On the question of ads in RSS feeds

<a title=”CogDogBlog

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Tags (and Northern Voice) get some love from a Hogtown rag

How cool… Vancouver-based supergenius Alexandra Samuel (I gotta meet this person!) has published a piece intended to render the “tagging phenomenon both accessible and meaningful to a general audience” in one of Canada’s biggest newspapers (free registration may be required).

Patrice Neff is a software developer based in Switzerland who uses del.icio.us to share links with a partner on a shared development project. And Cyprien Lomas, an academic technology expert at the faculty of agriculture at the University of British Columbia, uses del.icio.us tags to reconnect with colleagues in the tech field.

These early experiments reveal the pent-up demand for simple tools to support online collaboration. But they also reveal how tagging unlocks the gateway between information and community. By allowing people to share information effectively, tags create and support a growing number of online communities. And by bringing communities together around common interests, tags add value to the information those communities gather.

Del.icio.us isn

Posted in Textuality | 1 Comment

Feedback loop: a podcast resource weblog…

As a cumulative assessment project for one of my Office’s co-op work-placement students, I asked Frank Pan to develop a weblog/resource to support personal audio production and podcasting. As usual, I was pretty vague in my instructions to him (in my experience, cutting the younger set loose prompts wonderful surprises). I told him I wanted a home for our efforts in this area, a collection of resources and tutorials (appropriate reuse was fine), and a launch pad for RSS enclosures for podcasts. The intended audience is educators at UBC (and beyond) who are hearing the buzz and are looking for help to get sonic.

The version I am to evaluate can be found at: http://careo.elearning.ubc.ca/weblogs/audio/

I am far from an expert in this area, so if anyone has feedback or suggestions (which can directed to myself or to Frank) they would be appreciated. I should note that I have been very pleased with Frank’s efforts this term, and that will be reflected in my evaluation — people need not worry about screwing with an eager young student’s grade by offering some constructive criticism.

Posted in Webloggia | Comments Off on Feedback loop: a podcast resource weblog…

No reflection please…

I’ve been back for four days now, and I’m still enjoying the rush I got attending the Faculty Academy at the University of Mary Washington. I need to post something to at least briefly capture some of the observations and provocations from the event — but now is not that time. I was away from the regular day-to-day for nearly a full working week, and working life goes on and on, even when you wish it would take a break. Now I’m backed into more corners than an Escher sketch (or is that Escher-etch-a-sketch)… So I hope a Hee-Haw style Saaaa–lute! sent over to the many smart, hospitable and generous people who made my time in Virginia so memorable will do for the next few days.

In the meantime, I will be observing a limit on time spent browsing feeds and posting entries. Superficiality Regulations will be strictly enforced. Stop me before I sub-reference again.

Posted in Abject Learning | 3 Comments

On the futility of (me) conference blogging…

[Reporting semi-live from the UMW Faculty Academy…]

I am a terrible conference blogger. But textual silence is not indicative of a lack of interest on my part… quite the opposite. I’ve been having a blast through most of the sessions, some of which have triggered frontal lobe blowouts (a good thing). I’ll definitely be following up on at least a couple of them.

And I must admit my attention is conflicted, as I’ve been using the wireless to tinker with my third and final session. The premise of the hands-on workshop is simple: if it’s too much material for a half-day timeslot, it will be perfect in a one hour slot. Dubious logic, I admit, but I’m clinging to my delusions, at least until the end of the day.

Thanks to everyone who offered the supportive words to my previous post — I think my talk Been digital so long it feels like print to me… and the wiki workshop yesterday both went passably well… I was more self-indulgent with “Been digital” than usual, incorporating a riff on Glenn Gould and finishing up with a reading of Wallace Steven’s “Long and Sluggish Lines.” Once again I leaned heavily on the kindness and intelligence of the audience, and once again that leap of faith was rewarded.

Now off to conduct my experiment in uncontrolled information overload…

Posted in Abject Learning | 3 Comments

They blew my mind at the In-N-Out

I got a burger and blew my mind at the In-N-Out Burger...

My great deficiency as a weblogger is that I never write the posts I really want to write. If I feel genuinely engaged with a topic, I defer the actual writing of it endlessly — mulling it over, adding elements, seeing linkages elsewhere. All too often, I put off compositions until I am a) not sleep-deprived; b) have a couple hours absolutely free of obligation; c) passably sober. The past couple years, there have been precious few moments when all those conditions have been met.

I’m taking a shot at writing a post that’s been sitting in my head for more than one year. Since then, the story has taken a few turns, which I will try to capture, and other elements have either mutated or grown moldy from neglect.

