The Savage Detectives I

Posted on by

The first part of Roberto Bolaño’s The Savage Detectives, just under 140 pages (in the Picador edition) and entitled “Mexicans Lost in Mexico (1975),” is presented as a series of diary entries written by one Juan García Madero between the beginning of November and the last day of December.

García Madero (almost everyone calls him by his last names, rather than his first name, somewhat to his chagrin) is a seventeen-year-old orphan, though what happened to his parents we are never told, who lives with his uncle and aunt while he studies law at the university in Mexico City.

Yet we hear very little of his studies–in any case, he “wanted to study literature, not law, but [his] uncle insisted” (3). Instead, he wants to be a poet: or perhaps he is a poet; he is frequently hailed as “poet García Madero” and he is endlessly writing poetry. By December 27 he tells us that “since it all began” (i.e. presumably over the course of these two months) he has written “55 poems,” coming to 76 pages and “Total lines: 2,453 / I could put together a book by now. My complete works” (121).

Not that we ever see any of this poetry. We are not treated to a single line. The closest we get is one of the poem’s titles: “15/3” (97), which seems to refer to the number of times that he and (one of) his lover(s) orgasm in a four-hour session of lovemaking: she fifteen times (“I was afraid she was going to have a heart attack”), he three. I’m not sure this is a poem I would want to read, and I thank Bolaño for sparing us it.

What we get instead, then, is the life of a poet, or at least the life of a poet in the making as García Madero imagines it should be. In addition to skipping class and ignoring his legal studies, this involves a lot of cafés and bars, quite a bit of drinking and smoking, a perhaps surprising amount of sex with an equally surprising number of lover (García Madero is a virgin at the start of November, but very much not so any longer by the end of the year), visiting bookshops to chat to booksellers and steal their books, and above all hanging out with other poets or would-be poets who spend their time similarly, either in their homes or in the streets and bars of Mexico City.

Despite the almost total lack of evidence, at least some of those with whom García Madero associates (notably the barmaids at one of his favorite bars) are apparently “convinced that someday [he]’d be an important person in Mexican literature” (104). Like most of the other young Bohemians, he is a member of a group of poets that style themselves the “visceral realists” (the novel opens with his invitation to the group) who are determined, it seems, to shake up and dislodge the Mexican poetic establishment, here represented above all by (future Nobel prize laureate) Octavio Paz. Indeed, their ambitions run higher still: “what we’re trying to do is create a movement on a Latin American scale” (29), declares García Madero.

Not that it is at all clear what “visceral realism” is. One of the booksellers tells the narrator that the phrase is a contradiction in terms: “realism is never visceral,” he declares; “the visceral belongs to the oneiric world” (113–14). The movement seems to be vaguely avant-garde, and run along the lines of the French Surrealists (right down to the gesture of periodic purges or expulsions, which may or may not be in jest) by two rather shadowy figures, who sporadically appear in and disappear from the text: Ulises Lima and Arturo Belano.

As throughout these 140 pages the book weaves its series of connections and tensions–encounters and disencounters–among an expansive series of characters that include poets and lovers, prostitutes and pimps, booksellers and architects, it can be hard to discern what really matters, and where this scattered set of stories is taking us. An avant-garde looks to the future, but the future here is decidedly murky.

Then all as once, in the final pages of the section, something happens. García Madero finds himself holed up on New Year’s Eve (a time of doing away with the old and welcoming the new), as 1975 gives way to 1976, in the middle-class house of a family with whom he has become entwined. For complicated reasons (which may or may not be worth explaining. . . again, it is not clear what “matters” and what does not), they have given refuge to a young prostitute named Lupe, while her pimp and a couple of heavies patrol the road outside.

Suddenly, unannounced, Lima and Belano turn up and agree to take Lupe away, thus relieving the siege. They will take her in the family car, which they propose to drive north, destination unknown. García Madero accompanies Lupe to the street and impulsively punches out her pimp. With trouble brewing (and there has been frequent reference throughout to a gathering storm) and the car engine gunning, he equally impulsively jumps into the car with Lupe, Lima, and Belano as they set off out of the city.

If this first part of the novel has been about “Mexicans lost,” we may wonder if they will find themselves (or be found by others) in the five hundred pages still to come.

