Can someone please point me in the right direction?  I can’t seem to find the David V’s email on here, only David P’s.

Thanks,

Ernie

ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES to THE GLOBAL MARKETPLACE

RE: NEPAL — SCHOOL SECTOR REFORM PROGRAM (SSRP)

(From the World Bank)

Project ID: P113441/Project Status: Active (2009)

http://web.worldbank.org/external/projects/main?pagePK=64283627&piPK=73230&theSitePK=282386&menuPK=4679878&Projectid=P113441

FACE 1: MARKET FOCUS

SSRP is intended to increase access to school education and to improve the quality of school education.

FACE 2: TYPES OF OFFERINGS

The SSRP project is divided into two parts: basic education and secondary education.  First, SSRP is intended to ensure equitable access to and quality of basic education for all children ages 5-12 as well as to prepare pre-school-age children through Early Childhood Education and Development (ECED) for basic education and deliver basic numeracy and literacy to youths and to adults, especially women and marginalized groups.  Second, SSRP is intended to improve equitable access to secondary education by financing the development of physical facilities (i.e. classroom construction and rehabilitation, library and laboratory construction, and school construction for children with special needs) and provide scholarships for marginalized groups, the disabled, girls, and children from poor households.

FACE 3: THE BUYER

Learning bought nationally – open to regions – local guide offers via the World Bank

FACE 4: GLOBAL MARKETS

A region with no, restricted, or poor quality Internet service

FACE 5: DEVELOPMENT OF THE MARKET

Market does not seem to support E-learning/learning technologies

FACE 6: LEARNING TECHNOLOGY COMPETITION WITH OTHER FORMS OF LEARNING

Not yet applicable

CONCLUSION

As an educational venture analyst (EVA), there may be a business opportunity present in this project, for there is no infrastructure (i.e. LMS, CMS, virtual classrooms), no market development around E-learning, and no E-learning system.

The web 0.0 article was a good read. I have often wondered what the revenue model is for a lot of this web 2.0 activity and thought that maybe I was missing something.  Certainly for some services, humanistic, creative commons attitudes drive development (as opposed to annoying pop ups and blinking banner ads.) It was interesting to read about Twitter’s founder.  He can obviously afford to forge ahead without a solid game plan.  Internet users are more than happy to use free services (even if it is free as in beer and not free as in speech).