Category to select: B. PCK
Due on Wednesday of Week 5.
The readings below will help you prepare for the level of discussions promoted in this module. The readings encapsulate Shulman’s view of the knowledge of an educator as a specialized and professional knowledge base.
About PCK and TPACK
This knowledge base, in part, is an amalgam of knowledge about pedagogy (P) or the nature of teaching and learning and knowledge about content (C) such as geometry or evolution. PK or pedagogical knowledge might include things like student engagement, time management, access issues and district funding, administration and prep time for teachers. Taken together, he suggested the specialized knowledge of teachers is PCK and differentiated it from general pedagogical knowledge (eg. knowledge about students in general such as their affect, engagement levels, the profession, schools and schooling, or regulatory bodies governing teachers) and content knowledge that might be the purview of experts such as scientists and mathematicians. Rather, PCK includes specialized knowledge of how to teach a particular topic in a particular subject area. PCK includes knowledge of using the blind cave fish example to teach about evolution, knowledge of how to teach geometry, knowledge of using Punnet squares to teach genetics or using force diagrams to teach about opposite forces.
Mishra and Koehler extended this notion of PCK to include technology (T) as a third and important dimension to the work of educators. TK or general technology knowledge includes things like knowledge of interface design, browser compatibility, accessibility. Taken from one of my papers, TPCK or TPACK; however, encompasses that specialized knowledge of how technologies can be used to teach particular concepts, how pedagogical techniques that employ technologies to support the learning of content and development of skills, or how technology can help redress some of the problems with a challenging topic that students face. Over 13 000 dissertations have been written on TPACK. While PK and TK issues are important to some courses, the core focus of discussions in Module B (and C) in this class will be on PCK and TPACK. This means that contributions should focus on PCK throughout this module and illustrate deep thinking about teaching and learning specific concepts or skills in math or science and those activities, with or without technology, that may support aspects of conceptual development about particular topics in math or science.
Readings
Please read the following three papers to orient your contributions for the remaining modules. Discuss PCK and TPACK, your posts will be displayed below.
- Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4 -14. Text available on Connect.
- Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. The foundations of a new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1)1-23. Text accessible from Google Scholar.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Text accessible from Google Scholar.
1. Reflect on the concepts of PCK and TPACK;
2. Share an example of PCK or how you teach a particular concept in your practice (with or without digital technology). Share in advance of the respond by date.
3. Respond to one other blog post with reflections on the idea of PCK and TPACK by Wednesday of Week 5. Check calendar.
TPACK and PCK
Posted by Wanyi Wong on June 16, 2017
Technology Shifts
Posted by Allen Wideman on June 15, 2017
The Evolution of PCK in the Classroom
Posted by jwlewis on
TPACK: Putting it all together
Posted by Cristina Leo on June 14, 2017
PCK/TPACK and the TVT
Posted by momoe on
PCK & TPACK
Posted by seanturn on June 13, 2017
PCK and TPACK
Posted by YooYoung on
Minecraft TPCK
Posted by Derek Cowan on
PCK and TPCK as a math teacher
Posted by Gary Ma on
PCK & TPCK- There Is Theory Behind It!
Posted by Kirsten Ocoin on
Coding support for teachers
Posted by DANIELLE PETERS on
Billy’s Bike Speedometer
Posted by Michael Hengeveld on
TPCK and Spheros
Posted by Natalie Roberts on June 12, 2017
Coding and TPCK
Posted by Sarah Winkler on
Transformation
Posted by Nathan Lott on
Applying Minecraft in STEM
Posted by Jocelynn Mortlock on
Motion Graphs
Posted by Andrew Yeung on
Making the curriculum engaging…
Posted by baljeet gill on
Those Who Can, Do…
Posted by Joshua Elsdon on February 14, 2017
PCK and TPACK in Module B
Posted by samia on February 9, 2017
Transforming Teaching and Learning through PD – {a better late than never posting;)}
Posted by jessica holder on February 6, 2017
The tales of blood – PCK and TPACK
Posted by vibhu vashisht on February 5, 2017
Schulman and PCK Reflections
Posted by Michelle Furlotte on February 4, 2017
Using technology to maximize student learning
Posted by tyler kolpin on February 1, 2017
Subject matter as a “vehicle”: What are you driving?
Posted by Dana Bjornson on