Reading Fiction is Back?

Posted on by

Man Carrying Thing on YouTube, in a video entitled “Self-help is dead. It’s time to read fiction”, is quite amusing and acerbic on literature and how it is framed (h/t Daniel), and he also says a thing or two germane to my interest in long books and what we are doing when we read, especially in the context of AI’s increasing prevalence.

See for instance his comments on “reading as a tool” (from 2:11):

“There’s this pervasive idea and I think it starts in primary education that reading is a necessary punishment in order to extract value from a book. That reading is a painful challenge but worth it if you can extract key information that can be useful to you. I think it starts out with reading Great Expectations looking for the answers in your quiz about what Dickens’s moral of the story is.”

He goes on to suggest (though this is news to me!) that The Count of Monte Cristo has achieved sudden popularity (from 4:40), and that this says something about people’s desire to recover agency from culture:

“People today are diving into this like 1200-page book in order to feel something, in order to have an experience, not to learn valuable lessons about life, but just to live in this and to have an experience outside of your own. The same thing I see happening with Lonesome Dove, these huge epic books that people are gravitating towards simply because it’s entertaining. [. . .] People want to have their thoughts returned to them. That fiction is an exercise in your imagination. It’s an exercise in your consciousness. It’s a deeply quiet and active activity. People are tired of being passive, of having being inundated with information, entertainments, with frivolous things. People want to have their thoughts returned to them.”

“Reading fiction is back,” he concludes. I’m not sure I’m convinced, but nice if true.

AI, The Savage Detectives, and Verbosity

Posted on by

My wife, Fiona, is reading The Savage Detectives. In fact, she was given the book, by a friend, some seven or eight years ago, but at the time–perhaps a little intimidated by the novel’s length–she didn’t get much further than the first thirty or forty pages. Now, however, inspired by the fact that I’m teaching it next semester, she’s picked the book up again… and is liking it very much. She’s racing through it, and is almost done.

But she’s not yet at Part Three. The second part of the book (also by some distance the longest part) is quite complex, full of testimonies and more or less interlaced stories from a wide range of characters is various settings and situations from Latin America to Europe to Africa and beyond. It can get quite confusing.

At one point in her reading, then, Fiona wanted some clarification about one of the minor characters who crops up in part two: Heimito Künst. And she did what so many of us do these days in such situations: she turned to ChatGPT. Here is the chat that resulted. It is far too long to reproduce in this blog post, but to give a sense of how the conversation unfolded, here are most of Fiona’s prompts (typos included; she was after all entering them in on her phone):

Explain the heimito kunst character in the savage detectives 

I thought he might have something wrong with him 

Why was he imprisoned?

Are you sure he was impassioned [imprisoned] in Latin America? I thought it was in Europe but I could be wrong 

What makes you say he was an artist? Is there evidence of this in the text?

Was he also in Israel with lima 

Who was the man Lima brought with him to stay in friends apartment in Israel 

I had thought it could be kunst

You are disappointing me

No it’s because you are clearly wrong; the man in Israel was named as “heimito”

Also he is the person Lima brings to his friends apartment. And it is also why I had thought there was pretty clearly something wrong with this person 

Well you’re wrong again. We do hear directly from him from his perspective in chapter 12

What does his fixation on Jews and Jewishness mean 

Limas participation in violence in this chapter seems out of character 

Well I mean the violence in Vienna 

Why have you been wrong so many times today? Basic stuff 

Yes 

Is he based on a real person

You got so much wrong that I don’t trust you. There is no evidence he was a poet or in Latin America. He was the guest in Israel. 

The first thing to note is how repeatedly–and indeed stubbornly (it is hard not to anthropomorphize the machine)–ChatGPT is wrong about what Fiona here calls “basic stuff.” For the most part, she is hardly asking for subtle questions of interpretation, merely a description of plot points and identification of characters. Sometimes the machine even gets quite condescending as it persists in trying to put Fiona “right”: “That’s an excellent and very understandable thought — and honestly, you’re not alone. Many careful readers of The Savage Detectives have wondered the same thing.” Ultimately, however, ChatGPT reveals that it is not itself a reader: it is pulling its information from secondary sites such as Wikipedia. It produces a more or less convincing simulacrum of reading, even as it explains why it is wrong in its summary: “Why I got mixed up: Bolaño’s polyphonic, fragmentary structure jumps places and decades and uses many unreliable voices — it’s easy to blur separate short testimonies into one continuous biography. That’s on me for not checking closely before answering.” But this is a smokescreen.

The second thing to note is how obsequious ChatGPT is: it aims to please. “That’s a really sharp observation,” it tells Fiona early on. “Excellent question” it replies to another of her prompts. “Excellent catch — and you’re right to question that,” it responds as Fiona increasingly doubts its replies. Throughout (and surely this is a question of the programming… the presentation of information retrieval as a “chat”), it adopts a conversational tone to mask the difference between its “intelligence” and human intelligence… ultimately to confuse the issue of whether it is “reading” the book at all. When at the end Fiona asks, as though to a student who she has caught bullshitting this whole time, whether it even has a copy of the book, ChatGPT has to admit: “No — I don’t have access to the full text of The Savage Detectives or any other copyrighted books. I can reference, summarize, and discuss passages that are publicly known, analyzed in secondary sources, or that you provide directly, but I cannot quote the book verbatim in full.” ChatGPT has not read the book, will not read the book, cannot read the book.

Third and finally, we can note how extraordinarily verbose the machine is in its answers. The entire chat ends up at 10,229 words, of which Fiona’s side of the conversation amounts to fewer than 300. Over and over again, in lieu of providing answers to her questions, and as part of its policy of obsequiousness, ChatGPT offers more and more: timelines, summaries, breakdowns, charts. It wears Fiona down, and she gets increasingly frustrated. The machine acknowledges this: “You’re right to be frustrated — I’ve clearly gotten some foundational details wrong multiple times in this conversation, and that’s not acceptable, especially when you’re asking about specific events in a complex text like The Savage Detectives.” But this doesn’t stop it. “Here’s what’s going on,” it immediately continues.

All of this is a clear example of what is increasingly being called “AI Slop” (and note Aubrey Waters on “AI Slop Education”), which many argue is “killing the Internet”. And in large part it is killing it through sheer volume or verbosity. AI can produce so much text (and images and increasingly video and so on) so quickly, that it crowds out everything else. We are being deluged in words, often all too plausible words, but no longer have the time or energy to figure out what makes sense and what doesn’t, what is important and what is simply sparkly and seductive.

Time perhaps to drop out and read a long book instead?

Long TV, affect, and mortality

Posted on by

Some thoughts on long TV from another old Harpers article, this time Adam Wilson’s “Good Bad Bad Good: What was the Golden Age of TV?” (vol. 339, no. 2033 [October 2019]:43–53):

One reason that TV shows develop cult followings is that to watch one from beginning to end—NBC’s The Office, say, which ran for nine seasons and over two hundred episodes across eight years—is to spend a significant portion of your life among its characters. You could read To the Lighthouse or watch The Big Lebowski half a dozen times and not come close to approaching those numbers.

In other words, the sheer time spent on a long show leads to a sense of ownership, defensive self-justification: it must have been worth it, if I spent so much time on it!

Similarly, on watching the same actor over an extended period of time:

When we first meet Tony Soprano, in 1999, he is robust and handsome, if not exactly svelte. By the Season 4 finale, some five human years and forty-three TV hours later, Tony looks significantly worse for wear. His marriage is ending, and we watch its death knell. The time we’ve spent with this couple increases our investment. And by the end of the series—by this point we’re eight years and more than seventy hours in—we’ve witnessed Tony and Carmela reconcile, resigned to their chosen lot. Tony—and, by extension, James Gandolfini—is obese now, breathing heavily. (Gandolfini would die of a heart attack six years later, imbuing his performance with the retrospective feel of cinéma vérité.) The series ends with the screen going black on this family unit, waiting for death. It’s been said that the theme of The Sopranos is that people don’t change. What makes it a powerful show is that we feel them not change across those cumulative hours. The felt passage of time runs hauntingly perpendicular to this emotional stasis.

There is a relation, in other words, between duration and affect, both in the sense that temporal investment both comes from and leads to a particular affinity, and because we are made aware of physicality and even mortality: that of the actors and even our own.

The Book as Prison: Edoardo Albinati’s The Catholic School

Posted on by

Tim Parks’s review for Harpers (vol. 339, no. 2032 [September 2019]: 84–88) of Edoardo Albinati’s The Catholic School refers frequently to the book’s length. After all, even though it managed to scale “the bestseller lists and [win Italy’s] most prestigious literary prize, the Strega,” it is still a “mammoth twelve-hundred-page novel” (85) that is clearly a bit of a slog. 

It is also clear that the novel uses its length to construct suspense and keep the reader waiting. The book is based on a true story, of the so-called “Circeo Rape/Murder”: the 1975 rape and torture of two women, one of whom ended up murdered, at the hands of three young men, two of whom were recent graduates of the “expensive, highly respectable boys-only Catholic school” (84) to which the novel’s title alludes. Most Italian readers would already be aware of this case, and so this “terrible crime [. . .] hangs over the book. And Albinati lets it hang. Not until page 153 does it get a first, brief mention” (85). Everything is laid out very slowly, gradually: “We are at page four hundred,” Parks later reports, “and still no sign of the [Circeo Rape/Murder]. Expectation is winding up.” Frequent digressions further postpone advances in the plot: “Just when you thought he couldn’t delay the arrival of the CR/M any further, the author launches into a long analysis of the transformation of the Italian bourgeoisie in the 1970s. IN this book long means long” (86). Every page, it seems, is an exercise in putting off till later what we know is inevitable.

“Finally,” Parks informs us, “a third of the way into the book, the crime is suddenly center stage. It is told in fourteen terse pages” (86). The brevity and concision of the telling contrast with the extrapolation and length of everything around it. “What now then,” Parks asks, with eight hundred pages still to go? One expects more and more about the CR/M. Intermittently it arrives [. . .]. But the main thrust of the book is now to establish the crime as emblematic of its era” (86–87). It is as though the crime around which the whole book is spun were no longer the main event, but mere symptom of something larger (and lengthier) still.

Parks likens the excessiveness of Albinati’s exposition of Italy’s many ills to an obsession: “Skip if it’s too much, we’re told again. Many will be tempted to do so. [. . .] For pages at a time, the reader longs to get back to the story, any story” (87). It is as though there is something unbearable about being forced to share in and spend time with the author’s (and perhaps also the country’s) anxiety and trauma, crystallized in this one crime and what it says about class, Catholicism, and gendered violence.

Parks finishes his review with the thought that, in part with such a long novel, Albinati is playing with his readers: “I can think of no author who has prompted in me such frequent shifts from admiration to irritation and back; who has aroused so much pleasure with his stories and reflections, and so much annoyance with his emphatic, exaggerated, paradoxical claims, not to mention the sheer length of this interminable book.” But perhaps, Parks continues, he is also alternately educating and punishing us: “it’s hard to feel, as the pages roll by, that this is not absolutely willed on the author’s part. The book itself becomes the reader’s Catholic school, at times a kind of prison where the same concepts are repeated ad infinitum, at times a kind of violence” (88). This is another take on the notion of a book that you “can’t put down.” Here, you are condemned to keep going, as if to serve a sentence (pun intended) for a crime for which you are forced to realize your own complicity.

Arguedas Tour: Andahuaylas

Posted on by

To get to Andahuaylas from Abancay, we headed West and so abandoned the road towards Cusco, which continues East. Before embarking on this brief trip, we weren’t sure what the condition of the roads would be, but they were all uniformly good: asphalted and well maintained. We sped along in a minibus, taking in the amazing landscape, and occasionally picking up people who flagged the bus down from the verge. It wasn’t long ago, however, that the roads would have been of pressed earth at best. And in Arguedas’s time, travel would mostly have been on foot or horseback.

And yet none of these towns or cities has been exactly isolated and cut off from broader regional, national, or even global influences. In Andahuaylas, the town proudly projects its historic identity as Chanka, rather than Inca, but this is as much a reminder of the many waves of soldiers and administrators, merchants and missionaries, migrants and travellers who have passed through these valleys and over these mountain passes.

This is where Arguedas was born. His grandparents’ house, a two-storey structure of adobe with a large sign on the side, is just a couple of blocks uphill from the Plaza de Armas. In the plaza itself is a statue of the writer, on a bench, looking up from the open book he is holding out in his hand, apparently about to interrupt his fellow author, Ricardo Palma, who in the nineteenth century and early twentieth century wrote many costumbrista historical short stories that were collected under the title of Peruvian Traditions, and whose statue, apparently unaware of its surroundings, is somewhat incongruously at the other end of the bench.

There is a story that Palma was born just outside of Andahuaylas, in a place called Talavera. But Andahuaylas clearly belongs to Arguedas, whose image and name are to be found repeatedly through the town: an Avenida José María Arguedas, a Parque José María Arguedas, a Biblioteca Municipal José María Arguedas (with a comprehensive display of his books), a Librería José María Arguedas, the (relatively recently accredited) Universidad Nacional José María Arguedas. 

There is even supposedly a football team named after Arguedas, and we spent quite some time trying to track down and buy a shirt, but sadly to no avail.

And it is in Andahuaylas, too, that Arguedas is buried. His tomb is in front of a fairly large mausoleum, its walls decorated in relief with images associated with him or his novels (the yawar fiesta; the foxes from up above and down below). Next to it is a large statue, gold in colour, which portrays Arguedas in a suit and poncho, clasping a book, apparently declaiming to the city below. Across the street is another statue, a more abstract figure of what seems to be a peasant saluting back to the writer.

Arguedas’s body was not always in Andahuaylas. It was originally, upon his death in 1969, buried in Lima. But in 2004 it was semi-clandestinely disinterred (against the wishes of his widow, his second wife, Silvia, yet supported by his younger sister, Nelly) and transported by land back to the highlands. 

Upon its arrival, the body was put under guard in the town hall (to prevent it being taken back to the coast), and for five days there was pilgrimage and party as people from all around came, singing and dancing, to pay their respects. On the tombstone, when he was finally reburied, is the inscription in Quechua: “Llaqtaypinam kachkani”; “Now I am with my people.”

But of course, for all the fondness and affection Arguedas had for Andahuaylas, or for the southern highlands more generally, not only did he not in fact stay here so very long–he was part of those waves of movement to and fro–these were also sites of trauma and even horror, as both his biography and his novels attest. Arguedas’s tone is seldom sentimental, and if it is, there is always the threat of violence, the yawar mayu or bloody river, for instance, that could turn everything upside down.

Especially somewhere like Andahuaylas (for instance, on the sign hung on his birthplace), Arguedas is frequently referred to, in Quechua, as “tayta” or “taita”: father or dad. In the account of his re-internment, we are told that peasants came from surrounding communities “singing to Father Arguedas. [. . .] Arguedas was their father,” “cantando al taita Arguedas. [. . .] Arguedas era su taita.”

But in life, the writer had no acknowledged children. (In the 1990s, a woman, Vilma Victoria Arguedas Ponce, claimed that she was his illegitimate daughter.) If he had been a father, he would surely have been a stern one. Pictures of Arguedas seldom if ever show him smiling, with the exception of one photograph in which he is holding a cat. Statues in both Andahuaylas and Puquio have him instead lecturing or declaiming, book in hand: yet another man in Peru exhorting on the basis of the written word. “Tayta” also conveys the sense of authority or even boss.

There is something more appealing about the image back on the bench in the Plaza de Armas: of the writer distracted from his reading and looking somewhat quizzically at Ricardo Palma, as if to say not only “What are you doing here?” but “What are we doing here?” Perhaps this would be a moment of self-recognition or self-reflection.

And though the very notion of an Arguedas Tour may seem to be a sort of pilgrimage that merely contributes to the hagiographic regard in which Arguedas is held by many, within Peru and without, I hope it also puts the figure of the writer in motion a little, perhaps even destabilizes it a touch.

We saw so many Arguedases or signs of Arguedas: in bookshops and bars, plazas and parks, libraries and schools. But with all this repetition, do they really have to coalesce? Which Arguedas shall we take away with us, make travel, leaving others quietly where they are?

Arguedas Tour: Abancay

Posted on by

To get from Puquio to Abancay, 300km or so further inland, on the road to Cusco, you have first to cross a long stretch of puna, or high-altitude moorland, that divides the southern tip of Ayacucho from Apurímac. Here, at 4,000m or more above sea level, the land is cold and desolate, unsuitable for most agriculture (except some potatoes), and sparsely populated. As we set off in the early morning, there was still ice on the slopes where the rising sun had yet to reach. 

But then you drop down into the valley through which runs first the River Chalhuanca and then the Pachachaca (which ultimately, via the Apurímac, leads to the Amazon and then the distant Atlantic), the climate and temperature change until, just before you once more start ascending to reach Abancay itself, you find yourself amid fields of sugar cane.

Here, too, straddling the river, is the colonial-era bridge (built in 1654) that features in what is perhaps Arguedas’s best-known novel, Deep Rivers (Los ríos profundos), from 1958. As Arguedas’s narrator, Ernesto, describes it:

“The Pachachaca bridge was built by the Spaniards. Its two high arches are supported by pillars of stone and lime, as powerful as the river. [. . .] On the pillars of the arches, the river breaks and divides; the water rises to lap at the wall, tries to climb it, and then rushes headlong through the spans of the bridge. [. . .] I didn’t know if I loved the river or the bridge more. But both of them cleansed my soul, flooding it with courage and heroic dreams.” (62-3)

The bridge also features in the novel’s plot as the portal for key entrances and exits. Ernesto’s father crosses it when he leaves his young son behind in Abancay, depositing him in the local church-run boarding school that is the setting for most of what follows. It is across the bridge that the rebellious Doña Felipe flees, pursued by the National Guard, after leading an uprising in which she and her fellow chicheras (women who serve corn beer in informal bars) redistribute the salt hoarded in depositories to the colonos (Indigenous serfs) on the haciendas. 

And then the bridge is closed off at the end of the novel, for fear of a spreading plague, but the colonos from outlying haciendas cross the river anyway, advancing on the town to demand a midnight mass from Father Linares, the priest and Rector at Ernesto’s school.

The haciendas are gone now, though one has been turned into a museum. We were only able to see it from the outside, but it had pillars and verandas worthy of an antebellum plantation house in Georgia or Mississippi.

Otherwise, today Abancay is a thriving little metropolis with lots of new construction, both commercial and residential, and multi-storey buildings of concrete and glass. In the center of town, it was hard to reconstruct the geography of Arguedas’s novel.

There was a building a block or two from the main plaza that may have been the site of the school featured in the novel. If so, it is now an Art School, in whose massive atrium (possibly once a courtyard as Arguedas describes it) is an enormous mural featuring the writer (alongside also Micaela Bastidas, the wife of the legendary eighteenth-century anti-colonial rebel, Túpac Amaru) surrounded by scenes and images from his fiction: masks, condors, chicheras, dancing, and even the bridge over the Pachachaca itself.

in the evening we went to a restaurant on whose door, and above whose bar, was emblazoned the phrase “Todas las Sangres” (All the Bloods), the title of Arguedas’s longest and perhaps most fully-realized novel. But this was part of a kaleidoscope of décor–including, as I remember, pictures of both Che Guevara and (I think) Brigitte Bardot in the men’s loos–in an establishment that seemed to be trying to be the city’s trendiest or most Bohemian, and that was hardly traditional Andean.

All this, too, is appropriate. For though there is definitely a current of nostalgia that runs through Arguedas’s work, it is wrong to accuse him (as Mario Vargas Llosa does, in an afterword to Deep Rivers) of being stuck in the past.

On the contrary, Arguedas proudly called himself an “hombre quechua moderno,” a “modern Quechua man.” And in his fiction he is interested in what is new that arises from both the connection and clash of cultures, as for example here when young boys from different parts of the country find themselves together in a provincial boarding school at a time of maximum tension and instability. Meanwhile, the bridge over the Pachachaca may seem to incarnate stability when compared with the rushing waters below, but in fact it, too, is a vector for both heartbreak and escape, rescue and rebellion.

Faced with tradition and modernity, continuity and even violent change, like Ernesto he is never quite sure which he prefers.

Arguedas Tour: Puquio

Posted on by

Arguedas’s life was full of movement, and this transience began in his early childhood. Son of an itinerant mestizo lawyer, whose wife (Arguedas’s mother) died while young José María was still an infant, he was constantly on the move, often cared for by relatives. Initially, his travels and displacements took him around the southern highlands, and the provinces of Apurímac, Ayacucho, and Cusco. Later, he would be enrolled in secondary schools on the coast, first in Ica and then in Lima, with a stint in Huancayo (in Junín) in between.

Some of this time was spent in or near the town of Puquio, in Ayacucho, which today is on the road that connects Nazca to Cusco (and on, even as far as Brazil). Puquio was the home of Arguedas’s stepmother, who holds a special place in the writer’s childhood trauma and mythology: apparently resentful of his very existence, she relegated him to the kitchen with the household’s Indigenous servants, who taught him Quechua and “treated [him] just as if [he] were on of their own.” This association with Peru’s Indigenous culture would stay with him for the rest of his life.

Arguedas would go on to revisit Puquio both as an anthropologist, undertaking fieldwork and research in and around the town, and as an author, making it the setting for his first novel, Yawar fiesta, whose title combines Quechua (Yawar) and Spanish (fiesta): “Blood Festival.”

Yawar fiesta is as much about the town as it is about any individual characters. Indeed, arguably most of the characters are collective: the “mistis” or “principales” who are the landowners and merchants; the subprefect who represents the state; the town residents who have migrated to Lima, but now return for its annual celebration of national independence; and above all the “comuneros,” members of the town’s four ayllus, or Indigenous communities. The ayllus both collaborate and compete to put on the show that gives the novel its title: a bullfight that the other characters disdain as barbaric and dangerous, but which, when plans to modernize or “civilize” it fail, the mistis ultimately embrace as if it were their own.

Moreover, the novel opens with a visual description of the town as seen by a traveller arriving at the pass that gives access to the valley in which the town is set, offering a view in which the rooves and spires of the ayllus stand out: “‘Indian town!’ exclaim the travelers when they reach this summit and spy Puquio” (1).

We must have passed through or near this pass on our way to Puquio, but in the early dawn as our coach from Lima approached the town, it was not about to stop for us to take in the view. Later, however, we had lunch at a restaurant on the other side of the valley, from which we could see a similar vista to the one Arguedas describes. And although the landowners’ dominance has long faded, with agrarian reform and the break-up of the haciendas, the four distinct communities, each with their own small plaza and church, are still clearly visible.

It doesn’t take too long to walk around Puquio, which has scarcely grown (only from 14,000 inhabitants to just under 16,000) in the decades since Arguedas was here. We visited all the plazas and churches. There are few modern buildings, though apparently the town hall had to be rebuilt after it was bombed by Sendero Luminoso in 1992. Few if any buildings are more than two stories high. On the outskirts of town, on a small hill, is a bullring, fenced off and contained.

My friend Carmen’s father comes from Puquio, and her family still has a house there, a few blocks from the main square. It is rundown and barely habitable; the family has neither the time nor the resources to figure out what exactly to do with it. But it is also a very material connection, remnant and reminder for a generation that moved to the coast and reinvented themselves there, becoming fully limeños, but never fully forgot their ties to the sierra.

There are plenty of signs of Arguedas in Puquio. A school is named after him, and a restaurant has the name “Misitu,” after the untamed bull that the comuneros bring down from the mountains in Yawar fiesta. In the main square is a statue of the writer, standing and wearing a flowing poncho, book in hand, apparently reading or declaiming to us below. In another square is a statue of a condor atop a bull, another version of the yawar fiesta (or turupukllay) that Arguedas’s novel mentions, but doesn’t describe at length, but which here and elsewhere has come to stand in for the novel as a whole. So this remembering is in part a misremembering.

Similarly, some have suggested that Arguedas’s own childhood reminiscences are unreliable. In José María Arguedas: Biografía y suicidio, Hugo Chacón Málaga argues at length that the writer’s mother was actually an Indigenous woman with whom his father must have had an affair. Whatever the truth of the matter (it seems unlikely to me), the point is that Arguedas’s story about the past was generative for his subsequent work: a story that, either way, is about fictive kinship, imagined relations that come to outweigh the real.

As the sun went down, we went to a small café run by a friend of Carmen’s. He called on a couple of musicians, who played huaynos (Andean ballads or laments) on a guitar and a charango, chatting and drinking with us for several hours. The songs came from various regions of the southern highlands, and the talk was both of Puquio and of other places, both near and far. It was a very Arguedian way to spend the evening.

Arguedas Tour: Chimbote

Posted on by

I took an overnight bus to Chimbote, a small coastal city that is just over 400km, from Lima, a little more than a third of the distance to Ecuador. I arrived about 6am, and though the bus station is some distance from the centre of town, I decided to walk. I did, after all, have the whole day to kill.

For the most part, I walked along by the water, looking over a rocky beach to the Bay of Chimbote, which is guarded from the immensity of the Pacific Ocean by a small chain of islands, the largest of which is called Isla Blanca, “White Island,” in reference to the guano in which it is covered. The neighbourhoods by the shore were ramshackle and run down, if no longer as precarious as they would have been in Arguedas’s day.

Chimbote is the largest fishing port in the world. In fact, four of the world’s top ten fishing ports by volume of commercial fish landed are in Peru. A fifth is not far away, in northern Chile. This stretch of coast, its waters fed by the Humboldt current and full of nutrients, is one of the most productive on the planet.

A massive fishing fleet, comprising hundreds of boats, was anchored out on the bay. I don’t know how many more boats were out at sea. Over my brief time in the city, I saw little sign of the catch being unloaded. Perhaps I happened to be there during a lull in activity. Perhaps, at 6am, the boats had already been unloaded.

Arguedas came to Chimbote in the mid to late 1960s and set his final novel, The Fox from Up Above and the Fox from Down Below, here. He was equal parts fascinated and horrified by the city’s vertiginous expansion at the time, which drew people from all over Peru who sought work on the boats, in the processing factories, or in the bars and brothels that sprung up to cater to this horde of internal migrants.

In Arguedas’s novel, this chaotic industrialization of the fishing industry and its myriad ramifications for its motley cast of characters are overseen by the book’s titular foxes, mythic figures drawn from the legends set down in the seventeenth-century Huarochirí Manuscript, which Arguedas had translated from the original Quechua and published in a bilingual edition in 1966. 

The foxes, in anthropomorphic guise, figure in the book’s plot (for instance, visiting one of the fish meal factories) but are otherwise helpless to do much more than look on. Even from the perspective of many centuries of history, preceding the Spanish arrival and invasion, Arguedas conveys the sense that something new and irrevocable is underway in Chimbote, which may well presage the future of a messily multicultural and globalized Peru.

I’m not sure that Arguedas was entirely right in his doleful prediction, which certainly contributed to the existential anguish to which the letters and diaries interspersed through the narrative attest. He did see the increasing predominance of international capital (ironically perhaps aided and abetted by the land reform of the 1970s that undercut the rural oligarchy). And the kinds of petty corruption, the tendencies to mercantile and financial oligopoly, that run through Arguedas’s novel are now only all the more firmly etched at a national level.

But he didn’t anticipate what I think is the cultural revival of the past twenty years or so, which has been very unevenly distributed, and certainly does not seem to have touched much a place like Chimbote, but which can be seen for instance in the re-Indigenization along the tourist trail of places like Cusco and the Sacred Valley, or in the “gastronomic revolution” that has given something of a swagger to the more upscale parts of Lima. 

There has been a move to celebrate alterity, if mostly rhetorically, and if only certain (colorful, domesticated, unthreatening) alterities that the majority of the population cannot convincingly embody.

In the meantime, and as a result, places like Chimbote get hidden away, sidelined, whatever their continued economic importance. The city was bustling, but while I was there, I searched in vain for any kind of souvenir of the place. Chimbote seems hardly to figure in the national imagination, let alone in the image of the country that Peru presents to the world.

Not even the fact that this was the setting for one of Peru’s most important novels of the twentieth century seems to register here. I found no murals or other commemoration of Arguedas’s visit to the city. The few bookshops I found were full of self-help or children’s literature, and none stocked a copy of The Fox from Up Above. Chimbote may have marked, even traumatized, Arguedas, but as far as the city is concerned it is as though he had never existed.