This post is part of a series beginning with Tales of a Sabbatical: On Becoming a Student of Drawing, Part 1. For February and March 2026, I was a student in CDSR 100 Introduction to Drawing (Continuing Studies) at Emily Carr University of Art and Design. Throughout, I kept and analyzed a journal, in preparation for a Scholarly Personal Narrative (Ng & Carney, 2017) paper. The question guiding my research is: What are my lived experiences of being a student in a new (to me) discipline? I have posted part of my preparation, three attempts at narrative portraits (Rodríguez-Dorans & Jacobs, 2020) with reflection in the style of Brookfield (2017, Chapter 9). See
- On Becoming a Student of Drawing, Part 2: Emotional Beginnings
- On Becoming a Student of Drawing, Part 3: Practice for Purpose
- On Becoming a Student of Drawing, Part 4: I don’t like what I don’t practice
As I close this series, I will share my journal reflections from after our last class. First, I wanted to include a panel series of landscapes from Class #7. This series took me the entire 3h class period, and triggered in me an appreciation for repetition of images that speak to my heart. It’s a practice I have continued. This scene is a photograph I took standing on the footpath along Highway 3 in Osoyoos BC, looking South toward the US. It’s one of my favourite views.

Class #7: Practicing landscape with four mediums. Clockwise rom top left: compressed charcoal, conte, pen and marker, India ink (yes, India ink!).
“Which may be a nice place to segue into overall impressions of what I’ve learned about myself as a student. My goal was to connect my heart to my students, to increase empathy for learning. Learning is, at least for me, emotional. Deciding to attempt to learn something means acknowledging that there is something in me that could be more or different… it means being open to transformation. I couldn’t learn to draw without learning to focus my attention (on a line or shape or relationship), to see (a line or shape or relationship), to move my body (in a particular way using a particular tool) in new ways, to persist when things felt hard. I needed patience, got annoyed, unmotivated, extra-motivated, frustrated, joyful, inspired, surprised… all the feels! But that’s learning. I felt vulnerable — I had to acknowledge I didn’t know something, and lean into it anyway. To push through the discouragement when it didn’t feel I was making progress, and celebrate the littlest of wins.
Learning in class was essential to my sustained motivation and learning, especially through periods of discouragement. I learned more in community because I learned from my neighbours who had different past experience and goals than I did. They also pointed out strengths I didn’t see myself, and helped me celebrate the little wins (including ones I would have been too hard on myself to admit). And they used materials, made marks differently — their techniques were different and I could learn from them. The curriculum also exposed me to things I never would have accessed before, especially the gift of live human models! Which was a revelation that led me to try mirror self-portraits (vs. photos), and plan for en plen air landscapes.
I now look differently at the world sometimes because I’m thinking about the shadow or the lines or how on earth one could make that thing look 3D in 2D. I wonder in different ways, about different things. But practicing art as a place to feel, even through technique drills or repetition… perhaps even because of technique drills and repetition… this is a revelation to me. It feels like drawing, art, could be prayerful. That intimacy with creation, taking it in through my senses, transforming it through soul and then letting it move through me onto the page… just the idea leaves me feeling a sense of awe. And now that my art is just for me and for God, really… this learning is transformative in a way that anything I teach couldn’t be. At least I don’t think so.
Except it did transform me, to learn the scientific method as applied to humans, didn’t it. To learn how to see a complex human behaviour, and somehow come up with a way to distill it, try to capture it in a measurement, transform a human experience into numerical form, to patch it together in a story that tells us something about human beingness that wasn’t quite known before. I did learn to focus my attention, to see, to move my body (if learning software and calculations counts!), and to persist when things felt hard. It’s not as poetic, sure, and the results aren’t as pretty… but sometimes they are. And I guess that’s true for art too….
In art class, there were drills to “just” be able to use the tools and learn to see. That was transformative in a technical way. I felt more profound transformation when my art (drills/work) was engaging a subject matter I cared about or couldn’t help but care about: a human subject, my own image, a landscape I’d photographed. My heart, my emotions, my motivation increased – somehow those marks now mattered more. I was being transformed. Today I’m thinking about the intent of art… when it is intended to transform not just oneself (or lesser still to showcase one’s skills) but to transform those who receive it.. that’s what makes a piece (I think!) impactful. Or maybe one makes art to transform self, and if others are transformed, great, if not, great (Liz Gilbert’s Big Magic). Yet this is the (heart? dance?) art of teaching – we are called to create, to transform ourselves (to learn to apply tools) with full intent to transform others. Because learning is transformative in some way (even a little) or it’s not learning at all.
Hunh. More to explore here, that’s for sure. Research. Teaching. Art. It’s all creating something by observing and transforming those observations.”
Epilogue
The next day, my friend Lesley sent me this quote:
“A person who works with their hands is a laborer; a person who works with their hands and mind is a craftsperson; but a person who works with hands, mind, and heart is an artist.”
I’ve looked it up and although it’s widely attributed to St. Francis of Assisi there’s no evidence for that. Instead, looks like Louis Nizer wrote it (or similar) in 1948. Whoever said it, this progression captures how I feel about teaching these days, at this stage in my career. The realization of the fittingness of this analogy was made possible through this art class because it gave me such vivid experience of the interconnected movements of hand, mind, heart.
I am deeply grateful to the Instructor, to all my fellow students in CDSR 100, especially my closest neighbours, and to my encouraging family and friends (especially RAB and CER). And of course, I remain grateful for this spacious time of sabbatical, so I could rediscover the transformative heart of teaching and learning. It turns out transformation has always been central to my teaching philosophy. Yet I see it through new eyes.
Follow







