Category Archives: Reflections

A new chapter

Tired, nervous, excited, and hungry… I’m sitting in the Toronto airport about to return home to Vancouver after a whirlwind 24 hour stopover! I have spent the full day today meeting with the developing and sponsoring editors of my textbook. That’s right! I’m adapting a textbook! Specifically, I’m adapting Cozby’s Methods in Behavioural Research (currently in its 10th edition) for the first Canadian edition of this text. This is what we use for our Psyc 217 Research Methods courses at UBC.

Wow! I never thought I’d be writing a textbook… at least not so early in my career. But the opportunity presented itself, and I’m never one to pass on a chance to challenge myself and grow my skill set. Recently I have been feeling pretty nervous about the whole thing, including a touch regretful at the thought of the time committment that’s going to be involved. But after today’s meetings, during which we went through each chapter’s key needed revisions, the whole thing is feeling much more do-able. Still a lot of work, but manageable. Kim & Jen (the editors mentioned above) did a great job assuring me I needn’t change everything this round. The most important tasks are updating examples (featuring Canadian research where it makes sense to do so),  and clarifying the writing. And it all relates back to my Research Methods course… so time spent on this book is time spent developing my thinking and knowledge base for that course.

Students: are you interested? I’ll be developing this text over the next year and a half, and I would *love* to have student input on how I can make this text better for the next generations of Psyc 217 students! If you’re interested in contributing your ideas and feedback about this text – particularly if you’ve already taken the course with me – please get in touch with me!

Psyc 217 Poster Session!

Last Friday evening (November 26), 550 Psyc 217 (Research Methods) students showcased their hard work designing and conducting research throughout this term in a poster session. It was a fabulous event with many students reporting a rich learning experience… and that it was fun to see what everyone else had come up with!

Many thanks to Eric Eich, who committed financial support from the department to make this happen, to the Life Sciences Institute for allowing us to book their space, to my fellow 217 instructor and poster session co-coordinator Colleen Brenner, additional 217 instructors Victoria Savalei and Rajiv Jhangiani, and all dozen Teaching Fellows for their support and dedication to making this a success. And, of course, to our hard-working, impressive students! It was a pleasure to see your work!

BodyWorlds Field Trip!

Last night 37 of my fabulous Intro Psych Section 6 students joined me in an exploration of the brain and body at World of Science’s Body Worlds exhibit. We were able to see in real size many of the structures we’ve been exploring in class, including the structures of the inner ear, and brain parts including the corpus callosum, thalamus, and hippocampus. After looking so often at magnified, stylized, colour-coded versions of these brain strutures it was amazing to be reminded of just how small and unimpressive the structures appear — despite their incredible capacities. There were some great posters on display throughout the exhibit that discussed the neuronal communication process, and what we know about the brain’s influence in creativity, sleep, personality, love… and so on.

Here’s me and some of my students as we were leaving the exhibit area (unfortunately no pics are allowed inside).

What students were saying:

It really helped me visualize everything we were talking about in class.

By being able to see the actual thing [e.g., the cochlea] it is easier to picture. Seeing a diagram is one thing, but the actual structure adds another level.

This field trip helped me to understand more about the thalamus and the neurons.

Reflecting on teaching, broadly

An upcoming Teaching Fellows meeting has prompted me to reflect, yet again, on my assumptions and beliefs about teaching and learning. Our topic this week is lesson planning, and I selected both a pragmatic, nuts-and-bolts kind of lesson plan to consider, as well as a paper by Dan Pratt summarizing his work on the five perspectives of good teaching. It’s been a year or so since I last considered the teaching perspectives with respect to my own teaching. What strikes me the most this time around is the distinction between what I believe and what I (and my students) do in the classroom. I encourage students to take an active role in our lessons, and to do so I include a variety of activities including clicker questions, think-pair-share exercises, demonstrations, research projects, opportunities for students to draw diagrams and summarize what they’re learning (e.g., take-home messages). But when it comes down to it, I’m talking a lot of the time. While lecturing I try to connect material to examples, organize the material in new ways, elaborate or clarify some concepts to supplement deficiencies in texts, and so on. I also try to convey my enthusiasm and curiosity for the material. All of this seems more closely aligned with the transmission perspective. I try to take a variety of approaches as often as possible.

What I believe is that learners need to engage with the material and make it relevant to their lives. I also have high expectations for what my learners can do on their own: They’re intelligent people, so for me to package everything they need to know neatly, hand it to them, and ask for it back the same way (in the form of tests), would be an insult to that. Moreover, they need to be able to work with knowledge, package it for themselves, and find answers (or at least insight) on their own. I won’t be there to do it for them. But none of this is new… (see my philosophy).

What I’m considering is the extent to which my actions align with my beliefs (and vice versa). When I think of improving, who is that teacher I want to become? Do I want to become even more aligned with the developmental perspective? If so, what does excellence look like from a developmental perspective? In a class with one- or two- or three-hundred students? Once I figure out what excellence looks like, how do I achieve that excellence?

Looking for study tips?

Some well-researched sources have been in the news lately. Check them out!

9 evidence-based study tips from the British Psychology Journal blog

Forget what you know about good study habits from the New York Times

Let me know if they’re helpful!