Clarification on Electoral Law

By Julian Dierkes

So, in my haste to share information quickly, I got some aspects of the revisions to the electoral law wrong this morning.

[Thanks again to Byamba who brought these clarifications to my attention.]

An unofficial version of the electoral law has been reproduced on Mongolian news sites, e.g. news.mn

1. 48 members will be elected from single-member districts. I had thought this morning that the 48 members who would be elected directly would be elected in multi-member ridings as they had been in 2008. So voters will have two votes: a single individual candidate (in their riding) and a party or coalition.

While this means that Mongolia is out of the race for most complicated electoral system, this is obviously very good news and makes the revisions sound quite sensible.

2. Mongolians living abroad will be able to vote through Mongolian embassies 15 days before the election.

3. The quota for women candidates was 15% in the draft approved by committee, but seems to have been changed to 20% during the final plenary discussion.

Posted in Elections, Ikh Khural 2012, Politics | Tagged | 2 Comments

New Electoral Law Passed by Ikh Khural

By Julian Dierkes

[Byamba contributed significantly to this post.]

One of the factors that contributed to the riots of July 1, 2008 was uncertainty about the election outcome due to delays and a lack of trust in the counting of votes. This uncertainty in turn was at least in part rooted in the complicated nature of the multi-member multi-vote election system that had been adopted at the end of 2007.

Now it is the year 2011, Mongolia is gearing up for its next parliamentary election and the Ikh Khural appears to have passed revisions to the electoral law that not only surpass the previous law in complicatedness, but also face a possible constitutional challenge.

Changes to the electoral law that were passed yesterday (Dec 14) suggest that the election will be held on the 3rd or 4th Wednesday of June, June 20 or June 27, 2012.

How do you make an election law that features multiple votes in multi-member electoral ridings more complicated? You graft an element of proportional representation by national party lists on top of that.

As far as I have been able to understand, the June/July election will be contested in the same 26 electoral districts (20 aimags + six urban ridings in Ulaanbaatar) that sent 2, 3 or 4 members to the Ikh Khural based on a simple majoritarian election, but with multiple votes per voter depending on the number of seats up for grabs. It is unclear whether voters will have multiple votes under the new system or cast a single vote in their riding. If the latler is the case, it is unclear how multiple seats in ridings will be distributed. This mechanism will be used in the upcoming election to distribute 48 of the seats in the Ikh Khural. That means some aimags will presumably have a single member. Rural overrepresentation compared to population base will continue.

The 26 remaining seats to make up the 76-member Ikh Khural will be distributed according to a second vote for parties that will be contested on the basis of a national party list by proportional representation with a 5% minimum threshold to gain any seats.

Here is where the constitutional problem enters the scene: The constitution provides that eligible Mongolians shall vote for candidates, i.e. individuals, by name, not parties. There thus looms the possibility that a ballot that lists parties rather than candidates is open to a constitutional challenge.

No word yet on changes to voter registration which was highly problematic in 2008 other than that Mongolians living abroad will be able to vote, though I don’t know yet how this will work.

The final, though welcome, wrinkle is that a 20% women’s quota was introduce into the election law. 20% of nominated candidates have to be women. In 2007 there was originally a 30% quota that was abandoned at the last moment out of practical concerns, or so the argument went. Note that the Ikh Khural currently has 3 female members!

Posted in Elections, Gender, Ikh Khural 2012, JD Democratization, Law, Politics, Research on Mongolia | Tagged | 5 Comments

Canada Mongolia Roundtable finally happened

Earlier this year, two scheduled attempts to make the Canada-Mongolia roundtable happen failed.

Last week, December 1/2, the meetings finally occurred with Zorigt, Min of Mineral Resources and Energy, visiting Ottawa. There have been no announcement of any substance that was discussed at the meetings, though DFAIT has released two photographs: Min Zorigt with Cdn Min John Baird and Min Zorigt with Cdn Min Fast.

Clearly, Min Zorigt must have made an impression though. When John Baird spoke to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Ministerial Council, he explicitly endorsed Mongolian membership in the OSCE:

Canada strongly supports Mongolia’s candidacy for the OSCE. We look forward to a positive decision on this, here in Vilnius.

Source: DFAIT

Posted in Canada, International Relations, Mongolia and ... | Tagged | Leave a comment

Russians AND THEIR NEIGHBOURS still struggling to end authoritarianism?

By Julian Dierkes

In a post to the Globe & Mail’s Worldview blog, Mark Mackinnon wrote about neo-Soviet experiments in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. When Mark tweeted about this article he wrote, “Twenty years after fall of the USSR, Russians and their neighbours still struggling to end authoritarianism”. You can guess the direction that I will be going with this…

Twenty+ years after the fall of the Soviet Union, Mongolia remains the only post-Soviet nation/republic where democracy is somewhat reasonably entrenched. This is one of the features of contemporary Mongolia that makes it so fascinating.

[N.B.: The category of “Russians and their neigbours” is clearly too broad in another way as that would include Finland, the Baltic countries and Japan where none of the arguments that Mark makes seem to apply.]

Sure, Mongolian democracy is dominated by patronage politics and sees its share of convulsions (see “Current Convulsions in Mongolia’s Political Party Landscape” Asia Pacific Memo #52, Feb 1, 2011; “Why no Anti-Mining Party in Mongolia?” Asia Pacific Memo #106, Oct 4, 2011; “Mongolia, A Sultanistic Democracy?” and other posts in the “democracy” category of this blog). Yet, successive, peaceful changes of government (ignoring for the moment the riots of July 1, 2008) are but one criterion that points to the institutionalization of democracy. In the run-up to the parliamentary election next summer, many – reasonably – expect turmoil, but few fear any kind of turn toward authoritarianism.

For the Economist’s Intelligence Unit, Mongolia sits squarely in the “flawed democracy” category, a classification it shares with France, Greece (“The Cradle of Democracy”), and many nations of the former Soviet Bloc, Estonia, Latvia and Ukraine being the only other neighbours of Russia in this category, while some other neighbours (Finland and Japan) are in the “full democracy” category.

The Freedom House Index firmly marks Mongolia as “free” (political rights: 2, civil liberties: 2). It shares this status with Estonia, Finland, Japan, Latvia and Ukraine among Russia’s immediate neighbours.

The inclusion of the Ukraine in relatively high categories in both these indices may well change in coming editions due to the controversy surrounding the arrest of Julia Tymoshenko.

Mark Mackinnon identifies political responses to criticism as the focus point that may determine the fate of democracy in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. By this measure as well, Mongolia fares very well. Since the murder of Zorig in 1998, there has been no overt political violence in Mongolia (unless you believe conspiracy theories associated with Khurts, his arrest in the UK, and subsequent release in Germany this year), nor repression of dissent.

While the Mongolian press can veer toward the sensationalistic at times, it certainly is lively.

My reply to Mark Mackinnon thus is: Not all neighbours of Russia are struggling to end authoritarianism, some have succeeded long ago!

Or, in the (paraphrased) words of one of the world’s great fictional freedom fighters, “THE YEAR IS 2011 C.E. and the former Soviet Union and its neighbours are entirely occupied by authoritarians. Well, not entirely… One small nation of indomitable Mongolians still holds out against the invaders…”

Posted in Democracy, Global Indices, JD Democratization, Media and Press, Party Politics, Politics, Research on Mongolia | Tagged | 2 Comments

ACMS Fellowships Announced

The American Center for Mongolian Studies has announced its three fellowship programs for the coming year: ACMS US-Mongolia Field Research Fellowship, ACMS Mongolian Visiting Scholar Program, and ACMS Library Fellowship.

ACMS US-Mongolia Field Research Fellowship Program 2012

The ACMS US-Mongolia Field Research Fellowship Program was initiated in 2006 to foster a new generation of Mongolian Studies scholars by creating an opportunity for field studies early in the careers of both US and Mongolian scholars. During the 2012 program, the ACMS US-Mongolia Field Research Fellowship Program is open to research proposals from advanced undergraduate to post-doctoral US scholars, including university and college faculty, for the purposes of conducting short-term field research projects in Mongolia between May and October 2012.

Applicants must be US citizens currently enrolled full-time (students) or employed at least part-time (post-docs and faculty) at a university or college. Students graduating in Spring 2012 are eligible for the program. Undergraduate applicants must have at least third year standing in their program, while graduate applicants can be at a masters, pre-dissertation, or doctoral candidacy level. Post-doctoral scholars and faculty must regularly teach at least one course at a US university or college to be eligible. The program priority for post-doctoral scholars and faculty is to support individuals from non-research intensive universities and colleges, especially those who are helping guide student research projects or who can show how the fellowship experience will enhance their teaching and outreach.

