Category Archives: Reflections

My Fall 2013 Syllabi

Check out my Fall 2013 syllabi! After spending a lot of time thinking about these courses this summer, I’m excited to share my new syllabi. Psyc 217 features heavily revised Course Goals, new supplemental readings, and a References section listing research that I used to make decisions about this course (e.g., design, policies). Psyc 101 features revised Course Goals and new regular small writing assignments to replace a paper I assigned in years past. I also developed a graphic to help explain the new short writing assignment process.

Psyc 101 Section 005

  • MWF 12-1pm in CIRS 1250
  • 360 students
  • Teaching Assistants: Sara Knauft and Stef Bourrier

Psyc 217 Research Methods Sections 001 and 002

  • MWF 9-10am (Section 1) and 10-11am (Section 2)
  • 92 students per section
  • Teaching Fellows: Allison Brennan, Julia Kam, Jennifer Lay, and Eleni Nasiopolous

See you at Orientations and Imagine on Tuesday, and in class on Wednesday!

Thoughts on the Value of an Arts Degree

This afternoon I attended a program and reception welcoming our international students (here early for Jumpstart) to the Faculty of Arts. One of our International Academic Advisors, Robert Tudhope, organized this event and I’m delighted that he invited me to speak at it, along with a current student and three faculty colleagues. My talk went something like this…

*******************

My name is Dr. Catherine Rawn, and here are some of my thoughts on the value of earning a degree in the Faculty of Arts. I have an undergraduate degree from the University of Waterloo in Ontario, a master’s degree, and a PhD both from UBC. I now teach here in the Psychology Department. All of my degrees have pretty much the same specialization: Psychology. And I’m proud to say they’re all from Arts. Every aspect of my life has been influenced by my Arts degrees. My bachelor’s degree in particular had a profound impact on my entire life trajectory. I wasn’t bound my history anymore. I created the foundation of a future on my own terms—a future I am now living. It is this opportunity for drastic life changes that excites me most about a degree in Arts.

Collect.

In my opinion, one of the most important features that makes an Arts degree valuable is the opportunity to collect.

We get to spend four (or five) years taking classes, collecting different perspectives and ways of understanding the world around us. By studying Arts courses, I learned to use those perspectives to look inward and to call myself on my own prejudices and assumptions, so I can continually strive to be better. (My one regret from undergrad is that I didn’t collect even more different perspectives than I did… so I’m fixing that now by taking a course every now and then, and by collaborating with faculty from different disciplines.)

We get to collect people. For me, and maybe for you, I had friends in high school, but they weren’t really my people. They didn’t really get me. They weren’t interested in the things I was really interested in. It wasn’t until my Arts degrees that I found friends with common interests who would accept me, while challenging me to grow. As I learned to let myself get excited about learning, I met fascinating people who were also ok with getting excited about learning. It is the people I collected during my Arts degrees—not in high school—who I still call friends after more than a decade (and one of them, I also call my husband).

We get to collect experience that’s relevant for the working world… even though it might not be pre-packaged in that way. By taking courses in Arts, we get to collect a vast array of skills, including teamwork, writing, how to learn a lot… and quickly, how to ask questions and seek answers, speaking, thinking, research, video editing, (statistical) reasoning, social media management, club management, event planning, and the list goes on. These are all skills we can take into the working world, regardless of the exact content that we’re studying.

The challenge for you, then, is to set yourself up to collect the skill set you’re going to want to leave UBC with. This thought leads me to my next point…

Build.

When choosing among the vast number of courses and specializations in Arts, we decide which of those perspectives we’re going to keep building and cultivating in our collection, which we’re going to discard entirely, and which we’re going to let sit dormant, potentially ready to influence our thoughts some day in the future. We get to take all of those skills and ideas and connections we’ve collected and we get to mold them into a career however we want to. We might even create that career, it might not even exist yet.

In some fields, perhaps engineering or business or nursing, education is pre-packaged for one career. In Arts, each of us builds our own package. We curate and then showcase the collections we’ve acquired over the last four years, and we do all that on our own terms.