I write this sitting on a plane, on my way to the University of Mary Washington’s Faculty Academy— at which I am a featured speaker. In many ways, I feel as if this event is a natural outcome (I don’t want it to be a conclusion) of what I want to write about. So if I don’t write it now, I never will. Which would hardly be a tragedy to the literary commons, but I am tired of my tendency to allow perfectionism to foster procrastination.

So I’m just gotta bash this sucker out. It’s not going to end up the way I want, the structure will undoubtedly be all wrong, I’m going to leave out all sorts of stuff, but I’m going to live with the result and move on. It’s down there, beneath that extended entry link below.

The 2004 NLII Annual Meeting in San Diego was memorable for me for a number of reasons. It was the first time I did a presentation in which I stepped beyond the confines of my standard “what we are doing at UBC’ or the “what I like (and hate) about learning objects” presentation and tried to go for something a bit more ambitious, to play with ideas and explore the many diverse and tangential elements of online culture that are as essential to learning technology as all those acronyms (LMS, IMS, et al) are…

Damn was I nervous for that presentation. Right up until I started talking I was half-convinced I had succumbed to pride and hubris, that I had egregiously over-reached in terms of scope and scale.

But it went OK. Whatever people thought, they said very nice things to me about the talk.

NLII 2004 was a particularly strong conference in terms of the presentations — every session I attended was simply outstanding and delivered creatively. But the real mind-bender was Bryan Alexander’s talk on mobile learning… it was my first time seeing him speak, and I was simply blown away (he wrote an article with many of the same themes for the EDUCAUSE Review).

As the conference wound down, I found myself chatting with Bryan, who introduced me to Gardner Campbell and Kevin Creamer. Gardner was in full-on persuasion mode, passionately trying to round up companions for a trip to a local In-N-Out Burger. Being a fan of The Big Lebowski, I was intrigued, and Gardner closed the deal with his evocative descriptions of the “secret menu” — a host of special variations on the standard three item In-N-Out menu (there are descriptions available on the net, but I dare not reveal the secrets by direct linking… suffice it to say you need not be a power searcher to find them). I’m a sucker for arcane codes and obscure orders (and greasy food), so I was easily convinced, especially pleased because Bryan and Kevin were coming as well.

Gardner drove us out to the diner, and the conversation in the car kicked up to a level that left me nearly speechless. Among the topics were John Milton, science fiction, the history of intellectual property, pirate and underground radio… All of which was so cleverly and engagingly discussed I was almost paralysed by my sheer good fortune. I simply couldn’t believe I was privy to such an astonishing discussion.

On Gardner’s recommendation, I asked to have my burger prepared “animal style” — there was no indication of any burger styles anywhere on the posted menu, but the clerk didn’t blink and I got a patty that had been fried in onions and mustard. Meanwhile, the conversation powered on unabated, occasionally dropping from the intellectual stratosphere to more personal topics such as our kids… even then Bryan, Kevin and Gardner each spoke with such passion and eloquence that I felt profoundly inarticulate on every infrequent instance that I spoke. I felt like I was sitting in on a fast food version of My Dinner with Andre, and while I was luxuriating in something like a social equivalent of Nirvana, I also felt hopelessly out of my league. I stress that in no way did the these guys make me feel that way — my every grunt and twitch was treated with respect, genuinely listened to, tracked and responded to…

The meal wrapped up, we dropped Bryan off at the airport for his red eye flight, and we kept talking all the way back to the hotel. Gardner was in mid-flight on the topic of Stanley Kubrick when we finally parted ways in an elevator. I went back to my room, phoned home, and raved to Keira about what a fun conference it had been, and what a special evening I had been privileged to enjoy.

Off we all went, back to our home institutions, and to our respective trajectories — my own direction significantly altered by these and other wonderful outcomes from the San Diego conference. I followed Bryan’s many magnificent weblogs, and we exchanged the occasional email, and eventually we managed to entice him out to Vancouver where he delivered a tremendous talk (which I shamefully neglected to blog). Kevin was a stalwart participant and wiki-warrior for the face-to-face component of the Small Pieces Loosely Joined happening, which may still stand as the single piece of work I’m proudest to be associated with. Gardner left a nice comment on my weblog once, saying he looked forward to my posting about the In-N-Out burger voyage (it’s only taken me eighteen months), and we eventually reconnected at a couple of EDUCAUSE events, where I followed him around like a besotted puppy-dog, soaking up every bit of Gardner’s generous servings of wit, anecdote and wisdom. We also talked a lot of music.

