at separately from improving the AMS democratic and organizational structure. We shouldn’t shy away from investing time and money in either.

For now though, Mark is still willing to pick up the tab. And UBC may soon be transitioning to the continuous model itself. A proposal for this just went up today on the VoterMedia.org website – take a look.


3 Comments so far

  1. Anonymous on March 7, 2008 6:28 am


    Not so much a bonus as an easy decision to date. As soon as the AMS needs to pay >$10k for the contest, VFM has be judged on how much benefit it brings back to the AMS, and I guess I’ve always been a bit suspicious that it’s worth that dollar figure- just my view, not an AMS view.

    There’s nothing stopping the pursuit of VFM or other efforts in addition to internal governance reforms though(but it should be recognized that there is a cost to council’s time that effects its ability to address its other priorities). At the end of the day VFM still has to prove itself as a worthwhile investment.

    Also- despite our own AMS shortcomings, this is a new theory and we are early adopters. You’re unlikely to get to point where the benefits are perfectly clear (we’re a small sample population in an experiment). Council will face a decision, in continuing, that won’t be dissimilar from lots of start-up businesses- how long do you pour money in without seeing a return.


  2. Anonymous on March 8, 2008 6:22 am

    The new proposal looks a lot better than the mess we ran into during the last two elections.

  3. Mark Latham on March 9, 2008 1:40 am

    Thanks Maayan for covering SFU VFM – we need the publicity! A couple of details: the voting system (outlined at http://www.votermedia.org/sfu) is different from interpolated consensus; and the March award pool is $600.

    I appreciate and encourage a full range of frank opinion and advice about VFM.  Sorry I didn’t see your poll before it closed.  I would have voted “yes. it needs to be changed though.” – so I’m proposing a new year-round system for UBC.

Name (required)

Email (required)


Speak your mind

Spam prevention powered by Akismet