The way I see it, the right question for an Arts student choosing courses isn’t “what can I do with a degree in X?” I urge you to consider instead, “will this major/course/club/research assistantship/Go Global opportunity… help me to develop a skill set or perspective I want to collect, in a topic I find somewhat interesting?” Build your own collection, on your own terms.

So, what’s the value of an Arts degree? For me, it comes down to opportunity. Coming out of high school, I was just a kid from the low-class neighbourhood of a small city who had “potential”. None of my close family members had ever been to university before and I had no idea what opportunities awaited me. Carefully, I charted new territory, built my own collection. My undergraduate degree changed my life. Your life is about to change, too.

I urge you to start now: collecting perspectives, collecting people, collecting skills. I think that we—in Arts—have the richest opportunity of anyone else on campus to build our own unique and exciting and marketable collections. Welcome to the Faculty of Arts. What collection will you build?

*******************

On Being a Student Again

Last fall I decided, with the instructor’s permission, to enroll in Psyc 312A History of Psychology (see an earlier post on it here). It had been quite a few years since I sat facing the board rather than facing the classroom, and I wanted to re-cultivate my empathy for students in my classrooms. I chose History of Psychology because it was one of those courses I didn’t have to take when I was an undergrad, but now that I am teaching broad courses like Introduction to Psychology and Research Methods, I find myself increasingly interested in the breadth of our discipline. My educational trajectory was, I believe, rather common: as I moved through my three degrees, what I studied narrowed at each stage until I produced a 200+ page dissertation that addressed one single question from one tiny subtopic (self-control) from one subarea (the self) from one subfield (social psychology) of my discipline. When I started teaching Intro after that, the shift to thinking about the entire discipline was a rough one. Yet I believe that challenge has made me a more thorough, curious scholar. And the experience certainly made me more interested in the roots of our discipline.

I attended each lecture and took copious notes (as was my usual method as a student), I typed my class notes after each class (as usual), I read all the chapters and took copious notes (as usual). I adjusted how I studied for exams by emphasizing empirically-supported techniques self-quizzing and concept-mapping methods that integrated both text and class notes, which I did a bit of before. I dropped what research has shown doesn’t work well for long-term retention (and what I used to emphasize at one point): rote memorization and rewriting. I wrote the exams and the paper, because research shows that testing is much more effective than simply studying knowledge if I wanted to remember it… so why waste my time on auditing? Of course, I was teaching three classes and doing all the other things I do that in my work. I definitely felt the intensity and pressure of upcoming deadlines and balancing my own study time with my primary responsibility — my students!

One of the experiences that surprised me the most was how much I enjoyed writing the paper. Dr. Perrino (Andrea) offered the option for us to research an historical figure in psychology and write the paper as a compare and contrast with our own lives. What a fascinating experience! I couldn’t help but wonder how my fellow students approached this exercise; as someone whose career is devoted to psychology, I imagine I had a distinctly different experience set from which to draw. In any case, I offer my paper for you to read, if you’re interested. I cut out some of the personal details, but left in most. I compared my life to that of Mary Whiton Calkins (1863-1930), the first female American Psychological Association President.

Disclaimer: Please note that by posting this paper, I am by no means offering an example of a typical paper for that class. If you’re taking Psyc 312A this year, I highly advise against using this paper as a model for your own, for reasons expressed above.

I gave a talk, and here are the resources

I’m at the Vancouver International Conference on the Teaching of Psychology, and I’m giving a talk entitled, “Using integrated course design principles to promote meaningful learning in an innovative applied social psychology course.”

Here are some related resources:

My powerpoint slides

2012/2013 course syllabus and team assignment

Reflections on my student evaluations from 2012/2013

Fink’s Self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning

Fink’s Creating significant learning experiences

Team Based Learning resources, including books, sample syllabi, videos, etc

Student Evaluations of Teaching 2012/2013: Part 3 Special Topics Psyc 208

Thank you to each of my students who took the time to complete a student evaluation of teaching this year. I value hearing from each of you, and every year your feedback helps me to become a better teacher. As I explained here, I’m writing reflections on the qualitative and quantitative feedback I received from each of my courses.