I probably could double the length of this posting by rolling through the many things these guys have provoked and inspired within me since I met them. I won’t, in part out of sympathy for the reader… and partly because I am now sitting in the opening session of the Faculty Academy — Gardner has brought Bryan and I in as speakers (along with Diane Oblinger as Keynote). Obviously I couldn’t be more excited to be here… though at present I’m mostly nervous — I’ll feel better once I’ve delivered my talk.

[To be continued]

Posted in Abject Learning | 7 Comments

Linkchecking Software – Yes, it’s another cry for help…

I’m working with a unit on campus who have some stimulating challenges ahead of them. UBC’s Careers Online is [one of] the university’s most visited website[s] (about 1,000 distinct visits per day from students). Most of the visitors who log on to the site are after one thing — job postings — and tend to avoid learning anything about effective strategies for career devlopment, the application process, or professional conduct.

The Career Services unit has redeveloped the site to emphasize the teachable moments that present themselves during the job search process, cleverly deploying motivational hooks to lure visitors into exploring the literally thousands of useful links carefully positioned throughout the site.

While they constitute a tremendous resource to Career Service’s clients, those links are a potential nightmare in terms of maintenance. Dead links will pile up and spread like rust on a Ford Pinto, with grave effects on the usefulness of the pages. The unit also needs a means of gathering, categorizing and assessing new resources as they become available.

I worked with CS when they were developing the site — mainly by providing them with weblog and wiki spaces, a wee bit of training and support, and getting the hell out of the way. I’ve been asked to do something similar for the upkeep and maintenance phase… I’m fairly clear on a strategy for collective research and aggregation (an RSS and social bookmark frenzy). But I have yet to identify a link checking package. I’ve come across a few open source tools, but they are abandoned 0.4 builds (or lower), which makes me nervous (unless I had evidence that they were working effectively). I’ve seen a few commercial packages with nice feature sets, and the prices aren’t too prohibitive, but again I’d be more confident if I knew that these systems worked well.

Does anyone have recommendations (or horror stories) for link checking software?

Posted in tech/tools/standards | 5 Comments

They report, they don’t always decide

I’m becoming increasingly fascinated by the friction points between weblogs and traditional journalism. This commentary by the NPR Ombudsman points to a recent episode:

NPR’s Vicky O’Hara reported on a Defense Department document, which exonerated U.S. military personnel [in the shooting death in Iraq of Nicola Calipari, an Italian intelligence agent]. The document was highly edited (or “redacted” in Pentagon parlance), with about 20 percent of the original information removed.

Over the past weekend, NPR placed the document on its Web site.

But some NPR listeners and cyber-savvy bloggers (people who run personal Web sites on the Internet) soon discovered if they downloaded the document from npr.org and translated it into another format, the edited portions could be restored.

The unexpurgated document was then posted on a number of Web sites. It included details of U.S. Army policies and procedures in hostage cases, as well as the names of the military personnel involved in the killing of the Italian agent.

NPR removed the document from its Web site. But the information, available from many media sources, had already been disseminated around the Internet.

Two Issues

First, it is essential to report on government documents. But in this case, publishing the unedited report (albeit unintentionally) could have — and could yet — threaten peoples’ lives. There are times when editors have to make a difficult choice between the public’s right to know and the risk of endangering lives. But this was not one of those instances. NPR was right to remove the documents from its Web site once it became clear that the full version could be accessed.

Second, the blogosphere has proven once again to be an amoral place with few rules. The consequences for misbehavior are still vague. The possibility of civic responsibility remains remote. It is a place where the philosophy of “who posts first, wins” predominates. [My emphasis]

The slam on ‘amorality’ aside, the commentary actually addresses the challenges to conventional journalism (and its convergence with citizen journalism forms, if not practice) with a fairly realistic eye.

Posted in Textuality | 2 Comments

What do universities need to support weblogs?

A rare and welcome victory on the professional front. A project proposal submitted with partners at BCIT and UVic Distance Ed was awarded with significant funding from BCCampus’ Online Program Development Fund. (We should also have a private sector partner that I’m very excited about, but I’ll hold off announcing that until the deal is completed.)

What did we propose to do? Nothing less than creating and sharing a framework for social software applications for BC’s higher education institutions. In less grandiose terms, we have proposed to create a set of policy recommendations, tutorials, templates, and multimedia resources that can be reused by a school that wants to support weblogging and wiki use (and possibly other social software tools) for its own community. We also hope to foster a community-centered model for sharing expertise amongst practitioners attempting to develop their own projects.