Joint applications submitted by a student and post-doctoral scholar or faculty member are highly encouraged. Joint applicants must submit individual applications, but the applications will be evaluated both individually and jointly during the review process. Joint applications are not required, and individual applications are welcome. Prior research or study experience in Mongolia is not required to apply.

Deadline for submitting applications: February 15, 2012.

More information

The ACMS US-Mongolia Field Research Fellowship Program is funded by a grant from the Council of American Overseas Research Centers (CAORC) and US Department of State Bureau of Education and Cultural Affairs (ECA).

ACMS Mongolian Visiting Scholar Program 2012

The American Center for Mongolian Studies (ACMS) is pleased to announce the second year of the ACMS Mongolian Visiting Scholar Program. The Visiting Scholar Program provides funding support for 3-12 week short-term visits by Mongolian scholars to US universities and academic research centers to work with US based counterparts on collaborative projects and public outreach activities. Project proposals in all academic fields are eligible, and small colleges and universities are especially encouraged to apply.

Applications for the program must be submitted by a US host institution representative on behalf of an invited Mongolian scholar. Visits to the US must begin between September 1 and December 31, 2012. This program is intended to fund non-degree, scholarly exchange activities.

Deadline to submit application: February 15, 2012.

More information

The Program is supported by the US State Department Educational and Cultural Affairs Bureau (ECA) and the Council of American Overseas Research Centers.

ACMS Library Fellowship 2012

American Center for Mongolian Studies is pleased to announce the second year of the ACMS Library Fellowship. This fellowship supports US advanced graduate students, faculty members, or professionals in library and information sciences from colleges and universities to conduct short-term library development projects and/or research in Mongolia for a period of up to 12 weeks between May and October 2012. The ACMS Library Fellowship program is intended to help support the development of the ACMS research library and build stronger connections among local library partners through specific defined projects designed to enhance collection content, resource accessibility, and training.

Fellows are hosted by the ACMS and should propose projects that have measurable positive outcomes for the scholarly community served by the ACMS. Project proposals with similar outcomes and impacts on local partner libraries are also especially encouraged. Fellows spend a minimum of 4 weeks and a maximum of 12 weeks onsite in Mongolia at the ACMS library. Projects must begin after May 1, 2012 and end no later than September 30, 2012. Prior experience working in Mongolia is not a requirement. Due to conditions set by the funding agency only US citizens are eligible to apply to this program.

Deadline to submit application: February 15, 2012.

More information

The fellowship is supported with funding from the US State Department Education and Cultural Affairs Bureau and the Council of American Oversees Research Centers.

Posted in American Center for Mongolian Studies, Research on Mongolia | Leave a comment

Dec 16 Event: Mongolia FAQ

Mongolia Lecture Series
Program on Inner Asia
Institute of Asian Research
UBC

A Panel Presentation

FAQ Mongolia: Some Answers to the Most Frequently Asked Questions on (Mining) Policy

Friday, December 16, 2011
16-18h
UBC Robson Square
Room C.485

Supported by

The event is free and open to the public.

Mongolia has been hailed as the next mining investment Eldorado at several moments over the past decade. Much of the current interest is linked to the Oyu Tolgoi gold/copper project and the bidding for Tavan Tolgoi, a large coal project. While international investors explore opportunities in Mongolia, Mongolians grapple with the implications of a mining boom. Beyond the immediate economic implications, a mining boom will bring rapid and far-reaching ecological and social change to Mongolia. Members of our panel will present observations on contemporary Mongolia rooted in on-going research and consulting projects.

Some of the questions we will address will be:

  • The Mongolian government wants to overcome charges of corruption. How can governance be improved?

Hon. Jim Abbott PC
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Cooperation (retired)

  • How is the mining boom affecting the macroeconomic stability and competitiveness of Mongolia?

Dr. N. Bolor
Freelance Consultant, Toronto, Canada
Formerly Associate Professor, National University of Mongolia and Policy Analyst, Mongolian National Mining Association

  • How have recent policy shifts in Mongolia shaped environmental management in the mining sector?

Kirsten Dales
MSc Candidate, Master in Environmental Management
Royal Roads University

  • What role are environmental movements playing in Mongolia’s civil society?

D. Byambajav
PhD Candidate, Sociology
Hokkaido University, Japan

  • How is China viewed in Mongolia?

J. Mendee
MA Asia Pacific Policy Studies
MA Candidate, Political Science
UBC

  • How stable is Mongolian democracy? What likelihood is there for radical change in the political context of economic development?

Dr. Julian Dierkes
Associate Professor and Coordinator, Program on Inner Asia
UBC

Posted in Canada, Democracy, Events, FAQ Mongolia Dec 16 2011, Mining, Politics, Social Issues | 5 Comments

Jean-Frédéric Légaré-Tremblay on How Mining Activities are Testing Mongolia’s Sovereignty

Jean-Frédéric Légaré-Tremblay is a Canadian journalist who frequently writes on international affairs for Le Devoir and l’Actualité. In October 2011 he spent three weeks in Mongolia thanks to a Bourse Nord-Sud granted by the Fédération professionnelle des journalistes du Québec. The following article was originally published on OpenCanada.org, the site of the Canadian International Council.

Genghis Khan Keeps an Eye on His Riches

November 30, 2011

About an hour’s drive from Ulan Bator, Mongolia’s capital, a massive statue of Genghis Khan in shining armour emerges out of the steppe. Sitting straight on his horse at 141 feet, he looks defiantly at the horizon, wrapped in his brand-new 250-ton stainless-steel coat. Banned from the country, as any other nationalistic symbol was during the communist era that ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the cruel conqueror of the 13th century, who claims the fatherhood of the largest empire ever built on Earth, is now back in the Asian steppes – with a vengeance.

“It’s him who united all the Mongolians and built our country,” a Mongolian woman in her 50s wearing a blue silk del – the traditional costume – said from the observatory, standing atop the head of Khan’s mounting. “But we need, today, a new Genghis Khan to make Mongolia stronger, and to give us back our riches!”

As Mongolia experiences one of the fastest rates of economic growth in the world, driven by a massive mining boom and intake of foreign investments, the country, sandwiched between Russia and China, also experiences a wave of fierce nationalism that increasingly sees the exploitation of natural resources by foreign companies as a looting of its almost sacred riches. But the “looters” are now not only Chinese or Russian, as they have been for decades – they’re Canadian, too. Canada now ranks second after China in Mongolia for foreign investments but ranks first in the booming sector of natural resources (e.g. mining). It’s no wonder Canadian companies have felt the heat and will probably still do so in years to come.


The Roaring Mongolian Economy

It’s not rare anymore to hear that Mongolia, already one of the fastest growing economies in the world, could become the fastest soon. 2011 started with 6.1 percent growth, followed by 17.3 during the second quarter and 20.8 percent during the next. The International Monetary Fund forecasts a 11.5 percent growth rate for the whole year, close to 12 percent next year… and close to 16 percent in 2016 .


In his brand new monster house, harboured in one of the few gated communities – which have developed only recently in Ulan Bator as a feature of its unbridled development – a 53-year-old businessman recognizes that he owes his success and his three-storey house to the mining boom. “But we don’t need all these foreign investments,” says the father of two, who built his fortune selling Lexus and furs. “Genghis Khan gave us all these incredible riches. And there might be even more to discover. We have always been rich […]. But it’s the foreign companies that are benefiting from it. Not us.”

The man went on to speak in Mongolian about Oyu Tolgoi, saying that it was a test of sovereignty for his country (as his 18-year-old son translated into perfect English). Oyu Tolgoi, or “Turquoise Hill” – is the talk of the town. It is Mongolia’s biggest mining project and economic and political issue No. 1. It is also the flagship project of Vancouver’s Ivanhoe Mines, which owns 66 per cent (in partnership with Rio Tinto) of what will be one of the largest copper-gold mines in the world when the site goes online in late 2012. The Mongolian government owns the remaining shares. The $6-billion project – roughly the size of Mongolia’s GDP – should produce a third of the country’s GDP when it reaches its full capacity by the end of the decade.

But why is it a test of sovereignty? Because, when the businessman was speaking in the early days of October, the Minister of Mines had just declared that he wanted to reopen the deal that was closed in 2009 after six years of intense negotiations with Ivanhoe, and raise the government’s shares to 50 per cent. The minister’s declaration sent a shockwave across the world markets, and caused dismay among foreign investors, who fear the rise of resources and economic nationalism.

Even though the government finally backed down two weeks later, the roots of that nationalism have not disappeared. Far from it, since they seem to be deeply rooted in a national pride that longs to be uttered after four long centuries of direct and indirect rule by either the Chinese or the Russians. The ubiquity of Genghis Khan – whose name and face now appear on the national airport’s main terminal, on a big hotel façade, on top of Parliament’s front steps, on vodka and beer bottles, and on a hill bordering Ulan Bator, to name a few – is only the most visible expression of that reclaimed pride.

This sentiment is deeply rooted in the steppes, the mountains, and even the dryness of the Gobi desert that shape the beloved land roamed in every corner by the nomads. Nature is revered in the least-densely populated country of the world, and it has to be taken care of – a popular and strong injunction that basically clashes with mining. Rare are the citizens of Ulan Bator, where half of the 2.8 million Mongolians now live, who don’t dream from time to time of going (or actually go) back to the countryside.

Forty-two-year-old Batsetseg comes from the steppe every now and then to lend a hand in a modest restaurant in Ulan Bator. Her sister opened the restaurant a year ago, and named it “Meej Mountain,” after a hill near their homeland that they hold dear. “When I’m in town, it’s for making money and helping my sister. I really miss the steppe, though …” she says in a very affectionate way. “But back near Erdenet [a mining city 325 km North of Ulan Bator], I worry because of the mine,” she goes on to say even before being asked about the mining activity. “We are a people who respect the environment. Our parents taught us not to cut the flowers and the trees. To dig the earth makes me uncomfortable. If we are to do mining, we have to do it gently and restore the land exactly as it was before, or [make it] even better. Otherwise, nature will take its revenge.”

For Batsetseg, it is no coincidence that the mining boom started about a decade ago and since then, the harsh winters – called dzud – have killed millions of livestock.

There seem to be few Mongolians who are strictly against mining. But they all want to think that the exploitation of their natural resources will benefit them in the long run. To enforce that hope, this fall, the government started sending a cheque of 21,000 tugriks (CAD$17) to every citizen in the country each month, and will soon be distributing 10 per cent of the shares of the Tavan Tolgoi project, which will be the largest coking coal mine in the world, evenly among Mongolians.

Despite these cash handouts, many people from the poor and middle classes feel that they have yet to see the benefits of the mining boom. In the meantime, they have to cope with galloping inflation that rides alongside unbridled economic growth. Last year, Mongolians were hit by a 10.1-per-cent rate for consumer goods, one of the three highest in Asia. This year, the International Monetary Fund expects it to double to 20 per cent.

All this fuels a nationalistic sentiment among the population that fuels, in turn, the equally strong stream of populism among elected officials. This is all too salient as the country is heading towards legislative elections in 2012.

The government seems to suffer from a split-personality disorder, trying to woo foreign investors and please a growingly nationalistic population at the same time. That Mongolia wants to attract capital from abroad is a no brainer. For one, Prime Minister Sukhbaatar Batbold is a forceful voice in favour of attracting foreign investors – including Canadian ones. The country also has a “third neighbour policy” – somewhat similar to Pierre Trudeau’s “third option” – which aims to diversify Mongolia’s diplomatic and economic ties away from its two obtrusive neighbours and towards other countries, including Canada.

Nevertheless, in October, nationalism mixed with populism pushed politicians in power to try to revise, to its advantage, the biggest commercial deal signed in Mongolia since the country switched to a free-market economy.

As the nationalistic sentiment grows among the population, and with election season well underway, ignoring politics and the interests of Mongolians could come at a heavy price for Canadian and other foreign companies.

Posted in Canada, Media and Press, Mining, Mining, Social Issues | 1 Comment

Visiting PhD Student at UBC: Sodnom DOLJIN

S DOLJIN arrived in Vancouver this week to spend a year here at UBC as a visiting scholar at the Centre for Asian Legal Studies.

Doljin is a PhD student in Law at Soongsil Univ in South Korea. While here at UBC, she will be continuing the work on her dissertation which is focused on international arbitration and dispute resolution. The on-going negotiations for a Foreign Investment Protection Agreement (FIPA) between Canada and Mongolia make this topic particularly interesting.

I hope that we’ll see her regularly here at the Institute of Asian Research and perhaps get her to contribute to this blog as well.

 

Posted in International Agreements, Law, Mining, Mining, Mongolia and ... | Leave a comment

Mongolia Studies Centre at ANU

It appears that the Australian National Univ. has set up a Mongolian Studies Centre. You know that I’m jealous, but terrific to see this level of institutionalization of attention to Mongolia. The centre is headed up by Li Narangoa. I’ve long been aware of her work on Mongolia (and also Japan, a kindred spirit), but no less about some of the other people involved in the centre.

I wish the colleagues at ANU all the best and hope that some day we might be able to create something similar at UBC.

 

 

Posted in Research on Mongolia | Tagged | Leave a comment

Call for Papers for “Progress and Integration in Desert Research”

Our colleague Troy Sternberg at Oxford University sent us Call for Papers for the 2nd Oxford Interdisciplinary Conference. 29-30 March 2012
School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford.

Posted in Conferences | Tagged | Leave a comment

Dalai Lama on Surprise Visit to Mongolia

By Julian Dierkes

His Holiness the Dalai Lama is on a surprise visit to Ulaanbaatar.

Sukhbaatar Sq Billboard to Welcome the Dalai Lama (Sue Byrne)

He has arrived directly from Japan and clearly he had been issued a visa to visit, though this was not announced in advance. The last time, the Daila Lama visited Mongolia was in 2006. When the Dalai Lama visited Mongolia in 2002, the Chinese government reacted by interrupting traffic on the Transsiberian Railroad.

The fact that the Mongolian government has decided to take a stance by issuing a visa for the visit (in contrast to the recent decision of the South African government, for example, a government to whom most observers would attribute more clout than to the Mongolian government which has to live with China as its Southern neighbour after all). Surely, this stance will lead to an immediate tongue lashing by the Chinese government and possibly more serious consequences in the coming days.

The Dalai Lama is holding public teachings, and one which is taking place in the Sports Palace that has been constructed with Chinese funding. He will also be meeting Mongolian government officials at a reception, though they will simply happen to be at this reception, not meeting His Holiness specifically.

This visit is also associated with another important event in the Mongolian Buddhist community. On November 2,2011, the 9th Bogd Javzandamba Hutagt was enthroned in Ulaanbaatar as the head of Gandantegchenlin monastery – the Center for Mongolian Buddhists, the largest monastery in Mongolia. The previous 8th Bogd Javzandamba was known as the Bogd Khan and ruled Mongolia from 1911 (independence from China) until the socialist revolution. The position of Bodg Khan was abolished in 1924 and the Republic of Mongolia was declared a secular state.

The 9th Bogd was born in Tibet in 1932. He was identified as the incarnation of the 8th Bogd when he was 4 years old. In 1961, he feld to India. The Dalai Lama formally approved him as the incarnation of the 8th Bogd in 1992. In 2010, he obtained Mongolian citizenship.

His enthronement prompted wide public attention in Mongolia. Some opposition from within the Mongolian Buddhist community criticized the Gandantegchenlin Monastery for not consulting with other head lamas of Buddhist monasteries and a group of head lamas or hambas has filed a lawsuit against the former head of Gandantegchenlin Monastery.

See also, Chris Devonshire-Ellis’ article, “Mongolia Enthrones its Dalai Lama“.

(With contributions from T. Shakya and Byambajav D.)

Posted in China, Dalai Lama, Mongolia and ..., Religion, Research on Mongolia | 1 Comment

Toronto Occupied by High-End Ger

An article in the Toronto Star has reported that some of the Occupy Toronto protesters have taken up residence in a beautiful, ornate yurt. While the article identifies this as an “insulated felt huts favoured by Turkic nomads in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan”, the shape is more reminiscent of the Mongolian ger, than the more pointy version used by Kazakhs, including Kazakhs in Mongolia.

Debra Rasmussen of Agriteam first alerted me to this report. Deb is also an accomplished jazz singer, of course, who has long been involved with the Giant Steppes of Jazz festival and sings with the Northern Lights Quartet.

Posted in Curios | Tagged | 1 Comment

Korea, the United States, and Strategic Relations: Mongolia

An Oct 6, 2011 event at the Korea Society explored relations between Mongolia, Korea, and the United States.

Participants included Christopher Atwood, Associate Professor from the Central Eurasian Studies Department of Indiana University, The Korea Society’s Ambassador Mark Minton (U.S. Ambassador to Mongolia, 2006-2009), and Dr. Stephen Noerper (Visiting Professor, National University of Mongolia, The Asia Foundation Resident Representative, 2000-2003). They explore opportunities for business and foreign relations among the three players.

Korea, the United States, and Strategic Relations: Mongolia from The Korea Society on Vimeo.

For more information: koreasociety.org/​policy/​policy/​korea_the_united_states_and_strategic_relations_mongolia.html

Posted in International Relations, Mongolia and ..., Politics, South Korea | Tagged | Leave a comment

Election Law for Whom?

The revision of the Ikh Khural Election Law has been one of the vexing political issues in recent years.

The July 1st riot in 2008, which occurred after the Ikh Khural election and took the lives of five innocent people and injured hundreds, made the issue more urgent. The current session of the Ikh Khural is expected to make some vital changes, but party rivalries and MPs’ self-interests are posing a major constraint.

According to the Constitution of Mongolia, the Ikh Khural must not amend the Ikh Khural Election Law within six months before the upcoming election, so time is running out now for the summer 2012 election.

This may lead to a very similar situation as we saw in 2007 when the Ikh Khural waited until the last moment to amend the Election Law and chose the majoritarian multiple members system even though politicians had shown a notable degree of consensus over changing the majoritarian election system by introducing proportional-representation methods.

If you remember, it was one of the five pririorities of the government identified by S. Bayar, who was appointed as PM in November, 2007. Leading members of the Democratic Party, such as E. Bat-Uul, were active proponents for proportional-representative system at that time. Small political parties, such as the Civil Will Party, and newly formed “citizens’ movement” parties were apparently desperate and supported the change.

On December 4, 2007, seven MPs from four different parties submitted a draft Election Law to the Ikh Khural. The draft law proposed a proportional-representation system with a single electoral district, a list of party and independent candidates, and a five percent minimum threshold. But the change didn’t happen.

As the election was approaching, the two dominant political parties in Mongolia didn’t dare to change the rules of the game. Especially Democratic Party leaders became reluctant to introduce the proportional-representation system because they seemed to see S. Bayar’s MPRP as the potential winner if the upcoming election was held under the new system. At the same time, international donors and domestic civil society were pushing the MPRP and DP toward the adoption of the proportianal-representation system.

UNDP had, for example, a national program for assisting Mongolia to improve the electoral legislation and its major part was the re-examination of the existing election system. A number of conferences and national symposiums on election law change, comparative studies, study tours by MPs, and lectures by foreign experts had been organized, and there was much public expectation for positive change. However, two political parties stuck to the majoritarian system and made some unexpected changes at the last moment, such as removing the 30 percent gender quota provision from the election law. Ultimatelly, political party elites’ interests prevailed.

The majoritarian election system has consolidated two major political parties in Mongolia since 1992 (Duverger’s Law). Conversely, we also see how the parties have defined the election systems (Duverger’s Law Upside Down). Now, for example, the People’s Party of Mongolia (MPP), the former MPRP, is fighting to stick to the current majoritarian system.

Although there are on-going negotiations between the People’s Party and the Democratic party over the ratio of the Ikh Khural seats that would be decided by the majoritarian and proportional-representation systems, the final decision is going to depend on MPs and party leaders’ interests and strategies.

The People’s Party faces a strong challenge from its former chairman and the ex-president of Mongolia, N. Enkhbayar, who managed to register a new political party by usurping an 80-years old brand name – MPRP. The proportional-representation system also increases risks for less well-known MPs at the national level and MPs representing rural ridings.

The latest ratio between proportional and majoritarian election systems proposed by the People’s Party is 28:48. The negotiation and final decisions on the election system will  shape some crucial issues, such as the participation of Mongolian citizens living overseas, the gender quota of party candidates, and the alteration of electoral districts. Today, the Mongolian public expects fairness, inclusion, and legality from elections, and MPs and political party leaders are obliged to answer.

Posted in Democracy, Elections, Gender, Party Politics, Politics | Tagged | 1 Comment

A Good Day in Mongolia

Today, October 14, 2011, Mongolians are very busy. It is the 17th day of the second month of autumn, an auspicious day in Mongolia’s Buddhist calendar. We call it the day with Baljinnyam and Dashnyam (Buddhist deities) or a double-Nyam day. It has a strong symbolic meaning among Mongolians that this auspicious day will bring good things: happiness, wealth, and prosperity. Many things ranging from a multimillion dollar agreement to political party meetings to haircuts may be scheduled this day (OT Agreement was signed on the same 17th day, which was October 6, 2009). My friend in Mongolia is having his daughter’s haircut ceremony (feast), today. 128 couples will wed at the Ulaanbaatar’s Wedding Palace today starting from 01.40 am until 22.00 pm, which means each couple will have less than half an hour. A happy day for all.

Posted in Society and Culture | Tagged | Leave a comment