Psych 208: Special Topics

Overall, I thought this course was pretty smooth. Over the past four years I’ve developed a clearer vision for what this course is (see the syllabus), and I think that’s reflected in greater coherence, greater integration across in-class teaching methods, content, and learning objectives. Learning appraisals are in decent shape (although could probably use some refreshment in the coming year). As I have matured, I have matured this course.

After such self-assessment, I was pleased to note that students rated this course more positively than any previous iteration, right on par with my other more traditional courses (check out the quantitative data here). Reading the qualitative evaluations was almost overwhelming. Student after student noted how useful this course was, how much they applied these concepts to their everyday life, how they built skills they’d take with them into future courses and their careers. I am absolutely blown away by what people said about this course. When I first envisioned this course, I wanted it to be useful. So much of psychology (particularly social psychology) can improve our lives, and that’s exactly what I dreamed this course would help people do: apply our amazing research to improve their lives. To that end, numerous students wrote things like,

I found myself always referencing the course subject matter to my friends and applying it within my own life”, “this has been one of the most beneficial classes of my university career,” and “this will be one of those courses that I look back on knowing that it was a good use of my time” – even if they noted they were about to graduate.

All of this positivity was despite (or because of?) the extent to which this course challenged students in various ways (e.g., “not an easy A”) yet was perceived as valuable (e.g., “the course project on group work is such a valuable skill that students need”).  The usefulness of our course material got through to these students, and I’m absolutely thrilled!

Given these positive comments, I think it’s worthwhile to note that as I’ve matured (with) this course, there’s one key tweak I made in 2012 that I emphasized even more in 2013. During the first week, I am very explicit about the collaborative, applied, interactive nature of this course. I invite people to explore with me some ways of learning that are, for some people, uncomfortable and new. I also invite people who aren’t up for such exploration at this time to choose a different section or course, with no hard feelings. Along with better development of the curriculum and assessments, I think this tweak goes a long way toward student-course-instructor fit.

One area for growth that was noted a few times in the qualitative data was lack of clarity about learning assessment requirements. In my view, the handouts and LOs I give to students pretty clearly map on to my rubrics and exams. But there’s obviously a disconnect: a small yet larger proportion of students than in any of my other courses report lack of clarity for what to expect from grading. Moreover, my “fairness of evaluations” rating was the only UMI across all my 2012/2013 courses to fall below 4 out of 5. To remedy this disconnect, I have a couple of ideas: First, I will consider giving—up front—my rubrics for all components to the assignment. A couple of students suggested this, and I think it will help. Second, I will consider ways to give more advice for the exams, especially the midterm. One option would be to give a list of the short answer questions, a subset of which will appear on the exam (will this increase learning? If so, great! Will this increase the mean and/or reduce variance? If so, stress!).

[One of the challenges that I face (that’s not exactly popular with students, in my experience) is that attempts to change anything to do with grading run this risk of inflating the mean and/or changing the distribution of grades. Like all faculty in my department, I am bound by departmental requirements to have a mean around 65% and a standard deviation around 14% in all 100 and 200 level courses. Therefore, interventions that increase the mean or shrink the SD present real concerns that force me to confront this reality: any improvement in clarity might simultaneously require an increase in difficulty.]

Quite a few students mentioned enjoying the readings from one book, but finding the book that drew from a sport psychology perspective a bit less helpful and/or easily applied to academic life. Many of the readings will change in 2013/2014, largely because many of the chapters I currently rely on are out-of-date and must be changed anyway. Therefore, it’s a great opportunity to re-think the whole set of readings. I will be making every effort to get the custom course-pack down to one publisher, ideally with less of an emphasis on sport. Given the current offerings I’ve seen, I think that’s possible. I’ll also be thoughtfully considering the length of readings, as a (small) group of students mentioned feeling like there was too much to read.

Overall, in my view and the students’, this offering was the most successful iteration of Psyc 208 to date!