We intend the project to be platform-agnostic: we will definitely be using Movable Type and Drupal, but do our best to ensure that resources we create are not tied in with any one system. If possible, we might partner with mini-projects using tools such as WordPress, ELGG, or even Blogger.

I could go into more detail about our proposal, but will refrain for two reasons. 1) Our award, while substantial, was less than we asked for, so we need to reevaluate and scale down our objectives. And more importantly, 2) it’s very likely that our peers in the educational weblogging community have some great ideas we have not considered.

I am pleased we got this award, but I don’t feel much of a proprietary sense of pride. In large part, we got funded because webloggers around the world have been demonstrating proof of concept in myriad ways. In fact, if you are reading this weblog, there’s a decent chance that your efforts contributed to the success of the proposal (THANKS!). So what are your ideas how our project could support the successful adoption of weblogs and wikis by educators and students? What would be most useful? Where are the needs most pressing?

I should note that while we are charged to make our work available to BC institutions, we intend to be as public with our process and products as possible. We will be licensing our materials via Creative Commons, and we hope our work will prove helpful beyond our provincial borders.

It’s going to be a hell of a lot of work, but I think it’s also going to be a lot of fun.

Posted in Abject Learning, Webloggia, wikis | 10 Comments

(Not really) trying to curb my antagonism

I’ve never been much of a U2 fan. Oh, I suppose I liked the War album back when it came out (oh man, that was more than twenty years ago — I’m nearly as ancient as they are!), at least until I realised that The Edge copped his best riffs from Brian Eno.

So count me in with the ‘couldn’t care less’ camp when it came to the Bonomania that apparently swept through Vancouver with news of their series of concerts here. In fact, when I learned that my colleague (and weblog hero) Michelle Chua was a massive fan, my admittedly cranky reaction was to assemble a mix CD of tracks that prominently featured the classic forbidden single – U2/Negativland. I also made sure she knew the backstory, in which our idealistic quartet passive-aggressively backed the corporate crushing of the culture-jammers:

You see, Negativland had made a crucial error in judgment. Partly to find out whether fans would be able to distinguish their record from a genuine U2 record, they made sure that the U2 on the cover of the record dwarfed the word Negativland. As it turned out, one of the first to notice that U2/ Negativland was not a U2 record was the legal department at Island Records–U2’s record label. Before you could say “Can’t you take a joke?” Island had deposited a lawsuit on Negativland’s doorstep. Without, by the way, the knowledge of Bono and the boys–not that it mattered, as Hosler explains.

“At one level, U2 is just these four guys making some music. But they’re also not that at all. They’re so huge that it becomes something else entirely. They’re like Coca-Cola. As a commodity, as a corporately manufactured and distributed entertainment commodity, they — to me — become totally legitimate targets and you don’t have to worry about what their feelings are or ask permission or anything.”

Naturally, Island’s battery of fine legal minds saw things a bit differently.

The irony is that at the same time that Island was suing Negativland, U2 was taking its “ZOO-TV” tour around the world, illegally incorporating live satellite feeds into their video-driven stage show, a circumstance Hosler finds particularly galling.

“We were both doing the exact same thing!” he says. “[U2] should have turned around and gone to their label and said “Goddammit, if you don’t stop this [lawsuit] right now, there’ll be hell to pay! We won’t deliver you any more records, we’ll break our contract, we’ll cancel the tour!” They should’ve gone and done something very serious. But they aren’t about to do that. They claim they had no sway over Island, but of course the truth is they just weren’t willing to play hardball over some little piddly record.”

If you haven’t seen it, Craig Baldwin’s film Sonic Outlaws is a fun treatment of the story, and features an unforgettable scene in which Negativland confronts the The Edge live during a radio interview.

Maybe it was the ferocity of my reaction, or maybe she just worried about her job security, but a couple weeks back Michelle told me that learning the whole Negativland affair had actually cooled her excitement for the show. All I could think to tell her in response was that she shouldn’t let a bunch of grumpy old anarchists like Negativland (or me) ruin her musical fun. What a horrifying thought.

Well, it all more than balanced out on the karmic front. If you can believe it, Michelle was pulled up on stage, and escorted about hand-in-hand by The Bono Man himself. If you can’t believe it, photographs exist — this one is especially remarkable.

My estimated running tally in the competition for Michelle’s musical loyalties:

U2 – 234,567,876,876
Brian the Music Snob Grouch – 1 (goal is under review)

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment